p5-Bit-Vector SHA256 Checksum mismatch (was PERL problem installing SQLgrey)

2013-03-04 Thread Wolfgang Riegler
: checksum== === p5-Bit-Vector-7.2_2 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found = SHA256 Checksum mismatch for Bit-Vector-7.2.tar.gz. === Refetch for 1 more times files: Bit-Vector-7.2.tar.gz === p5-Bit-Vector-7.2_2 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found = Bit

Re: p5-Bit-Vector SHA256 Checksum mismatch (was PERL problem installing SQLgrey)

2013-03-04 Thread Trond Endrestøl
== ===phase: checksum== === p5-Bit-Vector-7.2_2 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found = SHA256 Checksum mismatch for Bit-Vector-7.2.tar.gz. === Refetch for 1 more times files

cmpsfont-1.0_7 checksum mismatch

2011-06-06 Thread n dhert
not found === License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE === Extracting for cmpsfont-1.0_7 = SHA256 Checksum mismatch for cmps-unix.tar.gz. === Refetch for 1 more times files: cmps-unix.tar.gz === Vulnerability check disabled, database not found === License check disabled, port

cmpsfont-1.0_7 checksum mismatch

2011-05-30 Thread n dhert
' === Cleaning for cmpsfont-1.0_7 === Vulnerability check disabled, database not found === License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE === Extracting for cmpsfont-1.0_7 = SHA256 Checksum mismatch for cmps-unix.tar.gz. === Refetch for 1 more times files: cmps-unix.tar.gz === Vulnerability check

Re: cmpsfont-1.0_7 checksum mismatch

2011-05-30 Thread Frank Shute
:15 +0200 --- Building '/usr/ports/print/cmpsfont' === Cleaning for cmpsfont-1.0_7 === Vulnerability check disabled, database not found === License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE === Extracting for cmpsfont-1.0_7 = SHA256 Checksum mismatch for cmps-unix.tar.gz. === Refetch

RE: cmpsfont-1.0_7 checksum mismatch

2011-05-30 Thread Matt Emmerton
:29:15 --- +0200 Building '/usr/ports/print/cmpsfont' === Cleaning for cmpsfont-1.0_7 === Vulnerability check disabled, database not found === License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE === Extracting for cmpsfont-1.0_7 = SHA256 Checksum mismatch for cmps-unix.tar.gz

Re: Checksum mismatch -- will transfer entire file

2009-12-29 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Dec 29), Victor Sudakov said: Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: Are you sure you understand me? I was talking about mirroring the whole repository with cvsup/cvsupd protocol, that's where the Checksum mismatch -- will transfer entire file error occurs. Sorry, I missed

Re: Checksum mismatch -- will transfer entire file

2009-12-28 Thread Nikos Vassiliadis
On 12/28/2009 7:46 AM, Victor Sudakov wrote: To cut a long story short, I would rather continue using cvs, perhaps until there is subversion-light in the base system. I use successfully cvs for the same reasons. Most of the time I use the French mirror and I have also used the two USA ones. I

Re: Checksum mismatch -- will transfer entire file

2009-12-28 Thread Victor Sudakov
repository with cvsup/cvsupd protocol, that's where the Checksum mismatch -- will transfer entire file error occurs. Actually I mirror the whole repository by cvsup from cvsup?.ru.freebsd.org and then make it available over cvs to a bunch of hosts at the local network. Updating every host in my network

Re: Checksum mismatch -- will transfer entire file

2009-12-28 Thread perryh
Victor Sudakov v...@mpeks.tomsk.su wrote: ... [svn] needs python26, perl and tcl - all the three of them ... It seems you may have discovered the significance of the name: it subverts the sysadmin's sanity. Maybe it can find practical use as a meta-port for scripting languages, if someone cares

Re: Checksum mismatch -- will transfer entire file

2009-12-28 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 11:46:37AM +0600, Victor Sudakov wrote: Victor Sudakov wrote: [dd] I would be happy to use svn as I do for my own projects. To run a cvs repository, you just need /usr/bin/cvs started from inetd. It is even in the base system. To run a subversion

Re: Checksum mismatch -- will transfer entire file

2009-12-28 Thread Victor Sudakov
Erik Trulsson wrote: I would be happy to use svn as I do for my own projects. To run a cvs repository, you just need /usr/bin/cvs started from inetd. It is even in the base system. To run a subversion repository, you need much more infrastructure and more overhead (lots

Re: Checksum mismatch -- will transfer entire file

2009-12-28 Thread Nikos Vassiliadis
On 12/28/2009 11:11 AM, Victor Sudakov wrote: Are you sure you understand me? I was talking about mirroring the whole repository with cvsup/cvsupd protocol, that's where the Checksum mismatch -- will transfer entire file error occurs. Sorry, I missed the part of conversation about cvs mode

Re: Checksum mismatch -- will transfer entire file

2009-12-28 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Dec 25), Victor Sudakov said: I cvsup the FreeBSD CVS repository daily from cvsup.ru.freebsd.org. Both the client and the server run CVSup Software version: SNAP_16_1h, Protocol version: 17.0. Recently I noticed that there are lots of messages Checksum mismatch

Re: Checksum mismatch -- will transfer entire file

2009-12-28 Thread Victor Sudakov
of messages Checksum mismatch -- will transfer entire file about all kinds of downloaded files. What could be the reason? Is my CVS repository corrupt or what? Is there a way to check the integrity of the entiry repository? I have read about there being a checksum mismatch problem

Re: Checksum mismatch -- will transfer entire file

2009-12-28 Thread Victor Sudakov
Nikos Vassiliadis wrote: Are you sure you understand me? I was talking about mirroring the whole repository with cvsup/cvsupd protocol, that's where the Checksum mismatch -- will transfer entire file error occurs. Sorry, I missed the part of conversation about cvs mode in cvsup. I thought

Re: Checksum mismatch -- will transfer entire file

2009-12-27 Thread Victor Sudakov
David Kelly wrote: Colleagues, Am I the only one to have this problem? No. Telling you more than I know: FreeBSD.org is moving (or has moved) from CVS to SVN. Is my guess that what we are seeing is an artifact of that move where data is hacked into cvs compatible format and

Re: Checksum mismatch -- will transfer entire file

2009-12-27 Thread Victor Sudakov
Victor Sudakov wrote: [dd] I would be happy to use svn as I do for my own projects. To run a cvs repository, you just need /usr/bin/cvs started from inetd. It is even in the base system. To run a subversion repository, you need much more infrastructure and more overhead (lots of

Re: Checksum mismatch -- will transfer entire file

2009-12-25 Thread David Kelly
On Dec 25, 2009, at 12:43 AM, Victor Sudakov wrote: Colleagues, Am I the only one to have this problem? No. Telling you more than I know: FreeBSD.org is moving (or has moved) from CVS to SVN. Is my guess that what we are seeing is an artifact of that move where data is hacked into cvs

Re: Checksum mismatch -- will transfer entire file

2009-12-24 Thread Victor Sudakov
of messages Checksum mismatch -- will transfer entire file about all kinds of downloaded files. What could be the reason? Is my CVS repository corrupt or what? Is there a way to check the integrity of the entiry repository? I have read about there being a checksum mismatch problem in CVSup version

portupgrade and checksum mismatch

2009-12-20 Thread Jamie Griffin
Hi been trying to portupgrade firefox3 for about a day but keep getting a checksum mismatch error and the build stops. What do I need to do to get it to upgrade? Jamie pgps5KOt9v59v.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: portupgrade and checksum mismatch

2009-12-20 Thread Matthew Seaman
Jamie Griffin wrote: been trying to portupgrade firefox3 for about a day but keep getting a checksum mismatch error and the build stops. What do I need to do to get it to upgrade? Try deleting the firefox sources you downloaded previously and start again. It seems your download somehow got

Checksum mismatch -- will transfer entire file

2009-12-01 Thread Victor Sudakov
Colleagues, I cvsup the FreeBSD CVS repository daily from cvsup.ru.freebsd.org. Both the client and the server run CVSup Software version: SNAP_16_1h, Protocol version: 17.0. Recently I noticed that there are lots of messages Checksum mismatch -- will transfer entire file about all kinds

Re: MD5 Checksum mismatch for netatalk-2.0.4.tar.bz2

2009-08-24 Thread Vincent Zee
On 23 August 2009, at 10:56, andrew clarke wrote: On Sun 2009-08-23 10:24:53 UTC+0200, Vincent Zee (zen...@xs4all.nl) wrote: === Vulnerability check disabled, database not found === Extracting for netatalk-2.0.4,1 = MD5 Checksum mismatch for netatalk-2.0.4.tar.bz2. = SHA256 Checksum

MD5 Checksum mismatch for netatalk-2.0.4.tar.bz2

2009-08-23 Thread Vincent Zee
netatalk it gives this error message: - === Vulnerability check disabled, database not found === Extracting for netatalk-2.0.4,1 = MD5 Checksum mismatch for netatalk-2.0.4.tar.bz2. = SHA256 Checksum mismatch for netatalk-2.0.4.tar.bz2. [snip] === Giving up on fetching files

Re: MD5 Checksum mismatch for netatalk-2.0.4.tar.bz2

2009-08-23 Thread andrew clarke
On Sun 2009-08-23 10:24:53 UTC+0200, Vincent Zee (zen...@xs4all.nl) wrote: === Vulnerability check disabled, database not found === Extracting for netatalk-2.0.4,1 = MD5 Checksum mismatch for netatalk-2.0.4.tar.bz2. = SHA256 Checksum mismatch for netatalk-2.0.4.tar.bz2. I'm getting

fetchmail checksum mismatch error

2007-04-11 Thread Zbigniew Szalbot
Dear all, I tried updating fetchmail today from 6.3.6 to 6.3.8. I used portupgrade to do it. However, I got an error message about checksum mismatch. I suspect it may have something to do with me stopping the upgrade process because while downloading the files, the connection froze

Re: fetchmail checksum mismatch error

2007-04-11 Thread Derek Ragona
At 11:50 AM 4/11/2007, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: Dear all, I tried updating fetchmail today from 6.3.6 to 6.3.8. I used portupgrade to do it. However, I got an error message about checksum mismatch. I suspect it may have something to do with me stopping the upgrade process because while

Re: fetchmail checksum mismatch error

2007-04-11 Thread Martin Tournoij
On Wed 11 Apr 2007 18:04, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: Dear all, I tried updating fetchmail today from 6.3.6 to 6.3.8. I used portupgrade to do it. However, I got an error message about checksum mismatch. I suspect it may have something to do with me stopping the upgrade process because while

Re: fetchmail checksum mismatch error

2007-04-11 Thread Kevin Kinsey
Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: Dear all, I tried updating fetchmail today from 6.3.6 to 6.3.8. I used portupgrade to do it. However, I got an error message about checksum mismatch. I suspect it may have something to do with me stopping the upgrade process because while downloading the files

Re: fetchmail checksum mismatch error

2007-04-11 Thread Zbigniew Szalbot
Hello again, line and tried again. Since then I have been getting checksum mismatch warnings and I am not able to upgrade. What should I do now? Your advice is very much appreciated! delete the downloaded bad file from /usr/ports/distfiles and then download a good file. That was it! Folks

Re: fetchmail checksum mismatch error

2007-04-11 Thread Apatewna
O/H Zbigniew Szalbot έγραψε: Dear all, I tried updating fetchmail today from 6.3.6 to 6.3.8. I used portupgrade to do it. However, I got an error message about checksum mismatch. I suspect it may have something to do with me stopping the upgrade process because while downloading the files

Re: checksum mismatch

2006-10-06 Thread Bill Moran
to deinstall it but i can't reinstall it :( i also tried: # make install clean with the same result, i have no idea how to fix this. anybody knows how to fix this? TIA i was able to fix it :D please ignore the thread :) solution: the checksum mismatch is causing a problem

checksum mismatch

2006-10-05 Thread jan gestre
guys, i'm having problems with the amavisd-new port, portupgrade reports that there is a mismatch so amavisd-new won't update, i tried # make deinstall and # make reinstall i was able to deinstall it but i can't reinstall it :( i also tried: # make install clean with the same result, i have

Re: checksum mismatch

2006-10-05 Thread jan gestre
: # make install clean with the same result, i have no idea how to fix this. anybody knows how to fix this? TIA i was able to fix it :D please ignore the thread :) solution: the checksum mismatch is causing a problem, the update from cvsup doesn't match the checksum from the mirrors, tried

Re: apache22 Checksum mismatch

2006-09-04 Thread Andrea Venturoli
Alexey Mikhailov wrote: If you trust to content of file apache22/apr_dbd_mysql.rev-50.c you can even use make NO_CHECKSUM=1 install. But if I were at your place I tried to update apache22 port and if this will happen again I would submit PR. Hello. Thanks for the answer. I repeatedly updated

Re: apache22 Checksum mismatch

2006-09-03 Thread Alexey Mikhailov
Andrea Venturoli wrote: Hi. I'm trying to install apache22 on a 6.1 machine. Here what I get since days: = MD5 Checksum OK for apache22/httpd-2.2.3.tar.bz2. = SHA256 Checksum OK for apache22/httpd-2.2.3.tar.bz2. = MD5 Checksum mismatch for apache22/apr_dbd_mysql.rev-50.c. = SHA256 Checksum

apache22 Checksum mismatch

2006-08-30 Thread Andrea Venturoli
Hi. I'm trying to install apache22 on a 6.1 machine. Here what I get since days: = MD5 Checksum OK for apache22/httpd-2.2.3.tar.bz2. = SHA256 Checksum OK for apache22/httpd-2.2.3.tar.bz2. = MD5 Checksum mismatch for apache22/apr_dbd_mysql.rev-50.c. = SHA256 Checksum mismatch for apache22

Checksum mismatch patch 010 bash-3.1.16

2006-04-18 Thread bsd
Hello, I am trying to upgrade my version of bash --- Upgrading 'bash-3.1.10_1' to 'bash-3.1.16' (shells/bash) I have a checksum mismatch for patch 010 of the package : = MD5 Checksum mismatch for bash/bash31-010. = SHA256 Checksum mismatch for bash/bash31-010. ** Listing the failed

Re: Checksum mismatch patch 010 bash-3.1.16

2006-04-18 Thread Daniel Bye
On Tue, Apr 18, 2006 at 08:15:54AM +0200, bsd wrote: Hello, I am trying to upgrade my version of bash --- Upgrading 'bash-3.1.10_1' to 'bash-3.1.16' (shells/bash) I have a checksum mismatch for patch 010 of the package : = MD5 Checksum mismatch for bash/bash31-010. = SHA256 Checksum

Re: checksum mismatch on hicolor-icon-theme-0.5

2004-12-24 Thread Chandler May
because of a checksum mismatch on hicolor-icon-theme-0.5.tar.gz. If you already have a local copy of this file, you may need to remove it and re-fetch an updated copy. Use 'make distclean' from the port directory to remove all distfiles for the port so you can re-fetch them. Ports refuses

checksum mismatch on hicolor-icon-theme-0.5

2004-12-23 Thread Chandler May
Hi, I've been unable to compile a very large number of programs because of a checksum mismatch on hicolor-icon-theme-0.5.tar.gz. Ports refuses to connect to any FTP or HTTP servers for the download, and will not recognize the file when I download it manually and put it in distfiles. Besides

Re: checksum mismatch on hicolor-icon-theme-0.5

2004-12-23 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Thu, Dec 23, 2004 at 12:20:26PM -0800, Chandler May wrote: Hi, I've been unable to compile a very large number of programs because of a checksum mismatch on hicolor-icon-theme-0.5.tar.gz. If you already have a local copy of this file, you may need to remove it and re-fetch an updated copy

phpbb + Checksum mismatch

2003-11-29 Thread Bryan Cassidy
Trying to install www/phpbb. I get a Checksum mismatch error for phpBB-2.0.6.tar.bz2. Don't know how to fix Checumsum mismatch errors. Thanks ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe

Re: phpbb + Checksum mismatch

2003-11-29 Thread Melvyn Sopacua
On Sunday 30 November 2003 03:15, Bryan Cassidy wrote: Trying to install www/phpbb. I get a Checksum mismatch error for phpBB-2.0.6.tar.bz2. Yes. They updated the packages without changing the version number to fix a security issue (yep, real smart). The maintainer has already sent a PR