Re: Apache problem

2003-05-31 Thread Rob O'Donnell
At 03:41 01/05/2003 -0700, Darren Pilgrim wrote:

[Redirected to -questions]

Nucking Futs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   I have installed the apache 1.3.27-fp port in my FBSD 4.8 
system.  Apache
will not start automatically when the system boots.  I receive an error
120: Syntax error: Unterminated quoted string  I tried chmod 755 the
apache.sh in /usr/local/etc/rc.d but this didn't help either.  Have I done
something wrong, is this a known problem?  Any suggestions as to what I can
do to fix this would be appreciated.  Thanks

What was the exact command you issued that returned the error?


I have just installed FreeBSD 4.8, and this same port, and got the same error.

There appears to be a problem in apache.sh - running `apachectl start` 
manually works
fine.  I also had another copy of this file appear as 
\usr\local\etc\rc.d\srm.conf  !

My own problem is that despite installing apache_fp, I don't seem to be 
able to
access the frontpage extensions!  Fp2000 elsewhere on the network refuses to
admit that the server has FP extensions installed.  The access.log shows 
404 errors
trying to access an .exe file in _vti_bin.  I understand that these files 
don't really
exist, but that the patches to apache itself should redirect requests to 
the real files.
Is there anything I can do to verify that the relevant patches to apache 
have been
applied properly?  Alternatively, is there a good how-to about on 
installing apache
and adding the extensions manually, rather than use this port?  Do the 
version 5
FP extensions still support Frontpage 2000 ?

Thanks in advance

Rob

___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


merging discs / filesystems

2003-03-21 Thread Rob O'Donnell
Hi there.

I've got an  4.5 server.  It boots and runs off a 1.2Gb IDE drive - I'm 
planning on
upgrading to latest 4.x on a new drive sometime soon

This server also has five ~120Gb IDE drives mounted at various positions 
underneath
/data, and are shared off via Samba and NFS.  Each of these 120's is a separate
filesystem.  Overall, I've got about 20% free space, however some drives 
have plenty
of space on them, and some are crammed full.

The question is ... can I merge all these discs into one filesystem so that 
I don't
need to shuffle stuff about to make space any more, without losing the data 
already
on them, and with the capability to add more drives later?

I also like the idea of adding redundancy, maybe RAID 5, even if it means
buying another drive.  I could do that to help conversion, in any case.
Preserving the data is important because I don't have capacity elsewhere on 
the
network to copy everything over, nor backup capacity to copy everything 
offline
in any easy fashion.  Current backups only concentrate on critical data and
system files; the rest is replaceable, although I don't fancy the idea very 
much!

Thanks in advance for any suggestions

Rob.

--

To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message


Re: Routing, NAT'ing and and external ADSL router.

2003-02-03 Thread Rob O'Donnell
At 23:01 02/02/2003 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


I have 2 network cards in the gateway machine.
rl0 is 192.168.0.1 255.255.255.0
rl1 is 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
(p.s. I know realtek suck.. but they were just spare cards!)

There is an external ADSL router connected to rl1, who's IP address is
192.168.1.2

The default router is 192.168.1.2

natd is enabled, and the natd interface is rl1
and gateway is enabled.

First off, it only seems to work if I also enable NATing on the ADSL
router, which I would've thought would've caused problems due to double
NATting


You would need to do this - the internet will ignore your 192.168 addresses.

I have a similar setup at home:

internet --- [hw adsl router (192.168.1.1)] -- 
[192.168.1.11(gateway)192.168.0.11] -- LAN - multiple PCs.

You need NAT enabled on the router.
You don't need NAT on the gateway PC; just a basic ability to forward 
(route) packets.
Default route on the gateway machine is the ADSL router.
Default router on other machines on the LAN is the gateway machine
and (here's the biggie) you need to set up a static route on the ADSL 
router for your LAN, gateway being your gateway PC.  In my case, I set up 
192.168.0.0/24 - 192.168.1.11.  Exact means to do so depends on make  
model of router.

You let the router do all the NAT. it knows about the network between your 
gateway pc and itself because it's on it, but you have to tell it where to 
find the other network, otherwise it'll just send it out the Internet, 
where it will be dropped.

Doing your double-NAT will work, as you have found, but it increases 
additional complexity, and means if you want to set up any pas-through 
ports you will need to set them up on both devices too.


Secondly, due to this setup, I don't really know how to configure the
firewall..


firewall can still be set up, but i will leave any details to the experts 
on this list.



Any, and I mean any, help would be appreciated! :)

Cheers,
Mark




To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message


--
APH Computers Ltd.
Tel: 0161-442 2603
Fax: 0161-443 1162


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



round robin routing - how?

2003-01-20 Thread Rob O'Donnell

Hi there!

I've had a good google for this, but not come up with anything significant...

My LAN has two available route to the internet - a FreeBSD box with an ADSL 
modem, (192.168.0.9) and a hardware ADSL router (192.168.0.10) .  Two 
seperate ADSL lines, both the the same ISP as it happens (though am moving 
one of them shortly.)

I can set up the clients individually with one or the other address as 
default gateway, and each has full access to the 'net at the maximum 
bandwidth of one line.

Is it possible under FreeBSD to set up some sort of round-robin router - I 
have another hardware ADSL router available, and am not adverse to sticking 
a couple more network cards in the FreeBSD box if necessary - what I was 
envisaging was the FreeBSD machine is default gateway for all clients on 
the lan, and it then routes out to the 'net via either hardware router - so 
any clients that wants faster bandwidth can get it, as long as they use 
multiple connections and don't expect any one of them to go over the 512K 
of one ADSL line.

Basically, I want something that does the same job as the Nexland pro800 
turbo:
http://www.nexland.com/turbo.cfm

I've seen references to ng_one2many, but the examples look like they tie 
multiple adapters together such that they operate as one adapter with one 
address on one LAN - would this work if i link two adapters directly and 
independently to two routers and set them up identically?

I've also seen references that (at least some versions of) Linux can have 
multiple default gateways and just use them in sequence.  I don't want to 
have to swap over though...

Many thanks in advance,

Rob,





--
APH Computers Ltd.
Tel: 0161-442 2603
Fax: 0161-443 1162


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message


Re: Installing FreeBSD 4.7 from ISO image

2003-01-06 Thread Rob O'Donnell
At 18:47 05/01/2003 -0500, Adam Maas wrote:

While WinRAR sees the iso as a WinRAR file it isn't, it should be burned as
downloaded, not extracted. Download it and burn it as an image directly,
you've just run into some brain damage on the part of WinRAR.

Adam


From memory (machine with nero on it is at home)  All that is needed to do 
to burn the ISO file is:

Start Nero,

Close the wizard that comes up without selecting anything.  You are not 
compiling a CD; you have it already,

Click File  Burn Image

Locate the .iso file you downloaded

Pick Disk at once instead of track at once

Burn!


You can adjust the burn speed, simulation first, settings etc, if you wish 
or are not confident about how well your burner works.

Regards

Rob









To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message


RE: Internal mail server

2003-01-06 Thread Rob O'Donnell
At 18:36 05/01/2003 -0600, Scott A. Moberly wrote:

 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 3:55 PM
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject: Internal mail server


 Here is my problem:

I have a lab with students that is going to be taught how
 to use an email client(Outlook). I want to set them up on an
 internal server that will not be visible from the outside
 world(Internet). I have the mail server setup using qmail and
 freebsd4.7. I also want to use a fake domain name, i.e.
 labcomps.net,.org,.com whatever, so that I will be able to
 send email within the class and no email will go outside or
 from the outside to the inside.

 Ironically, i just finished doing exactly that, if I understand you
 correctly.


Not a problem at all.  Just give named authority over the 'fake' domain
and give it some forwarders (in example named.conf file supplied with
FreeBSD).  Then point all the m$ clients at the internal dns.  Added
bonus...  it'll cache the results and depending on how dns was previously
set up you could see some reduction in external lookups.




You may be better using a domain name in the form labs.local or something
similar - especially if the machines have external access: you don't really
want your test emails escaping to the real domain if you pick a .com and,
say, the DHCP server resets your users' DNS server settings.

(owning irrelevant.com, the number of emails I get that are plainly tests 
or people
not wishing to fill in real addresses in web forms is astonishing ... or 
maybe not.)

You don't need to stick to the .com/.net/.org model of tlds if you are setting
up a system that nobody else will access.  Your imagination is the limit!


Regards

Rob










--
APH Computers Ltd.
Tel: 0161-442 2603
Fax: 0161-443 1162


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message


RE: opinions on my plan

2003-01-02 Thread Rob O'Donnell
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Darren
Sent: Wednesday, January 01, 2003 11:49 AM
To: fbsd-questions
Subject: opinions on my plan


I am building a firewall/NAT box for my father.  This is the first
firewall that I've built.  And, I'm trying to put only the minimum
software on it that will help me remote administer it (ie. ssh) and keep
it up to date (ie. portupgrade).

I figured I'd need a few programs installed for convenience.  But, I
didn't want to sacrafice security.  I thought I might get the advice of
those who have gone before me.


At 15:16 01/01/2003 -0600, Craig M. Luchtefeld wrote:

For mine I did the following:

- Minimal install
- kern_securelevel_enable=YES in rc.conf
- recompiled kernel for ipf and take out extra crap
- disabled inetd
- disabled sendmail
- used ipf and ipmon for firewall/nat

My firewall is running on minimal hardware and it's a firewall.. I only
want to mess with it once and be done with it.



Why not look at picobsd (in ports).  It's a script that you run on your 
FreeBSD box which produces a minimal system on small media (single floppy, 
bootable CD, CF disc etc), and is ideally suited for running routers, 
firewalls, etc. You customise it for your exact requirements.  It boots up 
and runs from RAMdisc - no hard disc required.  Problems? Reboot and it's 
clean again..

Obviously the less you have on any externally exposed machine, the less 
security risk it poses.  Since you can use pretty much any crap hardware to 
run as a router/firewall, find an old P1 (or worse) somewhere, and hide the 
decent machine you would need for squid internally, and put that, cvsup, 
etc on that, where it's safer.  To upgrade the router, you just re-run the 
script to create a new floppy, disc image, etc.

[any technical questions on picobsd best addressed to freebsd-small mailing 
list].

Regards

Rob



--
APH Computers Ltd.
Tel: 0161-442 2603
Fax: 0161-443 1162


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message


Re: Water Damage

2002-12-31 Thread Rob O'Donnell
At 22:24 30/12/2002 -0800, Doug Hardie wrote:


The one server that I have responsibility for (mailserver running FreeBSD 
4.6) took awhile to get rewired properly.  When it was yanked out, some of 
the internal cables were disconnected.  Had to find the motherboard book 
to figure out how to set them back up properly.  Once that was done, the 
machine came up and worked fine.  However, its inlet fan was severly 
disfigured by the falling burning stuff.  Since its at the bottom of the 
unit, the junk only marred the bottom of the frame. There were no 
electronics there for it to damage.  The fan sounds funny now and I 
wouldn't trust it.  However, the keyboard connector is now defective.  You 
can't plug a keyboard into it.  I couldn't find anything visibly wrong 
with it, it just doesn't work.  I have no idea how that happened since 
there was a keyboard plugged in during the flooding.  My only guess is 
that whoever unplugged it did so via the grab case and run method - 
leaving the keyboard to catch and disconnect itself.

If it's a PS/2 type keyboard connector (small plug) there is a plastic pin 
that often gets broken off and left in the socket if connectors are pulled 
out violently, blocking a new keyboard being inserted.  (Seen it often with 
mice.)  If this is so, I've had success getting them out by using 'blue 
tack' (a semi-adhesive goo used to hold the kids drawings on the wall) on 
the end of a matchstick to grab hold of it.

Sounds like this machine was lucky, though replace the fan when practical...


None of the MS servers survived.  None had backups either.  I suspect that 
will be a significant problem.  However, I do have backups for the mail 
server and did recover the complete disk and dumped it to my laptop so 
that will be a simple restore.

Are they completely toast?  Can the hard discs be pulled and tested in 
another machine?  Failing that, companies do exist  that specialise in data 
recovery in these situations.  For a price.  It depends how valuable the 
data is...

Oh... and, as my boss would say, it's an opportunity to sell them a backup 
solution


Rob



--
APH Computers Ltd.
Tel: 0161-442 2603
Fax: 0161-443 1162


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message


Re: email addresses used for lists [was: L0phtcrack]

2002-12-24 Thread Rob O'Donnell
At 15:46 23/12/2002 -0800, Kurt Bigler wrote:

on 12/23/02 3:34 PM, Kenzo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 And for using hotmail accountComputer 101, never
 use your real or company e-mail address to post on forums,  just attracks
 crackers.

I currently create a new email address for every category of mailing list
that I join.


For web use, I use a throw-away free-ISP account (which lets me pop mail from
anywhere!)  which hands out email addresses in the form 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- whenever a web sites asks me for an email address, I use their domain name
in front of the @ - nothing to set up my end, and I know immediately whenever
I get spam through that isp which web site gave it out.  (Thank you, Paltalk..)

I sort of forgot for this mailing list

Rob



I know others use special accounts for mailing lists which refuse to receive
any mail that doesn't come from one of the lists that they associate with
the account (or else they accomplish the filtering in their email client).

A word of warning:  When I first joined freebsd-questions, I joined with my
main preferred only-for-friends spam-safe email address by mistake.  Being
lazy, I waited a few hours to correct that, unjoining, and rejoining with
the desired address.  But ever since then I get matching paired spams on the
two addresses:  the one I used by mistake for a few hours, and the one that
I use at the moment ONLY for freebsd-questions.

Fortunately I get only 1 or 2 spams a day like this, but I'm afraid it will
grow and I will have to give up my main email address, or get deeply into
spam filtering, which so far I have avoided.

Regards,
Kurt Bigler


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message





To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



Re: Always mystified by this. /stand file sizes

2002-12-02 Thread Rob O'Donnell
At 12:21 02/12/2002 +0100, Cliff Sarginson wrote:

On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 02:25:59AM -0800, David Schultz wrote:

 See crunchgen(1).

Oh, that looks interesting :)
I never knew of such a thing, is it a well kept secret or am I not
widely read-enough ?
In point of fact I am slightly puzzled by /stand's existance. It says in
hier that it is for stand-alone systems. What exactly is it referring
to ? (Yes I know what stand-alone means ! But what context is this used
in ?)


PicoBSD (see the scripts in ports and the freebsd-small mailing list) uses
it extensively to fit a subset of commands onto small media (typically a
single floppy disc) for use in niche aplications (eg a diskless pc as a 
router).


Rob

--
APH Computers Ltd.
Tel: 0161-442 2603
Fax: 0161-443 1162


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message


Re: question on IP alias/broadcast

2002-11-20 Thread Rob O'Donnell
At 08:16 17/11/2002 +, Matthew Seaman wrote:

On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 02:04:57PM +0700, budsz wrote:
 On Sat, Nov 16, 2002 at 04:21:34PM +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
 expressed as a hexadecimal or even decimal integer.  thus:
 
 192.168.100.1 is the same as 0xc0a86401 or 3232261121
^^
 and
 
 0xff00 is the same as 255.255.255.0 or 4294967040
 ^^

 Sorry sir, How we calculate that number (Decimal Interger)?, I hope
 explaination step by step?

Simple enough:

This perl snippet will convert a dotted quad address into an integer:


[snip]

isn't it basically: 192 * 2^24 + 168 * 2^16 + 100 * 2^8 + 1


--
APH Computers Ltd.
Tel: 0161-442 2603
Fax: 0161-443 1162


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message



Re: USB: ugen0: device problem

2002-07-19 Thread Rob O'Donnell

At 19:53 19/07/2002 +1000, bigMAX wrote:
Hi,

I've been trying to get an alcatel speedtouch usb modem working and after
spending all afternoon struggling with it I've concluded that I don't have
USB working at all :(

several options here..  First,  I suggest you try the latest drivers, if 
you haven't already, (see http://www.xsproject.org/speedtouch/)

The modem lights going off completely though sounds like it's the old 
problem of the speedtouch drawing too much current from the usb ports - 
they pull more than the recommended maximum, and some chipsets detect this 
and shut the port down to prevent overload.  Try running the modem though a 
powered usb hub, or try a plug in pci usb card of different make. (both 
these worked for me.)  This is the same problem whatever OS and software 
you use

If nothing there helps, you can try asking on the speedtouch mailing list - 
subscription details on that same web page above.

Rob,


To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-questions in the body of the message