I received a panic message (see Subject) yesterday following a GNOME
upgrade. The upgrade was successful but I encountered subsequent problems
trying to access Firefox websites and my mail site in Thunderbird. I
noticed a Plugin error message in Firefox and prepared to paste it into a
message to
-Original Message-
From: Kris Kennaway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 07, 2006 3:20 PM
To: Robert H. Perry
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Panic: vrele: negative ref cnt
On Sun, May 07, 2006 at 03:16:46PM -0400, Robert H. Perry wrote:
I received a panic
Nagilum wrote:
Hi Bob,
It seems you caught the port in a unstable moment where the patch could
not be applied for some reason. This was probably only a very brief
moment so the next cvsup/portsnap update fixed the problem.
Kind regards,
Robert H. Perry wrote:
Original Message
Original Message
Subject: Need Assistance Upgrading Ethereal-0.10.13_3 to 0.10.14
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 00:52:21 -0500
From: Robert H. Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
FreeBSD sphinx.my.domain 5.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #0:
Ran
FreeBSD sphinx.my.domain 5.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #0:
Ran into the following error while running portupgrade on ethereal:
== applying extra patch
/usr/ports/net/ethereal/files/extra-patch-capture_loop.c
***Error code 1
Stop in usr/ports/net/ethereal.
Command failed [exit code 1]:
Daniel wrote:
On 11/30/05, Robert H. Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert H. Perry wrote:
Robert H. Perry wrote:
Currently running FreeBSD RELEASE 5.4 and a MultiTech Voice/Data/Fax
modem for dialup internet service on a server-type machine. I also
run another machine with 3 operating
Daniel wrote:
On 12/1/05, Robert H. Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel wrote:
On 11/30/05, Robert H. Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert H. Perry wrote:
Robert H. Perry wrote:
Currently running FreeBSD RELEASE 5.4 and a MultiTech Voice/Data/Fax
modem for dialup internet
Currently running FreeBSD RELEASE 5.4 and a MultiTech Voice/Data/Fax
modem for dialup internet service on a server-type machine. I also run
another machine with 3 operating systems (FreeBSD 5.4, Suse 9.2, and
Windows XP).
My original objective was to install Hylafax on the server and share
Robert H. Perry wrote:
Currently running FreeBSD RELEASE 5.4 and a MultiTech Voice/Data/Fax
modem for dialup internet service on a server-type machine. I also run
another machine with 3 operating systems (FreeBSD 5.4, Suse 9.2, and
Windows XP).
My original objective was to install Hylafax
Robert H. Perry wrote:
Robert H. Perry wrote:
Currently running FreeBSD RELEASE 5.4 and a MultiTech Voice/Data/Fax
modem for dialup internet service on a server-type machine. I also
run another machine with 3 operating systems (FreeBSD 5.4, Suse 9.2,
and Windows XP).
My original objective
David Armour wrote:
hello rob,
from /usr/ports/UPDATING:
20051113:
AFFECTS: users of x11/xterm, x11/xorg-clients, x11/XFree86-4-clients
AUTHOR: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Xterm no longer installs with '-static' prefix. Users should upgrade
XFree86-clients to 4.5.0_1 or xorg-clients to
Hi,
I'm running FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #0 on two machines and just CVSup'd my
systems last night finishing with portupgrade this morning. I ran into
a problem with machine #1. I ran portupgrade and stumbled with the
xterm and x11-fonts/linux-fontconfig upgrades. I tried to run startx to
Kevin Kinsey wrote:
Robert H. Perry wrote:
I'm running FreeBSD RELEASE 5.4 and recently installed IPF Firewall. I
rarely download files using FTP but have little choice using
portupgrade. Now, during an upgrade, I often see the error message,
No route to host...
while connecting with an FTP
Robert H. Perry wrote:
Hi,
I'm running FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #0 on two machines and just CVSup'd my
systems last night finishing with portupgrade this morning. I ran into
a problem with machine #1. I ran portupgrade and stumbled with the
xterm and x11-fonts/linux-fontconfig upgrades. I tried
Kevin Kinsey wrote:
Robert H. Perry wrote:
I'm running FreeBSD RELEASE 5.4 and recently installed IPF Firewall. I
rarely download files using FTP but have little choice using
portupgrade. Now, during an upgrade, I often see the error message,
No route to host...
while connecting with an FTP
I'm running FreeBSD RELEASE 5.4 and recently installed IPF Firewall. I
rarely download files using FTP but have little choice using
portupgrade. Now, during an upgrade, I often see the error message, No
route to host... while connecting with an FTP site. If I disable the
IPF/IPNAT rules the
,
--ken
On 11/11/05, *Robert H. Perry* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I have a box which needs to upgrade gconf, glib, gnomevfs, and gtk based
on the latest CVSup. Just want to confirm that I should still run the
gnome_upgrade.sh even though GNOME itself
I have a box which needs to upgrade gconf, glib, gnomevfs, and gtk based
on the latest CVSup. Just want to confirm that I should still run the
gnome_upgrade.sh even though GNOME itself is not installed.
Thnx,
Bob Perry
___
Ryan Thompson wrote:
Robert H. Perry wrote to FreeBSD-Questions:
I'm upgrading from 4.7 RELEASE to 4.8 RELEASE soon. My understanding
is that once you have built the world with buildworld, it's time to
build and install the new kernel.
In your scenario, yes, you'll definitely want
Lee Harr wrote:
Is docbook-3.0_2 still registered as installed on your system? I think
that
is the one it is looking for. It is possible that when upgrading one
of the
others, that one was removed inadvertently.
No, it is not registered as installed. As a matter of fact, none of the
docbooks
Lee Harr wrote:
pkg_info -ro sgmlformat-1.7_2, I get the following:
Information for sgmlformat-1.7_2:
Depends on:
Dependency: xmlcatmgr-1.1
Dependency: iso8879-1986_2
Dependency: jade-1.2.1_5
Dependency: linuxdoc-1.1_1
Dependency: docbook-4.1_2
Dependency: docbook-4.0_2
Dependency: docbook-3.1_2
Hi,
Just ran my weekly cvsup program followed by portsbd -Uu. Tried running
portsversion -l and received a message indicating that I should run
pkgdb -F to deal with a stale dependency. Note following:
Stale dependency: sgmlformat-1.7_2 - docbook-3.1_2 (textproc/docbook-310):
Lee Harr wrote:
Just ran my weekly cvsup program followed by portsbd -Uu. Tried running
portsversion -l and received a message indicating that I should run
pkgdb -F to deal with a stale dependency. Note following:
Stale dependency: sgmlformat-1.7_2 - docbook-3.1_2
(textproc/docbook-310):
I'm upgrading from 4.7 RELEASE and intended to build and install 4.8
RELEASE. It was recommended that I consider RELENG_4_8 because it
contained some 13 security fixes. I came across a CVS website
indicating that the code was for security advisories and other
seriously critical fixes.
Jeremy Faulkner wrote:
On Sun, Oct 26, 2003 at 11:52:11AM -0500, Robert H. Perry wrote:
I'm upgrading from 4.7 RELEASE and intended to build and install 4.8
RELEASE. It was recommended that I consider RELENG_4_8 because it
contained some 13 security fixes. I came across a CVS website
I'm upgrading from 4.7 RELEASE to 4.8 RELEASE soon. My understanding is
that once you have built the world with buildworld, it's time to build
and install the new kernel.
My current kernel is customized with a sound card device and nothing else.
The FreeBSD Handbook indicates that the safest
Ryan Thompson wrote:
Robert H. Perry wrote to Ryan Thompson:
In your scenario, yes, you'll definitely want to build a new kernel.
In fact, I hope you elected to go with the security branch
(RELENG_4_8), so that you get the 13 or so security related fixes
that have been applied since 4.8
Hello,
I'm making plans to upgrade from 4.7 RELEASE to 4.8 RELEASE. My
previous attempt was a binary upgrade from 4.5 to 4.7 which did not go
very well. I eventually purchased the 4.7 CD.
The FreeBSD Handbook stresses backing up the system and implies that
/dump/ is a better backup
Hello,
I'm making plans to upgrade from 4.7 RELEASE to 4.8 RELEASE. My
previous attempt was a binary upgrade from 4.5 to 4.7 which did not go
very well. I eventually purchased the 4.7 CD.
The FreeBSD Handbook stresses backing up the system and implies that
/dump/ is a better backup
29 matches
Mail list logo
