What are some of the major changes to ports/ported applications since
6.2-RELEASE (01/2007)? I am in the process of putting together a talk
and would like to mention some of the highlights. The main ones are
xorg 7.3, KDE 3.5.7 and GNOME 2.18.3. Have there been any other major
changes of
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 03:25:57PM +0100, Mike -freebsd wrote:
Guys, is anyone else seeing this?
drwxr-xr-x 69 4203 31337 1536 Nov 9 13:59 ports
I see this on three of four FreeBSD 7 boxes and only on /usr/ports/
(why...?). Anyone else?
Four different boxes of
Mike -freebsd wrote:
On Nov 10, 2007 5:28 PM, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sounds like you may have a security problem (re: 31337 GID). If
that's the case, I would strongly advocate formatting + reinstalling
those machines.
I asked because that is the uid/gid used on pointyhat
Jason C. Wells wrote:
I have been toying with a variety of package building methods lately.
My latest effort involves looking into the Third Party Release
Engineering documented here:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/releng-packages/index.html.
Where do I start if I am
Darrell Betts wrote:
I am receiving this error when trying to compile php5
Makefile, line 588: warning: duplicate script for target
main/internal_functions.lo ignored
/bin/sh /usr/ports/lang/php5/work/php-5.2.5/libtool --silent
--preserve-dup-deps --mode=compile cc -Iext/date/lib -Iext/date/
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 08:10:12PM -0800, Jason C. Wells wrote:
How does pkg_add determine what version of a port to add when
'pkg_add -Kr' is used?
pkg_add calls getosreldate(3) to obtain the integer value of the release
of FreeBSD running on the machine.
The list of
Piotr wrote:
hi
I try to install a packet from ports using portinstall:
# portinstall -f net/p5-Net-Pcap
but get the following error:
[Updating the pkgdb format:bdb_btree in /var/db/pkg ... - 651 packages found (-0
+1) . done] ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) !
Piotr wrote:
# cd /usr/ports/net/p5-Net-Pcap
# make install clean
=== Building for p5-Net-Pcap-0.15_1
Makefile out-of-date with respect to /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/mach/Config.pm
/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/mach/CORE/config.h
Cleaning current config before rebuilding Makefile...
make -f
Piotr wrote:
which clock you mean ?
# date
Thu Jan 3 02:41:21 CET 2008
--- On Wed 01/02, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Kris Kennaway [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 02:31:25 +0100
Subject: Re
Piotr wrote:
and how is the command to find out the timestamp of this file ?
--- On Wed 01/02, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Kris Kennaway [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2008 02:52:48 +0100
Subject: Re
Boris Samorodov wrote:
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:10:45 +0100 Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Boris Samorodov píše v st 09. 01. 2008 v 00:45 +0300:
No, the port is using sysctl(2) to query the OS version which cannot
be wrapped.
Hm, ports-mgmt/tinderbox masks it somehow... And doesn't get
an error for
Boris Samorodov wrote:
On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:28:45 +0100 Kris Kennaway wrote:
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Boris Samorodov píše v st 09. 01. 2008 v 02:16 +0300:
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:10:45 +0100 Pav Lucistnik wrote:
No, the port is using sysctl(2) to query the OS version which cannot
be wrapped
Boris Samorodov wrote:
On Wed, 09 Jan 2008 00:28:45 +0100 Kris Kennaway wrote:
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Boris Samorodov píše v st 09. 01. 2008 v 02:16 +0300:
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:10:45 +0100 Pav Lucistnik wrote:
No, the port is using sysctl(2) to query the OS version which cannot
be wrapped
Robert Huff wrote:
James Cook writes:
This seems to be caused by line 170 of hack.u_init.c, which
attempts to modify a string constant.
SOLUTION:
Add -fwritable-strings to CFLAGS in hack's Makefile. (There's
already a patch that changes that line of the Makefile, so this
is easy to
P Bielecki wrote:
Hi,
freebsd-update helps me update base system,
portaudit(1) reminds me everyday about security vulnerabilities in
ports/packages and thanks to portupgrade(1),
I keep them up to date.
Quite often I build packages or use packages whenever available and
share (NFS) them with my
P Bielecki wrote:
On Jan 22, 2008 12:23 AM, P Bielecki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 21, 2008 11:57 PM, Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
I still don't understand what you claim is the problem :) We do not
specially update packages like perl; rather, *every
Peter Much wrote:
Dear all,
a couple of Ports have in the install part of their Makefiles
constructs like this:
@ ${CHOWN} -R pgsql:pgsql ~pgsql/. ;\
I perceive this as very problematic. For instance: Below ~pgsql
there at least two mounted filesystems, both with a .snap
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Wesley Shields wrote:
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 07:45:09AM -0600, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Bill Fenner wrote:
Dear porters,
This is just a reminder to please periodically check the list of
unbuildable ports at http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/ .
A
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 10:37:38AM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
~ $ host ftp.freebsd.org
ftp.freebsd.org has address 204.152.184.73
ftp.freebsd.org has address 62.243.72.50
ftp.freebsd.org has IPv6 address 2001:6c8:6:4::7
ftp.freebsd.org has IPv6 address 2001:4f8:0:2::e
Patrik Forsberg wrote:
Hi,
Trying to do a make index of the ports tree on a FBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p4 but get
the following error
Generating INDEX-5 - please wait..=== arabic/ae_fonts_mono failed
*** Error code 1
=== accessibility/accerciser failed
*** Error code 1
2 errors
cut text
*** Error code
peter bird wrote:
Please can you help with this?
pulsarity# uname -a
FreeBSD pulsarity.demax.sk 7.0-RC1 FreeBSD 7.0-RC1 #1: Wed Feb 6 11:45:51
CET 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/PULS i386
pulsarity# timeseal
Bad system call
Use ktrace to determine what the syscall is.
Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
Hi.
I tried to start an application on 7.0 that requires libpthread.so.2.
I've installed misc/compat6x, but have a problem:
/usr/local/lib/compat/libpthread.so.2: Undefined symbol
__malloc_lockCould not load addin module
/usr/local/lib/libtfmessbsp.so!
As I can see
Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
The library is not linked with libc. But dynamic loader loads libc.so.7
for libthr.so.3. kib@ has told me it's impossible to fix (we can't mix
libc.so.6 and libc.so.7 in one namespace). So we should ask vendor to
recompile it for 7.0 (it's security/bsp_upektfmess).
Steven Hartland wrote:
Would fix this particular package but again: how many others
do this? Maybe this is something that BSDPAN could / should
override?
It might be possible, you should talk to the BSDPAN maintainer.
Kris
___
Steve Franks wrote:
Just built /devel/clint on my vanilla 7.0 system. Appears to build
and install fine, but #clint or #clint --help freezes the console, and
ctrl-C initiates a core-dump. Python appears to run just fine.
Talk to the clint developers and/or the maintainer.
Kris
Sean Bruno wrote:
I guess due to the 6.3 release all the 6.2 release packages got
deleted? Why delete them? Are they placed somewhere else?
$ pkg_add -nr net-snmp
Error: FTP Unable to get
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6.2-release/Latest/net-snmp.tbz:
File
Jim Stapleton wrote:
Supposedly SMP is available by default in 7.0, but I didn't see the
'options SMP' entry in the generic config. I take it that is
unnecessary for SMP support now?
No, I think you are referring to the fact that sysinstall will install a
kernel compiled with options SMP if
Soeren Straarup wrote:
Hi flz and ret,
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:19:20 +0100
Erwin Lansing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Portmgr is pleased to announce that Florent Thoumie has accepted the
challenge of being a portmgr member. Florent has been with the
project for a long time and is one of our most
On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 04:43:58PM +0900, Randy Bush wrote:
i386 extremely current. making bash
checking for ranlib... ranlib
checking for bison... yacc
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking for an ANSI C-conforming const... yes
checking for inline... inline
checking whether
Mark Linimon wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 06:41:30PM -0700, Xin LI wrote:
So does it imply that pointyhat's -CURRENT would (slightly) behind the
current development?
Yes, it takes some amount of time to upgrade everything.
Is there any way to know which __FreeBSDversion the current build
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Mark Linimon wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 06:41:30PM -0700, Xin LI wrote:
So does it imply that pointyhat's -CURRENT would (slightly) behind the
current development?
Yes, it takes some amount of time to upgrade everything.
Is there any way to know which
Randy Bush wrote:
`sh cflags optimize='-O2 -pipe -march=pentiumpro
-fno-strict-aliasing' globals.o` -DPIC -fPIC globals.c
CCCMD = cc -DPERL_CORE -c
-DAPPLLIB_EXP=/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.8/BSDPAN -DHAS_FPSETMASK
-DHAS_FLOATINGPOINT_H -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe
Paul Schmehl wrote:
I'm trying to figure out how to handle user input in package building mode.
I've got statements like this in my Makefile, and they work fine to
suppress user input from the pkg-install script:
pre-install:
.if !defined(PACKAGE_BUILDING)
@${SETENV} ${SCRIPTS_ENV}
Matthew Seaman wrote:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 12:38:05PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are right: make buildworld exits with
/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cc_tools/../../../../contrib/gcc/genattrtab.c:
In function 'make_internal_attr':
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Florent Thoumie wrote:
This adds support for /etc/pkg.conf configuration file.
Also, this adds support for naive multi-site package fetching.
Any comment welcome (and appreciated).
Patch is here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~flz/local/ports/pkg-install-config.diff
Erwin Lansing wrote:
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-8 - please
wait../a/erwin/tindex/ports/chinese/links/../../www/links/Makefile, line 75: warning:
duplicate script for target pre-configure ignored
pkg_info: not found
pkg_info: not found
pkg_info: not found
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Kris Kennaway píše v pá 06. 06. 2008 v 13:39 +0200:
Yasuhiro KIMURA wrote:
From: Erwin Lansing [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: INDEX build failed for 6.x
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 04:03:22 GMT
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-6 - please
wait../a/erwin/tindex
Dear maintainers,
For some time now the script that is supposed to monitor for port
version strings decreasing has not been functioning (it runs but
produces no output for some reason). Unfortunately this has allowed
quite a few regressions to creep in. These are the ones I detected;
the time
Please review and test the following patches that optimize port INDEX
builds (and as a side-effect, other recursive tree traversals). I am
particularly interested in a comparison between old and new indexes
built locally: the only diff should be in audio/festvox-hvs [1].
The patches remove
Pietro Cerutti wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Pietro Cerutti wrote:
| Kris Kennaway wrote:
|
| | Another important optimization is to use /rescue/sh instead of /bin/sh
| | for index builds. The former is statically linked and this is much
| | faster to execute.
|
| True
Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:45:32 -0500, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another important optimization is to use /rescue/sh instead of /bin/sh
for index builds. The former is statically linked and this is much
faster to execute.
I don't have INDEX in all of my
Alex Kozlov wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 06:45:32PM +0200, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Please review and test the following patches that optimize port INDEX
builds (and as a side-effect, other recursive tree traversals). I am
particularly interested in a comparison between old and new indexes
Alex Kozlov wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 11:52:01PM +0200, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Alex Kozlov wrote:
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 06:45:32PM +0200, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Please review and test the following patches that optimize port INDEX
builds (and as a side-effect, other recursive tree
David Hawthorne wrote:
I have a piece of software I've been working on that gathers stats about
the local host and shoves them into rrd files, with an accompanying web
front-end page that generates pretty graphs from the RRDs on demand. I
have a package done up for it, and I'd like to add it
Christian Weisgerber wrote:
So I just learned that pointyhat tries to run a target regression-test
as part of the build. (Somebody asked me to use that target in a
port.)
Is this documented somewhere?
I don't know off-hand. I assume you searched the handbook?
In particular, running tests
Pietro Cerutti wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Kris Kennaway wrote:
| **
| * NOTE TO PORT DEVELOPERS
Wesley Shields wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 08:54:17AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christian Weisgerber wrote:
...
In particular, running tests of what duration would be considered
appropriate? E.g., building audio/flac takes a minute here, running
the tests sixteen, which I suspect
Patrick Lamaizière wrote:
Hi,
kdebase3 package for 7-stable/i386 is missing on the FTP.
Yes. This happens from time to time when the ports or their
dependencies are broken.
Kris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
Patrick Lamaizière wrote:
Le Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:08:43 +0200,
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
kdebase3 package for 7-stable/i386 is missing on the FTP.
Yes. This happens from time to time when the ports or their
dependencies are broken.
Thank you Kris. I think something is wrong
Tom Hukins wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 12:35:01PM -0400, Wesley Shields wrote:
Which is why I would recommend wrapping them in checks for
MAINTAINER_MODE or something similar. This way you, as the maintainer,
can turn them on when you want but they don't affect anything else.
That's true
Thierry Thomas wrote:
Le Jeu 19 jui 08 à 19:06:36 +0200, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
écrivait :
We *want* regression tests to be available unconditionally -- that is
why I added the hook to the package build process to run them if
present. Please don't hack around this because you think
Thierry Thomas wrote:
Le Ven 20 jui 08 à 3:54:04 +0200, Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
écrivait :
I try to enable regression-test when possible, but the current
implementation is a post-build target, and some ports' testings need a
post-install target. In these cases, I enclose the
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
itche wrote:
Chess Griffin wrote:
Boris Kochergin wrote:
Hi, List. I noticed that there isn't a package for sysutils/screen for
7.0. Compiling it from ports works fine, and I looked around and
wasn't able to find logs relevant to it on
Doug Barton wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
The new 'make describe' target runs entirely using shell builtins
apart from the need to sed pkg-descr to extract the WWW [2]
[2] Actually I am not happy with this but couldn't think of a way to
do it better. Having to fork the subshell costs about
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
o Remove 5.x support
Port maintainer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is cc'd.
FYI, we stated in the EOL announcement that we are not doing sweeping
5.x removals right away. Please give it more time.
Kris
___
Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH wrote:
On 2008 Jun 24, at 19:03, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
o Remove 5.x support
Port maintainer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is cc'd.
FYI, we stated in the EOL announcement that we are not doing sweeping
5.x removals right
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 10:45:02PM +0800, Rong-en Fan wrote:
IIRC, we don't install pseudo library files, i.e., .la files on FreeBSD.
However, devel/libtool's ltmain.sh does not prevent this. Therefore,
when set USE_AUTOTOOLS=libtool:15, we will install .la files.
Do I miss something? Or,
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 02:07:40PM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote:
Hmm, I may have spoken too quickly, there is a report of this same problem
on 6.2. Never mind my noise.
Your point remains valid that the OP is in for a big shock if they
keep trying to use up-to-date ports on their 4.9 system.
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 04:55:39PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Something strange is going on.
I've used crack in past to check for weak passwords among my users
when I was sysadmin for a small network of Sun workstations used by
physicists for computation.
So, I decided to
On Mon, Mar 12, 2007 at 09:41:06PM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 02:53:03PM -0800, Eric P. Scott wrote:
i386 and amd64 builds are failing as though something were forcing
USE_AUTOTOOLS= libtool:15
and bypassing the included libtool. What's the difference?
There
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 04:09:26PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Are the different versions of tcl and tk really not backwards compatible
with earlier versions?
No, they are not.
Kris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 06:46:48PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Begin forwarded message:
From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: March 13, 2007 3:48:56 PM PDT
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Why so many tcl's and tk's
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 05:48:56PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Mar 13, 2007 at 04:09:26PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Are the different versions of tcl and tk really not backwards compatible
with earlier versions
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 07:26:25AM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Are the different versions of tcl and tk really not backwards
compatible with earlier versions?
No, they are not.
What a pity. So how come the various linux distributions seem to
get away with only one version of tcl and tk?
On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 01:24:37PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
Hello all,
I was just wondering if there was any way where we -- as a group --
could push to make the default jdk / jre the diablo packaged versions
because frankly I don't want a system to assume that I want to compile
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 02:55:09PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:16:22 -0500, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Dear Maintainer,
As you may know, in the near future FreeBSD 7.x will be switching from
the gcc 3.4 compiler to gcc 4.x. Unfortunately your port
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 03:47:25PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Rene Ladan [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tue, 20 Mar 2007 21:20:18 +0100):
Doug Barton schreef:
As for the requirements in the ideas page ...
[...]
* storing old copies of shared libraries after
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 02:51:31PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 15:21:39 -0500, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 02:55:09PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:16:22 -0500, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Dear
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 11:46:34PM +0200, Rico Secada wrote:
Hi All.
I have been using FreeBSD as a desktop system, on serveral computers for
about one and a half year now. I truly love FreeBSD! But keeping third party
ports/packages updated is just to timeconsuming IMHO.
Building
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 01:52:49PM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
I need a functioning version of acroread version 7 for my 6.1 system
pkg_add -r acroread7 does not find a package. portinstall acroread7
fails initially on an error return from a brandelf command, as it should,
because the
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 05:47:43PM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:57:06 -0400 Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 01:52:49PM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
I need a functioning version of acroread version 7 for my 6.1 system
pkg_add -r
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 03:32:40PM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:05:57 -0500 Rick Voland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Scott Bennett wrote:
I need a functioning version of acroread version 7 for my 6.1 system
pkg_add -r acroread7 does not find a package.
On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 01:58:18PM -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
FreeBSD Ports Tree Management wrote:
Dear FreeBSD ports community,
It has been a good quarter for the ports collection and now is as good a
time as ever to reflect back on the ports tree as well as plot it's
future. We have
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 07:52:57AM +0900, NIIMI Satoshi wrote:
On 2007/04/03 14:12, Rong-En Fan wrote:
After pav@'s commit to bsd.port.mk, now you can test WITH/WITHOUT
freely with OPTIONS.
I filed a PR ports/78343 with similar patch, but the PR was rejected.
Why the policy has been
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 09:10:21PM +0200, Marcus Ahlberg wrote:
My daily cronscript reported this morning that there was a new
version of ruby+pthreads:
ruby+pthreads-1.8.5.12,1 needs updating (index has
1.8.6,1)
However, when I was about to upgrade it, it didn't appear in
On Tue, Mar 14, 2006 at 07:37:56PM +0100, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
That would mean that ipw is broken. I never had such problems when I was
using 5-stable with ipw from the ports.
OK.
Kris
pgpXJoywrkH5y.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 01:59:32PM -0700, Kevin Downey wrote:
On 3/21/06, Maxim Sobolev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have just realized that maybe the best approach to address this
problem would be not reverting the change in question, but making
find_local_scripts_new() more strict, so that
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 09:31:42AM +0200, Matthias Andree wrote:
Greetings,
I just saw this after portsnap fetch update when running pkg_version -IvL=:
ruby-1.8.5.12,1succeeds index (index has 1.8.6)
Please restore ruby's PORTEPOCH - and consider installing
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 11:33:11PM +0200, Peter, Oliver wrote:
Hi,
I would like to use diablo-jdk under my fresh 7.0-CURRENT.
Is it correct that I have to use the binaries from FreeBSD 5.x instead
of FreeBSD 6.x ?
The Makefile check:
.if ${OSVERSION} = 60 ${OSVERSION} = 70
On Sun, Apr 08, 2007 at 09:13:16PM -0400, Jeff Whitman wrote:
In advance, thank you.
FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p3 #0: Sun Apr 8 16:02:37 EDT 2007
CPU: Pentium III/Pentium III Xeon/Celeron (498.75-MHz 686-class CPU)
Real memory = 805298176 (767 MB)
Avail memory = 782880768 (746 MB)
The script
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 12:29:54PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I'd really like to be able to do is used portsnap, which seems
like a great tool, but preserve all of the information about my
existing packages. I have no idea if I can just wipe out my old
/usr/ports and run portsnap
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 08:55:40PM +0100, Florent Thoumie wrote:
As you may know, we're not far from merging xorg modular in the CVS
repository. Before this happens, we have to make sure there are no
collateral damages made to innocent ports.
I'd like people to come to #freebsd-xorg on EFNet
On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 04:51:33PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My opinion is that there should be a threshold value empirically derived by
the developer / retrieved by bug reports, as well as a knob, to specify the
maximum number of parallel jobs to be used for a particular port, that
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 07:12:21AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 09:31:37PM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
Btw, do you think it's possible that a port can only be built with, n
parallel make jobs, but will fail with n+1?
No. I do not think
On Sun, Apr 15, 2007 at 03:40:02AM +0200, Benjamin Lutz wrote:
Hello,
Is make index on FREEBSD_4_EOL supposed to work? I'm getting breakage in
the gstreamer-plugin ports. If there's no easy fix, could someone send
me an INDEX file that matches the state of the ports tree at
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 10:10:41AM +0800, Foxfair Hu wrote:
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
David Southwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
portupgrade -a produces following output for lynx on cvsup from today.
freebsd 6.1
-
--- Upgrading 'lynx-2.8.5_2' to
Someone (probably two people) recently committed changes that make
INDEX builds emit warnings:
/usr/local/bin/kpsewhich: not found
Makefile, line 38: warning: /usr/local/bin/kpsewhich -format 'dvips config'
config.ps returned non-zero status
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 12:28:38PM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
On 4/20/07, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
/a/portbuild/amd64/7/ports/deskutils/linux-sunbird/
../../www/linux-seamonkey/Makefile.common, line 43:
warning: duplicate script for target post-extract ignored
Fixed
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 08:45:17AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
Once in a while a port fails to upgrade, because it wants to write something
in /etc. E.g. perl into /etc/make.conf or other ports into /etc/group.
On my systems / is normally a read only mount. These ports build fine during
a
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 07:04:43PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
make -DFORCE_PKG_REGISTER [re]install do install a second port (duplicate)
is this a bug or do I have some problem on this machine?
6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #0: Fri Apr 27 20:46:32 BRT 2007
portsnap update I did today
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 01:12:54AM +0100, Steven Hartland wrote:
I'm trying to install ports into a jail but even some
key ports like don't seen to support this option
even to the extent they appear to break the host OS
deleting files.
I'm assuming this shouldn't be the case?
DESTDIR is
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 09:12:29PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
I'm not sure what you want to hear but to clarify
What I meant was: when you are trying to report an error you usually
need to show exactly what is going wrong, because just describing it
vaguely does not often help, because we have to
Hi all,
After many months of hard work (mostly by flz@, as well as others) we
are approaching readiness of the xorg 7.2 upgrade. Because this is a
huge and disruptive change, we're going to approach it very carefully.
The current plan is the following:
1) Tag ports with PRE_XORG_7 and freeze
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 02:40:26PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Hi all,
After many months of hard work (mostly by flz@, as well as others) we
are approaching readiness of the xorg 7.2 upgrade. Because this is a
huge and disruptive
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 03:26:25PM -0600, Coleman Kane wrote:
On Wed, 2007-05-02 at 15:43 -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 02:40:26PM -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Hi all,
After many months of hard
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 11:36:03PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
In particular all ports committers are expected to participate in this
process of eating our own dogfood :)
Our marketing folks educated me to use the phrase drinking our own
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 03:31:59PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Hi all,
After many months of hard work (mostly by flz@, as well as others) we
are approaching readiness of the xorg 7.2 upgrade. Because this is a
huge and disruptive change, we're going to approach it very carefully
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 07:16:42AM -0300, JoaoBR wrote:
gnome-libtool: link: `/usr/X11R6/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.la' is not a valid
libtool
I guess one of those libraries needs to be rebuilt.
grep -r /usr/X11R6/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.la /usr/local/lib /usr/X11R6/lib
should show you the
On Wed, May 02, 2007 at 08:36:46PM -0400, David Stanford wrote:
Hi all,
Just out of curiosity, why is Python 2.4.4 the default version under
lang/python instead of 2.5.1?
Updating to 2.5.1 involves lots of (simple) work to fix the resulting
breakage to ports, if you are interested in helping
On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 05:43:47PM +0100, mal content wrote:
/usr/local
Hello.
Why is FreeBSD using /usr/local instead of /usr/X11R7?
/usr/local is the new de facto standard, AFAIK no-one is using
/usr/X11R7.
Kris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
1 - 100 of 399 matches
Mail list logo
