Vivek Khera wrote, On 11.7.2008 21:06:
On Jul 11, 2008, at 2:53 PM, Remko Lodder wrote:
So, when can I expect your updated work on the port, build all
dependencies to make sure they keep on working etc? I understand that
we want to have this as soon as possible, but also do keep in mind
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 12:23 PM, Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 8:20 AM, Václav Haisman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What if the ports infrastructure had additional flag, say EXPERIMENTAL.
Ports marked as such would not build/install by default unless something,
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 8:20 AM, Václav Haisman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What if the ports infrastructure had additional flag, say EXPERIMENTAL.
Ports marked as such would not build/install by default unless something,
say ALLOW_EXPERIMENTAL_PORTS=yes, was defined. That way we (people
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 03:06:57PM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
Seriously, though... is someone actively working on a perl 5.10 port and
can we find out what is holding it up for over 6 months now? Around
February I started wondering about it, but
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 08:18:58AM +0200, Koen Martens wrote:
Silly suggestion: if your business is depending on it, either fix the port
yourself or pay someone to fix it for you. Seriously, making demands in a
free software project is silly (if not rude).
Actually, Vivek does contribute to
On Friday 11 July 2008 23:18:58 Koen Martens wrote:
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 03:06:57PM -0400, Vivek Khera wrote:
Seriously, though... is someone actively working on a perl 5.10 port and
can we find out what is holding it up for over 6 months now? Around
February I started wondering about
On Friday 11 July 2008 14:30:11 Remko Lodder wrote:
David Southwell wrote:
On Friday 11 July 2008 14:02:09 Remko Lodder wrote:
David Southwell wrote:
On Friday 11 July 2008 11:53:50 you wrote:
David Southwell wrote:
If we had to argue for every port on these terms everyone would spend
reply: I think work is underway, we do not know when
it's available, but it will be as soon as possible.
Thanks,
remko
Here is a full and verbatim copy of my original posting that started this
thread.
_
Subject: portupgrade to Perl
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 02:29:06AM -0700, David Southwell wrote:
Here is a full and verbatim copy of my original posting that started this
thread.
_
Subject: portupgrade to Perl 5.10.0 ??
From: David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED
.
_
Subject: portupgrade to Perl 5.10.0 ??
From: David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Hi
Just wondered when an upgrade to 5.10.0 could be expected.
David
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 3:05 AM, David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not really.
The information you give is valuable and will be helpful to those who do not
understand the complications.
However you are not telling me anything I do not know chuckles- which was
why my original posting
On Jul 12, 2008, at 2:56 AM, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 08:18:58AM +0200, Koen Martens wrote:
Silly suggestion: if your business is depending on it, either fix
the port
yourself or pay someone to fix it for you. Seriously, making
demands in a
free software project is
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], wrote Gerard thusly...
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 03:40:38 -0700 David Southwell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just wondered when an upgrade to 5.10.0 could be expected.
Perhaps they are planning on releasing it with, and hopefully
including it in the FreeBSD-7.1
On Jul 11, 2008, at 4:01 AM, Parv wrote:
Perhaps they are planning on releasing it with, and hopefully
including it in the FreeBSD-7.1 release.
That would be darn too long not to install on my own (unless 7.1 is
coming out in a month)!
Not being one of the folks working on the port, I
On Jul 11, 2008, at 10:57 AM, Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
On 2008 Jul 11, at 10:31, Vivek Khera wrote:
When I talk to some linux folks they just laugh that we don't have
a perl 5.10 yet. It is embarrassing, actually, to go out and
evangelize FreeBSD when there are delays like this.
On 2008 Jul 11, at 10:31, Vivek Khera wrote:
When I talk to some linux folks they just laugh that we don't have a
perl 5.10 yet. It is embarrassing, actually, to go out and
evangelize FreeBSD when there are delays like this.
As a practical matter, is 5.10 really all that urgent?
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], wrote
Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH thusly...
On 2008 Jul 11, at 10:31, Vivek Khera wrote:
When I talk to some linux folks they just laugh that we don't
have a perl 5.10 yet. It is embarrassing, actually, to go out
and evangelize FreeBSD when there are delays like
On Friday 11 July 2008 07:57:11 Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
On 2008 Jul 11, at 10:31, Vivek Khera wrote:
When I talk to some linux folks they just laugh that we don't have a
perl 5.10 yet. It is embarrassing, actually, to go out and
evangelize FreeBSD when there are delays like this.
David Southwell writes:
As a practical matter, is 5.10 really all that urgent? (Bleeding-edge
Linuxers don't count; FreeBSD is a production OS.)
That sounds a bit complacent to me. I hope others are not likely
to be so dismissive of the needs of others.
And sometimes, a
On Friday 11 July 2008 09:13:21 Robert Huff wrote:
David Southwell writes:
As a practical matter, is 5.10 really all that urgent? (Bleeding-edge
Linuxers don't count; FreeBSD is a production OS.)
That sounds a bit complacent to me. I hope others are not likely
to be so dismissive
On Jul 11, 2008, at 2:53 PM, Remko Lodder wrote:
So, when can I expect your updated work on the port, build all
dependencies to make sure they keep on working etc? I understand
that we want to have this as soon as possible, but also do keep in
mind that we would like to make sure as much
David Southwell wrote:
If we had to argue for every port on these terms everyone would spend their
time arguing and we would have none atall.
It is not as though Perl is an obscure bit of buggy code that none uses.
If there is a request then simply a response to your last question is
On Friday 11 July 2008 12:06:57 Vivek Khera wrote:
On Jul 11, 2008, at 2:53 PM, Remko Lodder wrote:
So, when can I expect your updated work on the port, build all
dependencies to make sure they keep on working etc? I understand
that we want to have this as soon as possible, but also do keep
On Friday 11 July 2008 14:02:09 Remko Lodder wrote:
David Southwell wrote:
On Friday 11 July 2008 11:53:50 you wrote:
David Southwell wrote:
If we had to argue for every port on these terms everyone would spend
their time arguing and we would have none atall.
It is not as though Perl
David Southwell wrote:
On Friday 11 July 2008 14:02:09 Remko Lodder wrote:
David Southwell wrote:
On Friday 11 July 2008 11:53:50 you wrote:
David Southwell wrote:
If we had to argue for every port on these terms everyone would spend
their time arguing and we would have none atall.
It is
Hi
Just wondered when an upgrade to 5.10.0 could be expected.
David
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 03:40:38 -0700
David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Just wondered when an upgrade to 5.10.0 could be expected.
David
I have been trying to get an answer to that question for quite some
time now also. Perhaps they are planning on releasing it with, and
hopefully
On Thursday 10 July 2008 03:42:46 Gerard wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 03:40:38 -0700
David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Just wondered when an upgrade to 5.10.0 could be expected.
David
I have been trying to get an answer to that question for quite some
time now also. Perhaps
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Southwell wrote:
| On Thursday 10 July 2008 03:42:46 Gerard wrote:
| On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 03:40:38 -0700
|
| David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Hi
|
| Just wondered when an upgrade to 5.10.0 could be expected.
|
| David
| I have been
29 matches
Mail list logo
