Hi.
I read that FreeBSD 9.2 will bring TRIM to ZFS. Does anyone know if this
works even if the zpool is a mirror?
John
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any
In the last episode (Aug 02), John Andreasson said:
I read that FreeBSD 9.2 will bring TRIM to ZFS. Does anyone know if this
works even if the zpool is a mirror?
The vdev type doesn't matter. It'll work on plain disks, mirrors, and
raidzs. If for some reason you have a pool built on geom
Confirmed in beta 1.
- aurf
On Aug 2, 2013, at 2:12 AM, John Andreasson wrote:
Hi.
I read that FreeBSD 9.2 will bring TRIM to ZFS. Does anyone know if this
works even if the zpool is a mirror?
John
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
mirror-0 ONLINE 0 0 0
gpt/disk0 ONLINE 0 0 0
gpt/disk1 ONLINE 0 0 0
I boot directly from this.
This article from Oracle:
http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19253-01/819-5461/gazgw/index.html
implies I can add two more disks
Hi,
I have the current situation:
sdb@gigawattmomma$ zpool status zroot
NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM
zroot ONLINE 0 0 0
mirror-0 ONLINE 0 0 0
gpt/disk0 ONLINE 0 0 0
gpt/disk1
cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Mon, 13 May 2013 06:38:03 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: ZFS mirror install /mnt is empty
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
From: Paul Kraus p...@kraus-haus.org
In-Reply-To: alpine.bsf.2.00.1305131522340.72...@mail.fig.ol.no
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 09:38
On 13-05-13 07:58, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
On Sun, 12 May 2013 23:11+0200, Roland van Laar wrote:
Hello,
I followed these[1] step up to the Finishing touches.
I'm using a 9.1 Release.
After the install I go into the shell and /mnt is empty.
The mount command shows that the zfs partitions are
I responded to Trond privately.
On May 15, 2013, at 2:25 AM, Trond Endrestøl
trond.endres...@fagskolen.gjovik.no wrote:
Am I the only one to receive these emails twice, delayed only by a
couple of days since receiving the original emails?
Judging be the headers below this is either
On 15/05/2013 15:55, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
Am I the only one to receive these emails twice, delayed only by a
couple of days since receiving the original emails?
Judging be the headers below this is either misconfiguration, a MITM
attack or something else.
yes I got a duplicate of the
of the CPU resources, and the I/O bandwidth
to/from the drives.
Note also that RAIDz (RAIDz2, RAIDz3) have their own computational
overhead, so compression may be a bigger advantage in this case than in the
case of a mirror, as the RAID code will have less data to process after being
compressed
On May 13, 2013, at 1:58 AM, Trond Endrestøl
trond.endres...@fagskolen.gjovik.no wrote:
Due to advances in hard drive technology, for the worse I'm afraid,
i.e. 4K disk blocks, I wouldn't bother enabling compression on any ZFS
file systems. I might change my blog posts to reflect this stop
On Mon, 13 May 2013 08:40-0400, Paul Kraus wrote:
On May 13, 2013, at 1:58 AM, Trond Endrestøl
trond.endres...@fagskolen.gjovik.no wrote:
Due to advances in hard drive technology, for the worse I'm afraid,
i.e. 4K disk blocks, I wouldn't bother enabling compression on any ZFS
file
On May 13, 2013, at 9:25 AM, Trond Endrestøl
trond.endres...@fagskolen.gjovik.no wrote:
I guess it's due to my (mis)understanding that files shorter than 4KB
stored on 4K drives never will be subject to compression. And as you
state below, the degree of compression depends largely on the
On Mon, 13 May 2013 08:40-0400, Paul Kraus wrote:
On May 13, 2013, at 1:58 AM, Trond Endrestøl wrote:
Due to advances in hard drive technology, for the worse I'm
afraid, i.e. 4K disk blocks, I wouldn't bother enabling
compression on any ZFS file systems. I might change my blog posts
to
Hello,
I followed these[1] step up to the Finishing touches.
I'm using a 9.1 Release.
After the install I go into the shell and /mnt is empty.
The mount command shows that the zfs partitions are mounted.
When I reboot the system it can't find the bootloader.
What can I do to fix this?
Thanks,
On Sun, 12 May 2013 23:11+0200, Roland van Laar wrote:
Hello,
I followed these[1] step up to the Finishing touches.
I'm using a 9.1 Release.
After the install I go into the shell and /mnt is empty.
The mount command shows that the zfs partitions are mounted.
When I reboot the system it
Hi.
Is it possible to configure geom mirror+stripe (looks like RAID10)?
Trying to do it in VirtualBox:
gmirror label -v gm11 /dev/ada0s2 /dev/ada1s2
gmirror label -v gm12 /dev/ada2s2 /dev/ada3s2
gstripe label -v gs0 /dev/mirror/gm11 /dev/mirror/gm12
newfs -U /dev/stripe/gs0
mount /dev
Hi,
Before creating a pool i setup two disks mirror with gnop trick to have
ashift=12 - 4k pool alignment. I also did that for the disk partitions (gpt
-a 4k option) to have partitions 4k alignment (diskinfo -v disk shows
stripesize=4096 for both disks).
Now i replaced one disk with a new one
Hello Justin,
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 2:25 AM, Justin Dorfman jdorf...@netdna.com wrote:
Hello,
I was wondering how our company can provide a mirror for the FreeBSD
project?
Thanks.
Have a look at
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/hubs/article.html.
HTH,
--
Nino
Hello,
I was wondering how our company can provide a mirror for the FreeBSD
project?
Thanks.
Regards,
Justin Dorfman http://www.twitter.com/jdorfman
NetDNA http://www.netdna.com™
The Science of Acceleration™
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
On Wednesday 11 July 2012 16:20:41 Joseph Lenox wrote:
What about a ZFS root? Just make sure both disks are in the BIOS/EFT
boot order.
http://www.aisecure.net/2011/11/28/root-zfs-freebsd9/
Something else we noticed on our site is that backup of a system
snapshot can be quickly restored
/rootzfs/ and my own experimentation,
for restoring from a snapshot. It can also be used to clone a system
configuration from one system to another (very convenient). This is for
single-drive, just set up a mirror in the initial steps if you are going
that route.
1. Boot from a FreeBSD9 installation
I am no expert at this however a quick Google search comes up with:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/geom-mirror.html
The procedure shown there produces a mirror that will not boot on FreeBSD 9.
no idea but my procedure certainly would work if you use installer
1) install to first disk
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
I am no expert at this however a quick Google search comes up with:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/geom-mirror.html
The procedure shown there produces a mirror that will not boot on FreeBSD
9.
no idea but my procedure certainly would work
The current Handbook procedure avoids the copy by using the existing disk
as-is and just writing the gmirror metadata to the last block.
Exactly what i do doing instalations manually!
If that last block is already part of an MBR partition, the more strict checking stops
booting in 9.0.
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
The current Handbook procedure avoids the copy by using the existing disk
as-is and just writing the gmirror metadata to the last block.
Exactly what i do doing instalations manually!
If that last block is already part of an MBR partition, the
If that last block is already part of an MBR partition, the more strict
checking stops booting in 9.0.
not making MBR partition would not make problems.
There's no guarantee that bsdlabel checking won't be made more strict. No
matter what type of partitioning scheme, the metadata should not
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
If that last block is already part of an MBR partition, the more strict
checking stops booting in 9.0.
not making MBR partition would not make problems.
There's no guarantee that bsdlabel checking won't be made more strict. No
matter what type of
disklabel on both disk, then bsdlabel -B, them
gmirror each partitions separately.
often i do not mirror all partitions, ew. i do not for squid proxy data if
used.
both method results in system bootable from both drives and proper
disklabels
THEN partition it, so partition sizes sums up to gmirror size which is 1
sector less disk size.
then bsdlabel -B
method 2) i make same disklabel on both disk, then bsdlabel -B, them gmirror
each partitions separately.
often i do not mirror all partitions, ew. i do not for squid proxy data
partitions. The
second works with GPT partitioning also.
true. first doesn't. for now i use only second method in spite of not
using GPT. being able to de-mirror selectively a partition or not mirror
some partitions at all is quite a big adventage.
definitely not possible with hardware RAID
all,
I have two SAS disks for the FreeBSD install. I want to install the freeBSD
on one disk and mirror to another disk. Just like the AIX Mirror.
Any changes will sync between the two disks. And if one disk crashed or
disconnected, the OS could continue running on another disk.
Does
On Wed, 11 Jul 2012, Kaya Saman wrote:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:18 AM, miles kuo miles@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I have two SAS disks for the FreeBSD install. I want to install the freeBSD
on one disk and mirror to another disk. Just like the AIX Mirror.
Any changes will sync between
-7 with a zfs receive of the desired snapshot).
On 07/11/2012 04:18 AM, miles kuo wrote:
Hi all,
I have two SAS disks for the FreeBSD install. I want to install the freeBSD
on one disk and mirror to another disk. Just like the AIX Mirror.
Any changes will sync between the two disks. And if one
that:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/hubs/mirror-requirements.html
5.4G is sufficient.
Another question wth cvs is: can I get the particular port in its state of
N(=1,2, ...) changes ago? It seems to be possible only to look up particular
version for the particular file and checkout
*nix and *BSD systems. It's so exciting
to have a deal with a stable systems! So that's why I decided to write you
a letter concerning creating an official mirror of FreeBSD server in my
country. That all need to know is what procedures should I make? And what
demands to server and internet
Gökşin Akdeniz goksin.akde...@gmail.com writes:
So my question is: can I have a mirror of a FreeBSD server on my public
server that run already a Debian operating system?
Instead of working with packages, I suggest working with ports. As you
have already installed a base system, you can
Fetching snapshot generated at Mon Mar 28 02:04:59 CEST 2011:
'here is a long word of letters and numbers' 18% of 64 MB 341 kBps
02m38s
Here (or at 67%, or at.. but never reach 100%) stall the download. :(
What can I do to solve this problem?
It looks like a network trouble. If portsnap
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 3:46 PM, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Chris Brennan xa...@xaerolimit.net wrote:
... the list does not 'mail-back' your e-mail ...
i.e. you do not see your own post until someone replies to it.
... unless you go to the subscription page and select the option
to be
2011-03-28 20:21 keltezéssel, Gökşin Akdeniz írta:
Fetching snapshot generated at Mon Mar 28 02:04:59 CEST 2011:
'here is a long word of letters and numbers' 18% of 64 MB 341 kBps
02m38s
Here (or at 67%, or at.. but never reach 100%) stall the download. :(
What can I do to solve this problem?
mirror
server that I can use only me on my LAN. This mirror server should run
on my public Debian server. Why only me should use this server? Because
my ISP package allow to me only 4GB traffic.
So my question is: can I have a mirror of a FreeBSD server on my public
server that run already a Debian
mirror
server that I can use only me on my LAN. This mirror server should run
on my public Debian server. Why only me should use this server? Because
my ISP package allow to me only 4GB traffic.
So my question is: can I have a mirror of a FreeBSD server on my public
server that run already
the solution that I see in my case is to have my own FreeBSD mirror
server that I can use only me on my LAN. This mirror server should run
on my public Debian server. Why only me should use this server? Because
my ISP package allow to me only 4GB traffic.
So my question is: can I have a mirror
Chris Brennan xa...@xaerolimit.net writes:
2011/3/27 Paul Chany csanyi...@stcable.net
This same piece of mail, you sent a few hours ago frrom this very same
e-mail address with a different name
Yes, because when I sent the mail first time using my gmail address, I
get not the mail back
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Csanyi Pal csanyi...@gmail.com wrote:
Chris Brennan xa...@xaerolimit.net writes:
2011/3/27 Paul Chany csanyi...@stcable.net
This same piece of mail, you sent a few hours ago frrom this very same
e-mail address with a different name
Yes, because when
So my question is: can I have a mirror of a FreeBSD server on my public
server that run already a Debian operating system?
You can keep a mirror of a FreeBSD server but storage and bandwith
consumption depends on what you want to mirror. I guess you will
consume all your bandwith
Chris Brennan xa...@xaerolimit.net wrote:
... the list does not 'mail-back' your e-mail ...
i.e. you do not see your own post until someone replies to it.
... unless you go to the subscription page and select the option
to be sent your own posts :)
patrick gibblert...@gmail.com writes:
Is there any official way to run a private portsnap mirror? ie. Have
one, external server fetch from the official portsnap sources, and
then internal servers pulling from the private mirror?
It runs over pipelined HTTP, so all you need to do is set up
On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 2:56 PM, patrick gibblert...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there any official way to run a private portsnap mirror? ie. Have
one, external server fetch from the official portsnap sources, and
then internal servers pulling from the private mirror
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 14:52:01 -0500
Lowell Gilbert freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org wrote:
patrick gibblert...@gmail.com writes:
Is there any official way to run a private portsnap mirror? ie. Have
one, external server fetch from the official portsnap sources, and
then internal
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:13:38PM +, RW thus spake:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 14:52:01 -0500
Lowell Gilbert freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org wrote:
patrick gibblert...@gmail.com writes:
Is there any official way to run a private portsnap mirror? ie. Have
one, external server fetch
Is there any official way to run a private portsnap mirror? ie. Have
one, external server fetch from the official portsnap sources, and
then internal servers pulling from the private mirror?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Book
Mirror Edition u.s.b. 2.0 external hard drive? It is a RAID-1 drive, although
I have not been able to determine if the RAID is created in software or
hardware. If 8.1-release does not support this device, what is the most
similar u.s.b. RAID drive that it does support, if any? Any
support a Western Digital
My Book Mirror Edition u.s.b. 2.0 external hard drive?
I doubt an exhaustive list of USB wazzits, frobdars, dimsum will
ever be written even for Winders or Linus, let alone FBSD.
Seeing as how the RAID controller, whether hard or soft, is going to be
behind a USB adapter
I've got a problem. For performance reasons I use two 1TB harddrives as
a single pool, and as far as I know, ZFS on recent FreeBSD 9/amd64
treats suchs pools 'striped'. Well, I can measure a performance gain in
writing and reading. Well, for backup, I use an additional 2TB disk,
ZFS,
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 9:42 AM, O. Hartmann
ohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de wrote:
My question is: is it possible to migrate the two-disk pool without data
loss into a mirrored pool by adding the one 2TB-disk?
No, you cant create a two-way mirror of three disks with ZFS. The only
way
?
No, you cant create a two-way mirror of three disks with ZFS. The only
way of doing what you want by creating a gmirror (or by hardware raid)
of the two 1TB disks.
--
chs,
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
In the last episode (Jan 26), Christer Solskogen said:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 9:42 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
My question is: is it possible to migrate the two-disk pool without data
loss into a mirrored pool by adding the one 2TB-disk?
No, you cant create a two-way mirror of three disks
the one 2TB-disk?
No, you cant create a two-way mirror of three disks with ZFS. The only way
of doing what you want by creating a gmirror (or by hardware raid) of the
two 1TB disks.
You can, if you partition the 2tb disk into two smaller volumes, each the
same size as one of the 1tb disks
-disk pool without
data loss into a mirrored pool by adding the one 2TB-disk?
No, you cant create a two-way mirror of three disks with ZFS. The only
way of doing what you want by creating a gmirror (or by hardware raid)
of the two 1TB disks.
You can, if you partition the 2tb disk into two
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Dan Nelson dnel...@allantgroup.com wrote:
ZFS lets you add and detach mirrors on the fly, since you're not changing
the capacity of the pool itself. Sure, you're going to lose the contents of
the large 2TB drive, but that's sort of assumed. You can't convert
pool of 2TB overall capacity, I could simply 'mirror' this
pool to another disk of the same capacity.
Is there a way to 'send' via ZFS the data of the pool to the backup
disk, like a snapshot from one pool to another one?
Oliver
___
freebsd-questions
), but if he did two zpool
add commands, he has two independant vdevs in one zpool, and he can mirror
each of them with a zpool attach command. ZFS doesn't have a stripe
vdev type.
--
Dan Nelson
dnel...@allantgroup.com
___
freebsd-questions
On 26/01/2011 21:57, O. Hartmann wrote:
My thinking was simple, I thought since the two physical 1TB disks build
one joint pool of 2TB overall capacity, I could simply 'mirror' this
pool to another disk of the same capacity.
Is there a way to 'send' via ZFS the data of the pool to the backup
Is using one half of a mirror as a backup a good/bad idea?
I was thinking of rotating drives on a periodic basis as a back up
method. You'd get the backup instantly, but rebuilding the mirror with
the incoming drive would take a little time and leave you vulnerable to
a small loss of data
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Jason C. Wells j...@speakeasy.net wrote:
Is using one half of a mirror as a backup a good/bad idea?
I was thinking of rotating drives on a periodic basis as a back up method.
You'd get the backup instantly, but rebuilding the mirror with the incoming
drive
David Brodbeck wrote:
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Jason C. Wells j...@speakeasy.net wrote:
Is using one half of a mirror as a backup a good/bad idea?
I was thinking of rotating drives on a periodic basis as a back up method.
You'd get the backup instantly, but rebuilding the mirror
On 02/01/2011 20:30, David Brodbeck wrote:
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Jason C. Wells j...@speakeasy.net wrote:
Is using one half of a mirror as a backup a good/bad idea?
I was thinking of rotating drives on a periodic basis as a back up method.
You'd get the backup instantly
Hi,
Im running FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE
(FreeBSD hostname 8.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE #1: Tue Dec 1 16:10:08 CET
2009
pe...@hostname:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64)
and have a MTP-raidcard with a configured mirror.
mpt0 Adapter:
Board Name: SAS3041E
Board Assembly: L3-01101-04F
Hello everyone!.
I work for an ISP and we would like to be mirror site for downloads.
What are the requirements for this?.
Greetings.
Lacnic Info:
Name: GTD Internet S.A.
ASN: 14259
--
Walter González Flores
Cisco CCNA Certified
CSCO ID CSCO11327392
Administrador de Conectividad y Redes
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Walter Gonzalez Flores
wgonza...@gtdinternet.com wrote:
Hello everyone!.
I work for an ISP and we would like to be mirror site for downloads. What
are the requirements for this?.
You might consider looking at the handbook, specifically
http
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26/11/2010, at 08:27, Chris Brennan wrote:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Walter Gonzalez Flores
wgonza...@gtdinternet.com wrote:
Hello everyone!.
I work for an ISP and we would like to be mirror site for downloads. What
access denied
(state 14).
-- Forwarded message --
From: Cheng Renquan crq...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 10:34 AM
Subject: The FreeBSD mirror in Singapore seems have problem,
To: hostmas...@sg.freebsd.org
Hi,
The FreeBSD mirror in Singapore seems have problem,
http
Hello, list!
I've googled around a little and did not find an answer to the question.
I want to create ubuntu mirror using freebsd, but not the 'global' one
with all the architectures and releases, the 8.04-i386+amd64 only. Any
tool in ports for achieving that?
--
Old mercenaries never die
, it appears the problem is that ZFS
filesystems under an NFSv4 mountpoint are not auto-mounted by Linux
clients of a FreeBSD server the way they are when they're clients of
an OpenSolaris server; if I mount them manually, the ownership is
correct. I think OpenSolaris calls this functionality mirror
are not auto-mounted by Linux
clients of a FreeBSD server the way they are when they're clients of
an OpenSolaris server; if I mount them manually, the ownership is
correct. I think OpenSolaris calls this functionality mirror
mounts. Is there a way to get mirror mounts to work on FreeBSD
I am wanting to mount a mirror, to place repositories of debian / ubuntu,
because many machines in my company update the repositories and doing so
will improve the process performance.
However, I do this in FreeBSD (with spegla, ftpmirror ...), and was
wondering if it is possible, if not I
On 29/08/2010 15:37:51, Felipe Agnelli Barbosa wrote:
I am wanting to mount a mirror, to place repositories of debian / ubuntu,
because many machines in my company update the repositories and doing so
will improve the process performance.
However, I do this in FreeBSD (with spegla, ftpmirror
I'm convinced that ZFS mirroring is far better than gmirroring, but
the latter uses much less memory (I think).
My server has 3Gb and is solely used as server (web, files/nfs/samba,
dns, mail).
The data is serves does not change much, so I would think the data
integrity checks of ZFS although
I don't know, but I plan to test that scenario in a few days.
Matt
Please share the results when you're done, I am really curious :)
It *should* work... I made changes a while back that allow for multiple
vdevs to attach to the root. In this case you should have 3 mirror
vdevs attached
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
I have succesfully tested and used a full ZFS install of FreeBSD 8.0
on both single disk and mirror disk configurations using both MBR and
GPT partitioning. AFAIK, with the more recent -CURRENT and -STABLE
On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 10:07 -0800, Matt Reimer wrote:
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Dan Naumov dan.nau...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello
I have succesfully tested and used a full ZFS install of FreeBSD 8.0
on both single disk and mirror disk configurations using both MBR and
GPT
Hello
I have succesfully tested and used a full ZFS install of FreeBSD 8.0
on both single disk and mirror disk configurations using both MBR and
GPT partitioning. AFAIK, with the more recent -CURRENT and -STABLE it
is also possible to boot off a root filesystem located on raidz/raidz2
pools
in ports/Mk/bsd.sites.mk, the list of SourceForge mirrors is defined by:
.for mirror in heanet sunet iweb switch surfnet kent freefr \
voxel jaist osdn nchc transact softlayer \
internode biznetnetworks ufpr
# garr dfn ovh (redirect as of 2009-Sep-02
I don't know about blacklisting, however you may want to look at the port
called fastest_sites:
/usr/ports/ports-mgmt/fastest_sites]$ cat pkg-descr
Find the fastest mirror for every mirror list in bsd.sites.mk.
Output is suitable for inclusion into make.conf.
WWW:
http://www.semicomplete.com
Would route add heanet.dl.sourceforge.net 127.0.0.1 help?
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 11:38:01AM -0600, Kirk Strauser typed:
in ports/Mk/bsd.sites.mk, the list of SourceForge mirrors is defined by:
.for mirror in heanet sunet iweb switch surfnet kent freefr \
voxel jaist osdn
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Ruben de Groot mai...@bzerk.org wrote:
Would route add heanet.dl.sourceforge.net 127.0.0.1 help?
Or map heanet to a non-routable addy in /etc/hosts...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
] On Behalf Of J Sisson
Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2009 4:43 PM
To: Ruben de Groot; Kirk Strauser; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Blacklisting a SourceForge mirror from ports?
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 3:33 PM, Ruben de Groot mai...@bzerk.org
wrote:
Would route add
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 11:38:01 -0600
Kirk Strauser k...@strauser.com wrote:
In my /etc/make.conf, I have:
MASTER_SITE_SOURCEFORGE=http://sunet.dl.sourceforge.net/%SUBDIR%/
I set MASTER_SORT_REGEX instead
That *usually* works, but will often return a redirect, in which case
the fetch goes
On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 03:32:20 +
RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 11:38:01 -0600
Kirk Strauser k...@strauser.com wrote:
MASTER_SITE_SOURCEFORGE=http://sunet.dl.sourceforge.net/%SUBDIR%/
That *usually* works, but will often return a redirect, in which
case the
Could anyone give me some input on this. .
Issue: Trying to grow an existing mirrored filesystem with growfs fails. . :
Given:
FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE (GENERIC) #0: Fri May 1 07:18:07 UTC 2000
-
2 drives:
D data1 State: up /dev/da1s1 A:
432325/1430506 MB (30%)
D
On Tue, 2009-08-25 at 22:20 -0400, Duncan Hutty wrote:
Q. ports/distfiles contains tarballs of multiple versions of each
software; I assume that I only need one version of each tarball. And
since this mirror as described comes to ~100GiB, how can I modify my
For this you want portsclean(8
I'm planning to build a lab of perhaps 15 freebsd machines.
Not only do I want to be a good sysadmin and only download what I need,
but another issue is that these machines will live on a network that
will not have a reliable connection to the internet.
Therefore I want to build a mirror
Hi,
I am wondering if anyone has attempted to mirror the freebsd-update server?
Thanks,
Jason
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions
Hello to all.
I've got a problem setting up the gmirror + geli combination for /
under the FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE.
I have successfully created the mirror/gm0 device from fixit bsd
livecd, then I've initialized the geli provider using the command
geli init -b -l 256 -s 4096 -K /usb/gm0.key /dev
as it is supposed to. I have purchased two
new 74GB drives because I need more space.
With just the working 37GB drive connected, I ran:
# gmirror forget gm0
Then I connected one of the new 74GB drives and ran:
# gmirror insert gm0 /dev/da1
and the mirror rebuilt itself correctly, but of course only half
gm0 /dev/da1
and the mirror rebuilt itself correctly, but of course only half of the new
drive is being used.
I've now removed the 37GB drive and run gmirror forget gm0 again and the
system is running on the new half used 74GB drive.
How do I define a new slice and partition to fill
connected one of the new 74GB drives and ran:
# gmirror insert gm0 /dev/da1
and the mirror rebuilt itself correctly, but of course only half of the
new drive is being used.
I've now removed the 37GB drive and run gmirror forget gm0 again and
the system is running on the new half used
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Tim Judd taj...@gmail.com wrote:
I am having quite the issue with a cvsup-mirror install (1.3_8) here. It
seems to be keeping some meta information file somewhere and has FAILED to
give me a local mirror (not one to be publicly available) yet.
Being
I am having quite the issue with a cvsup-mirror install (1.3_8) here. It
seems to be keeping some meta information file somewhere and has FAILED to
give me a local mirror (not one to be publicly available) yet.
Being the stubborn person I am, I have multiple times cleared some and all
1 - 100 of 469 matches
Mail list logo
