On Monday 17 July 2006 05:00, mike wrote:
So I'm building Eclipse, and one of the things it wants to include is
python . Seems odd for my java ide to need python, so I look it up on
the web tool that shows all the dependencies for a port (which is a
fantastic tool, by the way). And python
- Original Message
From: Gerard Seibert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc: mike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 11:33:56 AM
Subject: Re: defining dependencies for ports
mike wrote:
Alex Zbyslaw wrote:
Owen G wrote:
You are aware
On Wednesday 19 July 2006 14:52, mh983 wrote:
How does the ports system come up
with the other dependencies? For example, this tree shows devel/ORBit2 as
a direct dependent of java/eclipse. How did it find that?
I already answered this in the main thread - this one is a second thread
RW wrote:
I already answered this in the main thread - this one is a second thread
created when Owen G answered a list digest (I do wish people wouln't do
that).
I was only guessing at the time, but my guess looks right:
...
I think the problem is that as time goes by more and more
Message: 5
Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2006 23:00:40 -0500
From: mike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: defining dependencies for ports
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Hello. I'm brand new to FreeBSD. I'm
Owen G wrote:
You are aware that there exists
1. ports = source = must be compiled = make install (as above)
2. packages = executable packages = precompiled = pkgadd -r . . .
Whilst your description of ports and packages is correct...
So unless you're running a custom kernel, there's no
Alex Zbyslaw wrote:
Owen G wrote:
You are aware that there exists
1. ports = source = must be compiled = make install (as above)
2. packages = executable packages = precompiled = pkgadd -r . . .
Whilst your description of ports and packages is correct...
So unless you're running a
mike wrote:
Thanks for the responses. This is /exactly/ why I'm using ports
instead of packages, because I want to have things compiled with my
options. However, the reason for my original post was that I'm having
a hard time customizing this, for java/Eclipse specifically. I try
make
- Original Message
From: Alex Zbyslaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: mike [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Monday, July 17, 2006 11:19:15 AM
Subject: Re: defining dependencies for ports
mike wrote:
Thanks for the responses. This is /exactly/ why I'm using ports
mike wrote:
Alex Zbyslaw wrote:
Owen G wrote:
You are aware that there exists
1. ports = source = must be compiled = make install (as above)
2. packages = executable packages = precompiled = pkgadd -r . . .
Whilst your description of ports and packages is correct...
So
Hello. I'm brand new to FreeBSD. I'm mostly enjoying it so far. I'm
playing with installing the Eclipse IDE port right now. I say playing
with because I started to install it and saw the list of dependencies
and shuddered. I like to keep my system relatively clean and tend to
start a new
On 7/17/06, mike [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello. I'm brand new to FreeBSD. I'm mostly enjoying it so far. I'm
playing with installing the Eclipse IDE port right now. I say playing
with because I started to install it and saw the list of dependencies
and shuddered. I like to keep my system
12 matches
Mail list logo
