Re: Devil Mascot

2004-06-28 Thread Richard Caley
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Kai Grossjohann (kg) writes: kg Software is written for users, isn't it? From observation I would say that most software is written against users. As for FBSD, I hope it is being written for the enjoyment of those writing it, since that is the best insurance that

Re: Devil Mascot

2004-06-26 Thread Kai Grossjohann
Thompson, Jimi [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Why should The FreeBSD project be interested in users ? They are VERY interested in users, according to my humble experience. And that's good: Software is written for users, isn't it? Kai ___ [EMAIL

Re: [OT] Re: Devil Mascot

2004-06-16 Thread Hendrik Hasenbein
Andrew L. Gould wrote: On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 11:20:17 -0400 Chris Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This thread cracks me up. No matter how many times the same subject has been brought up, I still can't stop laughing at the silliness of it all. Maybe FreeBSD should make a fuzzy bunny that does a happy

Re: Devil Mascot

2004-06-16 Thread Bart Silverstrim
On Jun 15, 2004, at 11:20 AM, Chris Lynch wrote: This thread cracks me up. No matter how many times the same subject has been brought up, I still can't stop laughing at the silliness of it all. Maybe FreeBSD should make a fuzzy bunny that does a happy dance...but, then we'd be stepping on the

Re: Devil Mascot

2004-06-15 Thread Anubis
Thompson, Jimi wrote: SNIP From a marketing perspective, you are shooting yourselves in the foot. There are many people of various religious backgrounds who will be dissuaded from trying FreeBSD because they have religious objections to a product that is promoted by a devil. Why should The

Re: Devil Mascot

2004-06-15 Thread MikeM
On 6/13/2004 at 5:02 PM Edward Hendrie wrote: | |Look at how MSN is marketing its ISP. They use characters dressed in |harmless butterfly costumes. = Looks more like a mosquito to me. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: Devil Mascot

2004-06-15 Thread Mi A. Llort
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 05:02:49PM -0700, Edward Hendrie wrote: Why do you have a Devil for a trademark mascot? From a marketing Ed, it's obvious you've hit a nerve. Many list subscribers who have never contributed before, feel compelled to reply, repeating the same explanations which have

Re: Devil Mascot

2004-06-15 Thread Jerry McAllister
On 6/13/2004 at 5:02 PM Edward Hendrie wrote: | |Look at how MSN is marketing its ISP. They use characters dressed in |harmless butterfly costumes. = Looks more like a mosquito to me. I don't know about that, but it probably tracks disease all over. And if that thing

Re: Devil Mascot

2004-06-15 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 05:02:49PM -0700, Edward Hendrie wrote: Why do you have a Devil for a trademark mascot? From a marketing Ed, it's obvious you've hit a nerve. Many list subscribers who have never contributed before, feel compelled to reply, repeating the same explanations

RE: Devil Mascot

2004-06-15 Thread Chris Lynch
happen then!!! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jerry McAllister Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 10:41 AM To: Mi A. Llort Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Devil Mascot On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 05:02:49PM -0700, Edward Hendrie wrote: Why do

[OT ...] Re: Devil Mascot

2004-06-15 Thread Bill Moran
... he's got contacts! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jerry McAllister Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 10:41 AM To: Mi A. Llort Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Devil Mascot On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 05:02:49PM -0700, Edward Hendrie

Re: Devil Mascot

2004-06-15 Thread Andy Harrison
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 11:20:17 -0400, Chris Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This thread cracks me up. No matter how many times the same subject has been brought up, I still can't stop laughing at the silliness of it all. Maybe FreeBSD should make a fuzzy bunny that does a happy dance...but, then

Re: Devil Mascot

2004-06-15 Thread Jerry McAllister
McAllister Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 10:41 AM To: Mi A. Llort Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Devil Mascot On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 05:02:49PM -0700, Edward Hendrie wrote: Why do you have a Devil for a trademark mascot? From a marketing Ed, it's obvious you've hit a nerve

[OT] Re: Devil Mascot

2004-06-15 Thread Andrew L. Gould
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 11:20:17 -0400 Chris Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This thread cracks me up. No matter how many times the same subject has been brought up, I still can't stop laughing at the silliness of it all. Maybe FreeBSD should make a fuzzy bunny that does a happy dance...but, then

Re: Devil Mascot

2004-06-15 Thread Mike Galvez
McAllister Sent: Tuesday, June 15, 2004 10:41 AM To: Mi A. Llort Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Devil Mascot On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 05:02:49PM -0700, Edward Hendrie wrote: Why do you have a Devil for a trademark mascot? From a marketing Ed, it's obvious you've hit a nerve

End of thread: Re: Devil Mascot

2004-06-15 Thread Nico Meijer
Hi all, Mostly for entertainment. Agreed. It was fun, thanks all. EOT, please? ... Nico ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Devil Mascot

2004-06-15 Thread Randy Pratt
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 09:53:57 -0400 Mi A. Llort [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 05:02:49PM -0700, Edward Hendrie wrote: Why do you have a Devil for a trademark mascot? From a marketing Ed, it's obvious you've hit a nerve. Many list subscribers who have never

Re: Devil Mascot

2004-06-15 Thread Chris
On Tuesday 15 June 2004 11:19 am, Randy Pratt wrote: On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 09:53:57 -0400 Mi A. Llort [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 05:02:49PM -0700, Edward Hendrie wrote: Why do you have a Devil for a trademark mascot? From a marketing Ed, it's obvious you've hit

Re: Devil Mascot

2004-06-15 Thread Jerry McAllister
On Tuesday 15 June 2004 11:19 am, Randy Pratt wrote: On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 09:53:57 -0400 Mi A. Llort [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 05:02:49PM -0700, Edward Hendrie wrote: Why do you have a Devil for a trademark mascot? From a marketing ... The FreeBSD

Re: Devil Mascot

2004-06-15 Thread Butterworth, Thaddaeus (Manpower Contract)
and Windoze, regardless of it's mascot. Sincerely, Thad Butterworth -- Message: 29 Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2004 14:53:49 -0500 From: Peter Pauly [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Devil Mascot To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type

Re: [OT] Re: Devil Mascot

2004-06-15 Thread Frank Knobbe
On Tue, 2004-06-15 at 10:39, Andrew L. Gould wrote: Maybe FreeBSD should make a fuzzy bunny that does a happy dance... Too fluffy. FreeBSD is a no-fluff OS! ;-) No, but it keeps going and going and going and going and... Cheers, Frank signature.asc Description: This is a

Devil Mascot

2004-06-14 Thread Edward Hendrie
Why do you have a Devil for a trademark mascot? From a marketing perspective, you are shooting yourselves in the foot. There are many people of various religious backgrounds who will be dissuaded from trying FreeBSD because they have religious objections to a product that is promoted by a

Re: Devil Mascot

2004-06-14 Thread Johannes Lochmann
On Monday 14 June 2004 02:02, Edward Hendrie wrote: Hi, Why do you have a Devil for a trademark mascot? It's not a devil, it's a daemon. Look at how MSN is marketing its ISP. They use characters dressed in harmless butterfly costumes. ... looking ridiculous, IMHO... You

Re: Devil Mascot

2004-06-14 Thread Jan Muenther
You may think that is a small issue, but when you are trying to create market awareness you need a mascot that evokes simplicity and goodwill, not one that evokes evil and deception. Man... either you're a (moderately funny) troll or *you're* the one with some serious issues here. It's a

Re: Devil Mascot

2004-06-14 Thread Ole Guldberg Jensen
Edward Hendrie wrote: Why do you have a Devil for a trademark mascot? http://www.freebsd.org/copyright/daemon.html From a marketing perspective, you are shooting yourselves in the foot. There are many people of various religious backgrounds who will be dissuaded from trying FreeBSD because

Re: Devil Mascot

2004-06-14 Thread Geert Hendrickx
You may think that is a small issue, but when you are trying to create market awareness you need a mascot that evokes simplicity and goodwill, not one that evokes evil and deception. I think it looks friendly, not evil at all. Moreover, it says FreeBSD, the power to serve. Sounds

Re: Devil Mascot

2004-06-14 Thread Bill Moran
Edward Hendrie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why do you have a Devil for a trademark mascot? From a marketing perspective, you are shooting yourselves in the foot. There are many people of various religious backgrounds who will be dissuaded from trying FreeBSD because they have religious

Re: Devil Mascot

2004-06-14 Thread Jason Stewart
On 13/06/04 17:02 -0700, Edward Hendrie wrote: Why do you have a Devil for a trademark mascot? From a marketing perspective, you are shooting yourselves in the foot. There are many people of various religious backgrounds who will be dissuaded from trying FreeBSD because they have

Re: Devil Mascot

2004-06-14 Thread Louis LeBlanc
On 06/13/04 05:02 PM, Edward Hendrie sat at the `puter and typed: Why do you have a Devil for a trademark mascot? From a marketing perspective, you are shooting yourselves in the foot. There are many people of various religious backgrounds who will be dissuaded from trying

Re: Devil Mascot

2004-06-14 Thread Henrik W Lund
If some people are put off from FreeBSD because the devil mascot evokes evil and deception, they are not people I personally would want using the same OS as me. Good riddance! Speaking only for myself, of course. Now MSN, and its behemoth parent Microsoft, on the other hand... *There's* evil

Re: Devil Mascot

2004-06-14 Thread K. Greenwood
Please realize that I am not an official representative of FreeBSD, nor any organization associated to it. --- Edward Hendrie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Why do you have a Devil for a trademark mascot? Daemon... From a marketing perspective, Blasphemy... you are shooting yourselves in

Re: Devil Mascot

2004-06-14 Thread Bart Silverstrim
On Jun 13, 2004, at 8:02 PM, Edward Hendrie wrote: Why do you have a Devil for a trademark mascot? From a marketing perspective, you are shooting yourselves in the foot. There are many people of various religious backgrounds who will be dissuaded from trying FreeBSD because they have

Re: Devil Mascot

2004-06-14 Thread Jorge Biquez
Hello all. We are proud of it. Period. At 08:33 a.m. 14/06/04 -0400, you wrote: On 13/06/04 17:02 -0700, Edward Hendrie wrote: Why do you have a Devil for a trademark mascot? From a marketing perspective, you are shooting yourselves in the foot. There are many people of various religious

RE: Devil Mascot

2004-06-14 Thread Thompson, Jimi
SNIP From a marketing perspective, you are shooting yourselves in the foot. There are many people of various religious backgrounds who will be dissuaded from trying FreeBSD because they have religious objections to a product that is promoted by a devil. Why should The FreeBSD project be

Re: Devil Mascot

2004-06-14 Thread Geert Hendrickx
Btw, I wonder what sane sysadmin would base his choice between OS'es upon their mascot. At least I wouldn't drop an excellent OS such as FreeBSD just for the mascot. For clarity: it refers to background server processes, not evil. The penguin refers to nothing. And if you really want BSD

Re: Devil Mascot

2004-06-14 Thread Steve Tremblett
You may think that is a small issue, but when you are trying to create market awareness you need a mascot that evokes simplicity and goodwill, not one that evokes evil and deception. For the original inspiration, look up Maxwell's daemon on google. In the 19th century, Maxwell used

Re: Devil Mascot

2004-06-14 Thread Cordula's Web
For clarity: it refers to background server processes, not evil. The penguin refers to nothing. Tux looks cute, but does it stand for (code) bloat? ;-) -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: Devil Mascot

2004-06-14 Thread Kevin Stevens
On Sun, 13 Jun 2004, Edward Hendrie wrote: Why do you have a Devil for a trademark mascot? From a marketing perspective, you are shooting yourselves in the foot. There are many people of various religious backgrounds who will be dissuaded from trying FreeBSD because they have

Re: Devil Mascot

2004-06-14 Thread Richard Caley
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Cordula's Web (cw) writes: cw Tux looks cute, but does it stand for (code) bloat? ;-) It's quite simple: BSD: Daemon, evil, 'nuff said. Linux: Penguin, it's never going to fly. Windows: Distorted windowframe, lets crooks in.

Re: Devil Mascot

2004-06-14 Thread Greg Pavelcak
On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 08:31:40AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote: This has come up 1 times. It's simply not going to happen because the beastie has too much historical significance. It's a matter of pride that the beastie mascot has more history than the Linux penguin and the Microshit

Re: Devil Mascot

2004-06-14 Thread Richard Tobin
Why do you have a Devil for a trademark mascot? You might want to look at the output of whois antichristconspiracy.com before wasting your time responding to this. Then you can construct much more amusing replies. -- Richard ___ [EMAIL

Re: Devil Mascot

2004-06-14 Thread Anthony Edwards
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 05:02:49PM -0700, Edward Hendrie wrote: Why do you have a Devil for a trademark mascot? From a marketing perspective, you are shooting yourselves in the foot. There are many people of various religious backgrounds who will be dissuaded from trying FreeBSD because

[going OT ...] Re: Devil Mascot

2004-06-14 Thread Bill Moran
Greg Pavelcak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 08:31:40AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote: This has come up 1 times. It's simply not going to happen because the beastie has too much historical significance. It's a matter of pride that the beastie mascot has more

Re: Devil Mascot

2004-06-14 Thread lbland
You may think that is a small issue, but when you are trying to create market awareness you need a mascot that evokes simplicity and goodwill, not one that evokes evil and deception. ... and here I thought that giving software away for free to everyone in the world was a form of altruism

Re: Devil Mascot

2004-06-14 Thread Peter Pauly
I wonder if the FreeBSD daemon could be considered a god... because he can make world. ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Devil Mascot(That

2004-06-14 Thread Mark Jayson Alvarez
--- Jan Muenther [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You may think that is a small issue, but when you are trying to create market awareness you need a mascot that evokes simplicity and goodwill, not one that evokes evil and deception. Man... either you're a (moderately funny) troll or

Re: Devil Mascot

2004-06-14 Thread Noah
On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 14:07:41 +0200, Ole Guldberg Jensen wrote Edward Hendrie wrote: Why do you have a Devil for a trademark mascot? http://www.freebsd.org/copyright/daemon.html From a marketing perspective, you are shooting yourselves in the foot. There are many people of

re Devil Mascot

2004-06-14 Thread LW Ellis
I don't think there is much to worry about on that front. Please read below and you will understand. http://bonehead.oddballs.com/todays_bonehead.html TODAY WE BESTOW SIX BONEHEAD AWARDS Not Screwed Up Enough. The Stupids Try To Have A Baby Bonehead award one goes to a German couple who, after 8

Re: Devil Mascot

2004-06-14 Thread Jorn Argelo
Peter Pauly wrote: I wonder if the FreeBSD daemon could be considered a god... because he can make world. Heh, now that's a nice one. Interesting discussion by the way, but I wonder, why are we going to reply to an obvious troll like that? Just let the man be, and we might as well spend time

Re: Devil Mascot

2004-06-14 Thread Chris
On Monday 14 June 2004 04:09 pm, Jorn Argelo wrote: Peter Pauly wrote: I wonder if the FreeBSD daemon could be considered a god... because he can make world. Heh, now that's a nice one. Interesting discussion by the way, but I wonder, why are we going to reply to an obvious troll like