In the last episode (Feb 12), Scott Ballantyne said:
Hi,
I'm trying to mount a 4 TB drive (The Seagate Backup-Plus) on FreeBSD
9.0 Generic, using
mount -t ntfs /dev/da0s1 /mnt
It fails with:
g_vfs_done() da1s1[READ(offset=0, length=1042)]error=22
mount_ntfs: /dev/da1s1 bad argument
On Mon, 9 Jul 2012 16:01:56 +, Graeme Dargie wrote:
Hi All,
I have been given a laptop to look at for a friend, the hard disk
is close to death with a SMART error on POST. My initial thought
was to just mount it on an Windows 7 machine and grab what I can
from the drive.
Bad idea. You
On Mon, 9 Jul 2012 18:54:37 +0200
Polytropon articulated:
On Mon, 9 Jul 2012 16:01:56 +, Graeme Dargie wrote:
Hi All,
I have been given a laptop to look at for a friend, the hard disk
is close to death with a SMART error on POST. My initial thought
was to just mount it on an
Graeme Dargie arab at tangerine-army.co.uk writes:
...
Is there a way to scan the drive for deleted files from the command
line or something from the ports tree that anyone can recommend to fulfil
this requirement.
testdisk
jb jb.1234abcd at gmail.com writes:
...
ntfs utilities
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/url.cgi?ports/sysutils/ntfsprogs/pkg-descr
I would suggest you compile it before use (otherwise grab a package).
jb
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
I have been given a laptop to look at for a friend, the hard disk is close to
death with a SMART error on POST. My initial thought was to just mount it on an
Windows 7 machine and grab what I can from the drive. No joy Windows insists
that the partition is RAW and I need to format it. I can
On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 15:30:41 -0400 (EDT)
Monah Baki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I copied 7 files totaling 280GB. I then rebooted the freebsd box (without
unmounting the ntfs partition) and then when I tried to mount the
partition mount -t ntfs-3g /dev/da0s1 /mnt/windows), all files where
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 11:43:48AM -0400, Monah Baki wrote:
Hi all,
We're in the process of copying 600GB to a ntfs volume on freebsd 6.2. I
rebooted the server and now all 200GB of data that I copied are no longer
visible. If I issue the command df -h, I see 200GB used.
How can I
I copied 7 files totaling 280GB. I then rebooted the freebsd box (without
unmounting the ntfs partition) and then when I tried to mount the
partition mount -t ntfs-3g /dev/da0s1 /mnt/windows), all files where
missing. I could not even see them on the windows server. Yet df -h shows
almost 300GB of
Well, I gave up using /etc/fstab to mount NTFS partitions at boot time a
couple of months ago when I realized that it's not the correct way to do it
(so I also wrote an rc.d script to do the job, but I'll talk about it
later). However, I recently looked at fusefs-ntfs source files, and as
Well, I gave up using /etc/fstab to mount NTFS partitions at boot time a
couple of months ago when I realized that it's not the correct way to do it
(so I also wrote an rc.d script to do the job, but I'll talk about it
later). However, I recently looked at fusefs-ntfs source files, and as
On 10/7/07, Craig Butler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Novembre wrote:
On 10/7/07, Mel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 07 October 2007 10:00:35 Novembre wrote:
On 10/7/07, Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 7 Oct 2007, Novembre wrote:
The first error above is because
On Sun, 7 Oct 2007, Novembre wrote:
The first error above is because the fuse kernel module is not yet loaded.
Well isn't it sort of pointless to proceed until you get the kernel module
loaded at boot time and then see what happens next?
--
This .signature sanitized for your
Oh, the kernel module IS loaded as shown in 'dmesg -a' and in
/var/log/messages. However, it can't be loaded unless / and /usr file
systems are mounted. That's what I meant in my post when I said the first
error above is because the fuse kernel module is not yet loaded, since the
mounting comes
On Sunday 07 October 2007 10:00:35 Novembre wrote:
On 10/7/07, Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 7 Oct 2007, Novembre wrote:
The first error above is because the fuse kernel module is not yet
loaded.
Well isn't it sort of pointless to proceed until you get the kernel
On 10/7/07, Mel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 07 October 2007 10:00:35 Novembre wrote:
On 10/7/07, Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 7 Oct 2007, Novembre wrote:
The first error above is because the fuse kernel module is not yet
loaded.
Well isn't it sort of
On Sunday 07 October 2007 20:07:00 Novembre wrote:
On 10/7/07, Mel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 07 October 2007 10:00:35 Novembre wrote:
On 10/7/07, Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 7 Oct 2007, Novembre wrote:
The first error above is because the fuse kernel module
Novembre wrote:
On 10/7/07, Mel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 07 October 2007 10:00:35 Novembre wrote:
On 10/7/07, Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 7 Oct 2007, Novembre wrote:
The first error above is because the fuse kernel module is not yet
On 8/8/07, Novembre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/7/07, Rakhesh Sasidharan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Starting ntfsmount.
/etc/rc: DEBUG: run_rc_command: _doit:
/usr/local/bin/ntfs-3g /dev/ad0s1
/mnt/w
indows
fuse: failed to exec mount program: No such file or directory
On 8/7/07, Rakhesh Sasidharan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Starting ntfsmount.
/etc/rc: DEBUG: run_rc_command: _doit:
/usr/local/bin/ntfs-3g /dev/ad0s1
/mnt/w
indows
fuse: failed to exec mount program: No such file or directory
--
I don't exactly know what it means by fuse:
On 8/6/07, Philip M. Gollucci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Novembre wrote:
rcvar=`set_rcvar`
That should be
rcvar=${name}_enable
Because of this, your script did not run because the rc system didn't
detect it correctly.
Try setting
rc_debug=YES
and/or
rc_info=YES
in /etc/rc.conf
to
On 8/7/07, Novembre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/6/07, Philip M. Gollucci [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Novembre wrote:
rcvar=`set_rcvar`
That should be
rcvar=${name}_enable
Because of this, your script did not run because the rc system didn't
detect it correctly.
Try setting
Starting ntfsmount.
/etc/rc: DEBUG: run_rc_command: _doit: /usr/local/bin/ntfs-3g /dev/ad0s1
/mnt/w
indows
fuse: failed to exec mount program: No such file or directory
--
I don't exactly know what it means by fuse: failed to exec mount program:
No such file or directory since
Novembre wrote:
rcvar=`set_rcvar`
That should be
rcvar=${name}_enable
Because of this, your script did not run because the rc system didn't
detect it correctly.
Try setting
rc_debug=YES
and/or
rc_info=YES
in /etc/rc.conf
to see more of whats happening.
command=ntfs-3g /dev/ad0s1
On 7/8/07, Novembre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, here's an update:
Creating a symlink from /usr/local/bin/ntfs-3g to /sbin/mount_ntfs-3g
does not work (as posted before on the ntfs-3g forum message below).
I, then, added the following ntfsmount startup script to
/usr/local/etc/rc.d/:
Okay, here's an update:
Creating a symlink from /usr/local/bin/ntfs-3g to /sbin/mount_ntfs-3g
does not work (as posted before on the ntfs-3g forum message below).
I, then, added the following ntfsmount startup script to
/usr/local/etc/rc.d/:
--
#!/bin/sh
#
# PROVIDE: ntfsmount
#
I have the same problem. A little search got me to
http://forum.ntfs-3g.org/viewtopic.php?t=292 where a solution is posted. It
seems that using /etc/fstab to mount the NTFS partition at boot time is not
working since the mount command is being executed before the 'fuse' kernel
module is loaded.
I had the same issue when installing fuse-fs the first time - I just
ran sysinstall again, went to distributions, then choose the source
dist, installed that, rebooted, and fusefs built and installed fine.
Steve
On 2/21/07, Jason Gretz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey guys, I got a prob here, I am
Jason Gretz wrote:
Hey guys, I got a prob here, I am trying to install the new
NTFS-3G driver, which just went 1.0, and This is what the
output of make install make clean got me:
=== Installing for fusefs-ntfs-0.20070207RC1
=== fusefs-ntfs-0.20070207RC1 depends on file:
FreeBSD has its own filesystem called UFS (or UFS2). It does not install
into a fat32 or NTFS partition. Both of those formats are used in 95
OSR2+ or NT4+ respectively.
Lucas Holt
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do i have to install the OS on FAT32 file system ... cause i am
On Friday 12 November 2004 18:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do i have to install the OS on FAT32 file system ... cause i am
currently running a NTFS on a Windows XP.
FreeBSD uses it's own filesystem. You will need to make some
unpartitioned space on your disk to install. The handbook has
63;
end: cyl 1023/ head 254/ sector 63
-- In Response to your message -
Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 21:51:33 +0100
To: J. W. Ballantine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mark Ovens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ntfs mount
J. W. Ballantine wrote:
Seems our friends
J. W. Ballantine wrote:
The full fdisk output is:
*** Working on device /dev/ad0 ***
parameters extracted from in-core disklabel are:
cylinders=4865 heads=255 sectors/track=63 (16065 blks/cyl)
[snip]
I take it that the partition sizees reported are correct?
It a Dell, but given the
On May 7, 2004, at 1:40 PM, Mark Ovens wrote:
J. W. Ballantine wrote:
It a Dell, but given the configuration, i do not believe it came
pre-installed from the factory.
I would have thought that a Dell would have had *an* OS pre-installed.
Not always. I am running FBSD 4.9 on a couple Dell 2650's
-- In Response to your message -
Date: Fri, 07 May 2004 18:40:15 +0100
To: J. W. Ballantine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mark Ovens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ntfs mount
J. W. Ballantine wrote:
The full fdisk output is:
*** Working on device /dev/ad0
Mark Ovens wrote:
Not come across Smart Boot Manager but I wonder if it creates a small
partition to run from; the OS/2 Boot Manager, which was also shipped
with older versions of Partition Magic, did but, like recovery
partitions it didn't get a drive letter.
Ah! I've just thought of
Bart Silverstrim wrote:
On May 7, 2004, at 1:40 PM, Mark Ovens wrote:
J. W. Ballantine wrote:
It a Dell, but given the configuration, i do not believe it came
pre-installed from the factory.
I would have thought that a Dell would have had *an* OS pre-installed.
Not always. I am running FBSD
To: J. W. Ballantine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mark Ovens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ntfs mount
Mark Ovens wrote:
Not come across Smart Boot Manager but I wonder if it creates a small
partition to run from; the OS/2 Boot Manager, which was also shipped
with older versions
On May 7, 2004, at 2:12 PM, Mark Ovens wrote:
Bart Silverstrim wrote:
On May 7, 2004, at 1:40 PM, Mark Ovens wrote:
J. W. Ballantine wrote:
It a Dell, but given the configuration, i do not believe it came
pre-installed from the factory.
I would have thought that a Dell would have had *an* OS
J. W. Ballantine wrote:
Ok, either I'm missing something very basic or
I'm trying to mount a w2k ntfs file system with: mount_ntfs
/dev/ad0s1 /C and I get back: mount_ntfs: /dev/ad0s1: Invalid
Argument
Is the filesystem you are trying to mount the first _primary_ partition
on the first (i.e.
-- In Response to your message -
Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 19:28:27 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mark Ovens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ntfs mount
J. W. Ballantine wrote:
Ok, either I'm missing something very basic or
I'm trying to mount
J. W. Ballantine wrote:
yes, there is only one hard disk.
What does the output from `fdisk ad0' show?
Regards,
Mark
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
From: Mark Ovens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ntfs mount
J. W. Ballantine wrote:
yes, there is only one hard disk.
What does the output from `fdisk ad0' show?
Regards,
Mark
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http
PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mark Ovens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ntfs mount
J. W. Ballantine wrote:
when I do a properties under w2k it says file system is ntfs,
fdisk on bsd show partition 1 is sysid 45,(unknown)
Hmm, should be sysid 7. I can't remember if the NTFS
?
and both freebsd show 165.
Which is correct.
Regards,
Mark
Thanks
Jim
-- In Response to your message -
Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 20:40:45 +0100
To: J. W. Ballantine [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mark Ovens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ntfs mount
J. W. Ballantine
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 08:51:32 +0200
Robert Golovniov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday, February 9, 2004, 4:52:36 PM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote:
IMT For my reference, what does ls /dev/ad0* print ?
/dev/ad0/dev/ad0s2 /dev/ad0s3a
Denis wrote:
Hi!
Does anybody explain me why i can't install FreeBSD on new HDD?
I have just NTFS hard drive formatted, but when i start freebsd install i see next:
Probing devices (this can take a while)
And next:
/:write falied, filesystem is full
What is it?
What I must do next?
Thanks.
Denis wrote:
!!!
Saturday, August 16, 2003, 9:40:38 PM, :
m Denis wrote:
Hello Matt,
Saturday, August 16, 2003, 8:13:50 PM, you wrote:
MH delete the NTFS partition and start again
And what partition I must create?
Without partition I see it message again:(
Maybe I bought bad hard?
Denis wrote:
Yeah!!!
I got it!
I just connect my second hard with WinXP and connect first 60gb which
i bought today.
And freebsd think that i will be install to second... and I don't see
errors message.
So, when I started FDisk I just create partition on 60 gb(my new hard!)
And I installed freebsd
Dear/Beste David,
Wednesday, December 4, 2002, 4:39:33 AM, you wrote:
If i have a dual boot system of Win2k and FreeBSD at which the Win2k is
on a NTFS partition will I beable to use Wine and VMWare with this
win2k? or does the partition have to be FAT or FAT32?
Dave
To Unsubscribe:
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 10:58:36AM +0100, Alex wrote:
Dear/Beste David,
Wednesday, December 4, 2002, 4:39:33 AM, you wrote:
If i have a dual boot system of Win2k and FreeBSD at which the Win2k is
on a NTFS partition will I beable to use Wine and VMWare with this
win2k? or does the
On Sat, Dec 07, 2002 at 10:58:36AM +0100, Alex wrote:
Dear/Beste David,
Wednesday, December 4, 2002, 4:39:33 AM, you wrote:
If i have a dual boot system of Win2k and FreeBSD at which the Win2k
is on a NTFS partition will I beable to use Wine and VMWare with this
win2k? or does the
52 matches
Mail list logo
