Chuck Swiger wrote:
On Oct 23, 2009, at 10:31 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
You aren't supposed to use CNAMES for anything found in other RR's;
in particular, you should always use an A record with the hostnames
used for nameservers (ie, have an NS record), because you are
supposed to be using the
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:33:07 -0700
xSAPPYx wrote:
> Also, MX needs to resolve to an A, not a CNAME.. If you are using mail
> on all these domains, use A records
You can use the domains for mail provided that that they share MX
servers, if example.com has a CNAME pointing to example.net then mai
Also, MX needs to resolve to an A, not a CNAME.. If you are using mail
on all these domains, use A records
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 10:19 AM, Sean Cavanaugh
wrote:
>
>> >how is this illegal?
>>
>> CNAME rule:
>>
>> a node with a CNAME cannot contain any other records.
>>
>> for the node domain.tld
On Oct 23, 2009, at 10:31 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
You aren't supposed to use CNAMES for anything found in other RR's;
in particular, you should always use an A record with the hostnames
used for nameservers (ie, have an NS record), because you are
supposed to be using the canonical name ra
Chuck Swiger wrote:
Hi--
On Oct 23, 2009, at 9:18 AM, Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
worse, it's illegal.
how is this illegal? if you are residing your domain on a hosting
service, this makes sense to me. Granted its bad form and should have
an A record to the host for the main domain record, but if
> >how is this illegal?
>
> CNAME rule:
>
> a node with a CNAME cannot contain any other records.
>
> for the node domain.tld:
>
> domain.tld. soa ...
> domain.tld. ns ...
> domain.tld. cname otherdomain.tld.
>
> this node has a CNAME and "other data", so it's illegal, no matter what you
>
Hi--
On Oct 23, 2009, at 9:18 AM, Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
worse, it's illegal.
how is this illegal? if you are residing your domain on a hosting
service, this makes sense to me. Granted its bad form and should
have an A record to the host for the main domain record, but if i
had control ov
>> >All true, and I did not do a very good job of explaining it. My issue
>> >was that we have requests to use a CNAME for the domain record. Such as
>> >this.
>> >
>> >example.com CNAME otherdomain.com
>> >www.example.com CNAME otherdomain.com
>> >
>> >I was taught this was not good form
>>
>>
>
>All true, and I did not do a very good job of explaining it. My issue
>was that we have requests to use a CNAME for the domain record. Such as
>this.
>
>example.com CNAME otherdomain.com
>www.example.com CNAME otherdomain.com
>
>I was taught this was not good form
worse, it's illegal.
,
Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
> Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 08:30:08 -0400
> From: dave.l...@pixelhammer.com
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: DNS Question
>
> Good morning.
>
> I have been asked by my co-workers and sales why I always create a A
> record for new domains we host instead
DAve wrote:
Good morning.
I have been asked by my co-workers and sales why I always create a A
record for new domains we host instead of a CNAME.
The issue I run into lately with some domains is that a client has a
website with a industry host such as frank.relator.com and he wants to
have
Hi Erik:
I don't recall the how-to explaining the usage of this script. I too,
just recently setup a DNS server for a couple domains. My
recommendation is to familiarize yourself with the Administrators
Reference Manual (ARM) on BIND's website:
http://www.isc.org/index.pl?/sw/bind/arm93/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
国徽 wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am building the DNS Server,But I can't find the script
> "/etc/namedb/make-localhost" used in the document, So I can't go on
> now? Please tell me how to find the script,Thank you very much!>
>
Unfortunately the docume
I think it depends upon the registrar. Of the 200 domains, they are
probably registered across 2 or 3 registrars.
Some ask for just the host name, while others ask for both hostname and IP.
Jeff.
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 13:14:01 +, Dick Davies
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Jeff MacDonald <[EMA
* Jeff MacDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [0157 12:57]:
> Not really a freebsdquestion specifically.
>
> My company uses
>ns.foo.com and ns1.foo.com for primay/secondary dns, about 200
> domains rely on these.
>
> We want a new physical machine , in a different location, with a
> different IP to
Hi,
Have you try "host" command ?
host
Maybe DNS takes a couple day for propagation.
If this is the case try later in next 2-3 days.
Cheers,
--- Xpression <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi list, I'm
getting a problem with my DNS, I'm running 4.7 +
> named, the
> config files are teorically w
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 12:29:29PM -0400, Xpression wrote:
> Hi list:
>
> I want to change my DNS server/service, I still using named almost
> understand it so good, then I want to know is anyone have knowledge of any
> other DNS server that can be installed to serve DNS requests...thanks.
Ahh okay, I understand that. Someone once told me the information is
already downloaded in a list, so the server doesn't have to contact
root all the time to get ns information. Is this not true anymore?
bind9 has the root-servers "hints zone" in its binary, but will use an
external hints zone
>[please wrap you lines at 72 characters or so]
>
>aSe wrote:
>
>> When a person does a dns lookup to the server and its not already cached,
>> how does It find out the correct name server to use to find the ip?
>
>FreeBSD comes with a list of "root" DNS servers. These are master servers
>maintain
When a person does a dns lookup to the server and its not already cached,
how does It find out the correct name server to use to find the ip?
The DNS navigates the DNS namespace until it finds a positive or negative
answer, or the until DNS's that should have the answer fail to respond.
Len
[please wrap you lines at 72 characters or so]
aSe wrote:
When a person does a dns lookup to the server and its not already cached,
> how does It find out the correct name server to use to find the ip?
FreeBSD comes with a list of "root" DNS servers. These are master servers
maintained by man
21 matches
Mail list logo