[quoting cleaned up]
on 1/8/03 12:50 AM, Daniel Goepp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on 1/7/03 11:29 PM, Jonathan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 11:26:53PM -0800, Kurt Bigler wrote:
on 1/6/03 10:59 PM, Jonathan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at
On Mon, 06 Jan 2003 at 22:32:42 -0500, Daniel Goepp wrote:
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
I don't know why you're talking about cvsup; cvsup is not relevant
to this; it is a method for downloading files, primarily from cvs
archives. What you're looking for is changing the base system
itself; how
On Mon, 06 Jan 2003 at 22:32:42 -0500, Daniel Goepp wrote:
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
I don't know why you're talking about cvsup; cvsup is not relevant
to this; it is a method for downloading files, primarily from cvs
archives. What you're looking for is changing the base system
itself; how
on 1/6/03 10:59 PM, Jonathan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 05:29:15PM -0800, Kurt Bigler wrote:
[...]
The problem came up when my VPS provider did a system upgrade. This process
left everything I had intact except I lost my sendmail soft link which had
pointed to
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 11:26:53PM -0800, Kurt Bigler wrote:
on 1/6/03 10:59 PM, Jonathan Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 05:29:15PM -0800, Kurt Bigler wrote:
[...]
The problem came up when my VPS provider did a system upgrade. This process
left everything I
Daniel Goepp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So mx1.freebsd.org itself runs Postfix, but yet, sendmail is still so
embedded in FreeBSD that it's almost imposible to get cleaned out. When
are they going to make the FreeBSD install configurable enough to not have
to include sendmail, bind, openssl,
-freebsd
[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Duncan Anker
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 6:53 PM
To: FreeBSD Questions; Daniel Goepp
Cc: Lowell Gilbert
Subject: Re: Postfix vs. Sendmail
On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 00:42, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Daniel Goepp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So mx1.freebsd.org itself
list.
Thanks.
Peace.
-Daniel
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Lowell Gilbert
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 9:42 AM
To: Daniel Goepp
Cc: FreeBSD Questions
Subject: Re: Postfix vs. Sendmail
Daniel Goepp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So mx1
: Monday, January 06, 2003 9:42 AM
To: Daniel Goepp
Cc: FreeBSD Questions
Subject: Re: Postfix vs. Sendmail
Daniel Goepp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So mx1.freebsd.org itself runs Postfix, but yet, sendmail is still so
embedded in FreeBSD that it's almost imposible to get cleaned out.
When
Daniel Goepp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Then do it. If it works, I doubt there will be much trouble getting
it accepted into the system.
Well yes, I would love to.
Plus, why
invent the wheel. CVSup is
with.
-Daniel
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Lowell Gilbert
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 10:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'FreeBSD Questions'
Subject: Re: Postfix vs. Sendmail
Daniel Goepp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lowell Gilbert
On 2003-01-06 19:48, Daniel Goepp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Then do it. If it works, I doubt there will be much trouble
getting it accepted into the system.
[...]
If someone can save me some time in searching, where is the source
that controls what is installed by
Not to miss out on the party either, but I'd like it on record that there
are also people, like me, who like things like sendmail and Perl, etc,
included in the FreeBSD distribution. :) I had to install these packages
anyway, and found it very useful to see them already included.
I recompiled
Adam Maas wrote:
Definitely keep them included, but not so closely tied to the core
installation. Perhaps take a page from Slackware, which includes them by
default, even on a minimal install, but you can manually deselect them if
you don't wish sendmail (or bind, etc).
See
).
--Adam
- Original Message -
From: Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 12:37 AM
Subject: Re: Postfix vs. Sendmail
Not to miss out on the party either, but I'd like it on record that there
are also people, like me, who like things like sendmail
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 05:29:15PM -0800, Kurt Bigler wrote:
[...]
The problem came up when my VPS provider did a system upgrade. This process
left everything I had intact except I lost my sendmail soft link which had
pointed to the sendmail replacement provided by qmail. The link was
On 5 Nov 2002, Simon J Mudd wrote:
In your case it may also be useful to enable debugging in smtpd by
modifying master.cf and adding a -v line, and then restarting postfix
with postfix reload.
Turns out the problem was that postfix didn't have access to the
/var/pwcheck directory. Putting
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (H. Wade Minter) writes:
This is a tale of two postfix installs.
Install one was on a clean 4.7 system, and works like a charm. Using
pwcheck_pam, everything's peachy.
On the other system, also a 4.7 install, currently running sendmail, I'm
attempting to migrate to
On Fri, Oct 18, 2002 at 09:34:43AM +0200, Axel Gruner wrote:
ct 18 09:20:08 briefzentrum postfix/postfix-script: starting the Postfix
mail system Oct 18 09:20:08 briefzentrum postfix/master[481]: fatal:
parameter inet_interfaces: no local interface found for 127.0.0.1
So, what is the problem
401 - 419 of 419 matches
Mail list logo
