Re: v6 speed compared to previous versions

2006-11-14 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 10:57:01AM +0300, John Smith wrote: On 11/14/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When was this corrected? Is 6.2 going to be faster than 6.1? As I said earlier, some of the most important changes that went into 6.0 were fixing performance problems in 5.x.

v6 speed compared to previous versions

2006-11-13 Thread Jim Pazarena
When I switched to 6.0, then 6.1, it was noticed by most of my clients that my php/mysql/apache system slowed down a fair bit compared to previous version (5.XX). I always like to be on the bleeding edge of FreeBSD, but the performance hit is being commented about by my (few) mysql/php clients.

Re: v6 speed compared to previous versions

2006-11-13 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 11:39:16AM -0800, Jim Pazarena wrote: When I switched to 6.0, then 6.1, it was noticed by most of my clients that my php/mysql/apache system slowed down a fair bit compared to previous version (5.XX). I always like to be on the bleeding edge of FreeBSD, but the

Re: v6 speed compared to previous versions

2006-11-13 Thread Jeff Mohler
Fair to say that those tools should be recompiled on a 6 system to ensure full update-ness? On 11/13/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 11:39:16AM -0800, Jim Pazarena wrote: When I switched to 6.0, then 6.1, it was noticed by most of my clients that my

Re: v6 speed compared to previous versions

2006-11-13 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 01:51:49PM -0800, Jeff Mohler wrote: Fair to say that those tools should be recompiled on a 6 system to ensure full update-ness? Shouldn't really matter, the relevant changes were in the kernel. Kris pgptUG0zqiPwb.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: v6 speed compared to previous versions

2006-11-13 Thread John Smith
On 11/14/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 01:51:49PM -0800, Jeff Mohler wrote: Fair to say that those tools should be recompiled on a 6 system to ensure full update-ness? Shouldn't really matter, the relevant changes were in the kernel. Kris When was this

Re: v6 speed compared to previous versions

2006-11-13 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Tue, Nov 14, 2006 at 09:27:47AM +0300, John Smith wrote: On 11/14/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Nov 13, 2006 at 01:51:49PM -0800, Jeff Mohler wrote: Fair to say that those tools should be recompiled on a 6 system to ensure full update-ness? Shouldn't really matter,

Re: v6 speed compared to previous versions

2006-11-13 Thread John Smith
On 11/14/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When was this corrected? Is 6.2 going to be faster than 6.1? As I said earlier, some of the most important changes that went into 6.0 were fixing performance problems in 5.x. Since then it's been a process of polishing and improving, instead