AM
To: fbsd_user
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ORG; Kris Kennaway
Subject: Re: ports package names changing?
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 11:07:32AM -0500, fbsd_user wrote:
I an running 4.9 the pkg_add -r command default path is
/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4.9-release/Lastest/
All the names
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 08:30:45 -0500
fbsd_user [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your missing the whole point.
The FBSD handbook says to use
http://www.freebsd.org/ports/index.html to find port and package
names and it only shows the names with versions suffix appended to
the names.
Pkg_add -r
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003, fbsd_user wrote:
The FBSD handbook says to use
http://www.freebsd.org/ports/index.html to find port and package
names and it only shows the names with versions suffix appended to
the names.
Pkg_add -r points to directory location with out names with
versions suffix
AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Kris Kennaway; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ORG
Subject: Re: ports package names changing?
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 08:30:45 -0500
fbsd_user [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your missing the whole point.
The FBSD handbook says to use
http://www.freebsd.org/ports/index.html to find port
Fleck
Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 10:30 AM
To: fbsd_user
Cc: Kris Kennaway; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ORG
Subject: RE: ports package names changing?
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003, fbsd_user wrote:
The FBSD handbook says to use
http://www.freebsd.org/ports/index.html to find port and package
names
: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 10:30 AM
To: fbsd_user
Cc: Kris Kennaway; [EMAIL PROTECTED] ORG
Subject: RE: ports package names changing?
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003, fbsd_user wrote:
The FBSD handbook says to use
http://www.freebsd.org/ports/index.html to find port and package
names and it only shows
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003, fbsd_user wrote:
Yes, but doing it that way as example, entering 'apache' would
download apache13 when I really wanted apache20. That logic does
not follow through, it's only valid for single versions of an
package.
Yes, it's true that the 'apache' package gets you
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003, fbsd_user wrote:
This thread is not intended to point fingers at any one or start an
flame war.
Just trying to point out problem and get some kind of feedback from
the
list of their thought on the subject.
To be honest, I'm not sure that anyone else considers this to
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 08:30:45AM -0500, fbsd_user wrote:
Your missing the whole point.
The FBSD handbook says to use
http://www.freebsd.org/ports/index.html to find port and package
names and it only shows the names with versions suffix appended to
the names.
Pkg_add -r points to
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 04:42:42PM -0500, fbsd_user wrote:
Is there an project in progress to change the ports and package
names that
you select on to include the version number as an suffix on the
name?
What do you mean? Packages already include the version number in the
name.
Kris
30, 2003 9:08 AM
To: fbsd_user
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ORG
Subject: Re: ports package names changing?
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 04:42:42PM -0500, fbsd_user wrote:
Is there an project in progress to change the ports and package
names that
you select on to include the version number as an suffix
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 11:07:32AM -0500, fbsd_user wrote:
I an running 4.9 the pkg_add -r command default path is
/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-4.9-release/Lastest/
All the names in that location do not have versions suffix appended
to the name.
Though
12 matches
Mail list logo
