valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 05:31:15 +0800, Morton Harrow said:
I see with pain in my heart that the GPLv3 doesn't actually give the
users of GPLv3 software the liberty and freedom the FSF has been
fighting for. Instead they are forced to play by the strict set of
Marco Peereboom wrote:
All this GPL blah blah is a huge waste of time. It comes down to this;
nearly everyone on this list thinks that the GPL is criminally stupid so
stop trying to convince people here that it does not suck dog ass.
Lets not have this retarded debate again, *we* know *you*
Byron Campbell wrote:
Xorg -configure now reports:
(++) Using config file: /root/xorg.conf.new
(WW) RADEON: No matching Device section for instance (BusID
PCI:1:0:1) found
(**) RADEON(0): RADEONPreInit
Manually doing the config by running xorgcfg -textmode gives a
different BusID in the
Byron Campbell wrote:
On Sunday 17 June 2007 10:23:19 pm Mark Kirkwood wrote:
AFAICS the symbol is defined in:
/usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/drivers/ati_drv.so
e.g:
$ nm ati_drv.so|grep ATIMemoryTypeNames_88800CX
b5c0 D ATIMemoryTypeNames_88800CX
What does it show on your system (I'm
Byron Campbell wrote:
Help, X was working just fine until I did a portupgrade of
xorg 6.9.0 to 7.2.
Looks like X is starting but my LCD monitor just goes black
with the monitor's OSD reporting video input, out of range.
I've gone back through Xorg configuration
(via xorgcfg -textmode) and
Byron Campbell wrote:
I went back and ran Xorg -configure again, and noted the
following error messages:
dlopen: /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/drivers//atimisc_drv.so:
Undefined symbol ATIMemoryTypeNames_88800CX
(EE) Failed to
load /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/drivers//atimisc_drv.so
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 01:07:18AM -0700, Andriy Babiy wrote:
I guess you missed the several replies (and the note in UPDATING)
telling you to install the xorg port to obtain a complete xorg
installation.
Kris
Thank you Kris.
Now I see, I didn't have xorg meta-port
Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote:
Since AMD/ATI doesn't make a native driver for FreeBSD, I only buy
notebooks with nvidia, and I told my friends about this.
We as FreeBSD users could write about this in our blogs and pages,
which will widespread the word about the driver issues in better way,
Dear Questions:
I have a machine with 2G of ram. I would like to be able to malloc about
half of it. However I keep running into the max data segment size
limitation:
$ ulimit -d
524288
Is there any way to increase or amend this ?
I am running FreeBSD 4.9 RELEASE i386 with the following non
I should have mentioned that I built the kernel when the machine had
either 512M or 1G of ram, and have subsequently added another 1G. Would
rebuilding the kernel result in this limit being recalculated?
Mark Kirkwood wrote:
Dear Questions:
I have a machine with 2G of ram. I would like
size */
so is there any reason *not* to amend this and recompile?
e.g.
#define MAXDSIZ (1024UL*1024*1024) /* max data size now 1G */
any opinions out there?
regards
Mark
Mark Kirkwood replied to himself:
I should have mentioned that I built the kernel when the machine had
either
to do...
Of course by this time I have managed to find some postings concerning
MAXDSIZ and kern.maxdsiz.
Hopefully the next person confused about this will find my postings
*before* dredging the code!
regards
Mark
Mark Kirkwood wrote:
so is there any reason *not* to amend this and recompile
I mean in /boot/loader.conf (growl...)
Mark Kirkwood wrote:
which looked suspicously like a kernel tunable for data segment size.
So setting kern.maxdsiz in /etc/loader.conf seems to be the thing to
do...
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http
.
regards
Mark
P.s : Still seeing loss of 2 processor scaling where *any* io is
involved, but I will study this some more and post to smp if cant
understand it (I wonder if its something to do with running 2 copies of
the *same* binary).
Mark Kirkwood wrote:
.
iostat blocks until the process
I use Linux for surfing + mail , and Freebsd for coding + research.
The choice of which to use for what was just how it happened - rather
than any deficiency in either product. I think they are both great.
Good to be spoilt for choice.
P.s : notice I did not mention that other operationg
I am running Freebsd 5.1 on a Dell 410 with 2xPII and 2xIDE drives (each
on its own channel).
Drive #1 as 1 filesystem mounted on /, drive #2 has 1 filesystem,
mounted on /data1
(both have softupdates enabled)
i) start a process doing some io on drive #1
ii) start iostat 5
iostat blocks until
16 matches
Mail list logo
