portsnap read the refuse file?
--
Linux is for people who hate Micro$oft. BSD is for people who love Unix ...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[E
On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 11:28:10PM +0100, Aren Olvalde Tyr wrote:
> On Wednesday 17 May 2006 22:00, martinko wrote:
>
> > i'm eagerly waiting for it.. and i'm sure i'm not the only one.. good
> > luck aren!
> >
> > m:)
>
> Thanks :^)
>
> I've actually finally got a day off tomorrow (been workin
On Wednesday 17 May 2006 22:00, martinko wrote:
> i'm eagerly waiting for it.. and i'm sure i'm not the only one.. good
> luck aren!
>
> m:)
Thanks :^)
I've actually finally got a day off tomorrow (been working for the last 9
consecutive days!) so will have a chance to work on it some more.
A
Aren Olvalde Tyr wrote:
>> Portmanager already has this I believe. You can add config options to
>> the portmanager config file and it will use them when building things.
>> For example:
>>
>> #
>> # custom settings #
>> # remove "#" to use #
>> #
>> #text
> Portmanager already has this I believe. You can add config options to
> the portmanager config file and it will use them when building things.
> For example:
>
> #
> # custom settings #
> # remove "#" to use #
> #
> #textproc/docproj|JADETEX=no|
> #java/
> The FreeBSD ports system + portsnap + portupgrade is a truly awesome
> combination, much better than any other package management system I've
> ever
> used on other systems.
>
> I'm currently working on a little port configuration tool to make
tweaking
> all
> the port Make knobs more convenient
> # portsnap fetch update;)
>
> Assuming, of course, you've already extracted the tree...
Ahh, of course, nice.
The FreeBSD ports system + portsnap + portupgrade is a truly awesome
combination, much better than any other package management system I've ever
used on other systems.
I'm curren
Yea, Colin's the man.
http://www.daemonology.net/portsnap/ highlights all the beneifts.
-David
On 5/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 01:35 PM 5/13/2006, Tom Moore wrote:
>Which program is best for retrieving and keeping the ports tree up
>to date? What are some pros and
At 01:35 PM 5/13/2006, Tom Moore wrote:
Which program is best for retrieving and keeping the ports tree up
to date? What are some pros and cons of each approach? Is one method
better than the other?
I just discovered portsnap a couple months ago after loading a couple
new machines with 6.0.
On 5/13/06, Aren Olvalde Tyr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Saturday 13 May 2006 18:35, Tom Moore wrote:
> Hi guys.
> Which program is best for retrieving and keeping the ports tree up to
date?
> What are some pros and cons of each approach?
> Is one method better than the other?
Both systems ar
On Saturday 13 May 2006 18:35, Tom Moore wrote:
> Hi guys.
> Which program is best for retrieving and keeping the ports tree up to date?
> What are some pros and cons of each approach?
> Is one method better than the other?
Both systems are very efficient and work extremely well, so you won't go t
Hi guys.
Which program is best for retrieving and keeping the ports tree up to date?
What are some pros and cons of each approach?
Is one method better than the other?
Tom
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.5.6/338 - Re
12 matches
Mail list logo
