with marcuscom.gnome3
xorg.devel
--
View this message in context:
http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/FreeBSD-as-Samba-Server-and-Windows-as-Client-tp5804306p5804418.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-questions
Dear All ,
When a Windows XP share is mounted with the following command in FreeBSD
9.1 amd64 , it is working :
# mount_smbfs -I 192.168.10.25
//user_name_in_Windows_Administrators@NetBIOS_NAME_in_Windows/Share_Name_in_Windows
/mnt
I could not be able to write an /etc/fstab entry to mount
When you say could not do an fstab entry, can you say what happens? Do
you get any messages in logs?
regards
Dave
--
http://www.marlinbrighton.com
On 16/04/2013 08:45, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
Dear All ,
When a Windows XP share is mounted with the following command in FreeBSD
9.1 amd64
to run network diagnostics
as you can now use WINPC for the Windows PC in any commands.
--
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
, or it won't resolve:
192.168.123.456 WINPC
This is also helpful as soon as you have to run network diagnostics
as you can now use WINPC for the Windows PC in any commands.
--
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa
,
When a Windows XP share is mounted with the following command in FreeBSD
9.1 amd64 , it is working :
# mount_smbfs -I 192.168.10.25
//user_name_in_Windows_**Administrators@NetBIOS_NAME_**
in_Windows/Share_Name_in_**Windows
/mnt
I could not be able to write an /etc/fstab entry to mount
When you put the entry in fstab and then try to mount it with fstab
providing the details, what happens? i.e. without doing a reboot, test
fstab by doing the mounts from the command line with the details in fstab
regards
Dave
http://www.marlinbrighton.com
On 16/04/2013 10:34, Mehmet Erol
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 2:41 AM, Dave Anderson d...@marlinbrighton.comwrote:
When you put the entry in fstab and then try to mount it with fstab
providing the details, what happens? i.e. without doing a reboot, test
fstab by doing the mounts from the command line with the details in fstab
Dear All ,
I could be able to connect a FreeBSD 9.1 amd64 computer as client to a
Windows XP ( 32 bits ) by
using information supplied by the mail
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2013-April/250500.html
and I sent a mail
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-doc/2013
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
m.e.sanlit...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear All ,
I could be able to connect a FreeBSD 9.1 amd64 computer as client to a
Windows XP ( 32 bits ) by
using information supplied by the mail
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2013
On Tue, 16 Apr 2013 02:28:33 -0700, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
Your message has supplied important information .
As I said, I did obtain it from a system that _has been working_
in that regards. :-)
When their equivalent values are entered , they worked :
WINPC :
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Richard Sharpe
realrichardsha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
m.e.sanlit...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear All ,
I could be able to connect a FreeBSD 9.1 amd64 computer as client to a
Windows XP ( 32 bits ) by
using
On 4/16/2013 2:20 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
Dear All ,
I could be able to connect a FreeBSD 9.1 amd64 computer as client to a
Windows XP ( 32 bits ) by
using information supplied by the mail
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2013-April/250500.html
and I sent a mail
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Joshua Isom jri...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/16/2013 2:20 PM, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
Dear All ,
I could be able to connect a FreeBSD 9.1 amd64 computer as client to a
Windows XP ( 32 bits ) by
using information supplied by the mail
http
On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 12:07:41 -0800 (PST)
leeoliveshackelf...@surewest.net wrote:
Good afternoon, FreeBSD enthusiasts. Can FreeBSD 9.1 be installed on a
computer on which Windows XP currently resides? If so, how can this
installation be done? In particular, is there a way to install 9.1 so
to get applications for an iPad and to copy PDFs to an
iPad, since ad-hoc networks until now never worked for me, but I also
would like to test hardware sometimes, impossible with VBox, so
sometimes it would be nice to have a real Windows install.
If this should work, will it become impossible
. This way you don't need to restart in WinXP. The same can
be done from WinXP side, a minimal hd with MBR boot menu to startup
the FreeBSD.
This does work?
I followed the instructions (only once) from this page
http://geekery.amhill.net/2010/01/27/virtualbox-with-existing-windows-partition
://geekery.amhill.net/2010/01/27/virtualbox-with-existing-windows-partition/
and it works under FreeBSD 8.3 and WinXP.
I've got XP as VBox's vdi and just a folder to share content with
*nix.
It would be possible to install XP bootable without VBox to a ntfs
partition, to boot it directly
Eduardo Morras emorr...@yahoo.es writes:
On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 12:07:41 -0800 (PST)
leeoliveshackelf...@surewest.net wrote:
Good afternoon, FreeBSD enthusiasts. Can FreeBSD 9.1 be installed on
a computer on which Windows XP currently resides? If so, how can
this installation be done
access BSD by my Linux installs. And no,
the ntfs isn't Windows.
FWIW my old drives have only one primary and a extended + tons of
logical partitions, but I started to partition new drives with 3 primary
and one extended including as much logical partitions as needed [2].
To have one partition
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013, Carl Johnson wrote:
Eduardo Morras emorr...@yahoo.es writes:
On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 12:07:41 -0800 (PST)
leeoliveshackelf...@surewest.net wrote:
Good afternoon, FreeBSD enthusiasts. Can FreeBSD 9.1 be installed on
a computer on which Windows XP currently resides? If so
On Mon, 2013-03-11 at 12:25 -0600, Warren Block wrote:
Booting the same Windows install alternately in a VM and then on real
hardware may trigger the Genuine Advantage annoyance.
This is true, but for some exceptional cases perhaps untrue.
I wasn't aware about this possibility, but it does
Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com writes:
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013, Carl Johnson wrote:
It is my understanding that FreeBSD doesn't allow using part of a disk,
but grabs the entire disk. That means that VirtualBox can't use
partitions on a disk that any other partitions are being used by
anything
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013, Carl Johnson wrote:
Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com writes:
On Mon, 11 Mar 2013, Carl Johnson wrote:
It is my understanding that FreeBSD doesn't allow using part of a disk,
but grabs the entire disk. That means that VirtualBox can't use
partitions on a disk that any
Good afternoon, FreeBSD enthusiasts. Can FreeBSD 9.1 be installed on a
computer on which Windows XP currently resides? If so, how can this
installation be done? In particular, is there a way to install 9.1 so that it
can be booted from the traditional master boot record? It is important
On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 12:07:41 -0800 (PST)
leeoliveshackelf...@surewest.net wrote:
Good afternoon, FreeBSD enthusiasts. Can FreeBSD 9.1 be installed
on a computer on which Windows XP currently resides? If so, how
can this installation be done? In particular, is there a way to
install 9.1 so
On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 3:07 PM, leeoliveshackelf...@surewest.net wrote:
Good afternoon, FreeBSD enthusiasts. Can FreeBSD 9.1 be installed on a
computer on which Windows XP currently resides?
As others have already answered, yes. The risks are minimal if you are
careful but you will always
On Sat, 2013-03-09 at 21:27 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
Partition Magic
I would avoid to use proprietary software, ntfs, fat16 and fat32 are
full supported by Linux gparted, available for free as in beer at
http://partedmagic.com as a live media. Perhaps you need to defragment
the Windows
On Sat, 09 Mar 2013 21:49:29 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
On Sat, 2013-03-09 at 21:27 +0100, Polytropon wrote:
Partition Magic
I would avoid to use proprietary software, ntfs, fat16 and fat32 are
full supported by Linux gparted, available for free as in beer at
http://partedmagic.com as a
On Sat, 09 Mar 2013 21:27:45 +0100, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Sat, 9 Mar 2013 12:07:41 -0800 (PST),
leeoliveshackelf...@surewest.net wrote:
Good afternoon, FreeBSD enthusiasts. Can FreeBSD 9.1 be
installed on a computer on which Windows XP currently
resides?
Yes.
If so
Solar Window
Solar Collecter Windows (Interior Mounted) - University Tested and Solar
Rejector Windows all in one
A 4' X 4' In'Flector window insulator can produce as much heat as a 600 watt
electrical heater per sunlight hour and reflect up to 72% of the room heat back
into the room
Manish Jain skrev 2012-11-04 12:37:
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 16:41:45 +0530
From: bourne.ident...@hotmail.com
To: les...@eskk.nu
CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: My freebsd partition changed by Windows chkdsk (Leslie Jensen)
On 04-Nov-12 13:17, Leslie Jensen wrote:
Manish
Hello Leslie,
The short answer is No. And it would need more than a miracle to salvage
the situation if the partition information is lost.
Sorry if I broke your hopes.
But to look at the brighter side of things :
1) You would never have learnt so quickly so much about
Windows/FreeBSD
Manish Jain bourne.identity at hotmail.com writes:
Hello Leslie,
The short answer is No. And it would need more than a miracle to salvage
the situation if the partition information is lost.
...
I am wondering if this could help:
http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/TestDisk
jb
On Mon, 5 Nov 2012 19:25:25 + (UTC), jb wrote:
Manish Jain bourne.identity at hotmail.com writes:
Hello Leslie,
The short answer is No. And it would need more than a miracle to salvage
the situation if the partition information is lost.
...
I am wondering if this could
Manish Jain skrev 2012-11-02 19:18:
1) Boot from your FreeBSD CD/DVD, enter the slice editor and
change the type of your FreeBSD slice back to 165. Do not press Q.
Press W instead. Conform with Yes to the warning, and then press
Ctrl+Alt+Del to abort the installation.
2) Boot from your
are unclear with FreeBSD terminology. What Windows calls
primary partitions are called slices in FreeBSD. You can have a maximum
of 4 slices per disk, as I had mentioned earlier. One of the slices may
optionally be marked as what Windows calls an extended partition. The
extended partition can be broken up
Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 16:41:45 +0530
From: bourne.ident...@hotmail.com
To: les...@eskk.nu
CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: My freebsd partition changed by Windows chkdsk (Leslie Jensen)
On 04-Nov-12 13:17, Leslie Jensen wrote:
Manish Jain 2012-11-02 19:18:
1
2012-11-02 04:39, Warren Block skrev:
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Leslie Jensen wrote:
I've replaced my dual boot hard drive with an SSD.
My hard drive had one 100 GB windows partition and one 300 Gb Freebsd
slice with five partitions (/, /usr, /var, /tmp and /home).
In order to move my Win7
On Thu, 01 Nov 2012 10:26:33 +0100
Leslie Jensen articulated:
I've replaced my dual boot hard drive with an SSD.
My hard drive had one 100 GB windows partition and one 300 Gb Freebsd
slice with five partitions (/, /usr, /var, /tmp and /home).
In order to move my Win7 partition a Norton
that your trust was never breached
by Microsoft (for once). Microsoft firmly believes that Windows is the only
OS that should reside on a PC's disk. Therefore running chkdsk with force
was only an invitation to Microsoft to run amok.
BTW, the reason I replied to this message was not to provide you
Jerry skrev 2012-11-02 12:22:
On Thu, 01 Nov 2012 10:26:33 +0100
Leslie Jensen articulated:
I've replaced my dual boot hard drive with an SSD.
My hard drive had one 100 GB windows partition and one 300 Gb Freebsd
slice with five partitions (/, /usr, /var, /tmp and /home).
In order to move
that you by now have discovered that your trust was never breached
by Microsoft (for once). Microsoft firmly believes that Windows is the only
OS that should reside on a PC's disk. Therefore running chkdsk with force
was only an invitation to Microsoft to run amok.
BTW, the reason I replied
that that is not the case.
Windows lives in an insular universe, where everything else is Windows.
Or should be, as far as it is concerned.
Same as always: make a backup before doing something serious to the
disk.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
On Fri, 2 Nov 2012, Leslie Jensen wrote:
I use sysinstall and fdisk to find the disk, and I get
Please don't use sysinstall for this or any disk formatting.
Offset Size(ST) End Name PType Desc SubtypeFlags
0 63 62- 12 unused
2012-11-02 16:12, Warren Block skrev:
On Fri, 2 Nov 2012, Leslie Jensen wrote:
I use sysinstall and fdisk to find the disk, and I get
Please don't use sysinstall for this or any disk formatting.
Offset Size(ST) End Name PType Desc Subtype
Flags
0 63
the data from the freebsd
partition?
I trust that you by now have discovered that your trust was never
breached
by Microsoft (for once). Microsoft firmly believes that Windows is
the only
OS that should reside on a PC's disk. Therefore running chkdsk with
force
was only an invitation to Microsoft
Hello.
2012/11/02 14:49:57 +0100 Leslie Jensen les...@eskk.nu = To Manish Jain :
LJ Right after installation of FreeBSD, I ran :
LJ dd if=/dev/ad4 of=ad4.512 bs=512 count=1
LJ dd if=/dev/ad4s2 of=ad4s2.512 bs=512 count=1
LJ dd if=/dev/ad4s2a of=ad4s2a.512 bs=512 count=1
LJ Will you explain
I've replaced my dual boot hard drive with an SSD.
My hard drive had one 100 GB windows partition and one 300 Gb Freebsd
slice with five partitions (/, /usr, /var, /tmp and /home).
In order to move my Win7 partition a Norton Ghost program was supplied
with the new disk.
When trying
On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, Leslie Jensen wrote:
I've replaced my dual boot hard drive with an SSD.
My hard drive had one 100 GB windows partition and one 300 Gb Freebsd slice
with five partitions (/, /usr, /var, /tmp and /home).
In order to move my Win7 partition a Norton Ghost program
Hello.
2012/09/05 09:06:36 +0700 Victor Sudakov v...@mpeks.tomsk.su = To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
VS Depending on a task I think the most interactive user-friendly solution
here is
VS a minicom(s) each in its own ssh'ed jail(s).
VS
VS There is special Windows software for managing
Peter Vereshagin wrote:
Depending on a task I think the most interactive user-friendly solution here
is
a minicom(s) each in its own ssh'ed jail(s).
There is special Windows software for managing Natex MUXes. It works
with those MUXes via an RS232 port only. I want to be able to run it
from
per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
In fact, the question is whether there is a standards compliant
(not written for some proprietary hardware terminal server
protocol) driver for Windows. Not exactly a FreeBSD question,
I know :)
Finding a Windows driver that will work with an existing
On 3-9-2012 5:02, Victor Sudakov wrote:
Colleagues,
There is a FreeBSD box with several RS232 ports. Can those ports be
accessed by Windows hosts over the network? Actually, does anyone
have a success story for such a scenario?
There is some software like comms/serialoverip, comms/tits etc
Victor Sudakov v...@mpeks.tomsk.su writes:
Hi,
There is a FreeBSD box with several RS232 ports. Can those ports be
accessed by Windows hosts over the network? Actually, does anyone
have a success story for such a scenario?
Yes, sredird on the FreeBSD box NetDialout from PCMicro
Peter Boosten pe...@boosten.org wrote:
On 3-9-2012 5:02, Victor Sudakov wrote:
There is a FreeBSD box with several RS232 ports. Can those ports
be accessed by Windows hosts over the network?
If I understand your question correctly, then AFAICT the only way to
access serial ports over
per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
There is a FreeBSD box with several RS232 ports. Can those ports
be accessed by Windows hosts over the network?
If I understand your question correctly, then AFAICT the only way to
access serial ports over the network is with a piece of additional
Eric Masson wrote:
There is a FreeBSD box with several RS232 ports. Can those ports be
accessed by Windows hosts over the network? Actually, does anyone
have a success story for such a scenario?
Yes, sredird on the FreeBSD box NetDialout from PCMicro on the Windows
box.
Oh
On Mon, 3 Sep 2012 10:02:17 +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote:
Colleagues,
There is a FreeBSD box with several RS232 ports. Can those ports be
accessed by Windows hosts over the network? Actually, does anyone
have a success story for such a scenario?
There is some software like comms
Polytropon wrote:
There is a FreeBSD box with several RS232 ports. Can those ports be
accessed by Windows hosts over the network? Actually, does anyone
have a success story for such a scenario?
There is some software like comms/serialoverip, comms/tits etc but are
there any
Hello.
2012/09/03 14:29:20 +0700 Victor Sudakov v...@mpeks.tomsk.su = To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
VS There is a FreeBSD box with several RS232 ports. Can those ports be
VS accessed by Windows hosts over the network? Actually, does anyone
VS have a success story for such a scenario
Victor Sudakov v...@mpeks.tomsk.su wrote:
In fact, the question is whether there is a standards compliant
(not written for some proprietary hardware terminal server
protocol) driver for Windows. Not exactly a FreeBSD question,
I know :)
Finding a Windows driver that will work
Colleagues,
There is a FreeBSD box with several RS232 ports. Can those ports be
accessed by Windows hosts over the network? Actually, does anyone
have a success story for such a scenario?
There is some software like comms/serialoverip, comms/tits etc but are
there any (freeware) Windows virtual
Hi,
On Saturday 23 June 2012 15:08:53 Thomas Mueller wrote:
I don't think I ever tried to connect a USB 2.0 device to 3.0 port, but I
tried the opposite.
I have here 2 hard disks and 2 flash drives with USB 2.0. Three of them work
on FreeBSD on an USB 3.0 port. One hard disk only works
on different hardware platforms and even those machines
prior not recognizing the USB drive do recognize the drive as Lexar USB
Flash drive with 64GB. That is Suse Linux (some 12.XX), that is Ubuntu
12.04, that is Windows 7 Pro/x64. I can format the drive, I can push and
pull data from it.
So, since
and hardware in the lab on last week.
I reformatted the USB drive with extFAT and standard block size on
Windows 7. The USB drive is now seen again on FreeBSD and recognized as
this points that the pendrive's controller is not just flaky but horrid.
The communiation with OS, and how/whether
My elder colleague often told me that it is the easiest and well-working way
to check whether the one is certified to work for Mac OS X to get USB mass
storage devices which work with *BSD :)
Just my 5 yen,
-|-__ YAMAMOTO, Taku
| __ t...@tackymt.homeip.net
What if a USB mass storage
What if a USB mass storage device works with some BSDs but not all?
well the only thing i never experiences with USB pendrives is a one that
works everytime properly. Everything else is possible.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On 21 June 2012 23:22, Hans Petter Selasky hsela...@c2i.net wrote:
usbconfig -d 7.6 add_quirk UQ_MSC_NO_INQUIRY
Then re-plug it.
I'm sorry to say a lot of USB flash sticks out there are broken and only
tested with the timing of MS Windows. Part of the problem is that it is
difficult
Hi,
On Saturday 23 June 2012 15:08:53 Thomas Mueller wrote:
I don't think I ever tried to connect a USB 2.0 device to 3.0 port, but I
tried the opposite.
I have here 2 hard disks and 2 flash drives with USB 2.0. Three of them work
on FreeBSD on an USB 3.0 port. One hard disk only works on
of MS Windows. Part of the problem is that it is
difficult to autodetect these issues, because once you trigger the non-
supported SCSI command, then the flash key stops working like you
experience.
I would be more than glad to open up an office to certify USB devices for
use with FreeBSD
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 15:50:05 +0700
Erich Dollansky articulated:
USB is more a lottery than real computing for me.
That is really sad. I am sort of forced to use USB devices on a
daily basis, Luckily, very few of them involve FreeBSD, which is why I
do not exhibit such a negative attitude,
Hi,
On Saturday 23 June 2012 18:18:58 Jerry wrote:
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 15:50:05 +0700
Erich Dollansky articulated:
USB is more a lottery than real computing for me.
That is really sad. I am sort of forced to use USB devices on a
daily basis, Luckily, very few of them involve FreeBSD,
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 1:08 AM, Thomas Mueller muelle...@insightbb.comwrote:
My elder colleague often told me that it is the easiest and well-working
way
to check whether the one is certified to work for Mac OS X to get USB
mass
storage devices which work with *BSD :)
Just my 5 yen,
ports.
Same as in my case.
USB is more a lottery than real computing for me.
but this is not USB standard fault, but USB device manufacturers that
cannot really read standard specifications. It works (under windoze,
under linux) is enough.
___
daily basis, Luckily, very few of them involve FreeBSD, which is why I
do not exhibit such a negative attitude, except of course when I do
attempt to plug one in a FreeBSD machine with negative results. I do
not know what is more pathetic; the fact that so many devices fail to
operate correctly
On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 15:00:29 +0200 (CEST)
Wojciech Puchar articulated:
ports.
Same as in my case.
USB is more a lottery than real computing for me.
but this is not USB standard fault, but USB device manufacturers that
cannot really read standard specifications. It works (under
windoze, under linux) is enough.
If the ROI does not exceed the expenditure to meet a specification that
only applies to a niche segment of the potential market, then it is in
all probability not going to happen.
Right. Fine.
There is not written on them conforms to USB Mass Storage standard
as Lexar USB
Flash drive with 64GB. That is Suse Linux (some 12.XX), that is Ubuntu
12.04, that is Windows 7 Pro/x64. I can format the drive, I can push and
pull data from it.
So, since the USB drive won't work with three different FreeBSD boxes
(one running 9-STABLE, two 10-CURRENT, all systems
platforms and even those machines
prior not recognizing the USB drive do recognize the drive as Lexar USB
Flash drive with 64GB. That is Suse Linux (some 12.XX), that is Ubuntu
12.04, that is Windows 7 Pro/x64. I can format the drive, I can push and
pull data from it.
So, since the USB drive won't
prior not recognizing the USB drive do recognize the drive as Lexar USB
Flash drive with 64GB. That is Suse Linux (some 12.XX), that is Ubuntu
12.04, that is Windows 7 Pro/x64. I can format the drive, I can push and
pull data from it.
So, since the USB drive won't work with three different
incapable of handling the 64GB drive. I do not have issues with USB
it's not about capacity. But seems some quirks for that pendrive (which
have buggy firmware) has to be added, as it doesn't respond for inquiry
command.
sorry i am not USB expert.
umass1: Lexar USB Flash Drive, class 0/0,
platforms and even those machines
prior not recognizing the USB drive do recognize the drive as Lexar USB
Flash drive with 64GB. That is Suse Linux (some 12.XX), that is Ubuntu
12.04, that is Windows 7 Pro/x64. I can format the drive, I can push and
pull data from it.
So, since the USB drive won't
, but this seems to be a gambling issue :-(
Trying Linux on different hardware platforms and even those machines
prior not recognizing the USB drive do recognize the drive as Lexar USB
Flash drive with 64GB. That is Suse Linux (some 12.XX), that is Ubuntu
12.04, that is Windows 7 Pro/x64
Hi.
Sorry for my english.
I have a dual boot system, windows 7 64-bit (ada1) and FreeBSD 9.0 amd64
GEOM (ada0).
I did it by installing FreeBSD boot0 on Windows HDD:
boot0cfg -B ada1
then I choose Windows HDD as first boot drive in BIOS. Now at boot i
have boot0 menu:
F1 - Win
On Wed, 23 May 2012, Jerry McAllister wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 07:32:06PM -0300, Mario Lobo wrote:
On Wednesday 23 May 2012 18:49:06 Jerry McAllister wrote:
Hi,
I have been searching through questions and forums for information
on dual booting FreeBSD 8.3 on a machine with Windows 7
Hi,
I have been searching through questions and forums for information
on dual booting FreeBSD 8.3 on a machine with Windows 7 already on it.
My problem is that the posts seem to go around in circles and be
contradictory. I am not sure which to believe.
My new machine has two disk drives
On Wednesday 23 May 2012 18:49:06 Jerry McAllister wrote:
Hi,
I have been searching through questions and forums for information
on dual booting FreeBSD 8.3 on a machine with Windows 7 already on it.
My problem is that the posts seem to go around in circles and be
contradictory. I am
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 07:32:06PM -0300, Mario Lobo wrote:
On Wednesday 23 May 2012 18:49:06 Jerry McAllister wrote:
Hi,
I have been searching through questions and forums for information
on dual booting FreeBSD 8.3 on a machine with Windows 7 already on it.
My problem
On Wed, 23 May 2012, Jerry McAllister wrote:
Hi,
I have been searching through questions and forums for information
on dual booting FreeBSD 8.3 on a machine with Windows 7 already on it.
My problem is that the posts seem to go around in circles and be
contradictory. I am not sure which
On Wednesday 23 May 2012 19:41:22 Jerry McAllister wrote:
Since each system is going to be on different physical drives, why don't
you make things easy for you and just use the BIOS boot menu to choose
which drive to boot from?
That surely seems the hard way.Why interrupt the boot and
On 05/23/12 14:49, Jerry McAllister wrote:
Hi,
I have a dual boot system, windows 7 (ad0) and FreeBSD 9-stable (ad1).
I moved back to BIOS boot after (I think) windows upgrade stabbed ad0.
I found the system with a blank screen in the AM. Using BIOS boot, The
first windows screen had
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 23:05:58 +0100, David Demelier wrote:
Hello,
I try to create a dualboot with Windows 7, I set up partitions like that :
ada0s1 - NTFS (windows recovery)
ada0s2 - NTFS (windows main partition)
ada0s3 - BSD
ada0s3a - freebsd-swap (3G)
ada0s3b - freebsd-ufs
On 19/03/2012 07:28, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 23:05:58 +0100, David Demelier wrote:
Hello,
I try to create a dualboot with Windows 7, I set up partitions like that :
ada0s1 - NTFS (windows recovery)
ada0s2 - NTFS (windows main partition)
ada0s3 - BSD
ada0s3a - freebsd
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 08:29:22 +0100, David Demelier wrote:
On 19/03/2012 07:28, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 23:05:58 +0100, David Demelier wrote:
Hello,
I try to create a dualboot with Windows 7, I set up partitions like that :
ada0s1 - NTFS (windows recovery)
ada0s2
On 03/19/12 17:49, Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 08:29:22 +0100, David Demelier wrote:
On 19/03/2012 07:28, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 23:05:58 +0100, David Demelier wrote:
Hello,
I try to create a dualboot with Windows 7, I set up partitions like that :
ada0s1 - NTFS
2012-03-19 08:53, Da Rock skrev:
On 03/19/12 17:49, Polytropon wrote:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 08:29:22 +0100, David Demelier wrote:
On 19/03/2012 07:28, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 23:05:58 +0100, David Demelier wrote:
Hello,
I try to create a dualboot with Windows 7, I set up
to create a dualboot with Windows 7, I set up partitions like
that :
ada0s1 - NTFS (windows recovery)
ada0s2 - NTFS (windows main partition)
ada0s3 - BSD
ada0s3a - freebsd-swap (3G)
ada0s3b - freebsd-ufs / (remaining space from drive)
Erm... according to traditional partitioning, isn't
the 'a' partition
:
On Sun, 18 Mar 2012 23:05:58 +0100, David Demelier wrote:
Hello,
I try to create a dualboot with Windows 7, I set up partitions like
that :
ada0s1 - NTFS (windows recovery)
ada0s2 - NTFS (windows main partition)
ada0s3 - BSD
ada0s3a - freebsd-swap (3G)
ada0s3b - freebsd-ufs / (remaining space
Hello,
I try to create a dualboot with Windows 7, I set up partitions like that :
ada0s1 - NTFS (windows recovery)
ada0s2 - NTFS (windows main partition)
ada0s3 - BSD
ada0s3a - freebsd-swap (3G)
ada0s3b - freebsd-ufs / (remaining space from drive)
And then I let the installer
1 - 100 of 1938 matches
Mail list logo
