Hello,
I've setup a brand new computer from scratch, it has two HDMI output
(via the on board and via the ati graphic card) with one codec for the
main board.
Usually I have these pcm :
pcm0: HDA ATI R6xx HDMI PCM #0 HDMI at cad 0 nid 1 on hdac0
pcm1: HDA Realtek ALC888 PCM #0 Analog at cad 0
On 16 March 2011 19:47, Carmel carmel...@hotmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 11:32:48 -0700
Chuck Swiger cswi...@mac.com articulated:
On Mar 16, 2011, at 11:24 AM, Carmel wrote:
OK, then does that mean that the latest version will be used in the
still not released 9 version of
On Wednesday March 16 2011 19:58:13 Da Rock wrote:
On 03/17/11 07:04, ajtiM wrote:
On Wednesday March 16 2011 09:39:11 Mark Felder wrote:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 02:48:45 -0500, Da Rock
freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au wrote:
IF I understand you correctly here, you need to
On 03/17/11 20:51, ajtiM wrote:
On Wednesday March 16 2011 19:58:13 Da Rock wrote:
On 03/17/11 07:04, ajtiM wrote:
On Wednesday March 16 2011 09:39:11 Mark Felder wrote:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2011 02:48:45 -0500, Da Rock
freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au wrote:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 10:46:44 +
krad kra...@gmail.com articulated:
[snip]
a combination of time and limited resources I guess. If it bugs you
that much why dont you volunteer yourself to maintain it, i'm sure
that if you dont feel competent enough at present, people will help
and mentor
Carmel writes:
It is part of the base system. I don't know if it has a true
maintainer. In any case, I would need commit privileges which I
don't and never expect to have and have no desire to acquire..
I do not believe that is correct; a fair number of people
contribute
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 03:32:59PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 06/03/2011 19:56, Lars Eighner wrote:
Using the -C switch with portupgrade, I am managing to turn WITH_HAL off in
ports that I install or upgrade. Is there a way to make this a global
default?
Is there a (convenient) way to list
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, Krutov Mikle wrote:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 03:32:59PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 06/03/2011 19:56, Lars Eighner wrote:
Using the -C switch with portupgrade, I am managing to turn WITH_HAL off in
ports that I install or upgrade. Is there a way to make this a global
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 17:42:00 +0300, Krutov Mikle nekoexmach...@gmail.com
wrote:
As for me, it is like a habit:
I've installed Xorg + HAL for the first time;
I've seen that my config is ignored;
I disabled HAL by-default in make.conf
:)
Similar situation here. The thing that annoys me most
On 17 March 2011 16:10, Lars Eighner luvbeas...@larseighner.com wrote:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, Krutov Mikle wrote:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 03:32:59PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 06/03/2011 19:56, Lars Eighner wrote:
Using the -C switch with portupgrade, I am managing to turn WITH_HAL off
in
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Da Rock
freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au wrote:
The problem is it'd have to be someone who's unemployed. ;) Any
software company is going to want to patent something that valuable;
they'd be failing their shareholders if they didn't.
Except a
Quoth David Brodbeck on Thursday, 17 March 2011:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Da Rock
freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au wrote:
The problem is it'd have to be someone who's unemployed. ;) Any
software company is going to want to patent something that valuable;
they'd be
I have a question regarding the installation and startup of sguil-client on a
8.2 Generic OS.
It seems that my installation requires an iwidget extension when run with
tclsh8.4 and receives an error when running wish8.4:
Error in startup script: can't read 0: no such variable while executing
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 05:35:04PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote:
Well yes, that's one thing: if you use HAL, everything must use HAL
and you can't pick and match incompatible applications and force half
of the things in xorg.conf.
There should be a way to override it on a piecemeal basis.
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 10:46:50AM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
Quoth David Brodbeck on Thursday, 17 March 2011:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Da Rock
freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au wrote:
Except a private company.
Yeah, but most private software companies are trying
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011, Chad Perrin wrote:
In my experience, about one third of the time HAL makes X work great, and
the other two thirds of the time it fails in some way that requires me to
create a complete xorg.conf file just for one or two options.
hal just provides input device hotplug
Hi there,
Thanks so much for placing this contact information in your header! I am
trying to add SRV records to my name server, which is a FreeBSD box.
(Output from uname -a):
ns1# uname -a
FreeBSD ns1.partnershiphp.org 4.11-RELEASE FreeBSD 4.11-RELEASE #0: Fri Jan 21
17:21:22 GMT 2005
I have a remote server, and I'd like to know if it will support
64-bit instructions. Is there some way I can tell? It's running 32-bit
FreeBSD right now.
From dmesg.boot:
Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz (2387.76-MHz 686-class
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:48:52 -0600
Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com articulated:
I blame Microsoft, GNU, and Canonical for this trend, mostly.
Chad, I believe I stand on firm ground when I state that you would
blame Microsoft if the sun didn't come up tomorrow. You obviously must
have a life
Hi:
FreeBSD 4.11 is juts too old you should Upgrade that machine.
Anyway check the named(bind) version to see if it supports srv records.
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Ola Peters opet...@partnershiphp.orgwrote:
Hi there,
Thanks so much for placing this contact information in your
Afaik there should be LM in AMD features output. Even for Intel. Grep
your dmesg.boot for LM.
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 12:33 AM, Tait free...@t41t.com wrote:
I have a remote server, and I'd like to know if it will support
64-bit instructions. Is there some way I can tell? It's running
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 14:33 -0700, Tait wrote:
I have a remote server, and I'd like to know if it will support
64-bit instructions.
I wrote this for the job (please, suggestions/comments very welcome):
BEGIN FILE
/* -*- tab-width:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Diego Arias dak@gmail.com wrote:
Its actually a little bit harder than that, not impossible but you have to
upgrade the base OS and then the ports (Packages). As we have now 8.2 i
suggest to do a clean-installation
From version 6 and newer you could do a
Ola,
You have BIND 8.3 as you wrote to me. Check manual if it supports SRV
records. If so -- you do not have to upgrade your OS now.
FreeBSD 4 is REALLY OLD but I do not think upgrading freebsd is what you
want to do now: your issue is to update SRV record, right?
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 12:48
Hello,
What name server do you use? I am almost sure you have BIND.
You must open your zonefile, add SRV record and reload zone.
I think your zonefile is somewhere in /etc/namedb/
read bind manual, man named and man ndc (or rndc) to solve your problem.
Your question is not about freebsd but
I have a remote server, and I'd like to know if it will support
64-bit instructions. Is there some way I can tell? It's running 32-bit
FreeBSD right now.
From dmesg.boot:
Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz (2387.76-MHz 686-class CPU)
Tait wrote:
I have a remote server, and I'd like to know if it will support
64-bit instructions. Is there some way I can tell? It's running 32-bit
FreeBSD right now.
From dmesg.boot:
Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 2.40GHz (2387.76-MHz 686-class
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 14:33 -0700, Tait wrote:
I have a remote server, and I'd like to know if it will support
64-bit instructions. Is there some way I can tell? It's running 32-bit
FreeBSD right now.
From dmesg.boot:
Timecounter i8254 frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0
CPU:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 05:35:57PM -0400, Jerry wrote:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:48:52 -0600
Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com articulated:
I blame Microsoft, GNU, and Canonical for this trend, mostly.
Chad, I believe I stand on firm ground when I state that you would
blame Microsoft if the
Using the standard version query syntax below..
dig +short @ns1.partnershiphp.org version.bind txt chaos
DNS Server v2090
She seems to have a DNS server that I'm both unfamiliar with
and unable to find with a search engine.
So, as you say, this is a DNS server question not an OS
question.
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Ilya Kazakevich
kazakevichi...@gmail.comwrote:
Afaik there should be LM in AMD features output. Even for Intel. Grep
your dmesg.boot for LM.
Please don't top-post.
yes that is correct, LM stands for Long Mode which indicates amd64 support.
If your CPU doesn't
Hi,
Does any of you met the following problem using phpmp with musicpd:
When I try to change the volume on the web interface I always get the following
error: ACK [5@0] {} unknown command volume, everything else is working
great.
Thank you!
Laszlo
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:36:37 -0600
Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com articulated:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 05:35:57PM -0400, Jerry wrote:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 13:48:52 -0600
Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com articulated:
I blame Microsoft, GNU, and Canonical for this trend, mostly.
On 03/18/11 03:35, David Brodbeck wrote:
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Da Rock
freebsd-questi...@herveybayaustralia.com.au wrote:
The problem is it'd have to be someone who's unemployed. ;) Any
software company is going to want to patent something that valuable;
they'd be failing their
--As of March 17, 2011 7:48:58 PM -0400, Jerry is alleged to have said:
I have two Linksys Wireless-N PCI cards in front of me that work
fine on a Windows platform. FreeBSD doesn't even have a driver for
them, thereby rendering them useless. I suppose that is Microsoft's
fault too.
No,
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 07:48:58PM -0400, Jerry wrote:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:36:37 -0600
Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com articulated:
No, not really. It's more the fault of the hardware manufacturer.
Chad, up until this point I had taken your response seriously. In fact,
I thought it
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 06:27:13PM -0500, Adam Vande More wrote:
yes that is correct, LM stands for Long Mode which indicates amd64 support.
If your CPU doesn't list it, it's either a 32 bit only CPU, or it's a bug.
. . . or maybe it is a 64 bit CPU that is not x86_64/amd64 compatible.
Do
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 08:27:32PM -0400, Daniel Staal wrote:
The additional knowledge that Linux supports them means the manufacturer
isn't totally closed to supporting Open-source software, but tells us
nothing beyond that. Linux's support may be by way of a binary blob from
Linksys,
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
. . . or maybe it is a 64 bit CPU that is not x86_64/amd64 compatible.
Do IA-64 (Itanium), IBM POWER, and SPARC 64 bit processors use the same
Long Mode functionality?
No, it is a function of it's ancestry, real mode,
--As of March 16, 2011 10:17:12 PM +, Matthew Seaman is alleged to have
said:
I suggest you try out your update in a VM then, because I doubt anyone
will produce an answer definitive enough for you.
--As for the rest, it is mine.
In case anyone still cares, and if a VM running in
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 07:54:13PM -0500, Adam Vande More wrote:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
. . . or maybe it is a 64 bit CPU that is not x86_64/amd64 compatible.
Do IA-64 (Itanium), IBM POWER, and SPARC 64 bit processors use the same
Long Mode
Some time ago, emacs started doing this on startup under X:
(emacs:65141): GLib-WARNING **: In call to g_spawn_sync(), exit status
of a child process was requested but SIGCHLD action was set to SIG_IGN
and ECHILD was received by waitpid(), so exit status can't be
returned. This is a bug in the
Hope someone can see what I missed here, as the topic says, webcamd
doesn't start at boot.
Logitec USB cameram product 0x08b2 vendor 0x046d, is plugged in, works
wonderfully in skype-2.0.0.72,1, emesene-1.6.3, pwcview, etc..
grep webc /etc/rc.conf
webcamd_enable=YES
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root
Hello all, including the guys who responded.
Thanks for the comments and tips/ links. I'd see what I can do to move
fwd on the issue.
Appreciate your feedback!
On 3/10/2011 11:33 AM, Juan C. Valido wrote:
I'm an old foggie also and a lifetime Windows guy and I did a lot of
research and a
yes that is correct, LM stands for Long Mode which indicates amd64 support.
If your CPU doesn't list it, it's either a 32 bit only CPU, or it's a bug.
. . . or maybe it is a 64 bit CPU that is not x86_64/amd64 compatible.
Do IA-64 (Itanium), IBM POWER, and SPARC 64 bit processors use the same
45 matches
Mail list logo
