I am using telnet just to see if the port accepts connections. That test
works fine internally. We are not running a telnet server. Also, we are
telnetting to the pcAnywhere port, not the telnet port. :)
- Original Message -
From: JJB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: adp [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL
This shouldn't be that hard, but I can't get it working.
I have a FreeBSD firewall with three NICs (Internet, LAN, DMZ). I have
bridging enabled between the Internet and DMZ interfaces.
I now have an internal computer (LAN) that needs to be accessible via
pcAnywhere.
I can telnet to the
I am running bind 8 inside a FreeBSD 4.9 jail. For some reason responses
from our internal DNS servers (all of which run in jails) are very slow when
resolving external hostnames. Here are some little factoids:
1. resolution of internal domain works great. it takes less than 1 second.
2.
I am working on some network performance issues. One of the first things I
inspected was netstat-s. This is for a FreeBSD 4.9-REL NFS and MySQL server
that has been up for 33 days. It seems to me that I have a lot of errors,
specifically with UDP (NFS related I would guess). The server is a dual
- Original Message -
From: Charles Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On May 5, 2004, at 2:27 PM, adp wrote:
On this server I'm thinking I need two things:
1. More sockets available.
2. Larger sockbufs for send and recv.
Is this an accurate assessment?
Given the application
As an added note, I am seeing real issues with the NFS stats on the server:
# nfsstat -s
Server Info:
Getattr SetattrLookup Readlink Read WriteCreate
Remove
502201060 80441153 281 4569327 2420840270703
462872
Rename Link Symlink Mkdir
I am running a FreeBSD 4.9-REL NFS server. Once every several hours our main
NFS server replicates everything to a backup FreeBSD NFS server. We are okay
with the gap in time between replication. What we aren't sure about is how
to automate the fail-over between the primary to the secondary NFS
I occasionally see error messages on NFS clients such as:
nfs server files:/rmt/mnt: not responding
pmap_collect: collecting pv entries -- suggest increasing PMAP_SHPGPERPROC
got bad cookie vp 0xdc92a9c0 bp 0xcc578fac
got bad cookie vp 0xdc92a9c0 bp 0xcc578e60
NFS actually runs fine. We haven't
We have two internal DNS servers in a FreeBSD web cluster. If the first DNS
server fails then after a timeout period the client's resolver will try the
second DNS server. This works fine, but is a bit slow. It looks like the
timeout takes 10 to 15 seconds on FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE. Is there a way to
unmount the
filesystem!?
How do I stop this from happening?
I am using this to mount NFS filesystems:
# mount -o bg,intr,soft ...
- Original Message -
From: adp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 30, 2004 2:43 AM
Subject: NFS server fail-over - how do you do
. :)
- Original Message -
From: Giorgos Keramidas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: adp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 30, 2004 10:12 PM
Subject: Re: Can I specify the resolver timeout?
On 2004-05-30 12:04, adp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to override this timeout
remotely
reboot the NFS client! Someone has to power reset the damn thing. That's
bad.
On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 02:43:37AM -0500, adp wrote:
I am running a FreeBSD 4.9-REL NFS server. Once every several hours our
main
NFS server replicates everything to a backup FreeBSD NFS server. We are
okay
-
From: Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: adp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004 11:55 AM
Subject: Re: NFS server fail-over - how do you do it?
adp wrote:
One of my big problems right now is that if our primary NFS server goes
down
then everything using
]; adp
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 31, 2004 3:16 AM
Subject: Re: Can I specify the resolver timeout?
On 2004-05-31 08:20, Matthew Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 06:38:58AM +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
Hmmm, I *am* running 5.X. Looking
I am running FreeBSD 4.9. We have several NFS clients and one server. On all
machines we are running rpc.statd. I noticed that the size is around 257MB,
although res is usually only around 460KB so this isn't a big problem. Why
is the size so large though?
I use the software from ports extensively. I also use a lot of compile-time
options (for example, WITH_IMAP=yes for lang/php4). Rather than recompile
our source each time we bring up a server we just build from ports and then
build a package using 'make ..options.. package'. We then use this
I want to run Apache under a FreeBSD jail. For normal http this works fine.
However, I'm a little worried that we won't be able to use jails because we
use SSL for several sites. With SSL we have to define one IP per site. Jails
only have one IP. Is there a way around this other than just having
My disk device is /dev/ar0:
# mount
/dev/ar0s1a on / (ufs, local)
/dev/ar0s1h on /home (ufs, local, soft-updates)
/dev/ar0s1e on /tmp (ufs, local, soft-updates)
...
Yet iostat shows /dev/adX:
n# iostat 5
tty ad0 ad4 ad6 cpu
tin tout KB/t
use SSL for several sites. With SSL we have to define one IP per site.
Jails
only have one IP. Is there a way around this other than just having one
jail
per SSL site? (I'd rather not do that!)
Something I think I'm going to end up doing is running two jails: one
for http, one for https.
We will be using our datacenter's backup (Datavault) for our FreeBSD
machines. I do have the Linux emu. installed, but before testing this out I
wanted to see if anyone else has done this before. The agent we will be
using is for Linux (no versions for FreeBSD per the datacenter).
The agent docs
We have a pretty high load mail server that does AV and spam filtering. I am
looking to perf. tune this machine. It's FreeBSD 4.9-REL and Postfix. I am
trying to correlate the info in systat to things I need to worry about. I am
using systat with vmstat output since that seems to basically show
I know that under Linux I can modify how the OS uses IDE drives using
hdparm. Is there an equivilent for FreeBSD? 'man tuning' seems to indicate
that there isn't anything and that I only need to worry about whether I need
to use softupdates. (It also mentions sysctl values such as
Problem: FreeBSD 4.9 load average quickly goes to high levels such as 300.
System becomes unusable and HOPEFULLY reboots. In general though we have to
call a tech to reboot it by hitting the power switch.
Here is the setup:
I have a FreeBSD 4.9 server on a P4 with 256MB of RAM. We have a IDE
I recently posted the following message to MySQL discussion list. The
response there, and the one I keep finding on Google, is that this is a
long-standing issue betweeen FreeBSD and MySQL. For me this has been
happening since FreeBSD 4.4.
I have one site where we are going to have to move to
I'm looking for a ramdisk-style filesystem for FreeBSD that can be used for
scratch space, e.g., tmpfs in Solaris. The filesystem should be able to grow
and shrink in memory (and use real disk space as needed) depending on the
amount of free RAM on the system. I don't want just a fixed sized block
Anyone get ntop totally working with FreeBSD 4.9? We can run it, but it's
flaky. On one FreeBSD box it runs fine for a while and then just dies. No
syslog messages. It's just gone. On another it won't display anything in the
Web interface (it opens new windows when clicking on some items), and it
This problem seems to be affecting Postfix in a FreeBSD jail, and I haven't
seen this problem outside of a jail, so I'm trying questions@ first.
I am running postfix-2.0.18,1 (from ports) in a FreeBSD 4.10 system in a
jail. Everything was fine until recently I moved NFS services over to this
same
We have several Dell-based systems that are dual-processor capable, but have
only one processor. The FreeBSD 4.9 kernels for each system is compiled with
SMP support, even though there is only one processor on each system right
now.
Would this actually reduce performance on a single processor
28 matches
Mail list logo
