On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:50:25 +0100, Frank Wißmann frank.wissman...@web.de
wrote:
Well, I used your settings of default release=cvs tag=RELENG_7, but
the answer is still this:
FreeBSD grissom.einundvierzig.org 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #0:
Wed Feb 18 21:36:57 CET 2009
Am Donnerstag 19 Februar 2009 10:53:43 schrieb Polytropon:
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:50:25 +0100, Frank Wißmann
frank.wissman...@web.de wrote:
Well, I used your settings of default release=cvs tag=RELENG_7,
but the answer is still this:
FreeBSD grissom.einundvierzig.org 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD
On Thursday 19 February 2009 08:14:01 Frank Wißmann wrote:
I did it now the way you told me but it still shows 7.0-Release at
uname -a. I attach my make.conf and cvs-supfile' maybe there is
something wrong?
Yep. You're using the cvs-supfile, which does not update the source tree, but
makes a
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:14:01 +0100, Frank Wißmann frank.wissman...@web.de
wrote:
I did it now the way you told me but it still shows 7.0-Release at
uname -a. I attach my make.conf and cvs-supfile' maybe there is
something wrong?
I've found something strange in the CVSup files:
Your
Am Dienstag 17 Februar 2009 21:20:15 schrieb Polytropon:
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:14:58 +0100, Frank Wißmann
frank.wissman...@web.de wrote:
What is going wrong here? Why isn't ther build a 7_STABLE as I
desire? What do I need to change to get my wanted results?
Are you sure you have the
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Frank Wißmann frank.wissman...@web.de wrote:
Am Dienstag 17 Februar 2009 21:20:15 schrieb Polytropon:
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:14:58 +0100, Frank Wißmann
frank.wissman...@web.de wrote:
What is going wrong here? Why isn't ther build a 7_STABLE as I
desire?
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 20:14:58 +0100, Frank Wißmann frank.wissman...@web.de
wrote:
What is going wrong here? Why isn't ther build a 7_STABLE as I desire?
What do I need to change to get my wanted results?
Are you sure you have the correct sources? How did you update them?
I'm using the
7_STABLE is incorrect.
. = CURRENT
RELENG_X = X-STABLE
RELENG_X_Y = X.Y-RELEASE
so you probably want RELENG_7
On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 20:14 +0100, Frank Wißmann wrote:
Hello, list!
When I try to build my new world with todays sources I don't get
properly what I want. I configured my
--On Tuesday, February 17, 2009 13:14:58 -0600 Frank Wißmann
frank.wissman...@web.de wrote:
Hello, list!
When I try to build my new world with todays sources I don't get
properly what I want. I configured my cvs-supfile with
default tag=7_STABLE
Should be default tag=RELENG_7
--
Paul
Christopher Lane [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Simple question: how can I tell what version of the system binaries
I'm running? Flame-proofing follows.
Searches on this mailing list and google tell me 'uname -a' is the
ticket, but that doesn't seem to get what I want.
No, it isn't. That gets
On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 10:01:26AM -0800, borg wrote:
Greetings,
I'm looking for a world clock that helps me keep track
of time in different cities by showing me clocks for
multiple time zones. Preferably under X if not I don't
mind using a non-GUI based application.
You could run xclock
On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 10:01:26 -0800 (PST)
borg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings,
I'm looking for a world clock that helps me keep track
of time in different cities by showing me clocks for
multiple time zones. Preferably under X if not I don't
mind using a non-GUI based application.
I
Under KDE
KDEMenu / toys / worldclock
puts up a world map that shows the correct time for
most capital cities when the city is under the mouse cursor
mjt
On Thu, 2004-11-04 at 05:40, epilogue wrote:
On Wed, 3 Nov 2004 10:01:26 -0800 (PST)
borg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings,
I'm
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED],
wrote borg thusly...
I'm looking for a world clock that helps me keep track
of time in different cities by showing me clocks for
multiple time zones. Preferably under X if not I don't
mind using a non-GUI based application.
Try sunclock in astro/sunclock.
-
On Sun, Oct 17, 2004 at 11:20:35AM +0100, Lewis Thompson wrote:
I'm just wondering if anybody can tell me how I can build sendmail from
world with LDAP support. I currently have SASL support enabled in
make.conf (copied examples from defaults/make.conf) and hoped it might
be possible to do
* Lewis Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20041017 13:21]: wrote:
Hi,
I'm just wondering if anybody can tell me how I can build sendmail from
world with LDAP support. I currently have SASL support enabled in
make.conf (copied examples from defaults/make.conf) and hoped it might
be possible to do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 23 January 2004 03:21 pm, Brian H wrote:
Greetings:
Problem: I do not have a fast internet connection at home and I want to
upgrade my freebsd from release to stable. For the ports tree I download
the file
The reason I don't want to do that is because I have several machines to do
the update on and I don't want to do the download for each machine.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 23 January 2004 03:21 pm, Brian H wrote:
Greetings:
Problem: I do not have a fast internet
You could look into nfs exporting /usr/src to all of your machines.
along with /usr/obj, you could also cut down to only having to build once.
~j
Brian H wrote:
The reason I don't want to do that is because I have several machines to
do the update on and I don't want to do the download for
Brian H [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The reason I don't want to do that is because I have several machines
to do the update on and I don't want to do the download for each
machine.
Can't they talk to each other without being connected to the
Internet?
My own approach is to have a single
Create an NFS share and distribute the source using that.
You cvsup one computer, and then you have it on all of them.
-Original Message-
From: Brian H [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 4:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: world
The reason I don't want
NFS seems to be the common idea here ;)
-Original Message-
From: Lowell Gilbert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 4:45 PM
To: Brian H
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: world
Brian H [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The reason I don't want to do that is because I have
CVSuping the source won't take too long. Even on dialup. Setup your source sup
for late at night if you can.
I'm willing to bet that doing a make world will take longer then your CVSup of
source.
I can second that. Upgrading from one release of FreeBSD to another
didn't take more than 30
At 2004-01-23T22:53:00Z, Michael Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
NFS seems to be the common idea here ;)
One other possibility: if you don't want to set up NFS for some reason,
rsync is an exquisitely nice system for synchronizing directory trees. You
can cvsup one machine, then use rsync to
24 matches
Mail list logo
