Re: Do I need to completely disable sendmail?
Robert C Wittig wrote: Rob Gabaree wrote: Thanks. What I did was remove all lines except `sendmail_enable=NO` and in /etc/mail/aliases, I setup the root alias to goto my real email address: root [EMAIL PROTECTED] I setup my firewall to block incoming/outgoing email on ports 21/25 as well, so no one on the outside can access mail services. It seems to be working correctly, as I received mail as it was ran to my @mydomain.com email. Does this seem ok? Did I do anything wrong? I run OpenBSD on my mailservers, but I expect that the sendmail works basically the same. In /etc/rc.conf or its FreeBSD equivalent, check the sendmail line to see if it references localhost.cf or sendmail.cf localhost.cf will permit internal mail on the machine, so that root can send messages to your everyday UID, etc., but will not permit mail to be sent to or received from, the Internet, or other machines in you LAN. sendmail.cf will permit full Internet email, but even this will not permit Internet email, unless your machine has a fully Qualified Domain Name, which is registered with your domain registrar, and has the Registrar's MX setting configured properly. Uh -- the way OpenBSD deals with sendmail is a bit different to the way FreeBSD does. Under FreeBSD, rc.conf settings are used to prevent sendmail from listening on any network interfaces than the loopback. Otherwise exactly the same sendmail.cf would be used for either case. FreeBSD also has all of the machinery required to rebuild the .cf files from the .mc files setup and available directly from /etc/mail. The system defaults to creating $(hostname).mc and $(hostname).submit.mc files if none exist already and then turning those into sendmail.cf and submit.cf Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Restricting access to home directory
Well... If there was an easy way to restrict users to their home directories using SCP or SCPONLY, I would love that instead. I don't really feel like installing an FTP server just so users can connect to my server when they are already used to using sftp-server. Is there anyway? -Matt On Sun, 24 Sep 2006, Marwan Sultan wrote: Hi Matt! If you are talking about givin FTP access only, then the easiest way to do it is just adding the user to the file /etc/ftpchroot and thats all!! if the file does not exist. then create it. add to /etc/ftpchroot all users that you want them to ftp but never see any upper level of shell. have fun, Marwan Sultan System Administrator. On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:09:23 -0400 (EDT) Matt Juszczak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to give a user access to my box via some kind of FTP but restrict him to his home directory. I have seen scponlyc, which supposedly can do this, but can't seem to get it working. _ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] !DSPAM:4517000f901501537419863! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Restricting access to home directory
Martin Hudec wrote: Hello Matt, DefaultRoot ~ [group] where ~ are their specified homedirs and group is optional (members of that group will be jailed to their homedirs, others will be able to browse everywhere, if group is not used, everybody using proftpd will be jailed). Martin pure-ftpd does this too. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
freebsd version?
hi can anybody tell me what is 6.2 preerelease. uname -a FreeBSD belagelo.com 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #0: Sun Sep 24 16:53:30 UTC 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/GENERIC i386 [EMAIL PROTECTED] azhar ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Howto zebra,balansing?
Hi! I made vpn (ipsec) on FreeBSD 6.1. For providing uninterrupted network performance, I made reserve channel connection with ADSL modem, added routes, installed zebra package. But during testing the reserve channel connection is not UP after basic channel gets DOWN. Diagram: gif0(ipsec) ++ net1/ \ net2 ---++ \ / \/ + ADSLADSL+ My zebra settings: ! ! Zebra configuration saved from vty ! 2006/09/14 14:06:20 ! hostname Router password * enable password * log file /var/log/zebra/zebra.log ! ! interface xl0 !ip address 192.168.166.107/24 ipv6 nd suppress-ra multicast ! interface ed0 ! ip address 192.168.1.1/24 ipv6 nd suppress-ra multicast ! interface gif0 ipv6 nd suppress-ra multicast ! ip route 192.168.165.0/24 gif0 ip route 192.168.165.0/24 ed0 ip route 192.168.166.0/24 xl0 ! line vty ! My ospf settings: ! ! Zebra configuration saved from vty ! 2006/09/14 16:46:34 ! hostname ospfd password * log file /var/log/zebra/ospfd.log ! interface xl0 ! interface ed0 ! interface gif0 ip ospf network point-to-point ! router ospf ospf router-id 192.168.166.107 network 0.0.0.0/0 area 0.0.0.0 network 192.168.166.0/24 area 0 network 192.168.165.0/24 area 0 redistribute connected redistribute static line vty ! Help me, please. Eugene Lomakin. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: freebsd version?
On 9/25/06, azhar freebsd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi can anybody tell me what is 6.2 preerelease. uname -a FreeBSD belagelo.com 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #0: Sun Sep 24 16:53:30 UTC 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/GENERIC i386 [EMAIL PROTECTED] When X-STABLE between X.Y and X.(Y+1) gets close to X.(Y+1), we call it X.(Y+1)-PRERELEASE instead of X.Y-STABLE. We're expecting 6.2 this November. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Restricting access to home directory
On 25 Sep Matt Juszczak wrote: If there was an easy way to restrict users to their home directories using SCP or SCPONLY, I would love that instead. Is there anyway? Short answer: NO and that's OK for a protocol based on ssh. Your users can pass the bounderies of their homedirectories if they're logged in too, can they not? And ssh is nothing more than kind of a remote login; a bit more secure than rlogin was (is) -- dick -- http://nagual.nl/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 6.1 +++ Solaris 10 6/06 ++ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Smart Link PCI modem
Hi, Did anybody managed to get an integrated smart link modem working under freebsd 6.x ? thanks for help, Felix ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: freebsd 6.1 floppy installation problem - boot loader finds only 16MB, but I have 256 MB - and it hangs
Hi. At Sat, 23 Sep 2006 21:49:20 +0200, Vo?ten?k Vladim?r wrote: I have an old HP NETSERVER PRO 2xpentium pro, 256 MB ram, and I tried to install the actual FREEBSD 6.1 there. I made 3 floppies: boot, kernel1 and kernel2. When it starts booting from the boot floppy, the loader show I only have 16 MB of RAM (instead 256MB I have there). Then it asks for kernel1 and 2 disk, and boot disk again. It gives me also the entry FREEBSD display with countdown - to choose boot type - default, no acpi, secure etc. I tried it all, but it alwaysl hangs after about 5 second after any choice. So I must just reboot. I think it is just because the lack of RAM, because, I think it requirets at least 24 MB of RAM. I have found something about this on the web, that it is necessary options MAXMEM=n to use all the RAM, because old BIOSes shows just first 16 MB or so, but I am just doing the installation. So how can I modify the kernel on the floppies to use such option during the installation from floppies? Or should I install from other media???Please can you help me with this??How can I make the installation boot floppy see all the RAM I have? Thank you very much for your reply. Greetings Vladimír Voštenák Choose 6. Escape to loader prompt from the boot menu and enter the two lines to the loader(8) prompt: set hw.physmem=256M boot See loader(8) for details. It's the same thing that you specify MAXMEM=256M to your kernel configulation file. --- Watanabe Kazuhiro ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Need help, some thing goes with wrong with Bridge-networking
Dear Sir: Those days i tried build an in-line firewall, I take freebsd as a good operation system because it is safety and stabilty, but i came with trouble when i follow the handbook to bridge the two Ethernet Card, the book(http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/network-bridging.html) says that i should recomplie the kernel to add options BRIDGE into it, however, after compiling the new kernel, typing comamds including sysctl -w net.link.ether.bridge.enable=1,sysctl -w net.link.ether.bridge.config=rl0,rl1, the bridge seems out of working, and my fressbsd system version is 6.1, those two network card is not assign any static ipv4 address, Can you tell me why it comes intn that, dieing to hrear from your answer, and i'm appriciate for it. yours steven ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Restricting access to home directory
Have a look to: http://www.pizzashack.org/rssh Regards, -- Thomas Gouverneur Junior UNIX Administrator TI Automotive -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Juszczak Sent: lundi 25 septembre 2006 8:28 To: Marwan Sultan Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Restricting access to home directory Well... If there was an easy way to restrict users to their home directories using SCP or SCPONLY, I would love that instead. I don't really feel like installing an FTP server just so users can connect to my server when they are already used to using sftp-server. Is there anyway? -Matt On Sun, 24 Sep 2006, Marwan Sultan wrote: Hi Matt! If you are talking about givin FTP access only, then the easiest way to do it is just adding the user to the file /etc/ftpchroot and thats all!! if the file does not exist. then create it. add to /etc/ftpchroot all users that you want them to ftp but never see any upper level of shell. have fun, Marwan Sultan System Administrator. On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:09:23 -0400 (EDT) Matt Juszczak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to give a user access to my box via some kind of FTP but restrict him to his home directory. I have seen scponlyc, which supposedly can do this, but can't seem to get it working. _ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] !DSPAM:4517000f901501537419863! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
portupgrade doens't work
Hi list, I've trying to update my freebsd 6.1 stable, but the portupgrade doesn't work. --- Upgrading 'arc-5.21o' to 'arc-5.21o_1' (archivers/arc) --- Building '/usr/ports/archivers/arc' with make flags: BATCH=yes script: openpty: No such file or directory and so go on Could you help me? Aguiar ___ Novidade no Yahoo! Mail: receba alertas de novas mensagens no seu celular. Registre seu aparelho agora! http://br.mobile.yahoo.com/mailalertas/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portupgrade doens't work
Have you done a portsnap fetch update before ? Aguiar Magalhaes a écrit : Hi list, I've trying to update my freebsd 6.1 stable, but the portupgrade doesn't work. --- Upgrading 'arc-5.21o' to 'arc-5.21o_1' (archivers/arc) --- Building '/usr/ports/archivers/arc' with make flags: BATCH=yes script: openpty: No such file or directory and so go on Could you help me? Aguiar ___ Novidade no Yahoo! Mail: receba alertas de novas mensagens no seu celular. Registre seu aparelho agora! http://br.mobile.yahoo.com/mailalertas/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
When to use SUID Perl (5.8.x)?
Hello, Just wondering what do you need suid perl for? I run a webserver for staff users, and have had no real need for it, and considering removing it. I think it goes to back the days when SA (possibly?) needed it and I just cp'd the make.conf across boxes over the years.. :) it is a security risk having it? Is the risk that if the webserver/webserver-app gets comprimised the user could use perl? Thanks in advance. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
calendar
Good day all. Where does one get an updated calendar.judaic? Mine seems to be out of sync. Thanks in advance. Michael ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Restricting access to home directory
rssh supports chroots it seems, but no way to actually tie them to their home dir. -Matt On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Gouverneur, Thomas wrote: Have a look to: http://www.pizzashack.org/rssh Regards, -- Thomas Gouverneur Junior UNIX Administrator TI Automotive -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Juszczak Sent: lundi 25 septembre 2006 8:28 To: Marwan Sultan Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Restricting access to home directory Well... If there was an easy way to restrict users to their home directories using SCP or SCPONLY, I would love that instead. I don't really feel like installing an FTP server just so users can connect to my server when they are already used to using sftp-server. Is there anyway? -Matt On Sun, 24 Sep 2006, Marwan Sultan wrote: Hi Matt! If you are talking about givin FTP access only, then the easiest way to do it is just adding the user to the file /etc/ftpchroot and thats all!! if the file does not exist. then create it. add to /etc/ftpchroot all users that you want them to ftp but never see any upper level of shell. have fun, Marwan Sultan System Administrator. On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:09:23 -0400 (EDT) Matt Juszczak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to give a user access to my box via some kind of FTP but restrict him to his home directory. I have seen scponlyc, which supposedly can do this, but can't seem to get it working. _ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] !DSPAM:4517c88b8285209328925! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Restricting access to home directory
Correct, but you can still use it into a chroot. Consider: http://www.sdri.co.jp/rssh/CHROOT_en.html Regards, -- Thomas Gouverneur Junior UNIX Administrator TI Automotive -Original Message- From: Matt Juszczak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: lundi 25 septembre 2006 15:35 To: Gouverneur, Thomas Cc: 'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org' Subject: RE: Restricting access to home directory rssh supports chroots it seems, but no way to actually tie them to their home dir. -Matt On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Gouverneur, Thomas wrote: Have a look to: http://www.pizzashack.org/rssh Regards, -- Thomas Gouverneur Junior UNIX Administrator TI Automotive -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Juszczak Sent: lundi 25 septembre 2006 8:28 To: Marwan Sultan Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Restricting access to home directory Well... If there was an easy way to restrict users to their home directories using SCP or SCPONLY, I would love that instead. I don't really feel like installing an FTP server just so users can connect to my server when they are already used to using sftp-server. Is there anyway? -Matt On Sun, 24 Sep 2006, Marwan Sultan wrote: Hi Matt! If you are talking about givin FTP access only, then the easiest way to do it is just adding the user to the file /etc/ftpchroot and thats all!! if the file does not exist. then create it. add to /etc/ftpchroot all users that you want them to ftp but never see any upper level of shell. have fun, Marwan Sultan System Administrator. On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 15:09:23 -0400 (EDT) Matt Juszczak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I would like to give a user access to my box via some kind of FTP but restrict him to his home directory. I have seen scponlyc, which supposedly can do this, but can't seem to get it working. _ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] !DSPAM:4517c88b8285209328925! The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and confidential information. It is intended only for the use of the person(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: lpd hewlett packard
On 9/25/06, justin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Hello, Now i ask myself what the /boot/device.hints file has to do with my kernel. What sort of file is /boot/device.hints and why do i have to rebuild my kernel. man device.hints(5) Thanks inadvance, Justin. -- Pietro Cerutti ICQ: 117293691 PGP: 0x9571F78E - ASCII Ribbon Campaign - against HTML e-mail and proprietary attachments www.asciiribbon.org ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Radeon R300 3d support
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 05:39:21PM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: On 9/23/06, Steve Roome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I've noticed a lot of people trying to get radeons with R300 and newer cores working with FreeBSD and 3D acceleration. At least there's been a fair few unanswered requests for it for a while now. So, does anyone know when the newer ati drivers will be put in the x.org port, or when that will be updated. xorg 7.x will hit the ports tree any time now. 6.9 already has some basic support, e.g. my 9550 works, very slowly though. What do you mean by basic support ? My PCIE X700 now has semi working 3D acceleration - glx and working dri working well enough to play with a few OpenGL apps, I've gone so far as to actually set some of the reallyslick screensavers up - and most work okay, well, not all, some of them whine about the odd issue, but there is limited 3D acceleration here. The 6.9 in the ports gave me only 2D acceleration, as expected, no DRI no glx etc. So, which version of 7.x is coming into the ports, and what version of the ati driver will be coming in with it ? Ta, Steve Roome ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
freeBSD official font
hi can you tell me what is name of freeBSD font? i would like to do some artworks to promote freebsd and i beadly need this font bye -- Pozdrawiam, Jarek Berecki ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: freebsd version?
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 04:35:07PM +0900, azhar freebsd wrote: hi can anybody tell me what is 6.2 preerelease. Just what it says. It is a FreeBSD 6.2 that has not been officially released yet. The present official release is 6.1. The 6.2 release is coming soon and is being worked on actively. You can install it for testing or development or somewhat risky production use. It is sort of a beta release. jerry uname -a FreeBSD belagelo.com 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #0: Sun Sep 24 16:53:30 UTC 2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/GENERIC i386 [EMAIL PROTECTED] azhar ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
sendmail + milter + postfix + jails question
hi, i don't like sendmail very much, but have been happily using postfix for years now, on a freebsd mailserver with jails i was wondering whether the following is possible : - all incoming email goes to 1 jail which only runs sendmail + milter and blocks all email with .gif attachments - sendmail then let's through all other emails with some transport-map which doesn't need individual aliases (per user) - other jails (separate jail for lists and email) accept the email via postfix can sendmail do this ? or is there other mailserver-software which can block gif and hand over all email to other jails with postfix i'm asking this for the following reasons : - i have a jail with postfix+mysql+spamassassin+maildrop, esp. the maildrop-part took me many many hours to figure out, (turned out that courier maildrop default mysql-support was dropped in favour for courier authdaemon+mysql-support) it's working fine now, so i prefer not to add more to this jail, but i'd like to stop .gif-images attached now - it looks like postfix needs per user aliases for transport-situation to virtual domains (or am i missing something ?) possible or not good ? thanks in advance for useful info! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Korn Shell [[ ... ]] operator
I know csh is the shell of choice on FreeBSD. But I have this question on Korn Shell and it would be great if somebody could explain. Can someone tell me a little more about the Korn Shell [[ ... ]] double-brackets construct used for comparing string expressions. How does it differe from the standard [ ... ] single brackets. You could tell me to RTFM but I haven't gleaned enough clarity from such efforts already expended. It would be great if you could give some idea through examples. Cheers, Andy -- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exim As MTA
I am running Exim as a sendmail replacement, and I keep getting a Message failure - message too big in my inbox for root. (looks like from daily run output) A message that you sent was longer than the maximum size allowed on this system. It was not delivered to any recipients. -- This is a copy of your message, including all the headers. -- No more than 100K characters of the body are included. it is soo large b/c of all the rejected mail: I do want to see the mail due to the messages in the queue.. but how do I get it not to show me rejected mail? ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Korn Shell [[ ... ]] operator
In the last episode (Sep 25), Arindam said: I know csh is the shell of choice on FreeBSD. But I have this question on Korn Shell and it would be great if somebody could explain. Can someone tell me a little more about the Korn Shell [[ ... ]] double-brackets construct used for comparing string expressions. How does it differe from the standard [ ... ] single brackets. Different comparison operators, basically, and faster than [ because it doesn't have to fork /bin/[ . You could tell me to RTFM but I haven't gleaned enough clarity from such efforts already expended. They're all documented in the manpage (ksh93 for the shells/ksh93 ports), under Conditional Expressions. Compare them with the test manpage. It looks like FreeBSD's test command does most of what ksh does, except for the wildcard matching of =, which is handy but can be emulated with a case statement :) -- Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Korn Shell [[ ... ]] operator
The [[ ]] operators are for compound tests, the [ ] operator is for simple tests. In ksh newer than 6/3/86 the [[ ]] makes the [ ] obsolete. Example of [[ ]]: [[ foo bar $PWD -ef . ]] print foobar foobar That is from the kornshell book co-written by David Korn. By the way, I use ksh for my root's shell and it works fine. -Derek At 10:31 AM 9/25/2006, Arindam wrote: I know csh is the shell of choice on FreeBSD. But I have this question on Korn Shell and it would be great if somebody could explain. Can someone tell me a little more about the Korn Shell [[ ... ]] double-brackets construct used for comparing string expressions. How does it differe from the standard [ ... ] single brackets. You could tell me to RTFM but I haven't gleaned enough clarity from such efforts already expended. It would be great if you could give some idea through examples. Cheers, Andy -- ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. MailScanner thanks transtec Computers for their support. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Radeon R300 3d support
On 9/25/06, Steve Roome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 05:39:21PM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote: On 9/23/06, Steve Roome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I've noticed a lot of people trying to get radeons with R300 and newer cores working with FreeBSD and 3D acceleration. At least there's been a fair few unanswered requests for it for a while now. So, does anyone know when the newer ati drivers will be put in the x.org port, or when that will be updated. xorg 7.x will hit the ports tree any time now. 6.9 already has some basic support, e.g. my 9550 works, very slowly though. What do you mean by basic support ? My PCIE X700 now has semi working 3D acceleration - glx and working dri working well enough to play with a few OpenGL apps, I've gone so far as to actually set some of the reallyslick screensavers up - and most work okay, well, not all, some of them whine about the odd issue, but there is limited 3D acceleration here. I mean, FWIW, that 6.9 has basic support for 3D on my 9550. 6.8 doesn't and I heard that 7.0 has much better support. The 6.9 in the ports gave me only 2D acceleration, as expected, no DRI no glx etc. So, which version of 7.x is coming into the ports, and what version of the ati driver will be coming in with it ? 7.1, the one that's bundled. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: sendmail + milter + postfix + jails question
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi, i don't like sendmail very much, but have been happily using postfix for years now, on a freebsd mailserver with jails i was wondering whether the following is possible : - all incoming email goes to 1 jail which only runs sendmail + milter and blocks all email with .gif attachments - sendmail then let's through all other emails with some transport-map which doesn't need individual aliases (per user) - other jails (separate jail for lists and email) accept the email via postfix can sendmail do this ? or is there other mailserver-software which can block gif and hand over all email to other jails with postfix i'm asking this for the following reasons : - i have a jail with postfix+mysql+spamassassin+maildrop, esp. the maildrop-part took me many many hours to figure out, (turned out that courier maildrop default mysql-support was dropped in favour for courier authdaemon+mysql-support) it's working fine now, so i prefer not to add more to this jail, but i'd like to stop .gif-images attached now - it looks like postfix needs per user aliases for transport-situation to virtual domains (or am i missing something ?) possible or not good ? Hi, Is there a specific reason why you absolutely want to keep sendmail? Why don't you do everything with postfix, and a content filtering tool you haven't mentioned: amavis? Jails runs all of the software you mentioned just fine. Just remember to bind on the IP of your jail. --- Philippe Lang Attik System smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: Exim As MTA
B. Cook wrote: I am running Exim as a sendmail replacement, and I keep getting a Message failure - message too big in my inbox for root. (looks like from daily run output) I do want to see the mail due to the messages in the queue.. but how do I get it not to show me rejected mail? To set the maximum message size the Exim will process, put something like message_size_limit = 50M return_size_limit = 1M in Exim's configuration file, /usr/local/etc/exim/configure See http://exim.org/ for full details. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
system gets panic
Hi list, I have a HP dx5150 SFF system with FreeBSD 6.1 Release running on it. The system worked fine the first 4 weeks, after that, the server begun to reboot while it was booting, and two or three times 5 minutes after booting. The error message said: panic: softdep_setup_inomapdep: found inode ... rebooting after 15 segs. Do you know what´s going on here? Thanks! ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GBDE on top of SSHFS (on top of rsync.net)
I am successfully using sshfs with my offsite backup provider, rsync.net. I used these instructions: http://www.rsync.net/resources/howto/freebsd_sshfs.html and have my remote filesystem mounted locally. I decided that I would like to create a 4 GB GBDE image and place it on the mounted offsite-filesystem, and then mount that ... which is a mount on top of a mount, but theoretically it should work. But it doesn't. When I issue the command: gbde init /dev/md0 -i -L /etc/gbde/md0 and save the file in the vi editor, making no changes, I get this error after entering my password: Enter new passphrase: Reenter new passphrase: gbde: write: Input/output error # So I am mainly just curious - has anyone ever mounted a GBDE on top of an sshfs mounted filesystem ? Thanks. __ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: build audit kernel
On Fri, 21 Apr 2006, Natalie Sugako wrote: I want to use audit events on FreeBSD6.1-BETA4. I read that I must build kernel with option: options AUDIT (FreeBSD handbook). But config (/usr/sbin/config) find next error: unknown option AUDIT Maybe, option was renamed? Help me, PLS! Thanks FYI: Support for audit has now been merged to the 6-STABLE branch for inclusion in FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE in the next month. The 6.1-BETA1 image includes basic audit support; it will be significantly refined and updated in 6.1-BETA2 next week. The handbook chapter has else been extended to cover audit in more detail. Thanks, Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re[2]: build audit kernel
Hello Robert, Tuesday, September 26, 2006, 12:05:25 AM, you wrote: FYI: Support for audit has now been merged to the 6-STABLE branch for inclusion in FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE in the next month. The 6.1-BETA1 image includes basic audit support; it will be significantly refined and updated in 6.1-BETA2 next week. The handbook chapter has else been extended to cover audit in more detail. s/6.1-BETA/6.2-BETA/g :-) -- Best regards, Danielmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: some apps very slow under Gnome
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 02:05:00PM -0700, Gary Kline wrote: Guys, This may/may not prove the superiority of BSD over the Linux kernel, dunno. Maybe you can help me figure out what I need to tune; or (*sob*) lighten my load on ethos. I've got three of the 4 default workspaces full of apps. Mostly xterms or gnome-terminals. I have 1G RAM, a huge disk, a 2800 AMD chip, yet realplay is *very* slow to respond. It's time-counter changes only ever 8 seconds and when I cover part or all, it takes several seconds to fill back in. Is this a bug in xorg or in realplay or what? Last night I closed realplay and began having similar problems with one of the terminals. I have run CTWM for years so am used to a lightweight wm. I haven't checked to see if gnome/kde-LITE are available. That may be the problem. I am reluctant to post this to the ubuntuforums because I've already asked enough idiot questions ... (Sure, I do the same here, but I know you guys:-) I could close all my xterms and see, but it took hours to get things configured just the way I want! Well, he said, replying to his ownpost, the trouble/(bug??) was in the Windows click-on in the gnome-config apps. I had the proper selection. It jst never responded until I clicked an un-clicked -- Gary Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.thought.org Public service Unix ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Filesystem size
Can anyone tell me if Freebsd 5.4 amd64 support file system more than 4TB ? I have a system disk and a raid 5 connected to a 3ware controller, installed system, but only see 96 GB on the 4 TB raid 5. Anyone can help me? My mailbox is spam-free with ChoiceMail, the leader in personal and corporate anti-spam solutions. Download your free copy of ChoiceMail from www.digiportal.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Filesystem size
--- Weijer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can anyone tell me if Freebsd 5.4 amd64 support file system more than 4TB ? I have a system disk and a raid 5 connected to a 3ware controller, installed system, but only see 96 GB on the 4 TB raid 5. Anyone can help me? My mailbox is spam-free with ChoiceMail, the leader in personal and corporate anti-spam solutions. Download your free copy of ChoiceMail from www.digiportal.com ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.freebsd.org/projects/bigdisk/index.html would answer your questions I believe -brian ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re[2]: build audit kernel
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006, Daniel Gerzo wrote: Tuesday, September 26, 2006, 12:05:25 AM, you wrote: FYI: Support for audit has now been merged to the 6-STABLE branch for inclusion in FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE in the next month. The 6.1-BETA1 image includes basic audit support; it will be significantly refined and updated in 6.1-BETA2 next week. The handbook chapter has else been extended to cover audit in more detail. s/6.1-BETA/6.2-BETA/g :-) Indeed! Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: When to use SUID Perl (5.8.x)?
Hi, Just wondering what do you need suid perl for? To run a Perl script that needs to get root privileges. it is a security risk having it? It is always a risk to have a powerfull tool installed when you don't need it. If a security bug is discovered in Perl, one could be able to become root without you wanting it. Is the risk that if the webserver/webserver-app gets comprimised the user could use perl? It depends on whatyou are running on your server. If you don't need setuid perl, do not install it :)) Olivier ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: USB based webcam
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006, Erik Norgaard wrote: Hi: I have a laptop with a built in webcam: ugen0: Vimicro Corp. USB2.0 Web Camera, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 2 Since this goes on the generic usb device, I guess there is no driver. Is this supported? Do I need to download a driver somewhere or will webcam software provide it? Secondly, what software is recommended to make this useful? Perhaps you should try freebsd-usb freebsd-mobile (see http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1 /books/handbook/eresources.html#ERESOURCES-MAIL) ? Regards, Uli. Peter Ulrich Kruppa Wuppertal Germany ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Dual Monitor problems
Well, I didn't get much input here. How about if I generalize it a little bit? Is *anyone* currently running a late model ATI card with dual monitors? If so, could you post or email me your xorg.conf? -- Jonathan Arnold Daemon Dancing in the Dark, a FreeBSD blog: http://freebsd.amazingdev.com/blog ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dummynet Question
Hi all, I have installed dummynet on a machine-2 which I am using to introduce delay between the packets that I'll be sending from machine-1 to machine-3. I am using ping to confirm that ICMP/TCP packets are getting delayed. I know both UDP/TCP fall under ip, so UDP packets should also be getting delayed but just to confirm, do you guys know of any utility that I can use to check if UDP packets are also getting delayed. ipfw shows pipe 1 and queue 1 as pipe 1 ip from any to any queue 1 ip from any to any I am running linux on machine-1 and machine-3. TIA -Sushant ps: please cc the reply to me also as I am not subscribed to the list. ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
dovecot port not compiling with mysql support
Hello all, as I am experiencing serious performance degradation while using dovecot (extremely high cpu usage), I've tried to recompile it without kqueue support as it seems to be the root cause (this issue is being solved in dovecot maillist), but I am getting error while wanting to compile with MySQL support in driver-mysql.c (please see below for more information). Is there someone experiencing the same issue? Or should I file pr? thanks, Martin Hudec RELEVANT INFORMATION 1.) config options MySQL support enabled, kqueue support disabled. 2.) output from make all ... Making all in lib-sql if cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -I../../src/lib -I/usr/local/include/mysql -I/usr/local/include -std=gnu99 -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Wall -W -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations -Wpointer-arith -Wchar-subscripts -Wformat=2 -Wbad-function-cast -MT driver-mysql.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/driver-mysql.Tpo -c -o driver-mysql.o driver-mysql.c; then mv -f .deps/driver-mysql.Tpo .deps/driver-mysql.Po; else rm -f .deps/driver-mysql.Tpo; exit 1; fi driver-mysql.c: In function `driver_mysql_parse_connect_string': driver-mysql.c:234: error: `ulong' undeclared (first use in this function) driver-mysql.c:234: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once driver-mysql.c:234: error: for each function it appears in.) driver-mysql.c:234: error: syntax error before numeric constant *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/mail/dovecot/work/dovecot-1.0.rc7/src/lib-sql. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/mail/dovecot/work/dovecot-1.0.rc7/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/mail/dovecot/work/dovecot-1.0.rc7. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/mail/dovecot/work/dovecot-1.0.rc7. *** Error code 1 ... ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Creating New Users over Telnet/SSH
So a friend of mine is interested in creating a FreeBSD telnet/SSH box for people in his networking class to screw with. He said he wants to do something like what happens when you telnet into sdf.*lonestar.org *and if you're a new user you just type new and go from there, but I've never done this or looked into it, so I was wondering if any of you had any ideas on how to do this. Basically, User telnets to the server. if they have a username and password, they put it in. If they don't, then they are taken to a place where they can create a new account (on lonestar, it says it's taking you to a NEWUSER mkacct server to do this then asks me to put in FEP commands for creating shell accounts) It gives you the options and disclaimer and such and you have to agree then choose a username. Then it asks you more questions like zip code and password and such and it finally creates your user account, you can then log in to the system. Lonestar is using netBSD, we are going to use FreeBSD 6.1 Any info on how to accomplish this is greatly appreciated. -John Cruz ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
