-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Wednesday 12 November 2003 04:10, Tom Munro Glass wrote:
Thanks Chris. Please take a look at my reply to Scott because the two of
you seem to be suggesting contradicting ideas, and I'm keen to learn why!
Have done. It's just my preference
Thanks Chris and Scott for your input on this subject - I've found it most
helpful.
The freedom to tweak the system to your own way of working is great, and I now
feel I am better informed on how to do this without doing anything radical
that I will regret in years to come.
Thanks again to
Tom Munro Glass wrote:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 15:31, Alex de Kruijff wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 01:53:20PM +1300, Tom Munro Glass wrote:
On an intranet file server, the users' private files are obviously stored
in /usr/home/username but where is the correct place to store files that
are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 02:52, Tom Munro Glass wrote:
I guessed there isn't a default, but I thought there might be a convention
for this and I want to follow conventions where ever possible.
I prefer to put things onto /usr/home (e.g.
Depends on what philosophy you subscribe to- if it's on a local system
only, then create a group for members that will need access to it, and
create a directory in the /home tree, like /home/'project_foo
If it's going to be NFS mounted by other systems, then create an /export
directory and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 19:38, Tom Munro Glass wrote:
filesystem for /home, should I mount this at /home and make /usr/home a
link to /home, or do I just mount it at /usr/home?
The latter is probably preferable.
- --
Cheers, Chris
Tom Munro Glass wrote:
Depends on what philosophy you subscribe to- if it's on a local system
only, then create a group for members that will need access to it, and
create a directory in the /home tree, like /home/'project_foo
If it's going to be NFS mounted by other systems, then create an
Hi Tom- /usr doesn't _have_ to be mounted read-only, but it's not
uncommon to do it on systems connected to the net/susceptible to
hacking/just for security. Default Sun for home is /export home,
primarily b/c Solaris thinks it's always the NFS server ;-) Most Linux
distros use /home, and
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 08:47, Chris Howells wrote:
Hi,
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 19:38, Tom Munro Glass wrote:
filesystem for /home, should I mount this at /home and make /usr/home a
link to /home, or do I just mount it at /usr/home?
The latter is probably preferable.
Thanks Chris. Please
Tom Munro Glass wrote:
Hi Tom- /usr doesn't _have_ to be mounted read-only, but it's not
uncommon to do it on systems connected to the net/susceptible to
hacking/just for security. Default Sun for home is /export home,
primarily b/c Solaris thinks it's always the NFS server ;-) Most Linux
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 01:53:20PM +1300, Tom Munro Glass wrote:
On an intranet file server, the users' private files are obviously stored in
/usr/home/username but where is the correct place to store files that are
common to many users? Would this be something like /usr/home/public or
On Tue, 11 Nov 2003 15:31, Alex de Kruijff wrote:
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 01:53:20PM +1300, Tom Munro Glass wrote:
On an intranet file server, the users' private files are obviously stored
in /usr/home/username but where is the correct place to store files that
are common to many users?
12 matches
Mail list logo
