Hi,
Who do I contact to see if they can add a step to the UPDATING
document in ports to make sure/remind/etc people to use.perl port before
upgrading all the modules?
Thanks, Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc.
___
[EMAIL
/sysinstall it, fdisk pitches a serious fit about
it.
What can I do to get this configured properly? It seems that if I
bring it down to RAID-1+0, it configures up fine.
Thanks, Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc.
___
[EMAIL
that
should be changed/added?
Thanks, Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cvsup ports-all first?
Done. Did it just before I started.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sunday 02 May 2004 04:25 pm, Tuc wrote:
cvsup ports-all first?
Done. Did it just before I started.
I think you need to run use.perl port before you update your p5-*
Thats what I wondered, how they were getting around that part. Thought
maybe the way the portupgrade
system. In 4 I knew how to
do it with device psm0at atkbdc? irq 12, but now not sure
how do this in 5. I see something about a hints file, but not sure how
it plays in, if at all.
Thanks, Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc
. In 4 I knew how to
do it with device psm0at atkbdc? irq 12, but now not sure
how do this in 5. I see something about a hints file, but not sure how
it plays in, if at all.
Thanks, Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc.
___
[EMAIL
at that LBA, and either fix it, or do something
so it doesn't use that block or any bad block anymore?
Thanks, Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
, Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a problem with it yesterday that is
going to be fixed and a snapshot made from CVS.
Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail
/usr/ports/devel/bonobo-activation: No such file or directory.
Eh? What happened?
Thanks, Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
Tuc wrote:
Hi,
Trying to upgrade my ports for some bonobo stuff.
Eh? What happened?
I was having a similar issue trying to update ports. I ended up using
pkg_deinstall -f libbonobo and then installing the port again by had
with make install clean. It was necessary
Try using pkg_deinstall not make deinstall.
himinbjorg# pkg_delete libbonobo-2.2.3
pkg_delete: no such package 'libbonobo-2.2.3' installed
himinbjorg# ls -ld /var/db/pkg/libbo*
drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Sep 23 11:44 /var/db/pkg/libbonoboui-2.2.4
Tuc/TTSG Internet Services
.
Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
RELENG_4_8.
Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the speeds it can go) I get :
pci_cfgintr_search: linked (63) to configured irq 11 at 0:29:0
Kernel trap 12 with interrupts disabled
Where do I go from here? Can't find anything on this.
Thanks, Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc
Thanks, Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mar 31 16:49:14 jake kernel: Warning: pid 37735 used static ldt
allocation. Mar 31 16:49:14 jake kernel: See the i386_set_ldt man page
for more info
I get this from XFree86 and xlock, mostly xlock.
Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc
?
Thanks, Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Arun G Nair [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I get this mesg when the mouse freezes in X.any idea
what this is.
Did you look at the FAQ on this?
I did since it happens to me on a daily basis. I think I tried
everything and didn't get any of it to work.
Tuc/TTSG
I can do to find
out, and then do a test backout of it to see if it fixes things?
Has anyone heard/seen this before and maybe know what the issue is?
Thanks, Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
libxml2) to see if that gets rid of it.
Yea, I did... On the 12th.
Please let me know if it works/helps/etc. If not, is there anyone
else thats run into it?
Thanks,
Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc
AFAIK this is the closest PHP gets to running a script under the same
UID/GID as the user/group that owns the script.
You can also check out CGI-WRAP. (The one in ports is too old.)
http://cgiwrap.unixtools.org/
Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc
at device 8.0
on pci1
asr0: major=154
asr0: ADAPTEC 2110S FW Rev. 380E, 1 channel, 256 CCBs, Protocol I2O
and I loaded the u160raid_sm_v304_fbsd411.tgz found on the site. Works
fine for us.
Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc.
___
[EMAIL
and throw it
away. Never had an issue like that before.
So, as weird as it might be, power supplies can do strange things to
a machine!
Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body
)
Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
it from source myself, works fine.
Set one of the following when building the port:
WITHOUT_SSL
WITH_SSL_AND_PLAINTEXT
Worked for me (the latter option) about a week ago.
Tried both, and both give me the verion that uses SSL and won't allow
plaintext passwords.
Tuc
Hi,
Having an oddity in /tmp on my 4.7-STABLEWhen I create files in
/tmp, they have the wrong group :
himinbjorg% id
uid=1000(tuc) gid=1000(tuc) groups=1000(tuc), 0(wheel)
himinbjorg% ls -l /tmp/tuc
ls: /tmp/tuc: No such file or directory
himinbjorg% touch /tmp/tuc
himinbjorg% ls -l
You need to do this with both cclient and imap-uw:
make WITH_SSL_AND_PLAINTEXT=yes
Been there, done that, been seriously frustrated, built from source.
EVERY time I compile, no matter what I do, it comes up with LOGINDISABLED
instead of AUTH=LOGIN
Tuc
On Thu, Feb 20, 2003 at 09:37:10AM -0500, Tuc wrote:
-rw-r--r-- 1 tuc wheel 0 Feb 20 09:35 /tmp/tuc
pinhead@aeolus [/tmp] $ ls -ld /tmp/
drwxrwxrwt 14 root wheel 1536 Feb 20 15:57 /tmp//
the sticky bit set for /tmp. thats the reason why all files have
gid wheel.
see sticky(8
And, of course, without meaning or implying any insult at all,
did you restart inetd?
Actually, I ran the binary by hand from the command line before
even installing. I check for the banner. I then exit it with b3 LOGOUT.
Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc
a difference.
Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
, and when I did RELENG_4 it
was 4.X as current as it was? Is there another tag for 4.7 most current?
Thanks, Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
with critical
updates.
RELENG_4 - More current than 4_7, has non critical updates and
tweaks, but doesn't guarantee it being 4_7 branch.
So there isn't a way to make sure I stay in 4.7, but get all the
fixes, right?
Thanks, Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc
the uname banner changed to
4.8-PRERELEASE? Thats not my impression of what 4_7 is.
Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
and try to get
back in again it'll completely lock up.
Is there any way to find out atleast whats causing the reboots?
I'm not seeing anything in the logs about it.
Thanks, Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd
, and the screen
went black, and the DELL splash screen came on. I ran burnP6 for a few
minutes (Boy does it make the system unhappy, but it kept chugging) and
BurnMMX too. I'm cvsup'd to Feb 23, RELENG_4.
Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
) and
BurnMMX too. I'm cvsup'd to Feb 23, RELENG_4.
Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc.
can faulty hardware be ruled out then?
I don't know.
burnP6 and burnMX have been running all night
342:16 49.17% 49.17% burnBX
340:52 48.10% 48.10% burnP6
and there are no problems
/replace RAM, power supply, CPU fan, cabling, CPU etc.
Heres the rub... Mine is a Dell 8200 laptop. Not like I can do
much hardware stuff to it... And the old It don't happen in Winderz.
Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
running for days with and without screen saver.
It boonied with the screen saver, it did not wihout.
Mine seems to always do it in X, haven't gotten it to do it in
command line yet What did you do to fix it? (I run xlockmore)
Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc
.
I know, had to throw it in. :) Winderz is here just for when
STAROFFICE doesn't work right.
Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
laugh.
Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
of number crunching (it need not be anything useful) or install
SETI and see if it crashes Windows.
Tried SETI and WINTEST, neither would do it.
Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body
, but
this only was installed 2 months ago.
Thanks, Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message
Have you tried tools like memtest and cpuburn to verify the reliability
of the hardware?
Yup, for over 24 hours. No issues detected. Ran [EMAIL PROTECTED] on the
Winderz side for 4 days, no problems.
Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc.
To Unsubscribe: send mail
a fresh install to clear it out?
Thanks, Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I'm not sure if this is appropriate here, if not I'll take it elsewhere.
I use the following .mc on my machine :
divert(0)
VERSIONID(`$FreeBSD: himinbjorg.mc,v 1.0 2003/02/04 16:39:14 tuc Exp $')
OSTYPE(freebsd4)
DOMAIN(generic)
FEATURE(access_db, `hash -o -TTMPF /etc/mail/access
a laptop I just ran a whole bunch of DELL stuff, and it claims
everything is fine So how do I tell/prove its an issue?
Thanks, Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
of the message rejection?
204.107.90.128 on the public one, and 65.105.161.248 for the
NAT one. (My laptop is 192.168.3.21 if it matters).
Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
)
: (envelope-from tuc)
Your address (and hostname) are under the kickstartusa.com domain.
My laptop goes so many different places, I can't keep it similar with
where I am all the time. Wallstreet34 is a NAT, there are actually 1/2 a dozen
of us behind it. But a TCPDUMP of 587 and 25 show
Hi,
Thanks to Arthur W. Neilson III, adding :
define(`confBIND_OPTS', `WorkAroundBroken')
fixed it. THANKS! NEVER run into this before on any of our
servers.
Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED
delete
the directory too, otherwise :
%rm -rf 20040705
rm: 20040705/www17-00_access_log: Bad file descriptor
rm: 20040705: Directory not empty
Thanks, Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http
delete
the directory too, otherwise :
%rm -rf 20040705
rm: 20040705/www17-00_access_log: Bad file descriptor
rm: 20040705: Directory not empty
Thanks, Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http
Hi,
Trying to create a node in dev that I need in 5.3-RELEASE-p10.
I tried to do :
devfs -m /dev rule add path rdptr0 major 88
But I get:
devfs rule: ioctl DEVFSIO_RADD: Input/output error
What part of this do I have wrong?
Thanks, Tuc
, 64.71.128.82 is the other end of the tunnel.
2001:470:1F00:::5E5 is my IP, 2001:470:1F00:::5E4 is the router
for my connection.
Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
and reinstalled
the nvidia driver, nothing.
Is there a way to specifically CVSUP by -pXX release, and I'll just
go one by one until it stops working to figure out what the change might be.
Thanks, Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc.
My 5.2.1-RELEASE-p4 didn't support
to misbehave/crash.
Is there any way to start talking to someone to figure out what the
cause is and maybe have a change done?
Thanks, Tuc
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
(Mine was /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/XF86Config)
I will have to try that also. Thanks for the leads.
Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
to misbehave/crash.
Is there any way to start talking to someone to figure out what the
cause is and maybe have a change done?
Thanks, Tuc
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
Test_DescriptionStatus Remaining LifeTime(hours) LBA
_of_first_error
# 1 Extended offlineCompleted: read failure 70% 4934 259
34873
So is there something I should do?
Thanks, Tuc
Tuc wrote:
ad0: FAILURE - READ_DMA status=51READY,DSC,ERROR error=40UNCORRECTABLE
LBA=11291
ad0: FAILURE - READ_DMA status=51READY,DSC,ERROR error=40UNCORRECTABLE
LBA=112977803
ad0: FAILURE - READ_DMA status=51READY,DSC,ERROR error=40UNCORRECTABLE
LBA=112977835
[ ...and SMART
in order to
get them to do something.
Sorry, I should have mentioned I used the BIOS based disk check and
it passed. Maybe I do need to go to the more extensive one.
Thanks, Tuc
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
to misbehave/crash.
Is there any way to start talking to someone to figure out what the
cause is and maybe have a change done?
Thanks, Tuc
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
, it stopped in the same exact part
of the perl build. It turned out they went to re-use the same power supply.
So, I guess all I'm saying is.. It can happen. :)
Tuc/TTSG Internet Services, Inc.
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing
/mnt/machineX/etc/hosts.allow to
../../etc/hosts.allow .
Does this sound too convoluted?
Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send
Hi,
I'm looking for more information about the entire
shutdown process. I know the rc.shutdown runs, but what/where
does it go from there? I need to run something when the
filesystems are mounted read-only. Does FreeBSD ever get
to this point? Where?
Thanks, Tuc
Hi,
I'd like to find out where to put the upsdrvctl shutdown in the
shutdown process. Putting it in rc.shutdown causes me to have dirty
filesystems constantly that sometimes don't allow the system to come up.
Thanks, Tuc
Hi Derek,
This isn't starting and stopping nut, this is shutting the UPS itself
off. The supplied scripts don't take care of anything having to do with
upsdrvctl doing a shutdown, only a stop or start.
Tuc
I use nut. The port puts an rc script in /usr/local/etc/rc.d
--- Scott Tuc Ellentuch at T-B-O-H [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to find out where to put the upsdrvctl shutdown in the
shutdown process. Putting it in rc.shutdown causes me to have dirty
filesystems constantly that sometimes don't allow the system to come
up
it comes back up?
Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mikhail Goriachev wrote:
Tuc at T-B-O-H wrote:
Tuc at T-B-O-H wrote:
The issue isn't with the upsmon or SHUTDOWNCMD... Its with the
fact that /etc/killpower gets set, and somewhere you need to put
upsdrvctl shutdown. Its during the shutdown -p now that at some point
needs
client. This server is a critical
NFS server to other 5.3 and 5.4 servers. I was wondering if it was
truely limited to 5.5 as a client.
Is anyone running NFS server on 5.5-RELEASE? Is this
something I'll have to worry about turning around and biting
me?
Thanks, Tuc
Scott Tuc Ellentuch at T-B-O-H wrote:
I'm being forced to upgrade from 5.3 to 5.4+ on a server.
Unfortunately, its an incredibly important server so I can't muck
around with it much. I'm looking to go to 5.5 to get a jump, but I
see in http://www.freebsd.org/releases/5.5R
Hi,
I recently upgraded from 5.4 to 5.5, and now if I leave it in X for a
few minutes it ends up locking up, usually when the screen blanks on
its own. I wanted to go backwards to see if that behaviour goes away.
I wasn't sure if there was a risk doing this.
Thanks, Tuc
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 09:39:27PM +0200, K?vesd?n G?bor wrote:
Tuc wrote:
Hi,
I recently upgraded from 5.4 to 5.5, and now if I leave it in X for=
a
few minutes it ends up locking up, usually when the screen blanks on
its own. I wanted to go backwards to see if that behaviour
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 04:41:35PM -0400, Scott Tuc Ellentuch at T-B-O-H wr=
ote:
On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 09:39:27PM +0200, K?vesd?n G?bor wrote:
Tuc wrote:
Hi,
I recently upgraded from 5.4 to 5.5, and now if I leave it in X=
for=3D
a
few minutes it ends up
10 22:10:43 himinbjorg kernel: KDB: stack backtrace:
Since its 5.5, and the system seems to potentially not be with it
hardware wise, think its worth persuing what happened here?
Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 11:22:21AM -0400, Tuc wrote:
I have a 5.5-STABLE laptop thats been having issues lately, mostly
related to memory. I bought new chips, and I think I narrowed it down to one
of the Dimm slots being bad. I did a memtest for 25 hours and it seemed
stable
Booting the machine in single-user mode and run fsck -y. I'm betting
you'll find errors. If not, then it's probably a kernel bug -- see
below, however.
Ya lost the bet All filesystems were supposedly fine.
Tuc
Hi,
We are having a problem on a 5.4 NFS server where at times
mountd seems to be just disappearing. Is there a good way to track
that this happens, or to find out what causes it to die?
Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions
Hi,
I was looking to upgrade using the :
http://www.marcuscom.com/downloads/gnome_upgrade212.sh
but it tells me that 4.11-STABLE isn't supported. Is there a
procedure to do the upgrade?
Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd
for GAIM and anything
else like mplayerxp. I start to get Can't open audio device /dev/dsp: Device
busy but with fstat I get :
toshiba# fstat|grep dsp
toshiba#
What do I do??
Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
On Saturday 03 December 2005 03:12, RW wrote:
On Friday 02 December 2005 19:28, Tuc at T-B-O-H wrote:
Hi,
I was looking to upgrade using the :
http://www.marcuscom.com/downloads/gnome_upgrade212.sh
but it tells me that 4.11-STABLE isn't supported
?
Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
stat0=50 stat1=00 devices=0x1ATA_MASTER
ata0: [MPSAFE]
ata1: channel #1 on atapci0
atapci0: Reserved 0x8 bytes for rid 0x18 type 4 at 0x170
atapci0: Reserved 0x1 bytes for rid 0x1c type 4 at 0x376
I tried doing a safe boot, EISA setting off, etc.. No luck. HELP!
Thanks, Tuc
Tuc at T-B-O-H [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I was trying to upgrade from 4.X to 5.4 and I bricked my laptop...
When it boots, the last thing I see is :
atapci0: Intel PIIX4 UDMA33 controller port
0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f
7 at device 5.1 on pci0
)
and are there any gotchas I might have to worry about?
Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, required by m3build
Any idea what to do now?
Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2006-01-09 12:06, Tuc at T-B-O-H [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, (FBSD 5.4-RELEASE)
I'm trying to install CVSUP on a machine with VERY LIMITED disk
space. Trying to build it out of ports won't happen, ezm3 is just TOO
TOO big. So I decided to try to install it as a package. Now I get
that.. Is there a different
directory structure on FTP.FREEBSD.ORG for each?
Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 2006-01-09 13:11, Tuc at T-B-O-H [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have compat4x installed already, but not 5x. Should I load 5x
on
a 5.4-REL system??
Sorry for the confusion. I replied too fast. Now that I've checked the
versions of libm.so in 5.X, 6.X and CURRENT I
.
Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for now?
Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
)
Where so I start to figure out where things went wrong?
Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
On 6/17/05, Tuc at T-B-O-H [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Ever since I upgraded to 5.3-RELEASE-p15, I've started to run into
problems... All of a sudden, anything I do results in a Segfault. Sometimes
I'll get :
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: top: Shared object has no run-time
On 6/17/05, Tuc at T-B-O-H [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Ever since I upgraded to 5.3-RELEASE-p15, I've started to run into
problems... All of a sudden, anything I do results in a Segfault. Sometimes
I'll get :
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: top: Shared object has no run
to 5.3-p15 (presumably from 5.3-p-something else)
could be pure coincidence. I mean, you have to be doing *something*
before getting a hardware fault!
Such is true..
Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions
like that. So I then changed it to IP:/usr/local/tboh
/usr/local/tboh nfs rw 0 0
and still getting the [udp] NAME:/usr/local/tboh: RPCPROG_NFS: RPC:
Port mapper failure - RPC: Unable to send
I checked google, and I don't know where to go on this...
Thanks, Tuc
?
Thanks, Tuc
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
your PC, but like Windows virus
scans, it seems like a necessary evil in this case.
I did the standard tests for 24 hours (21 passes) and it didn't fail.
I ran the 90 minute fading one for 24 hours (8 runs) and it too didn't fail.
Tuc
1 - 100 of 198 matches
Mail list logo
