Hello All,
I have a similar problem with passive ftp due to a self-imposed
restrictive firewall. When "make fetch" is run on a port and ftp data
is required, the PF firewall stops the program from completing. I got
around this problem by restarting the firewall with a separate set of
rules t
Wojciech Puchar wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> writes:
>
> > http://www.freeproxy.ru/en/free_proxy/faq/index.htm
> >
> > How to bypass corporate proxy?
>
> go away from corporation. A side effect is saving your mental health on
> the long run.
Well, judging by
> "I am trying to introduce FreeBSD in
http://www.freeproxy.ru/en/free_proxy/faq/index.htm
How to bypass corporate proxy?
go away from corporation. A side effect is saving your mental health on
the long run.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/
Kaya Saman gmail.com> writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to introduce FreeBSD into my office and it's been looked
> at with quite a bit of enthusiasm however, what makes it look bad is
> our companies 'security' policy to block FTP.
>
> At present they are running a whole bunch of CentOS based bo
On Fri, 13 Jul 2012 11:58:24 +0200 (CEST)
Wojciech Puchar articulated:
> > We handle a lot of highly sensitive information and that's the need
> > for the severe lock-down. Even the web-proxy is restricted to the
> > sites accessible meaning that we need to request access if we need
> > to go some
We handle a lot of highly sensitive information and that's the need for the
severe lock-down. Even the web-proxy is restricted to the sites accessible
meaning that we need to request access if we need to go somewhere not
governed by that proxy.
this make sense.
just blocking everything except
On 2012-07-12 15:26, Kaya Saman wrote:
On 07/12/2012 07:54 PM, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
Hello.
Why don't you use a portsnap? it's over http...
2012/07/12 19:01:15 +0100 Kaya Saman => To
Peter Vereshagin :
KS> I will check it out however and see if that method is best,
however
KS> CVSup would
On 07/12/2012 09:46 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 12/07/2012 21:26, Kaya Saman wrote:
My issues start coming into play when building the actual port itself.
Ie. fetching the distfile, as you suggested above.
As soon as I start running portmaster -a or a 'make install clean' on
certain ports, th
Hello.
2012/07/12 21:26:22 +0100 Kaya Saman => To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
KS> > A Demo? Am I invited for the show? ;-)
KS> Something like a Linux repo server if you will - though I mention the
KS> term very loosely.
SHould you try with a ixsystems's pcbsd.org then? http://pcbsd.org
If
On 12/07/2012 21:26, Kaya Saman wrote:
> My issues start coming into play when building the actual port itself.
> Ie. fetching the distfile, as you suggested above.
>
>
> As soon as I start running portmaster -a or a 'make install clean' on
> certain ports, the progress just bombs out totally.
>
My issues start coming into play when building the actual port itself. Ie.
fetching the distfile, as you suggested above.
As soon as I start running portmaster -a or a 'make install clean' on certain
ports, the progress just bombs out totally.
as you've said it is not a problem at all tom
On 07/12/2012 08:13 PM, kpn...@pobox.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 06:44:56PM +0100, Kaya Saman wrote:
I do infact work for this company and additionally I am one of the
administrators of the company.
The information comes straight down from the IT director who will
**not** change his mind
On 07/12/2012 07:54 PM, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
Hello.
Why don't you use a portsnap? it's over http...
2012/07/12 19:01:15 +0100 Kaya Saman => To Peter
Vereshagin :
KS> I will check it out however and see if that method is best, however
KS> CVSup would be the best way for us and I'm already l
Does your IT director understand the active/passive distinction? If not
From what he described his director is plain moron. He required him to
block things that HE needs to work, leaving port 80 open so things that
are best in distracting from work (youtube, facebook...) works, as well as
maj
Hello.
2012/07/12 14:44:48 -0400 Lowell Gilbert
=> To Peter Vereshagin :
LG> Peter Vereshagin writes:
LG>
LG> > 2012/07/12 13:19:56 -0400 Lowell Gilbert
=> To Kaya Saman :
LG> > LG> URLs as well as FTP. For ones that aren't, (and assuming the rather
LG> > LG> silly security policies won't al
Hello.
Why don't you use a portsnap? it's over http...
2012/07/12 19:01:15 +0100 Kaya Saman => To Peter
Vereshagin :
KS> I will check it out however and see if that method is best, however
KS> CVSup would be the best way for us and I'm already looking at this:
KS>
KS> http://www.freebsd.org/do
Peter Vereshagin writes:
> 2012/07/12 13:19:56 -0400 Lowell Gilbert
> => To Kaya Saman :
> LG> URLs as well as FTP. For ones that aren't, (and assuming the rather
> LG> silly security policies won't allow for an external web-based FTP proxy)
> LG> you may need to bring them in by offline media.
Most surprise for me is why no one is interested about what kind of a danger
the ftp protocol can ever be? i. e. skype is much more vicious in comparison to
As in lots of companies where idiots are directors (common case) the
danger is because it is something that "doesn't exist". As we all kno
The information comes straight down from the IT director who will
**not** change his mind on this as I have asked several times in the
past.
I just told about solution to a problem. Not a workaround.
How you can make your work if your director actively prevent it!?
Basically without getting to
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
> Hello.
>
> 2012/07/12 13:19:56 -0400 Lowell Gilbert
> => To Kaya Saman :
> LG> URLs as well as FTP. For ones that aren't, (and assuming the rather
> LG> silly security policies won't allow for an external web-based FTP proxy)
> LG> you m
Hello.
2012/07/12 13:19:56 -0400 Lowell Gilbert
=> To Kaya Saman :
LG> URLs as well as FTP. For ones that aren't, (and assuming the rather
LG> silly security policies won't allow for an external web-based FTP proxy)
LG> you may need to bring them in by offline media.
I believe there should be t
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Wojciech Puchar
wrote:
>> I am trying to introduce FreeBSD into my office and it's been looked
>> at with quite a bit of enthusiasm however, what makes it look bad is
>> our companies 'security' policy to block FTP.
>
>
> do you work FOR that company. Ask administr
I am trying to introduce FreeBSD into my office and it's been looked
at with quite a bit of enthusiasm however, what makes it look bad is
our companies 'security' policy to block FTP.
do you work FOR that company. Ask administrator to unblock if for you as
you need it for work.
Do you do your
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 6:15 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
>
> On Jul 12, 2012, at 9:42 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Devin Teske
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Jul 12, 2012, at 9:23 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
>>>
Hi,
I am trying to introduce FreeBSD into my office and it'
Kaya Saman writes:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Mark Felder wrote:
>> On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:23:29 -0500, Kaya Saman wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I would like to use ports specifically and not the pkg_add tool to get
>>> software.
>>
>>
>> Getting the ports tree with csup/cvsup wouldn't use ftp. You
On Jul 12, 2012, at 9:42 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Devin Teske
> wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 12, 2012, at 9:23 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I am trying to introduce FreeBSD into my office and it's been looked
>>> at with quite a bit of enthusiasm however, w
On 12 Jul 2012, at 17:23, Kaya Saman wrote:
> How does one get round this issue as my superiors are telling me that
> opening up FTP is a security risk and therefor don't want to proceed?
>
>
> I would like to use ports specifically and not the pkg_add tool to get
> software.
>
>
> Can anyon
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 12:00:01 -0500, Kaya Saman wrote:
Yeah, this is a good idea I was actually thinking about this.
I've never done it so I'd need to google around a bit and do some
testing but it is probably what we would want to do!
Install the port, run the setup script, answer some
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Mark Felder wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:23:29 -0500, Kaya Saman wrote:
>
>>
>> I would like to use ports specifically and not the pkg_add tool to get
>> software.
>
>
> Getting the ports tree with csup/cvsup wouldn't use ftp. You could run your
> own local mir
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 11:23:29 -0500, Kaya Saman wrote:
I would like to use ports specifically and not the pkg_add tool to get
software.
Getting the ports tree with csup/cvsup wouldn't use ftp. You could run
your own local mirror (net/cvsup-mirror) as well.
___
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Devin Teske wrote:
>
> On Jul 12, 2012, at 9:23 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am trying to introduce FreeBSD into my office and it's been looked
>> at with quite a bit of enthusiasm however, what makes it look bad is
>> our companies 'security' policy to b
On Jul 12, 2012, at 9:23 AM, Kaya Saman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to introduce FreeBSD into my office and it's been looked
> at with quite a bit of enthusiasm however, what makes it look bad is
> our companies 'security' policy to block FTP.
>
> At present they are running a whole bunch of C
Hi,
I am trying to introduce FreeBSD into my office and it's been looked
at with quite a bit of enthusiasm however, what makes it look bad is
our companies 'security' policy to block FTP.
At present they are running a whole bunch of CentOS based boxes and
VM's which of course can be run through p
33 matches
Mail list logo
