Over a year ago I filed this PR:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs/2009-February/034115.html
There is no response, and this problem is still there.
Is there any way to clear monitor mode from network device?
Yuri
___
On Thursday 10 June 2010 03:30:14 Pieter de Goeje wrote:
On Wednesday 09 June 2010 09:34:40 Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 09/06/2010 08:15:23, Eitan Adler wrote:
Why do I sometimes see the grep in ps's output and sometimes not see
it?
When you run that pipeline the OS doesn't start both
So, it would appear that Midphase hosting are still incapable of working out
why their ticketing system is sending replies with forged From: address to
posters to the freebsd-questions mailing list. (Their support queue is at
mpcustomer.com).
I'm assuming the list admins already have examples
Hi,
Am 10.06.10 11:47, schrieb Jonathan McKeown:
Subject: [#24548754] Re: why does ps |grep sometimes not return itself?
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 02:46:31 -0500
From: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Reply-To: supp...@mpcustomer.com
Message-ID:e436b556aafa1c4bd0f2c367a0097...@secure.mpcustomer.com
Am 10.06.10 11:47, schrieb Jonathan McKeown:
I'm assuming the list admins already have examples to work with, but here is a
set of headers from the reply I got to my last list post, in case it's any
help.
for everyone how does not want this mails anymore but into your
/etc/mail/access the
Hi,
On my system (FreeBSD 7.3 AMD64, system kernel current as per today)
it takes awully long to start up gnome (2.30) - awfully long meaning
2-3 minutes (this is on a Intel quadcore-CPU with 4GB RAM!)
In my /etc/rc.conf I've got
gnome_enable=YES
I've already ruled out the usual suspect being
Thanks for the recommendation. I'm pretty much settled on thttpd now
though - small, does cgi, no dependencies.
Thanks,
Peter.
-Original Message-
From: Nathan Peet Maier maier.nat...@gmail.com
Sent: 09 June 2010 23:38
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 4:24 AM, Matthias Fechner ide...@fechner.net wrote:
Hi,
Am 10.06.10 11:47, schrieb Jonathan McKeown:
Subject: [#24548754] Re: why does ps |grep sometimes not return itself?
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 02:46:31 -0500
From: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Reply-To:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 7:18 AM, Ewald Jenisch a...@jenisch.at wrote:
Hi,
On my system (FreeBSD 7.3 AMD64, system kernel current as per today)
it takes awully long to start up gnome (2.30) - awfully long meaning
2-3 minutes (this is on a Intel quadcore-CPU with 4GB RAM!)
In my
On Thursday 10 June 2010 14:06:46 Rob Farmer wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 4:24 AM, Matthias Fechner ide...@fechner.net
wrote:
Hi,
Am 10.06.10 11:47, schrieb Jonathan McKeown:
Subject: [#24548754] Re: why does ps |grep sometimes not return itself?
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 02:46:31 -0500
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:32 AM, Jonathan McKeown j.mcke...@ru.ac.za wrote:
On Thursday 10 June 2010 14:06:46 Rob Farmer wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 4:24 AM, Matthias Fechner ide...@fechner.net
wrote:
Hi,
Am 10.06.10 11:47, schrieb Jonathan McKeown:
Subject: [#24548754] Re: why does
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/06/2010 13:32:23, Jonathan McKeown wrote:
I know it creates work for the admins, but couldn't their address be
unsubscribed and banned, given that they have been creating a nuisance for at
least the last several weeks now?
Sure. Just tell
On Thursday 10 June 2010 14:51:42 Rob Farmer wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:32 AM, Jonathan McKeown j.mcke...@ru.ac.za
wrote:
[rant about midphase hosting and mpcustomer.com]
They posted in a previous thread about this, saying they couldn't
unsubscribe under their address, ie. somebody is
In response to Rob Farmer rfar...@predatorlabs.net:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:32 AM, Jonathan McKeown j.mcke...@ru.ac.za wrote:
On Thursday 10 June 2010 14:06:46 Rob Farmer wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 4:24 AM, Matthias Fechner ide...@fechner.net
wrote:
Hi,
Am 10.06.10 11:47,
On Thursday 10 June 2010 15:04:53 Matthew Seaman wrote:
The only other mechanism might be to tag each list e-mail with a unique
value for each recipient in such a way that it is preserved in the
message that mpcustomer.com's help system sends out. That has severe
problems of scale and load
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 6:09 AM, Jonathan McKeown j.mcke...@ru.ac.za wrote:
On Thursday 10 June 2010 14:51:42 Rob Farmer wrote:
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 5:32 AM, Jonathan McKeown j.mcke...@ru.ac.za
wrote:
[rant about midphase hosting and mpcustomer.com]
They posted in a previous thread about
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/06/2010 14:12:48, Jonathan McKeown wrote:
Isn't that called VERP (variable envelope return path)? I agree - the load it
Dat's der bunny.
would impose isn't worth it. I'm just shocked that midphase care so little
about their reputation or
I also have a similar problem (slow start-up) with gnome 2.30. In my case
gnome-panel stops for some time (30 secs ?) then outputs a message to the
console and then everything is ready to accept input. I can't attach the output
message now.
In my /etc/rc.conf I just added
hald_enable=YES
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Vinay vinay.par...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am new to FreeBSD. I have installed FreeBSD 6.3 and was playing with
gvinum.
snip
Can you let me know what am i missing?
You should use a current release of FreeBSD, if 6.3 is still supported it
won't be for much
Am 10.06.10 15:30, schrieb Matthew Seaman:
Until then, as someone upthread said, block them using your access DB if
you run your own sendmail based mail system. The equivalents for people
running other MTAs are left as exercises for interested students. If
you don't have your own mail system,
Hi all,
I can't find an answer to this question, so I decided to post here.
Since I'm not very good at english let me ask this with an example.
I assume that packages and ports may have different versions of the
same software (am I right?) so, for instance, if you install gnome
with packages you
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 04:58:56PM +0200, Antonio Vieiro wrote:
Hi all,
I can't find an answer to this question, so I decided to post here.
Since I'm not very good at english let me ask this with an example.
I assume that packages and ports may have different versions of the
same software
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Thu Jun 10 06:25:02 2010
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 13:24:55 +0200
From: Matthias Fechner ide...@fechner.net
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Midphase Hosting
Hi,
Am 10.06.10 11:47, schrieb Jonathan McKeown:
Subject: [#24548754] Re:
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 15:12:48 +0200
Jonathan McKeown j.mcke...@ru.ac.za articulated:
On Thursday 10 June 2010 15:04:53 Matthew Seaman wrote:
The only other mechanism might be to tag each list e-mail with a
unique value for each recipient in such a way that it is preserved
in the message
FreeBSD's sh (in 8.0) doesn't seem to support the ++ or -- arithmetic
operators
$ echo $((n++))
arithmetic expression: syntax error: n++
Am I wrong in thinking these are POSIX operators? It seems odd if they
were simply left-out..
___
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/06/2010 15:13:39, Matthias Fechner wrote:
Am 10.06.10 15:30, schrieb Matthew Seaman:
Until then, as someone upthread said, block them using your access DB if
you run your own sendmail based mail system. The equivalents for people
running
Hi all,
Its been a while since I have used CVSup.
I have a server with FreeBSD 8 RELEASE on it. It was built very shortly
after 8.0 was released.
I want to run CVSup on the source and ports before deploying it
TO make sure that just ports and source are updated, what tag do I use in
the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/06/2010 17:12:50, Jerry wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 15:12:48 +0200
Jonathan McKeown j.mcke...@ru.ac.za articulated:
On Thursday 10 June 2010 15:04:53 Matthew Seaman wrote:
The only other mechanism might be to tag each list e-mail with a
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 12:26:22PM -0400, Grant Peel thus spake:
Hi all,
Its been a while since I have used CVSup.
I have a server with FreeBSD 8 RELEASE on it. It was built very shortly
after 8.0 was released.
I want to run CVSup on the source and ports before deploying it
TO make sure that
RELENG_8_0
Yes. This will give you the latest 8.0 release + desired patch level
(critical security patches). This is almost certain what you want to be
running before going to production status. I mean, you could use
RELENG_8_0_RELEASE I suppose, but then the cvsup would be without
On 10.06.2010 18:12, Jerry wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 15:12:48 +0200
Jonathan McKeown j.mcke...@ru.ac.za articulated:
On Thursday 10 June 2010 15:04:53 Matthew Seaman wrote:
The only other mechanism might be to tag each list e-mail with a
unique value for each recipient in such a way that
I have an approach that will get MidPhase's attention, but I need the help
of as many of the other victims of their borked support system as I can
round up.
Anybody who gets one of their misbeggotten trouble-ticket acks, please
forward (or copy, or whatever) the message, with *COMPLETE* headers,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/06/2010 17:26:22, Grant Peel wrote:
Hi all,
Its been a while since I have used CVSup.
I have a server with FreeBSD 8 RELEASE on it. It was built very shortly
after 8.0 was released.
I want to run CVSup on the source and ports before
In the last episode (Jun 10), RW said:
FreeBSD's sh (in 8.0) doesn't seem to support the ++ or -- arithmetic
operators
$ echo $((n++))
arithmetic expression: syntax error: n++
Am I wrong in thinking these are POSIX operators? It seems odd if they
were simply left-out..
Easy enough
I had been using csh/tcsh for 20 years and I just switched to bash. The
recent discussion about the differences between the shells prompted me
to take another look at bash. I thought I'd share my perception of the
differences between tcsh and bash.
The big thing tcsh is lacking, and the reason
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Wed Jun 9 06:09:36 2010
From: Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 14:08:58 +0300
To: questi...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Too many defunct processes; kill -9 not working
Lately I've been getting a considerable number of defunct
Dan D Niles d...@more.net writes:
The which command functions differently between bash and tcsh. For
example, I have ls aliased to do color output and add some other options
that I like. With tcsh, 'which ls' returns
ls: aliased to \ls -GFB; with bash it returns
/bin/ls. The tcsh
In the last episode (Jun 10), Lowell Gilbert said:
Dan D Niles d...@more.net writes:
The which command functions differently between bash and tcsh. For
example, I have ls aliased to do color output and add some other options
that I like. With tcsh, 'which ls' returns
ls:
On Jun 10 2010 11:36, Robert Bonomi wrote:
I have an approach that will get MidPhase's attention, but I need the help
of as many of the other victims of their borked support system as I can
round up.
Anybody who gets one of their misbeggotten trouble-ticket acks, please
forward (or copy, or
I emailed the maintainer but got no response.
Fresh install of FreeBSD 8.0-Release and a port collection from around
6/5/10. Did a make on the dahdi-2.3.0rc2 port, but it fails.
I can provide details, but was wondering if it was something on my machine
or if others have noticed this and are
Douglas Thrift wrote on Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 02:27:25PM -0700:
Hello,
I've run into this before and it seems to me like the port should
actually depend on misc/compat6x. I emailed Martin about this a while
back, but never received any reply. Apparently there is even an open bug
for this:
On Thu, 10 Jun 2010 13:41:32 -0400
Lowell Gilbert freebsd-questions-lo...@be-well.ilk.org articulated:
bash (like most other sh-style shells) has no which builtin. You
end up running /usr/bin/which. bash (like most other sh-style
shells) does have a (rough) equivalent, which is type
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Douglas Thrift douglas...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I've run into this before and it seems to me like the port should
actually depend on misc/compat6x. I emailed Martin about this a while
back, but never received any reply. Apparently there is even an open bug
Hello,
I've run into this before and it seems to me like the port should
actually depend on misc/compat6x. I emailed Martin about this a while
back, but never received any reply. Apparently there is even an open bug
for this: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/146680
Hope this
I should have spent just a few more minutes googling. Found this:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.telephony.pbx.asterisk.bsd/3083
Looks like exactly the issue I ran in to.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
I Had a terrible week with freebsd. In monday I did an upgrade from 7.3
to 8.1-prerelease in 3 machines, 2 of them worked normaly and one stop
functioning, and without user (ldap) e cron is not sending emails. The
log for cron is:
Jun 10 19:45:00 sol /usr/sbin/cron[80892]: (root) CMD
Hello Martin, *,
the port lang/cmucl has a dependency on a very old libutil,
libc and libm:
% lisp
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libutil.so.5 not found, required by lisp
% which lisp
/usr/local/bin/lisp
% ldd `which lisp`
/usr/local/bin/lisp:
libutil.so.5 = not found (0x0)
hi all...
reading
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/sendmail.html
i did get an access file set up. it doesn't do anything thought...
i have only entry like this:
some.domain.comOK
and did make. then changed /etc/defaults/rc.conf to
On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 3:40 PM, kalin m ka...@el.net wrote:
hi all...
reading
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/sendmail.html
i did get an access file set up. it doesn't do anything thought...
i have only entry like this:
some.domain.com OK
and did
On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 02:49 am, Dan D Niles wrote:
I had been using csh/tcsh for 20 years and I just switched to
bash. The recent discussion about the differences between the
shells prompted me to take another look at bash. I thought
I'd share my perception of the differences between tcsh and
Disclaimer: If this mail has been sent to you by mistake or if you prefer not
to receive any future emails on Training Program from us, please reply this
e-mail with REMOVE in the subject line. We apologize for any inconveniences
caused. Thank you for your time.
Please forward this e-mail to
Hello
While I'm on the upgradeing path to KDE 4.4.4 I get the follwoing error in
x11/kdebase4-workspace. Any ideas?
Kind regards,
=== Building for kdebase-workspace-4.4.4
[ 0%] [ 0%] Built target kgreet_generic_automoc
Built target kgreet_classic_automoc
[ 0%] Built target
52 matches
Mail list logo