Re: Big external drives - which filesystem?
On 16/11/06, Chris Hastie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've just acquired a Western Digital 200GB USB 2 external HDD. After some initial glitches my FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE machine seems to recognise it fine. It comes pre-formatted with a single FAT32 file system (although confusingly there is a note in the manual about FAT32 not supporting partitions 32 GB and suggesting you change it to NTFS). Attempting to mount this hits the mountmsdosfs(); disk too big, sorry problem. The primary intended use for this drive is for off-site backups, but it would be useful if it was formatted such that I can easily plug it into Windows boxes to get at files occasionally. What are my best options for achieving this? The MSDOSFS_LARGE kernel option seems to come with a lot of warnings and caveats. Is it really as ropey as it sounds? Is NTFS an option? I've not had any trouble using that option but then I tend not to have too many files open once I've mounted the drive. IIRC the main warnings about using the option was that memory isn't freed until the drive is unmounted and as a result would gradually eat up your RAM the more files you had open etc etc. I could be wrong though ;-) Or would I be better partitioning the drive into two FAT32 partitions of 128GB each? If I go down that route how does this appear to FreeBSD - presumably as different slices on da0 which are mounted separately? You'd end up with da0s1 and da0s2 (for example). Al -- WWW: http://ajs.no-dns-yet.org.uk GPG/PGP: http://ajs.no-dns-yet.org.uk/pubkey.gpg ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with Portsnap Update
On 17/10/06, Gerard Seibert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I encountered this immediately after running 'portsnap' this moring: /usr/sbin/pkg_version -vIL= py25-tkinter-2.5_1 succeeds index (index has 2.4.3_1) python-2.5 needs updating (index has 2.4.3,1) python24-2.4.3_2 needs updating (index has 2.4.3_3) python25-2.5 'python-2.5' does not even appear to exist in the ports tree. Doesn't python-2.5 live under lang/python25 or has it been removed from the ports tree? (Hopefully that doesn't sound like a rephrasing of your question) 'py25-tkinter-2.5_1' also seems to have a problem. Is there something wrong with this mornings portsnap update? The problem could come from the downgrading of lang/python back to 2.4 after some problems were found with the 2.5 import. I've not seen any instructions in /usr/ports/UPDATING for those people that upgraded to python-2.5 before the change was reversed. What would be the best course of action? (I force-upgraded all the ports that were depending upon lang/python because I'm crazy and have loads of time on my hands). Al -- WWW: http://ajs.no-dns-yet.org.uk GPG/PGP: http://ajs.no-dns-yet.org.uk/pubkey.gpg ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: what are pX and #X
On 04/10/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What are pX and #X after the version displayed by 'uname'? As far as I know pX is the 'patch set' and #X is the number of times the kernel has been updated. However, yesterday I updated the kernel (of 6.1 installed from the boot CD and then FTP - some time ago) and p jumped to p10, while #X remained zero. I thought pX changes only when world is built and #X should have been changed to #1. What I did was - cvsup-ed src with tag RELENG_6_1 cd /usr/src create MYKERNEL config (just commented cpu I486_CPU and I586_CPU) make buildkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL make installkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL reboot My understanding is that as long as pX doesn't change then #X will be incremented. If you do another rebuild of your p10 system now then I would imagine that #X would increase to #1 and will continue to increase until pX is altered. Al -- WWW: http://ajs.no-dns-yet.org.uk GPG/PGP: http://ajs.no-dns-yet.org.uk/pubkey.gpg ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: mount_msdosfs 240G
On 26/09/06, sanya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello I have a problem with mounting big fat32 partition. - % mount_msdosfs /dev/ar0s1 /mnt mount_msdosfs: /dev/ar0s1: Invalid argument - in syslog: kernel: mountmsdosfs(): disk too big, sorry where I mistaken? I had a similar problem when trying to mount a 180G USB drive. Recompiling my kernel with the MSDOSFS_LARGE option allowed me to mount the drive. HTH, Al -- WWW: http://ajs.no-dns-yet.org.uk GPG/PGP: http://ajs.no-dns-yet.org.uk/pubkey.gpg ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portmanager port upgrade question
On 04/09/06, stan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to upgrade a machine, which was built only about 2 weeks agao.
portmanager reprts the following:
portmanager 0.4.1_6
FreeBSD brown.fas.com 6.1-STABLE FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #11: Sun Sep 3
13:33:28 EDT 2006
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BROWN i386
autoConflicts 0 autoMoved 0
backUp 0 buildDependsAreLeaves 0
forced 0 interactive0
log1 pmMode 0
pristine 0 resume 0
Mon Sep 4 17:31:36 2006
linux_base-8-8.0_16 /emulators/linux_base-8
marked IGNORE
port not installed/updated
Mon Sep 4 17:31:37 2006
linux_base-8-8.0_16
/emulators/linux_base-8
marked IGNORE
por t not installed/updated
Can anyon tell me why this port is marked ignore? Has it been superseeded?
From the port's Makefile:
DEPRECATED= unsupported by upstream, no security support anymore
EXPIRATION_DATE=2006-09-01
IGNORE= ${DEPRECATED}
Al
--
WWW: http://ajs.no-dns-yet.org.uk
GPG/PGP: http://ajs.no-dns-yet.org.uk/pubkey.gpg
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portupgrading tcl ?
On 11/07/06, Beni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, When trying to portupgrade -rR tcl all I get is what looks like an endless list of messages like this : [snip] I'd probably start by getting rid of the -rR from your portupgrade command as (unless I'm misreading the man page) that will try to upgrade all the ports that tcl depends on, plus all the ports that depend on it. Just running portupgrade tcl should be all you need to do. Whether or not it will fix the problem you're describing I'm not sure but give it a try. Al -- WWW: http://ajs.no-dns-yet.org.uk GPG/PGP: http://ajs.no-dns-yet.org.uk/pubkey.gpg ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Standard way of updating 6.x ?
On 01/02/06, Eric Kjeldergaard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wednesday 01 February 2006 10:56、RW さんは書きました: On Tuesday 31 January 2006 17:45, Garrett Cooper wrote: On Jan 31, 2006, at 8:31 AM, Xn Nooby wrote: portupgrade: Use for updating your actual ports programs. There may be a more elegant solution though and I would be more than happy to hear it too :). -Garrett I find that portmanager generally does a better job at keeping ports up to date without manual intervention. A notable example being its ability to upgrade Gnome without the help of a script. I also found portupgrade both more capable in many cases and more easy-to-use (just portmanager -u to do what one usually wants to do). Too bad it was pulled from ports. It added back into ports very shortly after it was pulled. Quite what its future is going to be do though I don't know as the author now seems to be concentrating on Linux as being portmanager's main platform. Al -- GPG/PGP: http://www.no-dns-yet.org.uk/~everlone/pubkey.gpg ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Shared objects
On 03/12/05, Dimitris Babasakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i installed freebsd 6.0 and some packages are not working the error mesages are bos /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object liblua.so not found, required by stratagus xchm /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libz.so.2 not found, required by libwx_gtk2_xrc-2.6.so.0 hot-babe /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 not found, required by hot-babe xmms /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object libgtk12.so.2 not found, required by xmms some of those Shared objects exist while deferend version eg libgdk-x11-2.0.so any sogestions on how to find them? Where did you install the packages from? It appears as if the package was built for an older version of FreeBSD. Al -- GPG/PGP: http://www.no-dns-yet.org.uk/~everlone/pubkey.gpg ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi :)
Alistair Sutton would like to invite you to join their network of contacts at http://www.wayn.com Visit http://www.wayn.com/wayn.html?wci=registerwce=refferalm=2441694c=92662312 to start your own network today! Regards, Alistair This invitation was sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Alistair ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).If you do not wish to receive invitations from WAYN members, please visit this link: http://www.wayn.com/?wci=premailsm=2441694c=92662312___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: WARNING /usr was not properly dismounted ...
On 26/11/05, Kiffin Gish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: When I restarted by machine, I get the warning messages: WARNING /usr was not properly dismounted WARNING /tmp was not properly dismounted ... and for a number of other mount points. Are there any special precautions I need to take, some disk check utility or whatever? Assuming you're running FreeBSD 6 (or -CURRENT) then unless you've knowingly turned off background fsck, all you need to do is just leave the system to check itself. Al -- GPG/PGP: http://www.no-dns-yet.org.uk/~everlone/pubkey.gpg ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Mozilla Firefox - anyone succeeded in installing?
On 24/11/05, Odhiambo Washington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: All attempts at compiling firefox on 5.4-STABLE fail at the same point: c++ -o nsDNSService2.o -c -DMOZILLA_INTERNAL_API -DOSTYPE=\FreeBSD5\ -DOSARCH=\FreeBSD\ -DBUILD_ID=00 -DIMPL_NS_NET -I./../../base/s rc -I../../../dist/include/xpcom -I../../../dist/include/string -I../../../dist/include/pref -I../../../dist/include/unicharutil -I../../../dist /include/necko -I../../../dist/include -I/usr/local/include/nspr -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -I../../../dist/sdk/include -I/usr/X1 1R6/include -fPIC -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions -Wall -Wconv ersion -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Woverloaded-virtual -Wsynth -Wno-ctor-dtor-privacy -Wno-non-virtual-dtor -Wno-long-long -O2 -fno-strict-alia sing -pipe -fshort-wchar -pipe -DNDEBUG -DTRIMMED -O -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -DMO ZILLA_CLIENT -include ../../../mozilla-config.h nsDNSService2.cpp In file included from nsDNSService2.h:40, from nsDNSService2.cpp:38: nsHostResolver.h:95: error: ISO C++ forbids declaration of `PRAddrInfo' with no type nsHostResolver.h:95: error: expected `;' before '*' token nsHostResolver.h: In member function `PRBool nsHostRecord::HasResult() const': nsHostResolver.h:99: error: `addr_info' undeclared (first use this function) nsHostResolver.h:99: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in.) nsHostResolver.h: At global scope: nsHostResolver.h:209: error: `PRAddrInfo' has not been declared nsHostResolver.h:209: error: ISO C++ forbids declaration of `parameter' with no type nsDNSService2.cpp: In member function `virtual nsresult nsDNSRecord::GetCanonicalName(nsACString_internal)': nsDNSService2.cpp:98: error: 'class nsDerivedSafensHostRecord' has no member named 'addr_info' nsDNSService2.cpp:99: error: 'class nsDerivedSafensHostRecord' has no member named 'addr_info' nsDNSService2.cpp:99: error: `PR_GetCanonNameFromAddrInfo' undeclared (first use this function) nsDNSService2.cpp: In member function `virtual nsresult nsDNSRecord::GetNextAddr(PRUint16, PRNetAddr*)': nsDNSService2.cpp:115: error: 'class nsDerivedSafensHostRecord' has no member named 'addr_info' nsDNSService2.cpp:116: error: 'class nsDerivedSafensHostRecord' has no member named 'addr_info' nsDNSService2.cpp:116: error: `PR_EnumerateAddrInfo' undeclared (first use this function) nsDNSService2.cpp: In member function `PRUint16 nsDNSService::GetAFForLookup(const nsACString_internal)': nsDNSService2.cpp:537: error: `PR_AF_UNSPEC' undeclared (first use this function) gmake[4]: *** [nsDNSService2.o] Error 1 gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/www/firefox-devel/work/mozilla/netwerk/dns/src' gmake[3]: *** [libs] Error 2 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/www/firefox-devel/work/mozilla/netwerk/dns' gmake[2]: *** [libs] Error 2 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/www/firefox-devel/work/mozilla/netwerk' gmake[1]: *** [tier_9] Error 2 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/www/firefox-devel/work/mozilla' gmake: *** [default] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/www/firefox-devel. Upgrade your devel/nspr port. (I think that is the one to do anyway, memory is a bit hazy this morning). Al -- GPG/PGP: http://www.no-dns-yet.org.uk/~everlone/pubkey.gpg ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portmanager coredumps [with backtrace]
On 12/11/05, cpghost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First time using portmanager. Using command line:
# portmanager -u -pi editors/openoffice-1.1 -l -f
It coredumps approx at line 00218 or so:
MGPMrController 0.3.4_0 info: running in forced update mode
portmanager 0.3.4_0: Collecting installed port data forced mode
00574 setiathome-3.08_3 /astro/setiathome
00573 compat4x-i386-5.3_2 /misc/compat4x
00572 localedata-5.4 /misc/localedata
00571 tiff-3.7.4 /graphics/tiff
00570 libtool-1.5.20 /devel/libtool15
00569 jpeg-6b_3 /graphics/jpeg
[...]
Here's the backtrace:
#0 0x2812c216 in strcpy () from /lib/libc.so.6
#1 0x080fd000 in ?? ()
#2 0x2807f82c in rrGetPortName (property=0xbfbfeb50,
portDir=0x80ed000 /ports/multimedia/avifile/../win32-codecs,
portName=0x80fd000 qt-3.3.5) at MGPMrCreateAllUpdateStatusDb.c:209
#3 0x2808047b in rrParse (property=0xbfbfeb50,
availablePortName=0x80ad000 avifile-0.7.41,2,
availablePortDir=0x809d000 /multimedia/avifile,
dependType=0xbfbfe790 RUN_DEPENDS,
buffer=0x80cd000 /usr/X11R6/bin/moc:/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/qt33,
counterPtr=0xbfbfe84c) at MGPMrCreateAllUpdateStatusDb.c:496
#4 0x280801e4 in rrDependencyParse (property=0xbfbfeb50,
buffer=0x80cd000 /usr/X11R6/bin/moc:/usr/ports/x11-toolkits/qt33,
availablePortName=0x80ad000 avifile-0.7.41,2,
availablePortDir=0x809d000 /multimedia/avifile,
dependType=0xbfbfe790 RUN_DEPENDS, counterPtr=0xbfbfe84c)
at MGPMrCreateAllUpdateStatusDb.c:424
#5 0x2807ff3e in rrFillDependencies (property=0xbfbfeb50,
availablePortName=0x80ad000 avifile-0.7.41,2,
availablePortDir=0x809d000 /multimedia/avifile, counterPtr=0xbfbfe84c)
at MGPMrCreateAllUpdateStatusDb.c:351
#6 0x2807f5d6 in rrFindDepends (property=0xbfbfeb50,
availablePortDir=0x809d000 /multimedia/avifile,
availablePortName=0x80ad000 avifile-0.7.41,2, counterPtr=0xbfbfe84c)
at MGPMrCreateAllUpdateStatusDb.c:149
#7 0x2807f4c9 in MGPMrCreateAllUpdateStatusDb (property=0xbfbfeb50)
at MGPMrCreateAllUpdateStatusDb.c:117
#8 0x2807e7ce in rPmUpgradeNewMethod (property=0xbfbfeb50)
at MGPMrController.c:727
#9 0x2807d724 in MGPMrController (property=0xbfbfeb50,
path=0xbfbfead0 PMUPGRADE) at MGPMrController.c:408
#10 0x2807be6d in rParseCommandLine (property=0xbfbfeb50, argc=6,
argv=0xbfbfed18) at MGPMrCommandLine.c:302
#11 0x2807b5d9 in MGPMrCommandLine (argc=6, argv=0xbfbfed18)
at MGPMrCommandLine.c:115
#12 0x08048533 in main (argc=6, argv=0xbfbfed18) at portmanager.c:38
I had this on my machine.
In the multimedia/avifile Makefile there is the following:
#CODEC_PORT= ${PORTSDIR}/multimedia/win32-codecs
CODEC_PORT=${.CURDIR}/../win32-codecs
Switching the commented lines around to this
CODEC_PORT= ${PORTSDIR}/multimedia/win32-codecs
#CODEC_PORT=${.CURDIR}/../win32-codecs
stops portmanager from coredumping when scanning that port.
I'm unsure as to where the problem lies so I wouldn't entirely
recommend making the change unless you're willing to spend time fixing
things if they get broken (note: I've had no problems so far but since
I don't fully understand the way the port works I'm not going to say
this is the Right Thing To Do ;-)
Al
--
GPG/PGP: http://www.no-dns-yet.org.uk/~everlone/pubkey.gpg
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portmanager coredumps [with backtrace]
I all ready have one pr against this port that looks like it will be pending until maintainer time out. Saw this a while bck and thought I had portmanager working around it. Mind testing the attached patch and seeing if it helps? Note: my /usr/ports tree is symlinked to somewhere within my home directory so I don't know if this is causing any problems. With the patch, rather than coredumping, portmanager now offers to remove the win32-codecs port. The output is like this: ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ~ sudo portmanager multimedia/avifile -ui -l -bu Password: rCreateCommandLineDb 0.3.4_0 info: executing rm -f /usr/local/share/portmanager/commandLine.db upgrading/installing /usr/ports/multimedia/avifile portmanager 0.3.4_0: Collecting installed port data 1 avifile-0.7.41,2 /multimedia/avifile WITHOUT_QT=yes Unix/FreeBSD/ports/multimedia/avifile/../win32-codecs is no longer in the ports collection, see /usr/ports/MOVED this port must be removed for portmanager to continue is it OK to remove from your system? (yes/no/auto yes to all) [y/n/a] [y] Previously I got this response: ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ~ sudo portmanager multimedia/avifile -ui -l -bu rCreateCommandLineDb 0.3.4_0 info: executing rm -f /usr/local/share/portmanager/commandLine.db upgrading/installing /usr/ports/multimedia/avifile portmanager 0.3.4_0: Collecting installed port data 1 avifile-0.7.41,2 /multimedia/avifile WITHOUT_QT=yes cd: can't cd to /usr/portsUnix/FreeBSD/ports/multimedia/avifile/../win32-codecs zsh: segmentation fault (core dumped) sudo portmanager multimedia/avifile -ui -l -bu If you want me to try moving the ports into /usr/ports properly, then let me know :-) Al -- GPG/PGP: http://www.no-dns-yet.org.uk/~everlone/pubkey.gpg ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portmanager coredumps [with backtrace]
On 12/11/05, Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Here is what I get with the patch I sent you applied: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ portmanager multimedia/avifile -ui -l -bu rCreateCommandLineDb 0.3.4_1 info: executing rm -f /usr/local/share/portmanager/commandLine.db upgrading/installing /usr/ports/multimedia/avifile portmanager 0.3.4_1: Collecting installed port data 1 avifile-0.7.41,2 /multimedia/avifile 2 nasm-0.98.39,1 /devel/nasm 3 qt-copy-3.3.4 /x11-toolkits/qt33 4 gmake-3.80_2 /devel/gmake 5 libtool-1.5.20 /devel/libtool15 6 sdl-1.2.9,2 /devel/sdl12 7 win32-codecs-3.1.0.p5_1,1 .2005.10.01/multimedia/avifile/../win32-codecs 8 liba52-0.7.4_1 /audio/liba52 This is correct, so may take at look at this cd /usr/ports/multimedia/avifile [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~cd /usr/ports/multimedia/avifile [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/ports/multimedia/avifilemake -V PORTSDIR /usr/ports (where ports thinks /usr/ports is located) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) /usr/ports/multimedia/avifile make -V PORTSDIR /usr/ports [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/ports/multimedia/avifilemake -V make -V .CURDIR /usr/ports.2005.10.01/multimedia/avifile(actual location) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) /usr/ports/multimedia/avifile make -V .CURDIR /home/ajs/Unix/FreeBSD/ports/multimedia/avifile [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/ports/multimedia/avifilels -l /usr/ports lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21 Nov 12 07:21 /usr/ports - /usr/ports.2005.10.01 I have a link from /usr/ports to /usr/ports.2005.10.01 Is your something like this? ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) /usr/ports/multimedia/avifile ls -l /usr/ports lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 28 Jul 2 09:06 /usr/ports - /home/ajs/Unix/FreeBSD/ports ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) /usr/ports/multimedia/avifile I've checked and I'm pretty sure that your patch applied cleanly so it must be something to do with how I've got my ports tree set up. Al -- GPG/PGP: http://www.no-dns-yet.org.uk/~everlone/pubkey.gpg ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Files left over from a installworld
On 09/11/05, Richard Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I've been continuously upgrading my machine from (I think) RELEASE-4.8, and I'm beginning to see lots of cruft from older releases accumulating. What are the list's feelings on deleting the majority of files listed by: find / /usr -xdev -mtime +7 There are plenty there that I created or belong the packages e.g. /etc/mail/$HOSTNAME.mc and /etc/X11/XFConfig but what about, for example: /etc/netconfig /etc/pam.d/ftpd /etc/periodic/daily/100.clean-disks /etc/amd.map /sbin/ip6fw /sbin/ilmid /lib/libdevstat.so.4 /lib/libutil.so.4 /rescue/ipmon Obviously dollops of common sense are needed, but has anyone attempted to formalize this type spring cleaning? There is something that was committed to -CURRENT a month or so ago that will delete out-of-date files but I can't remember what the name of it is. I'm sure it'll get MFCed from -CURRENT at some point once it becomes more stable. Al -- GPG/PGP: http://www.no-dns-yet.org.uk/~everlone/pubkey.gpg ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portmanager
On 09/10/05, Michael Lednev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Chris. On 9 îêòÿáðÿ 2005 ã., 19:01:10 you wrote: C Michael Lednev wrote: Hello, freebsd-questions. anyone tried to run portmanager from crontab? as for me it just coredumps, what am i doing wrong? its simply 0 0 * * * portmanager -s C Try this: C 0 0 * * * /usr/local/bin/portmanager -s portmanager 0.2.9_8 is running in DEBUG mode multiple instances of portmanager is now possible, a second instance will damage data bases so use caution Segmentation fault (core dumped) problem is not in wrong path but its portmanager itself What version of FreeBSD are you running? At the moment, portmanager dumps core on FreeBSD 6 (and presumably -CURRENT), the author is aware of it and AFAIK is currently trying to track down why and where. Installing portmanager from a 5.4 package works though (as long as you have the 5.x libs installed). Al -- GPG/PGP: http://www.no-dns-yet.org.uk/~everlone/pubkey.gpg ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portmanager
On 09/10/05, Michael Lednev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, Alistair. that's another issue, currently portmanager from ports runs fine on 6.0-current in interactive environment, but coredumps from cron or something similar. the same behaviour on on 5.4-stable. Ah, my bad. I forgot that the version in ports is different from a development snapshot that I've been trying to get working. :-) Al -- GPG/PGP: http://www.no-dns-yet.org.uk/~everlone/pubkey.gpg ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: correct syntax for openssl 0.9.8 in port
On 30/07/05, J.D. Bronson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 12:57 PM 7/30/2005, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 12:46:37PM -0500, J.D. Bronson wrote: I update my port tree on 5.4 to the latest and I am trying to figure out what steps I need to build openssl 0.9.8 in /usr/ports/security/openssl and end up overwriting any base files. This question comes up often, perhaps a comment can be put into the makefile? I have tried all the ideas on the archives and either it wont build or it keeps trying to build 0.9.7g !!! *ANY* advice will be greatly appreciated. I am able to compile the src code cleanly, but that install will place files in their own spot and obviously not overwrite base files. Read the makefile for the appropriate variables to set. Kris This is obviously my issue. I cannot figure out what variables to set. What I think it should be, it whines about. Can someone at least POST what we should use so this will at least be in the archives once and for all? To get the openssl port to overwrite the base files built by the system you need to put OPENSSL_OVERWRITE_BASE=yes into /etc/make.conf If you then don't want the system to rebuilt openssl you'll need to have NO_OPENSSL=yes in /etc/make.conf as well otherwise each time you update your world it will overwrite the files installed by the port. It might be easier just to have WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes in /etc make.conf so that software will always try to build with the openssl from the port. Even though the system will rebuild openssl each time you update your world, nothing outside of the base system should try and use those libraries. It might be an idea to read /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf to get a full list of what the various options are and what they can do. HTH, Al -- GPG/PGP: http://www.no-dns-yet.org.uk/~everlone/pubkey.gpg ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portmanager upgrade question
On 14/07/05, Bart Silverstrim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a way to force a rebuild with new dependencies when you get errors like: ** OLD ethereal-0.10.11_1 built with old dependency net-snmp-5.2.1_2, current dependency is net-snmp-5.2.1.2 OLD gtk-2.6.8 built with old dependency libxml2-2.6.19, current dependency is libxml2-2.6.20 OLD shared-mime-info-0.16_1 built with old dependency libxml2-2.6.19, current dependency is libxml2-2.6.20 status report finished percentDone-=0 = 100 - ( 100 * ( QTY_outOfDatePortsDb-=4 / TOTAL_outOfDatePortsDb-=4 ) ) upgrade 0.2.9_4 info: ignoring ettercap-0.6.b_2,1, reason: failed during (2) make checkForOldDepencies 0.2.9_4 skip: ethereal-0.10.11_1 has a dependency shared-mime-info-0.16_1 that needs to be updated first checkForOldDepencies 0.2.9_4 skip: gtk-2.6.8 has a dependency shared-mime-info-0.16_1 that needs to be updated first upgrade 0.2.9_4 info: ignoring shared-mime-info-0.16_1, reason: failed during (2) make update of ports collection complete with either some errors, ignored ports or both *** at the end of an upgrade cycle, like a recursive rebuild? Or do other tools have to be used outside of portmanager? Have you tried building shared-mime-info manually and seeing what the error during make is/was? It seems that once you figure out why shared-mime-info isn't building and get it fixed/updated then portmanager will be able to carry on and fix the rest of the ports. Al -- LJ: http://www.livejournal.com/users/everlone GPG/PGP: http://www.no-dns-yet.org.uk/~everlone/pubkey.gpg ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: port rebuild question
On 01/07/05, Bart Silverstrim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jun 30, 2005, at 9:46 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote: * Bart Silverstrim [EMAIL PROTECTED] [20050630 15:58]: wrote: Silly question... If I want to rebuild amavisd-new and ALL p5 ports that amavis uses (so I can make sure they are seeing the upgraded PERL version properly), would I just use portupgrade -rR amavisd-new? I'd do portupgrade -f amavisd-new Isn't this just a force upgrade? Amavisd-new thinks it's the latest version, at amavisd-new-2.3.1,1. Or would this do the rebuild? It'll just force the rebuild of amavisd-new. If you did a 'portugprade -fR amavisd-new' then you'll rebuild all of amavisd-new's dependencies as well as amavisd-new itself. Wait...duh...manpage says it will *also* do a rebuild. Second question; should this be done just to amavisd-new or also to PERL? And is there a way to get all the subsequent modules to rebuild that depend on PERL afterwards again, all the p5*? You could do a 'portupgrade -f /var/db/pkg/p5*' to rebuild all the p5* ports after you've rebuild perl if you like but that is probably only necessary if you don't do 'portupgrade -fR'. Al -- LJ: http://www.livejournal.com/users/everlone GPG/PGP: http://www.no-dns-yet.org.uk/~everlone/pubkey.gpg ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portmanager, amavis update problem
On 27/06/05, Bart Silverstrim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There seems to be a dependency loop occuring on our server when trying to do an upgrade; is there a way to force the update and rebuild dependencies? Below is a snippet of output (please let me know if more of the update info is needed...) snip output The output seems to suggest that p5-Mail-SpamAssassin-3.0.4 isn't installed and as such portmanager wants to install it. Why it is looping the build I don't know. Have you tried manualling installing the amavisd-new port? If there is a problem with the dependencies then manually installing the port should pull in SpamAssassin without any problems and portmanager should no longer need to rebuild it thus allowing it to continue on upgrading anything else. Al -- LJ: http://www.livejournal.com/users/everlone GPG/PGP: http://www.no-dns-yet.org.uk/~everlone/pubkey.gpg ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portmanager, amavis update problem
On 27/06/05, Bart Silverstrim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jun 27, 2005, at 11:02 AM, Alistair Sutton wrote: Have you tried manualling installing the amavisd-new port? If there is a problem with the dependencies then manually installing the port should pull in SpamAssassin without any problems and portmanager should no longer need to rebuild it thus allowing it to continue on upgrading anything else. right now it looks like after manually deinstalling/reinstalling a couple of the perl modules Amavis depends on (well, spamassassin) it builds, but there's a problem with a MIME module or something depending thereof :-/ I get mime_decode-1 FAILED errors in the amavis logs. I'm guessing that may have something to do with one of the perl mime modules but I've no idea which one (helpful aren't I? ;-) Is there a way to rebuild amavis and all the perl modules it uses easily? Apologies for asking this but have you read /usr/ports/UPDATING specifically wrt the recent perl upgrade? Could be worth running the perl upgrade script mentioned there. I know that portmanager should handle the upgrade without any issues but I've not managed to have enough time to let my system work through all the perl-dependent ports yet. You could use 'portupgrade -fR amavis' to rebuild all the ports that amavis depends upon as well as amavis itself. That should work things out in the right order and rebuild everything so that all dependecies are sorted. Al -- LJ: http://www.livejournal.com/users/everlone GPG/PGP: http://www.no-dns-yet.org.uk/~everlone/pubkey.gpg ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portmanager, amavis update problem
On 27/06/05, Bart Silverstrim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Jun 27, 2005, at 11:14 AM, Alistair Sutton wrote: I get mime_decode-1 FAILED errors in the amavis logs. I'm guessing that may have something to do with one of the perl mime modules but I've no idea which one (helpful aren't I? ;-) Well, it helps to know that someone is guessing what I'm guessing :-) At least you don't have go mad on your own ;-) I know that portmanager should handle the upgrade without any issues but I've not managed to have enough time to let my system work through all the perl-dependent ports yet. You could use 'portupgrade -fR amavis' to rebuild all the ports that amavis depends upon as well as amavis itself. That should work things out in the right order and rebuild everything so that all dependecies are sorted. I'll try that one...but I should probably run portupgrade -fR amavisd-new, no? Good point ;-) Al -- LJ: http://www.livejournal.com/users/everlone GPG/PGP: http://www.no-dns-yet.org.uk/~everlone/pubkey.gpg ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: portmanager, amavis update problem
On 27/06/05, Bart Silverstrim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip amavis output
So why wouldn't it read it properly?? I'm really at a loss here.
I'm afraid I am too as I've never used amavis{-new} before.
Sorry
Al
--
LJ: http://www.livejournal.com/users/everlone
GPG/PGP: http://www.no-dns-yet.org.uk/~everlone/pubkey.gpg
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: cvs
On 20/06/05, Muhammad Kashif Yaqoob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip parsing supfile /usr/share/examples/cvsup/ports-supfile connecting to cvsup.uk.freebsd.org cannot connect to cvsup.uk.freebsd.org: connection refused will retry at 23:15:30 I don't think that particular server is functioning anymore. It used to take you to a web page when viewed in a browser but it now directs you straight to a plig.org mirror. I suggest you read the handbook and find a different mirror. I used to use the cvsup.ie.freebsd.org one which was quite reliable. Al -- LJ: http://www.livejournal.com/users/everlone GPG/PGP: http://www.no-dns-yet.org.uk/~everlone/pubkey.gpg ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Grainy X
On 6/12/05, Subhro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I dont have a clue about what you are talking about. My xorg.conf *does* have a Screen section. Section Screen Identifier Screen0 Device Card0 MonitorMonitor0 SubSection Display Viewport 0 0 Modes 1280x1024 Depth 24 EndSubSection EndSection Out of interest, have you tried setting your Depth to anything other than 24? I could be making it up but I'm sure I remember reading somewhere (probably a long time ago) that 24bit depth often had problems that made some apps display weirdly. Can't remember where I read it nor what made it happen. Al -- LJ: http://www.livejournal.com/users/everlone GPG/PGP: http://www.no-dns-yet.org.uk/~everlone/pubkey.gpg ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problems with USB HD
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 12:14:42 +0100, Darksidex [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 When I conect my external HD I get this message: | umass0: Cypress Semiconductor USB2.0 Storage Device, rev 2.00/0.01, addr 2 | umass0: Get Max Lun not supported (STALLED) | da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 | da0: ST320082 2A \\\\ Fixed Direct Access SCSI-0 device | da0: 1.000MB/s transfers | da0: 190782MB (390721968 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 24321C) Does the drive work after this? I have compiled my kernel (5.3-STABLE) with device EHCI in order to be able to transfer files as faster as posible. The external hd propierties: 2 partitions of 90GB, and both are fat32 formatted, I need it to share information with windows. Can I do something to be able to boot my computer with the hd connected? What version of FreeBSD are you running? There have been a few updates in RELENG_5 for EHCI support which has meant that my USB2.0 devices now get recognised at 40MB/s instead of 1MB/s. Al -- LJ: http://www.livejournal.com/users/everlone GPG/PGP: http://www.no-dns-yet.org.uk/~everlone/pubkey.gpg ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: If I have portmanager, do I need portupgrade?
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 17:02:59 -0800, Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks All, its running OK on my system but there are 55 more ports still to upgrade! I hope yours is a little faster. I've got a P4m 2.2GHz so it isn't that slow. My problem is that I have too much stuff on my drive and so performance suffers cause I'm nearly always 99% full :-D I may get chance to have it finished tonight (or at least get enough of the core stuff done that I can start using the desktop again). Al -- LJ: http://www.livejournal.com/users/everlone GPG/PGP: http://www.no-dns-yet.org.uk/~everlone/pubkey.gpg ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Port options and portmanager
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 11:27:45 +, Chris Hodgins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, If I want to retain a port option (that perhaps I passed at the command line using -D) between uprades of a port, will portmanager handle this automatically or do the options need to be placed in make.conf? You can put the option in /etc/make.conf if you want but then it will be picked up by all the ports. If you read the manpage for portmanager I think it should tell you about the configuration file where you can store all the options. I can't remember the name of it off the top of my head at the moment I'm afraid. Al -- LJ: http://www.livejournal.com/users/everlone GPG/PGP: http://www.no-dns-yet.org.uk/~everlone/pubkey.gpg ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: If I have portmanager, do I need portupgrade?
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 20:52:25 +, Chris Hodgins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Excellent. Does it leave packages for everything or is just thunderbird that does this? It will create packages for every port that it updates and place them under the usual /usr/ports/packages structure. Al -- LJ: http://www.livejournal.com/users/everlone GPG/PGP: http://www.no-dns-yet.org.uk/~everlone/pubkey.gpg ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: If I have portmanager, do I need portupgrade?
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 16:12:21 -0800, Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sunday 13 March 2005 04:06 pm, Alistair Sutton wrote: On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 20:52:25 +, Chris Hodgins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Excellent. Does it leave packages for everything or is just thunderbird that does this? It will create packages for every port that it updates and place them under the usual /usr/ports/packages structure. Al I should mention Al here provided the code to add an interactive update option to portmanager. With version 0.2.9_3 portmanager-ui will let you make Y/N decisions on which ports to update. I've just submitted it to FreeBSD so should be in the Tree sometime in the next 24 hours. And so my plan for world domination starts ;-) Al -- LJ: http://www.livejournal.com/users/everlone GPG/PGP: http://www.no-dns-yet.org.uk/~everlone/pubkey.gpg ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: If I have portmanager, do I need portupgrade?
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 13:13:35 -0800, Michael C. Shultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: One other thing just to let you know, I've been testing portmanager against this new gnome update, when its done there is a bunch of gstreamer-plugins-* left un-upgraded. I'm about 3% through the upgrade for that now. I had it going this afternoon when I was mucking around at a friend's workplace. I'm sure I've seen it mention that some gstreamer-plugins needed upgrading but I've not paid that much attention :-) I just tried pkg_delete -f gstreamer-plugins-* on them and let portmanager -u bring them back in, it seems to be working but I also cvsup'ed and there is so many new changes it will be awhile before I know for sure. I'll let you know if my system gets upgraded without any issues or if the gstreamer stuff still needs manual attention. Al -- LJ: http://www.livejournal.com/users/everlone GPG/PGP: http://www.no-dns-yet.org.uk/~everlone/pubkey.gpg ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: If I have portmanager, do I need portupgrade?
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 13:28:14 -1000, Robert Marella [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Like Chris I have packages scattered in my ports directories. I have just started using Portmanager. I have now created /usr/ports/packages directory. Do I need to move the packages one at a time from the individual ports directories? Will running portmanager again find them and move them? I don't think portmanager will find and move them but if the port gets upgraded again then it'll recreate the packages in /usr/ports/packages. The best thing would possibly be to just search for all *.tbz files under /usr/ports and move them into /usr/ports/packages/All if you want them all in the same place. I don't think it will affect any distfiles but I'm not sure if there are any that have a .tbz suffix. Al -- LJ: http://www.livejournal.com/users/everlone GPG/PGP: http://www.no-dns-yet.org.uk/~everlone/pubkey.gpg ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Updating Ports
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005 21:50:33 -0600, Donald J. O'Neill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gee, I did that this morning - make fetchindex that is - and when I ran portversion -vL= I learned that 14 of the installed packages were to advanced and I needed to go backwards. I wonder when that INDEX-5 was built. There was a note from Kris a couple of days ago saying that the machine that builds the INDEX files hasn't been able to cvsup the ports for about 2 weeks so the INDEX is currently a bit out of date. I'm not sure if he's posted anything else to say if the problem is fixed yet as my backlog of mail is quite big :-) Al -- LJ: http://www.livejournal.com/users/everlone GPG/PGP: http://www.no-dns-yet.org.uk/~everlone/pubkey.gpg ___ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Firefox for FBSD?
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 18:32:05 EEST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is there a Firefox version for Freebsd or must we use the one for Linux? /usr/ports/www/firefox Al -- LJ: http://www.livejournal.com/users/everlone GPG/PGP: http://www.no-dns-yet.org.uk/~everlone/pubkey.gpg ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 4.4BSD-Lite source code
On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 13:56, Hanno wrote: Hi, I´m currently using the book by Gary R. Wright and W Richard Stevens ¨TCP/IP Illustrated Volume 2¨, which uses the 4.4BSD-Lite source code as example. My question : Up to which version of FreeBSD is the 4.4BSD-Lite code used ? Has it changed much and if so is the source code for older version of FreeBSD and/or the code for 4.4BSD-Lite still available for download somewhere ? You can check it out from the FreeBSD CVS repository using the bsd_44_lite tag. Al -- LJ: http://www.livejournal.com/users/everlone GPG/PGP: http://www.no-dns-yet.org.uk/~everlone/pubkey.gpg ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 4.4BSD-Lite source code
* Tim McMillen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Many FreeBSD mirrors still carry code to FreeBSD 2.0, but that is not what you want if you just want 4.4BSD-lite. I think the BSD-lite code is still available as a tarball to download from various places. 40MB or so if I recall. I couldn't find it from a very quick search, but I'm sure you could find it. It may even be on ftp.FreeBSD.org if you know where to look. You can check it out from the CVS repository using the bsd_44_lite tag. Al ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Wine: user_ldt not recognized?
On Fri, 2004-03-26 at 23:56, Stefan A. Deutscher wrote: Hi folks, trying to install wine on 5.1Release the build of Wine-20030508.tar.gz from ports went fine but told me to rebuild the kernel, among other options, with USER_LDT Now, the kernel build tells me CAMSOUNDWINE: unknown option USER_LDT make: don't know how to make depend. Stop What gives? USER_LDT is included in the kernel by default on 5.x systems so there is no need to specify it in your kernel config. Al -- LJ: http://www.livejournal.com/users/everlone GPG/PGP: http://www.no-dns-yet.org.uk/~everlone/pubkey.gpg signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
