> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of RW
> Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2007 2:35 PM
> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: ADSL Bandwidth Monitoring
>
>
> On Sat, 8 Sep 2007 23:16:35 -0700
> "
On Sat, 8 Sep 2007 15:05:03 -0700
"Ted Mittelstaedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Get a personal website from the ISP
Definitely - testing from anywhere else than somewhere in your ISP's network
will add to the equation all the bandwidth-affecting-factors to/from the
*other* network / hosts. O
On Sat, 8 Sep 2007 23:16:35 -0700
"Ted Mittelstaedt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...
> However, the thing that most people (who don't work at telcos) do not
> understand is that the telcos found very quickly that they cannot put
> contention into an ATM network comprised of a DSL atm circuits for
Thank you all for the information and the hints; very helpful. At
least, now I've got a clue.
Bahman
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL
Hi Bahman,
Bahman M. wrote:
Hi all,
I have an ADSL connection at home.
When I'm _uploading_ files the whole upload bandwidth is consumed; so
far so good.
But when _downloading_ no more than 30~40% of download bandwidth is
consumed.
The guys in the ISP say they've granted me the requeste
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Joao Barros
> Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2007 7:33 PM
> To: Ted Mittelstaedt
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: ADSL Bandwidth Monitoring
>
>
> On 9/
ebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> > Subject: Re: ADSL Bandwidth Monitoring
> >
> >
> > On 9/8/07, Bahman M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I tested the connection by downloading 2~3 files simultaneously and used
> > > 'bmon' as Mel suggested
PM
> > To: Bahman M.
> > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> > Subject: Re: ADSL Bandwidth Monitoring
> >
> >
> > On 9/8/07, Bahman M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I tested the connection by downloading 2~3 files simultaneously
> > > and use
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Tim Daneliuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't understand this. If the actual DSL circuit is point-to-point -
i.e., not shared between the premise and the DSLAM in the CO, just
exactly *where* is the contention occuring?
Inside the ISP's router.
However even cheap
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Tim Daneliuk
> Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2007 2:01 PM
> To: RW
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: ADSL Bandwidth Monitoring
>
>
> RW wrote:
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Amitabh Kant
> Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2007 12:25 PM
> To: Bahman M.
> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: ADSL Bandwidth Monitoring
>
>
> On 9/8/0
eebsd.org
> Subject: ADSL Bandwidth Monitoring
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have an ADSL connection at home.
>
> When I'm _uploading_ files the whole upload bandwidth is consumed; so
> far so good.
>
> But when _downloading_ no more than 30~40% of download bandwid
RW wrote:
On Sat, 08 Sep 2007 15:27:38 -0500
Tim Daneliuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Amitabh Kant wrote:
On 9/8/07, Bahman M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I tested the connection by downloading 2~3 files simultaneously
and used 'bmon' as Mel suggested in another reply (thanks to
him). As I'd a
On Sat, 08 Sep 2007 15:27:38 -0500
Tim Daneliuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Amitabh Kant wrote:
> > On 9/8/07, Bahman M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I tested the connection by downloading 2~3 files simultaneously
> >> and used 'bmon' as Mel suggested in another reply (thanks to
> >> him). As
Amitabh Kant wrote:
On 9/8/07, Bahman M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I tested the connection by downloading 2~3 files simultaneously and used
'bmon' as Mel suggested in another reply (thanks to him). As I'd
already guessed the RX don't get bigger than 30~40% of the expected
bandwidth. I perform
On 9/8/07, Bahman M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tested the connection by downloading 2~3 files simultaneously and used
> 'bmon' as Mel suggested in another reply (thanks to him). As I'd
> already guessed the RX don't get bigger than 30~40% of the expected
> bandwidth. I performed the test wit
Joao Barros wrote:
On 9/8/07, Bahman M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I have an ADSL connection at home.
When I'm _uploading_ files the whole upload bandwidth is consumed; so
far so good.
But when _downloading_ no more than 30~40% of download bandwidth is
consumed.
The guys in the ISP s
On 9/8/07, Bahman M. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have an ADSL connection at home.
>
> When I'm _uploading_ files the whole upload bandwidth is consumed; so
> far so good.
>
> But when _downloading_ no more than 30~40% of download bandwidth is
> consumed.
>
> The guys in the ISP say t
On Saturday 08 September 2007 16:16:08 Bahman M. wrote:
> How may I know the real bandwidth limits of my connection? Any tool or
> trick? Or maybe I'm misunderstanding something about ADSL bandwidth?
net/bmon is a good tool to see the bandwidth of your local interfaces. Other
then that, bandwi
Hi all,
I have an ADSL connection at home.
When I'm _uploading_ files the whole upload bandwidth is consumed; so
far so good.
But when _downloading_ no more than 30~40% of download bandwidth is
consumed.
The guys in the ISP say they've granted me the requested bandwidth but
this is not wh
20 matches
Mail list logo
