I'm trying to install FreeBSD 9.1 Release on an HP Pavilion Slimline (model
s5-1414); I get through the installation fine, but when I re-boot, the machine
gives an:
ERROR: No boot disk has been detected or the disk has failed.
I looked around for suggestions via mailing list archives
On 02/25/2013 22:39, Russell Murphy wrote:
ERROR: No boot disk has been detected or the disk has failed
Isn't this a BIOS message about a failing harddisk?
to add unused space to an existing install
I have a FreeBSD 8.3 RELEASE box that we recently discovered only has
part of the disk being used. This box has four 1TB drives in RAID 5,
and df only shows 500MB of disk available.
fdisk shows this:
# fdisk -p
# /dev/mfid0
g c364602 h255 s63
p 1 0xa5 63
AM
To: FreeBSD Questions List
Subject: How to add unused space to an existing install
I have a FreeBSD 8.3 RELEASE box that we recently discovered only has
part of the disk being used. This box has four 1TB drives in RAID 5,
and df only shows 500MB of disk available.
fdisk shows
On Thu, 7 Feb 2013, Teske, Devin wrote:
On 7 Feb 2013, Paul Schmehl wrote:
I've been doing some more research on this problem, and I've discovered
that bsdlabel has a 2 to the 32nd limit on disk size. It appears I have to
use gpart instead. Is that not correct?
Only if your disk is larger
I have a FreeBSD 8.3 RELEASE box that we recently discovered only has part
of the disk being used. This box has four 1TB drives in RAID 5, and df
only shows 500MB of disk available.
fdisk shows this:
# fdisk -p
# /dev/mfid0
g c364602 h255 s63
p 1 0xa5 63 1562363771
a 1
When I run the fdisk
On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 11:58:56 -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote:
When I try to create a new slice using fdisk, it doesn't seem to work. If
I move to the label editor, I get this:
FreeBSD Disklabel Editor
Disk: mfid0 Partition name: mfid0s1 Free: 0 blocks (0MB)
Part Mount
On Wed, 6 Feb 2013, Polytropon wrote:
On Wed, 06 Feb 2013 11:58:56 -0600, Paul Schmehl wrote:
When I try to create a new slice using fdisk, it doesn't seem to work. If
I move to the label editor, I get this:
FreeBSD Disklabel Editor
Disk: mfid0 Partition name: mfid0s1 Free: 0 blocks
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Paul Schmehl
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 9:59 AM
To: FreeBSD Questions List
Subject: How to add unused space to an existing install
I have a FreeBSD 8.3
I used gpart to set up a new disk,
then went through a 9.1 install.
Everything seemed to go fine, but when time came to boot the new drive,
it wouldn't boot.
When doing the 9.1 install,
I selected the disk and had to assign the partitions to the various filesystems.
AFIK, I did not otherwise
Gary Aitken writes:
I used gpart to set up a new disk,
then went through a 9.1 install.
Everything seemed to go fine, but when time came to boot the new drive,
it wouldn't boot.
While the it wouldn't boot is catastrophically imprecise, I
had what sounds like a similar problem
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013, Gary Aitken wrote:
I used gpart to set up a new disk,
then went through a 9.1 install.
Everything seemed to go fine, but when time came to boot the new drive,
it wouldn't boot.
What did it say?
When doing the 9.1 install,
I selected the disk and had to assign
I have a spare amd64 PC that I want to install FreeBSD 9.x on. I want
it to utilize ZFS right from the start. There are two HD's in the PC.
One will handle the /var partition and the other everything else. The
last FBSD installer I used was on the 7.x branch. Does the new
installer in the 9.x
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013 07:55:06 -0500, Carmel wrote:
I have a spare amd64 PC that I want to install FreeBSD 9.x on. I want
it to utilize ZFS right from the start. There are two HD's in the PC.
One will handle the /var partition and the other everything else. The
last FBSD installer I used
On Monday 28 Jan 2013 12:55:06 Carmel wrote:
I have a spare amd64 PC that I want to install FreeBSD 9.x on. I want
it to utilize ZFS right from the start. There are two HD's in the PC.
One will handle the /var partition and the other everything else.
If you're going to be using ZFS
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, Carmel wrote:
I have a spare amd64 PC that I want to install FreeBSD 9.x on. I want
it to utilize ZFS right from the start. There are two HD's in the PC.
One will handle the /var partition and the other everything else. The
last FBSD installer I used was on the 7.x branch
On Jan 28, 2013, at 10:39 AM, Mike Clarke wrote:
If you're going to be using ZFS then you'll probably be better off not having
separate partitions and letting ZFS manage space allocation if you want to
limit the size of /var or any other part of the system,
You can manage space within a ZFS
I get to the logo screen where it says:
1. Boot [Enter]
2. etc.
3. etc.
Won't accept any keyboard input, not even
Ctrl-C, or Ctrl-Alt-Del.
Am using PS/2 Keyboard and mouse through my
trusty PS/2 KVM switches.
Any ideas or do I just stick with 8.3?
Start Here to Find It Fast! -
.
If that is indeed the default location, how do I get the
make install package command put it there automatically?
All packages will be stored
in /usr/ports/packages/All/relevant/sub/directory. There is no need
for any any configuration or files. # make package is the proper
command for building packages
Hello, I just installed FreeBSD last night using the bootonly image for
9.0-RELEASE. I then updated to 9.1-RELEASE using freebsd-update. Everything
seems to have gone smoothly but now I'm getting the below error when trying
to isntall xorg.
Error: Unable to get
On 10/01/2013 16:30, Scott Eberl wrote:
Hello, I just installed FreeBSD last night using the bootonly image for
9.0-RELEASE. I then updated to 9.1-RELEASE using freebsd-update. Everything
seems to have gone smoothly but now I'm getting the below error when trying
to isntall xorg.
Error:
Read the 9.1 Release notes. This is the expected behavior. You'll need the
DVD iso or build from ports to get xorg going in 9.1 right now.
Hello, I just installed FreeBSD last night using the bootonly image for
9.0-RELEASE. I then updated to 9.1-RELEASE using freebsd-update.
Everything
When I do a make install package command the package gets stored in
the directory I am in.
What is the default path for the packages to be stored in?
Is it /usr/packages?
If that is indeed the default location, how do I get the
make install package command put it there automatically
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 1/10/13 2:04 PM, Fbsd8 wrote:
When I do a make install package command the package gets stored
in the directory I am in.
What is the default path for the packages to be stored in? Is it
/usr/packages?
If that is indeed the default location
Thu, 10 Jan 2013 14:04:59 -0500 tarihinde
Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com yazmış:
What is the default path for the packages to be stored in?
Is it /usr/packages?
It is /usr/ports/packages/All.
If that is indeed the default location, how do I get the
make install package command put
On Thu, 2013-01-10 at 10:30 -0600, Scott Eberl wrote:
[snip] I then updated to 9.1-RELEASE using freebsd-update. Everything
seems to have gone smoothly but now I'm getting the below error when trying
to isntall xorg.
I upgraded from 8.3 to 9.1,
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Thu, 2013-01-10 at 10:30 -0600, Scott Eberl wrote:
[snip] I then updated to 9.1-RELEASE using freebsd-update. Everything
seems to have gone smoothly but now I'm getting the below error when trying
to isntall xorg.
I upgraded from 8.3 to 9.1,
Gökşin Akdeniz wrote:
Thu, 10 Jan 2013 14:04:59 -0500 tarihinde
Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com yazmış:
What is the default path for the packages to be stored in?
Is it /usr/packages?
It is /usr/ports/packages/All.
If that is indeed the default location, how do I get the
make install package
On 10/01/2013 21:21, Fbsd8 wrote:
Is the upcoming pkgng going to have any effect on this?
No.
The layout of /usr/ports/packages is controlled at a rather lower level
by the Makefiles in /usr/ports/Mk. pkgng doesn't really care about this
layout in any case since pkgng repositories don't need
Hi,
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 23:16:58 -0800
Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 12:55:49PM +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 18:55:04 -0800
Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
ms well use my 2005 Thinkpad. it is reasonably fast at
| been inside that box) on a Promise SATA RAID controller, but RAID
is
| not used and has never been used (I have a 3Ware controller for
RAID on
| that box).
|
| When things settle down, I'll try to figure out how to sanitize the
| disk and try to install 9.1 again.
|
|
| If somehow some RAID
commands completely
successfully.
After zero-ing out the sectors, I tried to install FreeBSD 9.1, and I
continued to get the RAID problems trying to mount root.
So I punted that drive, and used another drive. FreeBSD 9.1 installed
without an issue, and it is running fine as I type this.
So
execute.
| Using the LiveFS disc for FreeBSD 8.3, the dd commands completely
| successfully.
|
| After zero-ing out the sectors, I tried to install FreeBSD 9.1, and
I
| continued to get the RAID problems trying to mount root.
|
| So I punted that drive, and used another drive. FreeBSD 9.1
installed
guys,
I used my EEE-900a [[last year]] to wow the medical team downtown
with my unfinished VBC program. since nobody seems willing to
volunteer to test the (*almost*)-finished version, I figure I
ms well use my 2005 Thinkpad. it is reasonably fast at
I want the Gnome Desktop, espeak, and gvim. If there is a CD
or DVD with 9.x, can somebody give me a URL?
The usual place:
http://www.freebsd.org/releases/9.1R/announce.html
I'm typing this on a Thinkpad X200, which works well under 9.0.
Hi,
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 18:55:04 -0800
Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
ms well use my 2005 Thinkpad. it is reasonably fast at
3.06GHz. should clue me in on how much stuff I need to compile to
test.
You should be able to run anything from 7.4, 8.3, 9.1 to 10.0.
I mention 7.4 here
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 12:55:49PM +0700, Erich Dollansky wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 18:55:04 -0800
Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
ms well use my 2005 Thinkpad. it is reasonably fast at
3.06GHz. should clue me in on how much stuff I need to compile to
test.
You should
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of
Ilya Kazakevich
Sent: January-03-13 7:17 PM
To: Matt Rauch
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Looking for info on how to install and configure
Hi all,
I can not install the package subversion with pkg_add -r
pkg_add: unable to fetch
'ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9.1-release/Latest/subversion.tbz'
by URL
I observed that there is packages-9.1-release in
'ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64
On 01/03/13 11:50, Celso Viana wrote:
Hi all,
I can not install the package subversion with pkg_add -r
pkg_add: unable to fetch
'ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9.1-release/Latest/subversion.tbz'
by URL
I observed that there is packages-9.1-release in
'ftp
On 03/01/2013 17:56, Joseph A. Nagy, Jr wrote:
On 01/03/13 11:50, Celso Viana wrote:
Hi all,
I can not install the package subversion with pkg_add -r
pkg_add: unable to fetch
'ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/amd64/packages-9.1-release/Latest/subversion.tbz'
by URL
I observed
Hello,
I apologize if there is an easy spot to find this, but I'm looking for some
instructions on implementing suPHP on FreeBSD 8 with Apache. The server is
currently in production and I'd like to convert it from running PHP files as
an Apache module and instead as cgi with suPHP for security
http://www.freshports.org/www/suphp/
Is not it what are you looking for?
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 2:29 AM, Matt Rauch mattr-li...@eagle.ca wrote:
suPHP
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
is at the end of this
message).
When I boot from the install DVD, I see a lot of messages along the
lines of ~Root mount waiting for GRAID~, then eventually that times out
and I am allowed to select the Install option. However, when I get to
the partitioning (btw, it's another issue
with
| the disk.
|
| Well, 9.1 has issues with my system (dmesg is at the end of this
| message).
|
| When I boot from the install DVD, I see a lot of messages along the
| lines of ~Root mount waiting for GRAID~, then eventually that times
out
| and I am allowed to select the Install option. However, when I
, but RAID is
not used and has never been used (I have a 3Ware controller for RAID on
that box).
When things settle down, I'll try to figure out how to sanitize the
disk and try to install 9.1 again.
If somehow some RAID controller ever wrote out metadata to the disk it will
be the last sector
controller, but RAID is
not used and has never been used (I have a 3Ware controller for RAID on
that box).
When things settle down, I'll try to figure out how to sanitize the
disk and try to install 9.1 again.
If somehow some RAID controller ever wrote out metadata to the disk
I boot from the install DVD, I see a lot of messages along the
lines of ~Root mount waiting for GRAID~, then eventually that times out
and I am allowed to select the Install option. However, when I get to
the partitioning (btw, it's another issue, but the new set of screens
to partition the drive
For those interested...
hostileadmin.com has published a new blog entitled FreeBSD Ports Batch
Install at http://blog.hostileadmin.com/2012/12/10/freebsd-ports-batch-install/
--
Take care
Rick Miller
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Do you know if FreeBSD will install with a Intel Core 2 CPU 6400 @ 2.13 GHz
Carlos Griffith
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions
On Dec 4, 2012, at 11:28 AM, ksg k...@teleguam.net wrote:
Do you know if FreeBSD will install with a Intel Core 2 CPU 6400 @ 2.13 GHz
Carlos Griffith
Yes it will.
You'll want the amd64 version, likely.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
On Tue, 4 Dec 2012 20:28:58 +1000, ksg wrote:
Do you know if FreeBSD will install with a Intel Core 2 CPU 6400 @ 2.13 GHz
There's basically nothing that would speak against it.
You could use amd64 for this one (as it is a 64 Bit CPU),
and you probably have more than enough RAM to justify
Доброго дня.
Hi, I'm so impressed freebsd system that try to use it anywhere and in
anything. How to install freebsd on
CX-01 Mini Android TV USB Stick Android 4.0 Cortex A5 detailed a description
for link:
http://www.androidgadgets.co.uk/#/shop/4562780474/CX-01-Mini-Android-TV-USB-Stick
Доброго дня.
Hi, I'm so impressed freebsd system that try to use it anywhere and in
anything. How to install freebsd on
CX-01 Mini Android TV USB Stick Android 4.0 Cortex A5 detailed a description
for link:
http://www.androidgadgets.co.uk/#/shop/4562780474/CX-01-Mini-Android-TV-USB-Stick
Доброго дня.
Hi, I'm so impressed freebsd system that try to use it anywhere and in
anything. How to install freebsd on
CX-01 Mini Android TV USB Stick Android 4.0 Cortex A5 detailed a description
for link:
http://www.androidgadgets.co.uk/#/shop/4562780474/CX-01-Mini-Android-TV-USB-Stick
Доброго дня.
Hi, I'm so impressed freebsd system that try to use it anywhere and in
anything. How to install freebsd on
CX-01 Mini Android TV USB Stick Android 4.0 Cortex A5 detailed a description
for link:
http://www.androidgadgets.co.uk/#/shop/4562780474/CX-01-Mini-Android-TV-USB-Stick
Доброго дня.
Hi, I'm so impressed freebsd system that try to use it anywhere and in
anything. How to install freebsd on
CX-01 Mini Android TV USB Stick Android 4.0 Cortex A5 detailed a description
for link:
http://www.androidgadgets.co.uk/#/shop/4562780474/CX-01-Mini-Android-TV-USB-Stick
Thanks for this very informative suggestion.
I think I need to study it thouroughly, but will certainly head for that
solution.
kind regards,
Jos Chrispijn
Polytropon:
That would work, and could be performed easily even using
the slice editor of the sysinstall program.
Of course, make sure
I was intending this on my 1TB hard disk (FreeBSD only):
Two slices of 500G
Slice one:
1g/
4gswap
7g/var
1g/tmp
487g /var
Slice two:
500g /backup
I question myself why I should use a 1TB hard disk, but it came with the
hardware J-)
I might better use
there. mysql does that, I've heard. For a normal FreeBSD install, 2G
for /var is plenty, maybe more if you want to keep lots of log files or
mail.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
for /home and any other local data
requirements. If there's to be any large mysql databases then I'd put them
here with symlinks from /var where mysql normally expects to find them.
When you come to upgrade to the next FreeBSD release just install it into the
spare second slice and boot from
On 2012/10/14 at 01:59, Jos Chrispijn j...@webrz.net wrote:
When setting up my 1TB harddisk for FreeBSD 9.0, I have some questions
about partioning:
I think of creating two partitions of 5Gb; one for the standard
FreeBSD file layour and a second one with a /backup slice on it.
Does this
as ada0 and ada1
- I install FreeBSD 9.0R into ada0, with manual setup, which includes
- gpt partitioning, with freebsd-boot partition at 64, size 192
(aligned for 4kB blocks), freebsd-swap, and freebsd-ufs partitions
- gpart bootcode -b /boot/pmbr -p /boot/gptboot -i 1 ada0
- gmirror
jb jb.1234abcd at gmail.com writes:
...
A follow up.
I e-mailed FB office boyz and received a response, which is safe to share
with the list:
Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org
This is almost not doable for many reason:
1/ the ports itself will be over complicated to only allow
package containing
various interconnected parts of office productivity programs.
So I assume it's not easy to build _only_ one component.
In case you are intending to just install a text processing
program, try AbiWord. It is the TP designed to be used with
Gnome, but builds independently (even though
Polytropon freebsd at edvax.de writes:
On Sun, 7 Oct 2012 05:11:50 + (UTC), jb wrote:
Hi,
is there a way to do that right now in ports (config, make options) ?
Or would that require separate source packaging per component ?
I'm not aware that this is possible, as LibreOffice (like
On Sun, 7 Oct 2012 12:12:17 + (UTC), jb wrote:
Polytropon freebsd at edvax.de writes:
On Sun, 7 Oct 2012 05:11:50 + (UTC), jb wrote:
Hi,
is there a way to do that right now in ports (config, make options) ?
Or would that require separate source packaging per component ?
of RedHat) I can install libreoffice-writer
only, which pulls libreoffice-common, and perhaps some extension packages
(if so configured).
jb
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
of functionality thru modularity.
For example, in CentOS (clone of RedHat) I can install
libreoffice-writer only, which pulls libreoffice-common, and perhaps
some extension packages (if so configured).
Yes, but libreoffice-common is essentially the whole thing; libreoffice-
base, libreoffice-calc
libreoffice-common leaner, and offer some more stuff as separate packages or
extensions packages.
Who knows what FB office boyz could do with it if they really wanted.
Anyway, the objective would be to be able to install each of components
individually, as needed.
jb
Hi,
is there a way to do that right now in ports (config, make options) ?
Or would that require separate source packaging per component ?
jb
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
PORTVERSION=2012.2.0.0
$
and do this
# make install clean
and fail in lang/ghc with this (see the whole sad story at the end of this
message)
gmake -r --no-print-directory -f ghc.mk phase=final all
inplace/bin/ghc-stage1 -H32m -O -I/usr/local/include -L/usr/local/lib
-package-name ghc
Hello-
I'm having troubling installing apcupsd 3.4.10 on a FreeBSD 9.0 machine. This
is what I get:
aries# pwd
/usr/ports/sysutils/apcupsd
aries# make install clean
=== Building for apcupsd-3.14.10
src
src/lib
src/drivers
src/drivers/apcsmart
src/drivers
I'm having troubling installing apcupsd 3.4.10 on a FreeBSD 9.0 machine.
This is what I get:
aries# pwd
/usr/ports/sysutils/apcupsd
aries# make install clean
=== Building for apcupsd-3.14.10
src
src/lib
src/drivers
src/drivers/apcsmart
src
What I'm wanting to do is build/installworld from my workstation to a
remote machine but both have different /etc/src.conf and kernel
configuration files. Is there a way to define seperate files so I can
perform this upgrade without any errors?
___
/conf or /sys/amd64/conf).
Make sure /usr/obj is empty.
Then use the build and install parameter DESTDIR=
and pay attention to other upgrading steps as listed
in the comment header of /usr/src/Makefile.
Also see The FreeBSD Handbook, section 25.7:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books
Hi Gardner
Polytropon wrote:
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 11:29:47 -0400, Gardner Bell wrote:
What I'm wanting to do is build/installworld from my workstation to a
remote machine but both have different /etc/src.conf and kernel
configuration files. Is there a way to define seperate files so I can
Neudorf'; questi...@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: FreeBSD Install Problem
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Chris Neudorf
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 2:10 PM
To: questi...@freebsd.org
Subject: FreeBSD
mode before installing FreeBSD 9.
The OP may have said he tried sysinstall approaches but unless he specifically
said he tried Druid, it actually implies he was comparing FreeBSD 8 media to
FreeBSD 9's. This is naturally not a fair fight because both install media are
using different kernels
unable to install.
I even have problems going through the sysinstall route.
In the installation process, I'm able to go far to the partitioning area in
where the problem occurs. I click for Guided partitioning and then I receive
this Abort message:
Abort
--
An installation step has been
]
-
When I click restart I end up with the same result, and I end up in a
neverending cycle of unable to install.
(I even have a the same problem installing from GhostBSD.)
Is there any remedies to this problem?
In Bios is legacy support for sata enable?
On some
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Chris Neudorf
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2012 2:10 PM
To: questi...@freebsd.org
Subject: FreeBSD Install Problem
Hello,
I have a problem installing FreeBSD
2012/9/4 Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com
On Tue, 4 Sep 2012, Waitman Gobble wrote:
On Sep 4, 2012 7:03 PM, Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br wrote:
All I've done was csup -L 2 ports-supfile with ports-www in it.
Then cd /usr/ports/www/firefox; make with default options.
As for my
Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br writes:
2012/9/4 Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com
On Tue, 4 Sep 2012, Waitman Gobble wrote:
On Sep 4, 2012 7:03 PM, Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br wrote:
All I've done was csup -L 2 ports-supfile with ports-www in it.
Then cd /usr/ports/www/firefox; make with
another cvsup server or subversion.
You nailed it Jan !
I updated bsd.gecko,mk from the link you posted:
http://trillian.chruetertee.ch/freebsd-gecko/changeset/951
It solved BOTH problems! (libvpx and the install issue). I deleted the
symlink to libvpx.so and compilation/installation went
there to libvpx.so and the port compiled without errors.
Then after issuing a make install, this comes up everytime:
[Snip]
a ./searchplugins/yahoo.xml
a ./dictionaries/en-US.aff
a ./dictionaries/en-US.dic
a ./defaults/pref
a ./defaults/pref/channel-prefs.js
a ./chrome/icons
a ./chrome/icons
-fo devel/pkgconf pkg-config-\*
pkgng:
# pkg set -o devel/pkg-config:devel/pkgconf
# pkg install -f devel/pkgconf
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail
or
# portupgrade -fo devel/pkgconf pkg-config-\*
pkgng:
# pkg set -o devel/pkg-config:devel/pkgconf
# pkg install -f devel/pkgconf
Thank Alexander but been there, done that.
pkg_info | grep pkg
pkgconf-0.8.7 pkg-config compatible utility which does not depend on glib
--
Mario Lobo
http
On 09/04/2012 10:29 PM, Mario Lobo wrote:
Thank Alexander but been there, done that.
pkg_info | grep pkg
pkgconf-0.8.7 pkg-config compatible utility which does not depend on glib
Hopefully, somebody else on the list will be of more help than I have been.
this:
-L/usr/local/lib/nss
I made a symlink there to libvpx.so and the port compiled without errors.
That's an incredibly ugly solution; if the vpx port were installed
correctly, it would have been detected, so you're probably just hiding a
real problem.
Then after issuing a make install, this comes
is CORRECTLY installed
under /usr/local/lib/vpx, together with all the other correctly
installed libraries on my system so most certainly there is something
uglier than my hack here.
Then after issuing a make install, this comes up everytime:
[Snip]
a ./searchplugins/yahoo.xml
install, this comes up everytime:
[Snip]
a ./searchplugins/yahoo.xml
a ./dictionaries/en-US.aff
a ./dictionaries/en-US.dic
a ./defaults/pref
a ./defaults/pref/channel-prefs.js
a ./chrome/icons
a ./chrome/icons/default
a ./chrome/icons/default/default16.png
a ./chrome
On Tue, 4 Sep 2012, Waitman Gobble wrote:
On Sep 4, 2012 7:03 PM, Mario Lobo l...@bsd.com.br wrote:
All I've done was csup -L 2 ports-supfile with ports-www in it.
Then cd /usr/ports/www/firefox; make with default options.
As for my /etc/make.conf
CPUTYPE?=nocona
with print/teTeX-base
BUILD_DEPENDS +=pdftex:${PORTSDIR}/print/teTeX-base \
texi2dvi:${PORTSDIR}/print/texinfo
ALL_TARGET+=pdf
CONFIGURE_ENV +=INSTALL_INFO=${LOCALBASE}/bin/install-info \
MAKEINFO=${LOCALBASE}/bin
settable options, make configure (_after_ make rmconfig
to limit the possibilities of mistakes) is supposed to
bring up the configuration dialog I showed.
Then you proceed to show messages from a make or make
install command:
Downloaded 689.8 kilobytes in 3:35 seconds. (3.19 KB/s)
=== Found
[root@sea ~]# cd /usr/ports/math/R
[root@sea /usr/ports/math/R]# make install clean
=== R-2.15.1 is marked as broken: The PDF_MANUALS option cannot be used,
because print/texinfo is incompatible with print/teTeX-base.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/math/R
On Sat, 25 Aug 2012 21:32:55 -0400, contro opinion wrote:
[root@sea ~]# cd /usr/ports/math/R
[root@sea /usr/ports/math/R]# make install clean
=== R-2.15.1 is marked as broken: The PDF_MANUALS option cannot be used,
because print/texinfo is incompatible with print/teTeX-base.
*** Error code
}/bin/install-info \
MAKEINFO=${LOCALBASE}/bin/makeinfo
INSTALL_TARGET+=install-pdf
PLIST_SUB+= PDF_MANUAL=
.else
PLIST_SUB+= PDF_MANUAL=@comment
.endif
.endif # LIBR_SLAVEPORT
.endif # !LIBRMATH_SLAVEPORT
Keywords are MDOCS and MINFO_MANUALS
it)
***
WARNING: The C extension could not be compiled, speedups are not enabled.
Plain-Python build succeeded.
***
make install
...
building '_mysql' extension
cc -DNDEBUG -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -O2 -pipe -fno-strict
Am 08/16/12 21:44, schrieb Garrett Cooper:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Hartmann, O.
ohart...@zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
I ran into a very delicate and nasty situation.
...
On both FBSD 10 boxes, the installation of the port security/cyrus-sasl2
got corrupted by install and/or mtree
101 - 200 of 5507 matches
Mail list logo
