On Sun, 9 May 2010, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 02:56:49PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Maybe some sort of 'Server Running *BSD' icon / link from web sites to
bsdstats.org would help too ...
Not all BSD Unix systems are servers.
True, but, then again, few desktops users pr
On Fri, May 07, 2010 at 02:56:49PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> Maybe some sort of 'Server Running *BSD' icon / link from web sites to
> bsdstats.org would help too ...
Not all BSD Unix systems are servers.
This email was composed in Mutt+Vim on FreeBSD 7.2 on a ThinkPad R52.
--
Chad Pe
Actually: "Contributor to BSDStats" sounds better / easier to understand
On Fri, 7 May 2010, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Maybe some sort of 'Server Running *BSD' icon / link from web sites to
bsdstats.org would help too ...
On Fri, 7 May 2010, Chip Camden wrote:
I like that idea.
On May 07
I was just thinking about it, and one point that I don't know if I've ever
made (or haven't made in awhile) is that BSDStats looks at who is *using*
a *BSD variant, not who *was* ... it relies on being run *at least* once a
month for a server to be counted ... if you run it once and never run
Maybe some sort of 'Server Running *BSD' icon / link from web sites to
bsdstats.org would help too ...
On Fri, 7 May 2010, Chip Camden wrote:
I like that idea.
On May 07 2010 09:37, Fbsd1 wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Thu, 6 May 2010, Robert Huff wrote:
The problem with not includi
I like that idea.
On May 07 2010 09:37, Fbsd1 wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> >On Thu, 6 May 2010, Robert Huff wrote:
> >>
> >>> The problem with not including bsdstats in sysinstall or some
> >>> other means of bringing it to peoples attention is that it gets
> >>> forgotten and loses its effe
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Thu, 6 May 2010, Robert Huff wrote:
The problem with not including bsdstats in sysinstall or some
other means of bringing it to peoples attention is that it gets
forgotten and loses its effectiveness. Maybe it could go in the
>>> monthly subscription list remin
On Thu, 6 May 2010, Robert Huff wrote:
Chris Whitehouse writes:
The problem with not including bsdstats in sysinstall or some
other means of bringing it to peoples attention is that it gets
forgotten and loses its effectiveness. What about a monthly (3
monthly, whatever) reminder saying w
Chris Whitehouse writes:
> The problem with not including bsdstats in sysinstall or some
> other means of bringing it to peoples attention is that it gets
> forgotten and loses its effectiveness. What about a monthly (3
> monthly, whatever) reminder saying what bsdstats is about and the
> re
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Wed, 5 May 2010, Randi Harper wrote:
I wouldn't want to add an option to sysinstall for this unless
bsdstats was part of base.
nobody would appreciate (and outcry would be heavy) if someone were to
add an 'opt-out phone home script' that they didn't consciously en
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 12:20 AM, Randi Harper wrote:
>
> This idea was mentioned a few years as a way to improve advocacy
>> statistics. Something short and sweet, with a one or two line explanation
>> encouraging people to install the BSDStats system. If it were a yes/no
>> option similar to the
mikel king wrote:
On May 5, 2010, at 10:55 PM, Randi Harper wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Wed, 5 May 2010, Chris Whitehouse wrote:
I seem to have probs with mine too. I was under the impression that
bsdstats was installed by default (in the base system?)
There has been talk about addi
On Wed, 5 May 2010, Randi Harper wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Wed, 5 May 2010, Chris Whitehouse wrote:
I seem to have probs with mine too. I was under the impression that
bsdstats was installed by default (in the base system?)
There has been talk about adding it as an option to sysinst
On May 5, 2010, at 10:55 PM, Randi Harper wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Wed, 5 May 2010, Chris Whitehouse wrote:
I seem to have probs with mine too. I was under the impression
that bsdstats was installed by default (in the base system?)
There has been talk about adding it as an option
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Wed, 5 May 2010, Chris Whitehouse wrote:
I seem to have probs with mine too. I was under the impression that
bsdstats was installed by default (in the base system?)
There has been talk about adding it as an option to sysinstall, but,
unfortunately, I don't have eno
On Wed, 5 May 2010, Chris Whitehouse wrote:
I seem to have probs with mine too. I was under the impression that
bsdstats was installed by default (in the base system?)
There has been talk about adding it as an option to sysinstall, but,
unfortunately, I don't have enough knowledge of sysinsta
On Wed, 5 May 2010, Chris Hill wrote:
Since we're on the topic, and in light of Fbsd1's recent adventure...
Panama seems awfully high in the country stats. I understand what you
said upthread about haproxy being in Panama, but it's a small country to
be always at the top; maybe there's some wa
On Wed, 5 May 2010, Chris Whitehouse wrote:
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
can you tell me two things:
nslookup rpt.bsdstats.org
and the contents of /var/db/bsdstats
I seem to have probs with mine too. I was under the impression that bsdstats
was installed by default (in the base system?) so for
On Tue, 4 May 2010, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Tue, 4 May 2010, Gary Kline wrote:
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 09:12:21PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Wed, 5 May 2010, Fbsd1 wrote:
BSDSTATS is dead. Don't waste your time.
Not dead, still very active with reports in daily ...
i s
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
can you tell me two things:
nslookup rpt.bsdstats.org
and the contents of /var/db/bsdstats
I seem to have probs with mine too. I was under the impression that
bsdstats was installed by default (in the base system?) so for a very
long time I haven't installed it. Obv
can you tell me two things:
nslookup rpt.bsdstats.org
and the contents of /var/db/bsdstats
the results should have showed up instantly on the web site ... but, just
checking the database, I do find a connection from PH today at 2010-05-05
03:30:12.196478 ... and the country stats does show
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 11:40 PM, Fbsd1 wrote:
> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 4 May 2010, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>>
>> Don't worry about it, found and fixed that bug ... it had to do with
>> trying to masquarade behind haproxy, so it looked like all systems were
>> coming in from Panama i
Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Tue, 4 May 2010, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
Don't worry about it, found and fixed that bug ... it had to do with
trying to masquarade behind haproxy, so it looked like all systems were
coming in from Panama if they were running the newest code ... which
means alot of p
On Tue, 4 May 2010, Gary Kline wrote:
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 09:12:21PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Wed, 5 May 2010, Fbsd1 wrote:
BSDSTATS is dead. Don't waste your time.
Not dead, still very active with reports in daily ...
i see a golden opportunity here, marc. why not
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 09:12:21PM -0300, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Wed, 5 May 2010, Fbsd1 wrote:
>
> >BSDSTATS is dead. Don't waste your time.
>
> Not dead, still very active with reports in daily ...
>
i see a golden opportunity here, marc. why not post the
basic onlist n
On Tue, 4 May 2010, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
On Wed, 5 May 2010, Fbsd1 wrote:
Most odd ... what is in your /var/db/bsdstats file ... ? I've had no
reports of problems in many months now ...
Don't worry about it, found and fixed that bug ... it had to do with
trying to masquarade behind hapr
On Wed, 5 May 2010, Fbsd1 wrote:
BSDSTATS is dead. Don't waste your time.
Not dead, still very active with reports in daily ...
I am a retired American who is now living in the Philippines. All during
RELEASE 7.0, 7.1, 7.2, and now 8.0 I have been running the bsdstats port
on my single syst
The backend to bsdstats.org is load balanced behind an haproxy backend,
with only the IP of haproxy being passed back into it ... one of the key
issues that was brought up from day one was security and anonymity(sp?) of
those submitting, and we've taken that *very* seriously ... other then the
Steve Bertrand wrote:
Marc, et-al,
I wasn't originally going to post this to the list, but I thought that
it would be useful to do so in order to try to solicit feedback.
There's a suggestion that I have for the server-side of bsdstats. I
would find it very useful if the server could track the
Marc, et-al,
I wasn't originally going to post this to the list, but I thought that
it would be useful to do so in order to try to solicit feedback.
There's a suggestion that I have for the server-side of bsdstats. I
would find it very useful if the server could track the % of the
reporting conne
30 matches
Mail list logo