On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 03:29:51AM -0200, Herculano de Lima Einloft Neto wrote:
Hello all,
Maybe this is not the best list to post this question,
but it won't hurt. I've been compiling everything from source
for lack of options, and was just wondering what should be the
policy for 5.1
Kris Kennaway wrote:
What do you mean by policy for 5.1 package-feeding?
I mean: will 5.1 packages continue to be offered with new software?
For instance, there are no gnome 2.4 packages for 5.1.. so I had to
compile the whole thing.
Should I consider upgrading to 5.2 for that matter?
--
Herculano
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 09:02:30PM -0200, Herculano de Lima Einloft Neto wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
What do you mean by policy for 5.1 package-feeding?
I mean: will 5.1 packages continue to be offered with new software?
For instance, there are no gnome 2.4 packages for 5.1.. so I had to
Hello all,
Maybe this is not the best list to post this question,
but it won't hurt. I've been compiling everything from source
for lack of options, and was just wondering what should be the
policy for 5.1 package-feeding, since the upgrade process has
been described as very unstable at the