Victor Sudakov wrote:
I have several Supermicro-based servers with the mpt RAID adapter:
# mptutil show adapter
mpt0 Adapter:
Board Name: UNUSED
Board Assembly:
Chip Name: C1068E
Chip Revision: UNUSED
RAID Levels: none
#
The problem is, I cannot
Colleagues,
I have several Supermicro-based servers with the mpt RAID adapter:
# mptutil show adapter
mpt0 Adapter:
Board Name: UNUSED
Board Assembly:
Chip Name: C1068E
Chip Revision: UNUSED
RAID Levels: none
#
The problem is, I cannot configure any RAIDs (please see
Use PACKAGESITE=http://pkg-test.freebsd.org/pkg-test-${ABI}/latest
That's the kit that will form the official FreeBSD package repository;
it just lacks the crypto bits for signing the packages, which is why
it's calling itself 'pkg-test'
Oh -- there isn't an A record in the DNS for
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013, at 10:58, Zoran Kolic wrote:
Use PACKAGESITE=http://pkg-test.freebsd.org/pkg-test-${ABI}/latest
That's the kit that will form the official FreeBSD package repository;
it just lacks the crypto bits for signing the packages, which is why
it's calling itself 'pkg-test'
Yeah!!! 96.47.72.120 works! Thanks!
Depends. Where are your other installed packages from? I'd probably
re-install all of them from the pkg-test repository just to be safe.
I installed 9.1 on new node and compiled from ports.
It took a long time, which I want to avoid right now.
Here is what I
Summary:
Where is the (U.S.) pkg(ng) repository for amd64 9.2-RELEASE (i.e.,
what's the right URI for PACKAGESITE in pkg.conf)?
Things I tried that didn't work:
* pkg_add -r pkg didn't create /usr/local/etc/pkg.conf
* pkg.conf.sample suggests http://pkg.freebsd.org/${ABI}/latest
On 02/10/2013 21:07, Winston wrote:
Summary:
Where is the (U.S.) pkg(ng) repository for amd64 9.2-RELEASE (i.e.,
what's the right URI for PACKAGESITE in pkg.conf)?
Things I tried that didn't work:
* pkg_add -r pkg didn't create /usr/local/etc/pkg.conf
* pkg.conf.sample suggests
Hi. I run 9.1-RELEASE on two boxes: one i386 and the other amd64. I've run
the latter for a bit over a week. When I portsnap update, the 32-bit
machine typically gets several to dozens or hundreds of updates, while the
64-bit machine typically gets none, or maybe a couple. What might
. Then just portsnap fetch
portsnap extract. You will get a fresh ports tree.
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 2:20 PM, Christian Campbell
dc...@alumni.ufl.edu wrote:
Hi. I run 9.1-RELEASE on two boxes: one i386 and the other amd64. I've run
the latter for a bit over a week. When I portsnap update, the 32
On 09/13/2013 02:46 PM, Eir Nym wrote:
I get this error for a while, and don't know what to do with.
I build the world, then try to install it into DESTDIR. And at this point I
always get error that libc.a can't be found.
To eliminate any mistakes in commits I've run snapshot r255342 from
I get this error for a while, and don't know what to do with.
I build the world, then try to install it into DESTDIR. And at this point I
always get error that libc.a can't be found.
To eliminate any mistakes in commits I've run snapshot r255342 from FTP in
VM and build sources it contains.
my
I am currently using a 9.1-RELEASE with an i386 install.
The hardware is a core 2 duo with 2 GB of RAM. My video card
is an ati radeon hd 2400 xt. Things work fine.
Would I gain anything by starting over and doing an AMD64 install
or would that be a bad idea? Would my system perform better
I am currently using a 9.1-RELEASE with an i386 install.
The hardware is a core 2 duo with 2 GB of RAM. My video card
is an ati radeon hd 2400 xt. Things work fine.
Would I gain anything by starting over and doing an AMD64 install
or would that be a bad idea? Would my system perform better
gain anything by starting over and doing an AMD64 install
or would that be a bad idea? Would my system perform better, worse,
or the same after the change? I may eventually bring the memory up
to 4GB, but not anytime soon.
I understand some ports my not work - like WINE - but I do not use
an AMD64 install
or would that be a bad idea? Would my system perform better, worse,
or the same after the change? I may eventually bring the memory up
to 4GB, but not anytime soon.
For machines with less than 4GB of RAM, running 32-bit version is probably
wise; 32-bit processes use memory more
Hello list,
Portaudit said thunderbird had a vulnerability so I went to upgrade it
with portupgrade but it coredumps and it does this a good while into the
compilation process. Can anyone advise please how to overcome this?
Here is my system and output:
system - FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE-p3 #0
Dears All ,
The following message
hwpstate0 : set freq failed , err 6
is displayed frequently on the following computer :
Main board : ASUS M5A97 R2.0
Processor : AMD FX X8 8350
Graphics Card : PowerColor HD 4830
Memory : 32GB
FreeBSD 9.1 amd64 2013-04-20 Snapshot
What may be the reason
I'm migrating a lot of services to a new server running 9.1 amd64.
I have a VMWare FreeBSD 3.3 server I want to decommission, which is
running a client's website with a shopping cart system in an a.out
binary (source code lost long ago).
I have just tried to build a new kernel on the 9.1
At 09:07 AM 1/23/2013, Anton Yuzhaninov wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 22:52:17, Derek Ragona wrote:
DR I have a couple servers that are built using the supermicro
X9SCM-F/X9CL-F
DR motherboards, and I can't quite get IPMI SOL working right.
DR
DR These motherboards have 3 NIC's. One NIC is for a
On Mon, 21 Jan 2013 22:52:17, Derek Ragona wrote:
DR I have a couple servers that are built using the supermicro X9SCM-F/X9CL-F
DR motherboards, and I can't quite get IPMI SOL working right.
DR
DR These motherboards have 3 NIC's. One NIC is for a dedicated IPMI interface.
DR
DR I have both
I have a couple servers that are built using the supermicro X9SCM-F/X9CL-F
motherboards, and I can't quite get IPMI SOL working right.
These motherboards have 3 NIC's. One NIC is for a dedicated IPMI interface.
I have both servers configured to use the dedicated IPMI NIC and these
NIC's are
On 10-01-2013 05:56, ＊;sτóΡ〆~*~ξ wrote:
��请�导
���骤�
# portsnap fetch update
# cd /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose
# make install clean
�路��认���OK�
�
pass -build programs
pass -Libraries
pass -DLLs
pass -Programs
Pass - install
���请�导
��骤��
# portsnap fetch update
# cd /usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox-ose
# make install clean
��路���认�OK��
���
pass -build programs
pass -Libraries
pass -DLLs
pass -Programs
Pass - install
kmk:*** NoRULE to make target
line relevant?
# dmesg|grep power management
jbusppm0: JBus power management mem
0x4000f00-0x4000f07,0x4000f410050-0x4000f41005f on nexus0
#
Anyway, I wonder if powerd is only for amd64/i386
and is not supposed to work on sparc64.
cpufreq(4) is not listed in sparc64 GENERIC kernel
Hi,
I've done the upgrade yesterday. It was a clean 8.3 install, I only set
up PPPoE and then run the following commands.
# cd /usr/ports/misc/mc make install clean
# uname -r
8.3-RELEASE
# freebsd-update -r 9.1-RELEASE upgrade
# freebsd-update install
# shutdown -r now
# freebsd-update
Hi,
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 05:13:39 +0100
Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@rocketmail.com wrote:
ok, so FreeBSD release is the version of the kernel and not a
labelling for the collection of all the software.
yes. It is even so that the ports work on all 'current' FreeBSD
versions but not the packages.
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 05:29 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
I'd say: Use the source Luke. :-)
:)
Strange question: Is the FreeBSD handbook available as iBook?
At the moment I've got plenty of time, unfortunately not in front of my
desktop computer. Some time ago I won an iPad2, it's a dust catcher,
On Dec 20, 2012, at 10:51 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 05:29 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
I'd say: Use the source Luke. :-)
:)
Strange question: Is the FreeBSD handbook available as iBook?
You can get it as a PDF at
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 15:52 +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
The author of the snd_hdspe driver for FreeBSD seems to need testers.
I never have heard of this driver.
It's a new driver for FreeBSD for some cards of the vendor RME, AFAIK
they only sell really professional audio cards, used for
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 10:57 -0500, Paul Kraus wrote:
On Dec 20, 2012, at 10:51 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 05:29 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
I'd say: Use the source Luke. :-)
:)
Strange question: Is the FreeBSD handbook available as iBook?
You can get it
On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 07:35 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 10:57 -0500, Paul Kraus wrote:
On Dec 20, 2012, at 10:51 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 05:29 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
I'd say: Use the source Luke. :-)
:)
Strange question: Is the
Hi :)
this isn't a request, just a note about the handbook, from the point of
view a newbie has got.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html
We also assume that you have already obtained the sources to a newer
system. If the sources available on the particular
Ralf,
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Ralf Mardorf
ralf.mard...@rocketmail.com wrote:
Hi :)
this isn't a request, just a note about the handbook, from the point of
view a newbie has got.
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/makeworld.html
We also assume that you
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 10:14 -0600, Antonio Olivares wrote:
You may also use at your discretion the portmaster tool? It works
very well and a nice example is given by W. Block:
http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/portupgrade.html
Thank you Antonio :)
because I can't install FreeBSD by
Ralf,
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Ralf Mardorf
ralf.mard...@rocketmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 10:14 -0600, Antonio Olivares wrote:
You may also use at your discretion the portmaster tool? It works
very well and a nice example is given by W. Block:
Hi,
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 18:09:16 +0100
Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@rocketmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 10:14 -0600, Antonio Olivares wrote:
You may also use at your discretion the portmaster tool? It works
very well and a nice example is given by W. Block:
Thank you Erich :)
ok, so FreeBSD release is the version of the kernel and not a
labelling for the collection of all the software.
For Linux major distros there usually is a labelling for the collection
of the software, independent of the kernel version.
On Linux I usually install binaries for
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 05:13:39 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
Thank you Erich :)
ok, so FreeBSD release is the version of the kernel and not a
labelling for the collection of all the software.
No. The version specification refers to the version of the
kernel _and_ the operating system (which form
chime in where Erich couldn't answer as I recently made the
switch to amd64 myself.
x11-wm/xfce4
yes.
www/firefox
Yes.
www/linux-f10-flashplugin11
Yes
editors/libreoffice
Yes.
www/tomcat-7
www/apace22
Typo? Apache 2.2 runs.
devel/aegis (I am the maintainer)
devel/fhist
devel/cook
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 18:42 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
I want to test snd_hdspe. How can I upgrade from 8.2 to a version
^^^8.3
including the driver or something similar to get the driver?
Btw. I didn't test, if the driver is part of 8.3 until
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 18:42:41 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
I want to test snd_hdspe. How can I upgrade from 8.2 to a version
including the driver or something similar to get the driver?
Btw. I didn't test, if the driver is part of 8.3 until now :D, but if
IIUC I need = 9.0.
It would probably be
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 18:57 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 18:42:41 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
I want to test snd_hdspe. How can I upgrade from 8.2 to a version
including the driver or something similar to get the driver?
Btw. I didn't test, if the driver is part of 8.3 until
On Tue, 18 Dec 2012 18:54:29 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 18:42 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
I want to test snd_hdspe. How can I upgrade from 8.2 to a version
^^^8.3
including the driver or something similar to get the
-ose (and additions)
print/cups
I have avoided amd64 in the past due to some or not all them working,
but want to switch if possible because PAE seems to be broken now on
i386.
So I have the following questions:
1. Will all the above ports (and their dependencies) work on amd64?
2. Is there any way
avoided amd64 in the past due to some or not all them working,
but want to switch if possible because PAE seems to be broken now on
i386.
It was a big jump forward when I switched during 8.0 or 8.1.
So I have the following questions:
1. Will all the above ports (and their dependencies) work
Hi,
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 06:00:51 -0500
Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.com wrote:
I have been using i386 (-STABLE) for years now and was wondering if
switching to amd64 finally makes sense (i.e. are enough ports working
on it now [xfrce4, firefox, libreoffice, openjdk-6, tomcat, mysql
On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 05:35 -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
I'm running amd64 and it seems rock-solid and well supported.
I had a similar question. I wanted to know if there are issues for
audio, when using 64 bit and got this reply:
If you do not have a _specific_ requirement for 32 bit, use
On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 18:45 +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
flash
For Linux there are no issues with the proprietary 64 bit flash, but
there will be no new versions of Flash any more for Linux. If FreeBSD
should use the Linux version, than Flash in the near future either way
won't work any more.
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 13:05:47 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 18:45 +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
flash
For Linux there are no issues with the proprietary 64 bit flash, but
there will be no new versions of Flash any more for Linux. If FreeBSD
should use the Linux version,
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sun, 2012-12-16 at 05:35 -0600, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
I'm running amd64 and it seems rock-solid and well supported.
I had a similar question. I wanted to know if there are issues for
audio, when using 64 bit and got this reply:
If you do
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 12:48:40 +0100
Ralf Mardorf ralf.mard...@rocketmail.com wrote:
Specific requirements _could_ be wine and nVidia's proprietary GPU
driver, as far as I know. - Polytropon (Btw. thank you Polytropon :)
I'm using amd64 on an Atom/ION box here, the Nvidia binary drivers
On 12/16/12 11:00, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
I have been using i386 (-STABLE) for years now and was wondering if
switching to amd64 finally makes sense (i.e. are enough ports working
on it now [xfrce4, firefox, libreoffice, openjdk-6, tomcat, mysql,
apache22, flash, cups, devel/aegis, devel/cook
On 12/16/12 04:00, Aryeh Friedman wrote:
I have been using i386 (-STABLE) for years now and was wondering if
switching to amd64 finally makes sense (i.e. are enough ports working
on it now [xfrce4, firefox, libreoffice, openjdk-6, tomcat, mysql,
apache22, flash, cups, devel/aegis, devel/cook
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 12:13:36 -0700, Gary Aitken wrote:
On 12/16/12 07:08, Polytropon wrote:
And if you're using Firefox, there are plugins available that
allow you to download video content instead of dealing with the
Flash player the site wants you to use.
and the recommended one is?
On Sun, 16 Dec 2012 06:00:51 -0500
Aryeh Friedman wrote:
I have been using i386 (-STABLE) for years now and was wondering if
switching to amd64 ... nvidia-kmod are the minimal ones I need]) the
main reason for asking is PAE seems to be broken now
The last I heard the nvidia driver wasn't
The problem is, it gets recreated upon updating from source.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/i386-vs-amd64-tp5765012p5765488.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd
Even that I was aware of that, I've just lost track of it. Thanks for simple
solution.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/i386-vs-amd64-tp5765012p5765489.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Bill Tillman btillma...@yahoo.com wrote:
i386 will not see anything above 4 GB
Actually you *can* give access to 4Gb RAM for your system: PAE allows you
to use 36 bits instead of 32 to address your memory (and supported till
Pentium Pro) but that is only
How does the system know what is OS and what is 32-bit apps?
OS works in kernel space while application is not.
PAE affects paging system allowing software to address 2^36 bytes of memory.
You can access it in kernel space, but user space applications are limited
to 2^32 bytes of virtual memory
more than 4GB.
However, since apps runs unmodified, a single process cannot break that
barrier.
So, if you are running a single program that requires that lot of
memory, PAE is not an option and you will need amd64.
OTOH, if you run several programs which don't singularly require more
than
From: Fleuriot Damien m...@my.gd
To: birdf...@yahoo.com
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: i386 vs amd64
On Nov 28, 2012, at 6:36 PM, mike miskulin birdf...@yahoo.com wrote:
About to build
If it was from me, my system is without 32bit compat
whatsoever, and this is not default setting on amd64.
Maybe on def. amd64 there are no problems, I don't
know, nobody replied to my thread.
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/i386-vs-amd64
Hello,
On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Bill Tillman btillma...@yahoo.com wrote:
i386 will not see anything above 4 GB
Actually you *can* give access to 4Gb RAM for your system: PAE allows you
to use 36 bits instead of 32 to address your memory (and supported till
Pentium Pro) but that is
About to build a replacement system for an older i386 setup. A few
years ago I had tried the amd64 port on it and found it was frustrating
as things that just worked on i386 did not on amd64. IIRC ports were
large annoyance too.
Now I have a new system with 8GB, etc,etc and wonder if I am best
On Nov 28, 2012, at 6:36 PM, mike miskulin birdf...@yahoo.com wrote:
About to build a replacement system for an older i386 setup. A few
years ago I had tried the amd64 port on it and found it was frustrating
as things that just worked on i386 did not on amd64. IIRC ports were
large
On Wed, 28 Nov 2012, mike miskulin wrote:
About to build a replacement system for an older i386 setup. A few
years ago I had tried the amd64 port on it and found it was frustrating
as things that just worked on i386 did not on amd64. IIRC ports were
large annoyance too.
Now I have a new
What port was that ?
I've never had a *single* problem due to using amd64 over i386.
Well I have to apologize, I've reached senility! My past bad experience
was with netbsd amd64 afterwhich I bailed and went to FreeBSD i386
(thanks google).
But I guess the basic question remains
packages (wine_amd64, if I remember
correctly), but the rest of the system should run good on
amd64 as it did on i386.
Sidenote: I switched back from 8.2/amd64 to 8.2/i386 because
of three reasons (in fact, two reasons and one justification):
I had problems with wine, problems with nVidia's driver (plus
On 11/28/12 18:49, Warren Block wrote:
On Wed, 28 Nov 2012, mike miskulin wrote:
About to build a replacement system for an older i386 setup. A few
years ago I had tried the amd64 port on it and found it was frustrating
as things that just worked on i386 did not on amd64. IIRC ports were
might be if you want to use wine. As it has
been said, there are binary packages (wine_amd64, if I remember
correctly), but the rest of the system should run good on
amd64 as it did on i386.
Sidenote: I switched back from 8.2/amd64 to 8.2/i386 because
of three reasons (in fact, two reasons
code 1
...
ok, I get it. I think I built drm and agp
together, hence I haven't encountered this
error.
Do you use radeon video driver?
Do you use radeondrm device in kernel?
This only place I see this is in
src/sys/amd64/conf/NOTES.
My understanding is that to get drm
working
From ill...@gmail.com Sat Nov 24 16:09:29 2012
On 22 November 2012 06:19, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk
wrote:
It is not clear for me from the agp(4) man page,
whether I need this device in the kernel or not.
The pciconf -lv output is below. Or
code 1
...
ok, I get it. I think I built drm and agp
together, hence I haven't encountered this
error.
Do you use radeon video driver?
Do you use radeondrm device in kernel?
This only place I see this is in
src/sys/amd64/conf/NOTES.
My understanding is that to get drm
working
On 22 November 2012 06:19, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
It is not clear for me from the agp(4) man page,
whether I need this device in the kernel or not.
The pciconf -lv output is below. Or do I need to
show dmesg?
Please advise
Thanks
Anton
hostb0@pci0:0:0:0:
On 24 November 2012 10:14, ill...@gmail.com ill...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 November 2012 06:19, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
It is not clear for me from the agp(4) man page,
whether I need this device in the kernel or not.
The pciconf -lv output is below. Or do I need to
show
It is not clear for me from the agp(4) man page,
whether I need this device in the kernel or not.
The pciconf -lv output is below. Or do I need to
show dmesg?
Please advise
Thanks
Anton
hostb0@pci0:0:0:0: class=0x06 card=0x30c2103c chip=0x79101002 rev=0x00
hdr=0x00
vendor =
What's state of valgrind port on pure amd64 system?
Here, it core dumps upon linking both with clang and gcc47,
with complaint that looks suspicious (expected i386 not X86_64
or something to that effect).
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/valgrind-on-pure
running 9.0 release
Being frustrated with my radeon hd-5550 video card which occasionally
(once a week or so) goes into some kind of reset loop, filling up
Xorg.0.log and crashing the system because /var is full...
I picked up an asus nvidia gt 610.
Downloaded the nvidia driver and tried to
running 9.0 release
Being frustrated with my radeon hd-5550 video card which occasionally
(once a week or so) goes into some kind of reset loop, filling up
Xorg.0.log and crashing the system because /var is full...
I picked up an asus nvidia gt 610.
Downloaded the nvidia driver and tried to
On 10/27/12 07:50, Gary Aitken wrote:
running 9.0 release
Being frustrated with my radeon hd-5550 video card which occasionally
(once a week or so) goes into some kind of reset loop, filling up
Xorg.0.log and crashing the system because /var is full...
I picked up an asus nvidia gt 610.
: amd64
Processor Architecture: amd64
ZFS Storage pool Version: 28
ZFS Filesystem Version: 5
FreeBSD 9.1-RC2 #0 r241106: Mon Oct 1 18:26:44 UTC 2012 root
2:32AM up 4 days, 18:32, 7 users, load averages
On 21/10/2012 07:35, Darrel wrote:
Advice? I have not seen this before:
(685) @ 2:22:16 cd /usr/src
(686) @ 2:22:18 svn up
Updating '.':
Skipped 'sys' -- Node remains in conflict
At revision 241794.
Summary of conflicts:
Skipped paths: 1
(687) @ 2:22:43
For some reason svn thinks
I am trying to install FreeBSD stable - either 8.3 or 9.0 - on a Dell
420 with Perc H310 LSI PCI Express SAS Rain controllers.
Although the physical disks are present and recognized by the BIOS the
sysinstall does not see the disks. I think the issue is mfi driver
and was added to the
Kevin,
Thank you for your response. It is great to get confirmation and I
will try with 9.1-RC1
I DO have on board Broadcom 5720 NIC. Nice to know what my next
problem is likely to be. Hopefully that will be easy to solve if I
install another NIC card.
Thanks!
Jean
Jean
== John Levine wrote on Mon 13.Aug'12 at 5:41:52 - ==
Oops, it's 14.0.1 I'm trying to build. 13.0.0.1 is what I have installed now.
In article 20120813053621.24629.qm...@joyce.lan you write:
did you select the option to use optimised CFLAGS when you run make
config in the port
I'm reasonably sure I have the png and sqlite3 libraries built as
needed, but the build still barfs when compiling the SSL function
nsNSSErrors.cpp. The end of the build log is copied below.
I don't have the logs handy, but Thunderbird fails the same way. Any
suggestions?
R's,
John
c++ -o
Oops, it's 14.0.1 I'm trying to build. 13.0.0.1 is what I have installed now.
In article 20120813053621.24629.qm...@joyce.lan you write:
I'm reasonably sure I have the png and sqlite3 libraries built as
needed, but the build still barfs when compiling the SSL function
nsNSSErrors.cpp. The end
Hi Darren,
On Sun, 29 Jul 2012 04:57:43 +0400
Darren Baginski kick...@yandex.com wrote:
No, feel free to open if you feel it needed.
I would say it's more a feature request, but without it, bsdinstall not
usable on non release environments.
thanks, I submitted the PR here:
of the to-be-used mirror. Also re-trying it on the original system(1)
leads to an error but a different one. Since then I upgraded from 9.0-RELEASE
to 9.0-RELEASE-p3 using freebsd-update.
Here are the symptoms:
(2) FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE-p3 amd64: After typing bsdinstall... it brings me
directly
-p3 amd64: After typing bsdinstall... it brings me
directly to the mirror selection list, but after selecting a mirror it aborts
with an error message An installation step has beeen aborted. Would you like
to restart the installer or exit the installer?
(1) FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE-p3 i386: After
-update.
Here are the symptoms:
(2) FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE-p3 amd64: After typing bsdinstall... it brings me
directly to the mirror selection list, but after selecting a mirror it
aborts with an error message An installation step has beeen aborted. Would
you like to restart the installer
Hi Darren,
thanks for diving into the issue. I looked through the mentioned places in the
bsdinstall code and understand it now.
On Sat, 28 Jul 2012 17:24:48 +0400
Darren Baginski kick...@yandex.com wrote:
I thing release/arch selection has to be a part of the installer, either
directly or
On 21/07/2012 22:06, Ihsan Junaidi Ibrahim wrote:
I assume you have compiled the bootblocks as per the instruction in the
handbook.
Second, do you have more than one serial port on the box because FreeBSD can
only work its serial console magic on only one port at a time.
If you redirect your
what am i doing wrong here?
From rebuilding the install iso and from the handbook instructions
here:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install-advanced.html
which suggests that in /boot/loader.conf only
console=comconsole
is required,
i have tried this and also
I assume you have compiled the bootblocks as per the instruction in the
handbook.
Second, do you have more than one serial port on the box because FreeBSD can
only work its serial console magic on only one port at a time.
If you redirect your IPMI serial console or just a normal serial
2012/5/19 Edward M eam1edw...@gmail.com:
On 05/19/2012 02:28 PM, lokada...@gmx.de wrote:
On 05/17/12 07:54, Любомир Григоров wrote:
We have to wait, unfortunately. I am using a Linux partition with Wine
meanwhile. As long as it's not mainstream, it will be hard to do. Not to
mention port is
...@home.freelooser.fr:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/FNEUFNEU amd64
and
FreeBSD fneufneu.secuserve.net 8.2-STABLE FreeBSD 8.2-STABLE #4
r226057M: Thu Oct 6 16:43:50 CEST 2011
r...@fneufneu.secuserve.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
all my system use xorg-dev trunk (WITH_NEW_XORG=yes for xorg-server
1.12.1
On 05/17/12 07:54, Любомир Григоров wrote:
We have to wait, unfortunately. I am using a Linux partition with Wine
meanwhile. As long as it's not mainstream, it will be hard to do. Not to
mention port is at 1.4.
FreeBSD have 2 wine- ports. :)
On 05/19/2012 02:28 PM, lokada...@gmx.de wrote:
On 05/17/12 07:54, Любомир Григоров wrote:
We have to wait, unfortunately. I am using a Linux partition with Wine
meanwhile. As long as it's not mainstream, it will be hard to do. Not to
mention port is at 1.4.
FreeBSD have 2 wine- ports. :)
Can anybody play diablo 3 with wine on FreeBSD 9R amd64?
Wine 1.5.4,1 64bit can't running Diablo III perhaps because of Agent.exe.
see http://appdb.winehq.org/objectManager.php?sClass=versioniId=25953.
Thanks!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
1 - 100 of 2012 matches
Mail list logo
