file system" (as you said without partitions, and I'll take
that literally): You can use tar, "the universal file system
that isn't a file system" to write data to the USB stick.
which is best in USB pendrive wear and speed point of view.
pendrive's flash translation layers are just awful, on
fsck does run automatically when a filesystem does not get shut down
cleanly. However, fsck cannot fix all of the problems a filesystem can
experience without risk of loss of data. In those cases, there is no
option but to stop and ask the operator to intervene.
fsck_y_enable=YES in rc.conf
After a power failure at home, my FreeBSD server automatically starts
again but fails to mount my UFS /boot disk because it was not properly
unmounted. Here is my fstab:
$ cat /etc/fstab
# Device Mountpoint FStype Options Dump Pass#
/dev/da0s1a /boot-disk ufs
If you're talking about an MS-DOS disk, then yes, it contains
a DOS partition which is formatted. In FreeBSD, we would call
it a slice (slice == "DOS primary partition"). In this case,
there is no (sub)partitioning, the _slice_ carries the MS-DOS
unless you need windows 98 support partitionless
Notes:
1. SSDs don't necessarily use 4k blocks, some use larger ones. Starting the
All use 4K as it is NTFS default block size and most are sold to be used
with windoze.
first filesystem partition at 1M works for most of the common values.
Alignment of filesystem cannot be better than it
Floppy disks aren't partitioned/sliced - they use 'dangerously dedicated'
they use "dangerously obsolete" mode. nobody use them at all.
disk's empty. If you're on an old system and run 'gpart show da0' and don't
see a partition table it's quite easy to forget to check if da0 itself
contains
A company I worked with were still distributing files on floppy disks as
recently as 2009.
quite funny :)
They _are_ obsolete, but I suspect plenty of people still
use them.
unless it is a normal way of using it.
That's right - I was thinking of my system where I destroyed all the data on
I have been given a laptop to look at for a friend, the hard disk is close to
death with a SMART error on POST. My initial thought was to just mount it on an
Windows 7 machine and grab what I can from the drive. No joy Windows insists
that the partition is RAW and I need to format it. I can how
quote from:
http://serverfault.com/questions/275875/raid-bus-controller-intel-corporation-82801jir-ich10r-sata-raid-controller
"ICH10R-based RAID controllers are so called fake- or software-RAID
controllers, the OS needs to do all the work."
It is always better to use gmirror instead of "hard
It is always better to use gmirror instead of "hardware" RAID. One have
full control over what is going on
mmh not always. Nothing replaces a good hardware RAID card with a BBU
for real reason i used parantheses for word "hardware".
___
freebsd-ques
# gmirror list
gmirror: Command 'list' not available.
# gmirror status
gmirror: Command 'status' not available.
gmirror load
It is probably "soft-RAID", but I prefer to use it though appropriate
driver instead of classical software RAID configured through OS.
i would recommend otherwise.
A
That's clear to me.
These "hardware" raid controllers are not very reliable because they are
indeed not real hardware raid controllers, but software based.
Maybe for desktop usage it's ok/ good enough?
precise what is "desktop" usage is.
i don't see a reason for doing mirroring for home use.
'geom raid load;geom raid list' doesn't give anything. I've tried
'geom load mirror', but 'geom mirror list' is also empty.
what other do you expect with no mirrors created yet?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mai
On Tue, 10 Jul 2012, Bosko Radivojevic wrote:
On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Wojciech Puchar
wrote:
what other do you expect with no mirrors created yet?
But mirror (raid10) array is created through LSI MegaRAID BIOS. I'm
if it is RAID10 i assume you have 4 disks.
tryi
Hi Bosko,
I do not have any experience with these kind of controllers, so I could just
guess.
I have a lot ;) but the only thing i always do is to disable "RAID" in
BIOS just after receiving new machine. whole experience.
___
freebsd-questions@fre
precise what is "desktop" usage is.
Here at work we just use non raided disks for workstations which run linux.
and this is proper way to do this.
The home directories are on nfs, so when a disk fails it's replaced very fast
See above. I cannot imagine any other configuration.
Me neithe
Ironically, it runs even faster than the /bin/sh + find(1) version,
go figure.
true.
unix shell was never intended to execute scripts fast, it is usually
slower even than python.
unix shell is designed to automate things quickly.
___
freebsd-questio
I have two SAS disks for the FreeBSD install. I want to install the freeBSD
on one disk and mirror to another disk. Just like the AIX Mirror.
man gmirror
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-
I am no expert at this however a quick Google search comes up with:
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/geom-mirror.html
The procedure shown there produces a mirror that will not boot on FreeBSD 9.
no idea but my procedure certainly would work if you use installer
1) install to first disk
2
I am trying to introduce FreeBSD into my office and it's been looked
at with quite a bit of enthusiasm however, what makes it look bad is
our companies 'security' policy to block FTP.
do you work FOR that company. Ask administrator to unblock if for you as
you need it for work.
Do you do your
The current Handbook procedure avoids the copy by using the existing disk
as-is and just writing the gmirror metadata to the last block.
Exactly what i do doing instalations manually!
If that last block is already part of an MBR partition, the more strict checking stops
booting in 9.0.
not
The information comes straight down from the IT director who will
**not** change his mind on this as I have asked several times in the
past.
I just told about solution to a problem. Not a workaround.
How you can make your work if your director actively prevent it!?
Basically without getting to
we recently bought kyocera 2020D printer. There are USB and LAN versions.
We got cheaper USB as it is connected 1 meter from server anyway.
But seems there are some problems with USB
ulpt seems to work fine, device is connected at 480Mbps
but 2 page 5 megabyte postscript file is transmitted 10-
Larger postscript files are transmitted longer.
I am not sure but seems it is not printer problem. Any ideas what to
check/change in ulpt?
It's worth trying unlpt. But if the sending time is proportional to the file
already tried. The only difference is that printer doesn't know when each
another idea.
ulpt shows like that
ugen1.3: at usbus1
ulpt0: on usbus1
ulpt0: using bi-directional mode
for parallel lpt port on some printers disabling bi-di mode solves most
problems.
can this be disabled on ulpt or it is irrevelant?
___
freebsd
or clearly - found to be not FreeBSD problem. Printing from windoze using
postscript gives exactly the same speed.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail t
--> Efficiency
--> Compatibility with ZFS
If you're running 9, give HAST a shot.
maybe a stupid question but what is a practical difference between hast
and doing ggate+gmirror and setting "prefer" load balancing to local disk?
___
freebsd-question
Create snapshots of your datasets and use zfs send. You can even transfer
differences between snapshots.
and then try to recover data from these backups after a year or so ;)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mail
Allan
___
Erm, you have to realize the new installer was discussed at length here,
when 9.0 was still under development/beta/prerelease.
Alternatively, you could do like me and install entirely by hand:
- boot a
because, well, I LOVE FreeBSD. Basically, I've tried out NetBSD ONCE,
actually i used NetBSD BEFORE switching to FreeBSD, short time after they
released 2.0 and following versions. Got slower, unstable and bloated.
Switched to FreeBSD, which in every version is getting BETTER not worse.
I al
I first touched FreeBSD around 2005. The current insteller is much more
appealing and useful. All the people displaying elitist attitude toward the
arcaic installer which infact DID push people away from FreeBSD, I don't
understand you.
so may i explain you:
Those who cannot install things witho
http://www.calxeda.com
Anyone know what the status would be of running our fav OS on these quadcore,
blade based server processors? Running a server at 5W would be reeaal nice,
you know :)
not really 5W. you have to connect some hard drive anyway.
_
This is contrary to the "usual" advice which is to split swap across disks
AFAIK. I've never done any benchmarks, but my gut feeling would be that if
the disks were on separate controllers, and if the machine did swap regularly
then two swap partitions would be beneficial. Even on the same con
or to be exact - Windows incompatibility with standards & FreeBSD server.
the problem:
Windows clients (like total commander) can't fetch or delete files with
spaces in name - while it can create such file.
are there any solutions?
___
freebsd-que
I will install a fax server using hylafax on FreeBSD. This fax server must
handle at least 8 fax-modem attached to it. For this I think I need a serial
port multiplier or PCI based fax-modem cards which has at least 8 ports
fax-modem chip. For FreeBSD 6.0 which hardware do I have to use for not
are there any solutions?
As this is a FreeBSD list, you may not get useful answers to
questions about how to use various third-party Windows
applications. Maybe asking the companies that sold you the
i do not want to get answer about windows.
i just would like what's the difference between Fr
Hi group, I was just wondering if there's an advantage to running FreeBSD on
a SPARC than compared with a regular PC. Obviously the architecture is
different (CISC vs RISC). How ever you can purchase a higher powered PC box
for less money than it would cost for a SPARC.
user Opteron/Athlon64 - b
Yes, it is amassing. I have a friend who has spent thousands of dollars
keeping his old car running. He could have purchased a new one with a
new warranty, etc. and have saved all that money, but he refused. For
some individuals, the challenge is the real thrill that they crave.
and SUN itself
i use this widely with NetBSD and now try with FreeBSD
rlogin/rlogind works the same - all OK. if host is entered in .rhosts then
it logs in without password
rsh -l login host command worked fine too in NetBSD same way - no asking
for password if .rhosts consist of my host and user name.
in
what's the difference? how to fix it?
FreeBSD's rsh may really be ssh? In any event, use ssh-keygen to set up some
keys, and copy them to authorized_keys, and use that to permit password-less
login between machines securely.
NO I MEAN RSH not ssh. and i DO use rsh/rlogin not ssh
ssh works
For a FBSD (or Solaris 10) based server that is only acting as an NFS server
and nothing else, is there any advantage to using an SMP machine? Any
no. one CPU is powerful enough. pentium 200 class machine does have no
problems working as NFS server for 100Mbit/s LAN at full speed, assuming
di
i installed dctc-0.84.1 from prebuild .tbz on FreeBSD 6.0/amd64
and (with parameters that i used before on NetBSD/i386 system):
INFO ] ""Direct Connect Text Client v0.84.1|
hubip: dchub.l. hubport: 1411
VAR ] ""cnx_status|1|
file exists.
creating new sema.
creating.
semid=196610
created 2FD103C
I'm going to assume that Dual Core is better (can't believe that they took a
step back) ... but, is how does it rate? I know that HyperThreading is
definitely != Dual CPU ... but how close does Dual Core get?
Dual Core = two physical CPUs, possibly sharing L2 cache.
HyperThreading = double s
Is there such a thing as a virtual CD drive in the Ports. Something that
well it has virtual CD, virtual DVD, virtual floppy, virtual disk and
virtual any-block-device
man mdconfig :)
in base FreeBSD distribution.
mdconfig -a -t vnode -o readonly -f file
will show device name like md0
while running my FreeBSD/amd64 server a couple of days it once change it's
time to midnight 1 january 2000. of course lots of services failed to work
undil i did rdate
can it be hardware or software bug?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
Hi,
I want to rsync /usr/home from one machine to another, for purposes of
backup.
i do:
rsync -e "rsh" -avzrlHpogDtS --delete --delete-excluded --force
\ --exclude-from=../$1-exclude [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/ .
where $1 is server name
you may of course change rsh to ssh, and / to /usr/home
:)
FreeBSD 6.0 amd64
i tried to run it but crashes on first X client started
as i386 version works i replaced Xvnc with i386 version - now works
as long as i don't run any gtk/gdk based program
then i got:
The program 'gimp' received an X Window System error.
This probably reflects a bug in the
on my 1GB machine:
Mem: 529M Active, 209M Inact, 149M Wired, 38M Cache, 109M Buf, 1772K Free
while "Cache" is dynamic, Buf is not and never goes down.
how can i get it down to somehow like 40MB?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://l
EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Wojciech Puchar
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 1:21 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: FreeBSD & time travel
while running my FreeBSD/amd64 server a couple of days it once
change it's
time to midnight 1 january 2000. of
Mem: 529M Active, 209M Inact, 149M Wired, 38M Cache, 109M Buf, 1772K Free
while "Cache" is dynamic, Buf is not and never goes down.
how can i get it down to somehow like 40MB?
I think "Buf" corresponds to what NetBSD's top calls "File", it's the amount
of memory that is bufferring raw blocks
Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/da0s1a248M180M 48M79%/
/dev/da0s1h 14G496M 13G 4%/mnt
/dev/da0s1h has an exact copy of /dev/da0s1a using dump/restore.
I want to configure things so that the next time I reboot it will
automati
Possibly you don't understand your question, either. "Buf" is not a state
which is exclusive: that 110MB of memory is comprised of backing store from
the disk which is in the Active or Inactive states.
hw.physmem - Wired ~= hw.usermem
Active + Inactive + Cache + Free ~= hw.usermem
fortunat
how to force for a given SCSI-like disk (/dev/da?) to recreate right
/dev/da?s? devices based on DOS partition table?
it's done well on attach, but how to do this on request?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailma
Hmm... guess I didn't realize there was a difference :)
I want the OS to "run" from /dev/da0s1h so that I can then completely wipe
and replace /dev/da0s1a [1].
if second - add:
vfs.root.mountfrom="ufs:da0s1h"
to which file?
loader.conf
[1] The box is a new 5.3 install. My though
.
.
.
parameters to be used for BIOS calculations are:
cylinders=125 heads=255 sectors/track=63 (16065 blks/cyl)
Information from DOS bootblock is:
1: sysid 6 (0x06),(Primary 'big' DOS (>= 32MB))
start 63, size 2008062 (980 Meg), flag 80 (active)
beg: cyl 0/ head 1/ sector 1;
OS use rate in my project.
2005/01/10 - 2006/01/10
RedHat Enterprise Linux ES3.0 - 3947
RedHat Enterprise Linux AS3.0 - 1287
Sun Solaris 9 - 583
*BSD - 0
that's just a problem of these 5817 people/companies/whatever that use
them and not FreeBSD.
PS. completely off topic, please add more data
now, cant su. the password I used is > 12 chars long, and was made
intentionally cryptic. I know all the chars used in the password (yes I have
it written down).
Q: Where are all the ssh password 'guessing' utilities I see the hackers
using on my system? Located, I could really use one.
Fail
can it be solved?
with first rule in my firewall config i have
flush
add 2 deny ip from any to any not antispoof
works fine - as long as no IPv6 link-local communication is needed -
route6d is an example.
changing it to
add 2 deny ip4 from any to any not antispoof
is using link-local add
i'm using dump to backup up filesystem of about 1.5 million files and 60GB
size (14 DVD+RW disks), will be larger for sure after a time.
once per about 2 months - full dump, once a week -1 dump, every other day
-2 dump.
works fine. i used this under NetBSD, now under FreeBSD.
but have 2 ques
TO JEST ANGIELSKA LISTA MAILOWA. POSZUKAJ POLSKIEJ
This is english mailing list, not Polish.
please run FreeBSD install CD and enter rescue mode, and type
/sbin/dmesg|grep ad
this behaviour is very strange, i have never problems with disks on
FreeBSD.
NEXT TIME PLEASE don't write in Polis
or maybe dump
while testing my full backup with restore -rvf, after 7-th DVD restoring
fine, when started to restore 8-th DVD it prepends ? to every file name
like this:
extract file ?/home/kopie/3miasto.net/root/NetBSD-1-5/usr/pkg/bin/a2p
extract file ?/home/kopie/3miasto.net/root/NetBSD-1-
nobody here do backups of their systems? strange?!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
___
Huh? I do. I'm sure a lot of people do.
strange that nobody answerem by questions. it's quite impossible that
only i have such problems.
i really must be sure my dumps are restorable! :)
___
freebsd
nobody here do backups of their systems? strange?!
I backup and restore using those self-named tools on a variety of DLT and 4mm
DAT tape drives. 4mm DDS DAT kinda sucks, and they are super-sensitive to
being cleaned a lot.
i'm using DVD+RW discs. after doing dvd+rw-format for a first time,
how can i make ident service to make informative answers for connections
handled by natd? like answering last byte of source IP number or DNS
reverse name or maybe from table like oidentd?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.fr
handled by natd? like answering last byte of source IP number or DNS
reverse name or maybe from table like oidentd?
If you're using 1-to-1 NAT forwarding, run identd or the inetd-based version on
the internal hosts you're forwarding to. If you're using NAT to only forward
individual ports to sp
connections handled by natd? like answering last byte of source IP
number or DNS reverse name or maybe from table like oidentd?
How about running oidentd, if you already know it does what you'd
like? It's in ports.
well that's what i needed.
___
free
number or DNS reverse name or maybe from table like oidentd?
How about running oidentd, if you already know it does what you'd
like? It's in ports.
well that's what i needed.
___
"oidentd is an ident (rfc1413 compliant) daemon that runs on Linux,
is it possible for userland application (or many of then) for TCP
connections to select it's source IP address from a list random or
round-robin way? (say 2-4 different IP's)
with ipfw or other ways?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
htt
If it's out there - where?
I'm not sure about this, but aren't the DVD versions created by a third-party
company?
___
well i created 8.5GB DVD version of FreeBSD 6.0/amd64 by myself for
personal use. it is original install CD+all binary packages ava
off, then everything works, but FreeBSD can only see 3gb of ram. Some
documentation suggested a custom kernel with 'options PAE' enabled
would be required, but adding that generates an 'invalid option PEA'
^
is it typo now or
while i'm not regular user of gnome, i have to configure it for users.
the problem is how to make configuration template default for every new
user.
i tried to copy whole or partial user directory to other users+chown but
no success. always something crashes or doesn't work. only copying desk
switched to Xorg for these machines a while back, and was pleased to find
that I did not have to create a config file for Xorg as it was able to
autodetect all the correct stuff.
anyway - it's always better to create this file based on autoconfig made
by -configure option. it's quite unlikely au
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ gedit
(gedit:50388): Gdk-WARNING **: shmget failed: error 28 (No space left on
device)
or ..
(gedit:23354): Gdk-WARNING **: shmget failed: error 12 (Cannot allocate
memory)
df and ulimit?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mail
Here is a simple (I think!) question for the I/O savy among you:
If I had two identical disks, say, 73 GB Seagate 10K SCSIs, one completely
operational fully setup FreeBSD with all the trimmings, and the other blank,
or perhaps loaded but no longer usable, is 'dd' and appropriate tool to
comp
Sorry, I forgpt to add this,
I the answer is yes to the first question (original question), then, what
happens if one 'dd's a small, say 36 GM disk to a larger one, say 73 GB. Can
the newly made disk be resized so as not to loose 1/2 of it?
yes - with growisofs and disklabel
i actually did t
It is, with a few 'buts'. Firstly, the source should be mounted
but may not - unless system is generally idle. fsck will be checking the
copy then, but with success.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis
As far as I know, this only works with a "normal" adduser.conf and
using the adduser command or pw.
Also, (with X11 programs especially) you'll have to edit all absolute
paths in the config files to point to either relative, of if the app
supports it, $HOME or ~/, so the programs won't attempt to
list sometime in the last 3-5 weeks. Giorgios Keramidas
commented that "dd" was too slow for his tastes and
dd is the fastest, but probably he used small block size. 64K is OK
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/ma
anyone using this.
i installed from ports and it get in crash loop like this.
any idea? anyone using it?
Mar 20 17:00:18 hel kernel: pid 94901 (sqwebmaild), uid 0: exited on
signal 10
Mar 20 17:00:18 hel kernel: pid 94903 (sqwebmaild), uid 0: exited on
signal 10
Mar 20 17:00:18 hel kernel: pi
what is right/best/simplest way to configure mirrored disk system? there
was raid driver in NetBSD, but how in FreeBSD. possibility of booting from
this set is important.
thank you (please point to RTFM)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
this way
[EMAIL PROTECTED] portsnap fetch
Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... using portsnap2.FreeBSD.org.
Fetching public key... failed.
on FreeBSD-6.0/amd64, while working perfect on other machine with exactly
same version of portsnap.
the difference is that other machine chooses po
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006, Colin Percival wrote:
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] portsnap fetch
Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... using portsnap2.FreeBSD.org.
Fetching public key... failed.
Usually this is due to network problems. If you run
# portsnap --debug fetch
it will
the question is - why character 'a' isn't written!??!?!
#include
#include
#include
#include
main() {
int ff=open("test",O_RDWR|O_CREAT,0666);
char *adr;
lseek(ff,1<<24,0);
write(ff,"",1);
adr=mmap(0,1<<24,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_NOCORE,ff,0);
if(adr==MAP_FAILED) { puts("error"); exit(
#include
#include
#include
#include
main() {
int ff=open("test",O_RDWR|O_CREAT,0666);
char *adr;
lseek(ff,1<<24,0);
write(ff,"",1);
adr=mmap(0,1<<24,PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE,MAP_NOCORE,ff,0);
Try MAP_NOCORE|MAP_SHARED here. It's probably defaulting to a private
mapping.
WORKS!!! thank yo
On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 11:52:55AM +0100, Ashley Moran wrote:
I've just installed a new server with gmirror and I like it. I've got an
identical server running on-board RAID currently. Can I split the array in
the BIOS, install gmirror on disk 1, reboot, and add the second disk in? Or
i thin
running for more than a few hours.
In Windows XP, which has less per-task resource restriction (I guess?), I
did successfully complete the task on the same hardware machine; although it
takes more than 30 mins.
How can I push up the priority of the whole paging task? How can I
this will not spe
anybody knows about program able to convert PCL printer code to
postscript/PDF/bitmap/whatever - so it will be possible to view PCL prints
on monitor and print it on non-PCL printers?
thanks! Wojtek
___
freebsd-question
I have two nets: wireless and ethernet and i need make something for
combine these into 1 net.
How do this in freebsd?
man 4 bridge
--
Best regards,
Playnet mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mail
that's on clean directory.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/sbin/portsnap fetch
Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... using portsnap1.FreeBSD.org.
Fetching public key... done.
Fetching snapshot tag... done.
Fetching snapshot metadata... done.
Fetching snapshot generated at ndz 9 kwi 02:33:58 2006 CES
[EMAIL PROTECTED] portsnap fetch
Looking up portsnap.FreeBSD.org mirrors... using portsnap1.FreeBSD.org.
Fetching snapshot tag... done.
Fetching snapshot metadata... done.
Updating from ndz 9 kwi 02:33:58 2006 CEST to wto 11 kwi 19:04:27 2006
CEST.
Fetching 4 metadata patches. done.
Applying me
does anyone know software able to read Btrieve .DAT files and output
text formatted tables?
thanks
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTEC
shells: files
$ host example
Host example not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)
"host" command always use DNS. try ping, telnet, whatever use IP
connections
$ host example.example.org
Host example not found 3(NXDOMAIN)
What am I doing wrong here that is keeping /etc/hosts from being read?
--
Thanks,
J
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006, Colin Percival wrote:
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] portsnap fetch
[...]
Fetching 4 metadata files... /usr/sbin/portsnap: cannot open
4ad98b45a8fb7f262971491949ddd63be3fa066a31d5d09d53a9eddff3276698.gz: No
such file or directory
metadata is corrupt.
tried
assume i have my program, that accesses data using mmap interface only, is
run many times on same machine.
if it's uniprocessor machine, it's clear - all processes will see the data
coherrent.
what in case of more than one processor. will one processor keep in cache
data that was already m
i want to go to FreeBSD instead of NetBSD on my i386 machines because of
all "new features" :( introduced in NetBSD after 1.5 mostly crashing
softdeps, strange memory/unified disk cache management (large writing to
file almost freezes everything) etc. etc.
i installed FreeBSD once to do quick pe
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
i installed FreeBSD once to do quick performance tests, and at least in
disk I/O and fair scheduling it's MUCH better (tested 4.10 and 5.1).
It's nice to be welcomed by higher performance when you switch OSes. :-)
while high performance is always cool, stable p
for excellent user support. now i have enough answers and can start
working tomorrow :)
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Thank you all who took time to reply! The problem really seems to be one
of the (or maybe even both, even the LinkSys!) NICs in the FreeBSD machines.
No wonder, the RealTek card is a cheap piece of crap (around EUR 6), I
am going to replace it with something more reliable. Any recommendations?
Is t
page about ipfw yesterday. i think i will not miss :)
NikV
On Friday 16 July 2004 00:50, Wojciech Puchar wrote:
Wojciech Puchar wrote:
i installed FreeBSD once to do quick performance tests, and at least in
disk I/O and fair scheduling it's MUCH better (tested 4.10 and 5.1).
It's nice to b
901 - 1000 of 3258 matches
Mail list logo
