Re: what's the priority on building 5.1 packages?

2004-01-23 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 03:29:51AM -0200, Herculano de Lima Einloft Neto wrote: Hello all, Maybe this is not the best list to post this question, but it won't hurt. I've been compiling everything from source for lack of options, and was just wondering what should be the policy for 5.1

Re: what's the priority on building 5.1 packages?

2004-01-23 Thread Herculano de Lima Einloft Neto
Kris Kennaway wrote: What do you mean by policy for 5.1 package-feeding? I mean: will 5.1 packages continue to be offered with new software? For instance, there are no gnome 2.4 packages for 5.1.. so I had to compile the whole thing. Should I consider upgrading to 5.2 for that matter? -- Herculano

Re: what's the priority on building 5.1 packages?

2004-01-23 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 09:02:30PM -0200, Herculano de Lima Einloft Neto wrote: Kris Kennaway wrote: What do you mean by policy for 5.1 package-feeding? I mean: will 5.1 packages continue to be offered with new software? For instance, there are no gnome 2.4 packages for 5.1.. so I had to