AM
To: Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Ivailo Tanusheff
i.tanush...@procreditbank.bg; Odhiambo ワシントン odhia...@gmail.com;
owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org; Anton an...@sng.by
Subject: Re: FreeBSD as a router
You might also check out monowall
Hello all,
I'm new to FreeBSD and I'm seeking help.
For entire time I have been making everything with Windows, but now
I'm stumbled upon problem, where only router on FreeBSD + IPFW could
help me.
I have installed FreeBSD, compiled kernel, found how to launch VPN
connection to ISP. But, further
For entire time I have been making everything with Windows, but now
I'm stumbled upon problem, where only router on FreeBSD + IPFW could
help me.
I have installed FreeBSD, compiled kernel, found how to launch VPN
connection to ISP. But, further, I don't know how to go :-(
I could not figure out
Tanusheff
Deputy Head of IT Department
ProCredit Bank (Bulgaria) AD
Anton an...@sng.by
Sent by: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
11.06.2009 12:01
Please respond to
Anton an...@sng.by
To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
cc
Subject
FreeBSD as a router
Hello all,
I'm new to FreeBSD and I'm
So I may suggest you use man ipfw and google a little bit - the answers
are simple.
Also I may suggest you to use ipf, which is in my point of view far more
powerful.
you are joking or just don't know ipfw. i used both, ipf when i used
NetBSD and then in FreeBSD a bit, until i learned how to
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 2:55 PM, Ivailo Tanusheff
i.tanush...@procreditbank.bg wrote:
Hi,
I am not sure that FreeBSD + IPFW is the best option for you as you have
not read how to use it yet.
So I may suggest you use man ipfw and google a little bit - the answers
are simple.
Also I may
powerful.
Hmm, PF would be better (not IPF) but I hear ipfw ha smore features .
basicly - if you think ipfw can't do something - read manual again ;)
exaggerated, but not very much...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
You might also check out monowall. It is a stripped down version of FreeBSD
that can run off a small flash card and has a web interface.
On Jun 11, 2009 6:05 AM, Wojciech Puchar woj...@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl
wrote:
powerful. Hmm, PF would be better (not IPF) but I hear ipfw ha
smore
Odhiambo ワシントン odhia...@gmail.com
Sent by: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
11.06.2009 15:42
To
Ivailo Tanusheff i.tanush...@procreditbank.bg
cc
owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Anton
an...@sng.by
Subject
Re: FreeBSD as a router
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009
Hello Jeremy:
On 10/6/08 9:30 PM, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 06:08:50PM -0700, Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote:
Hello All:
We have a load balanced pair of PF boxes sitting in front of a whole bunch of
server doing all manner of things! It's been
Hello All:
We have a load balanced pair of PF boxes sitting in front of a whole bunch of
server doing all manner of things! It's been working great up until today when
it, well, didn't. Here's what I see in top -S.
PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZERES STATE C TIME WCPU
On Mon, Oct 06, 2008 at 06:08:50PM -0700, Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote:
Hello All:
We have a load balanced pair of PF boxes sitting in front of a whole bunch of
server doing all manner of things! It's been working great up until today
when it, well, didn't. Here's what I see in top
Robert Fitzpatrick wrote:
It's time to upgrade my old Cisco 10Mbps router and I am seriously
considering using FreeBSD. I have found some solutions and wonder what
one would recommend here on the list...
Solution 1: http://tomclegg.net/256-router
Solution 2: http://m0n0.ch/wall/index.php
I
It's time to upgrade my old Cisco 10Mbps router and I am seriously
considering using FreeBSD. I have found some solutions and wonder what
one would recommend here on the list...
Solution 1: http://tomclegg.net/256-router
Solution 2: http://m0n0.ch/wall/index.php
I want to duplicate my Cisco
Robert Fitzpatrick skrev:
It's time to upgrade my old Cisco 10Mbps router and I am seriously
considering using FreeBSD. I have found some solutions and wonder what
one would recommend here on the list...
Solution 1: http://tomclegg.net/256-router
Solution 2: http://m0n0.ch/wall/index.php
PROTECTED]
--RIP Brother Dime--
-- Original Message ---
From: Robert Fitzpatrick [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FreeBSD freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Sent: Wed, 20 Sep 2006 12:11:32 -0400
Subject: Using FreeBSD as a router
It's time to upgrade my old Cisco 10Mbps router and I am seriously
dont know about
performance pros/cons.
It seems that the 'pf' that comes with FreeBSD 6.0 is equal to that
within OBSD 3.8.
So all things considered - is there any advantage to using FreeBSD
for a router or just keeping things the way they are?
Thanks for any comments or flames (I
is quite the same - but I dont know about
performance pros/cons.
It seems that the 'pf' that comes with FreeBSD 6.0 is equal to that
within OBSD 3.8.
So all things considered - is there any advantage to using FreeBSD for a
router or just keeping things the way they are?
Thanks for any comments
At 09:01 AM 11/24/2005, Nathan Vidican wrote:
Not to start any flames of my own, know one can do a custom install
and have the same result with FreeBSD - just pointing out the
'simple' default install does enable things you'll probably want to
disable if just using the machine as a router
is quite the same - but I dont know about
performance pros/cons.
It seems that the 'pf' that comes with FreeBSD 6.0 is equal to that
within OBSD 3.8.
So all things considered - is there any advantage to using FreeBSD for
a router or just keeping things the way they are?
Thanks for any
Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
Am Sonntag, 3. April 2005 17:36 schrieb Rob:
There is a FAQ, that explains:
If you want all outgoing SMTP connections to use
port 2525, you can use this in your .mc file:
define(`RELAY_MAILER_ARGS', `TCP $h 2525')
define(`ESMTP_MAILER_ARGS', `TCP $h 2525')
I
Emanuel Strobl wrote:\
If you don't have /etc/mail/yourhostname.domain.mc
then you should cd to /etc/mail and type make,
after you edited the file make all install restart
Thanks for your help. I generated the files with this
make command, and all just worked out of the box.
I can send email,
Am Sonntag, 3. April 2005 17:36 schrieb Rob:
Emanuel Strobl wrote:\
If you don't have /etc/mail/yourhostname.domain.mc
then you should cd to /etc/mail and type make,
after you edited the file make all install restart
Thanks for your help. I generated the files with this
make command,
Hi,
My ISP provides me with a fixed IP address and a
registered hostname.
I use a Sitecom DC-207 that serves as a plain router,
NAT and 4-port switch, to connect three Windows PCs
and one FreeBSD PC simultaneously to the internet.
The router gets the fixed IP address, whereas my
FreeBSD system
Am Samstag, 2. April 2005 18:07 schrieb Rob:
Hi,
My ISP provides me with a fixed IP address and a
registered hostname.
I use a Sitecom DC-207 that serves as a plain router,
NAT and 4-port switch, to connect three Windows PCs
and one FreeBSD PC simultaneously to the internet.
The router
Hello,
Im trying to move away from my linksys wireless router and move onto an
old Pentium 200 Mhz I have. It will be the gateway between my modem and
my network. I installed isc-dhcp3 on the box and took the sample dhcp.conf
file in the freebsd handbook. I edited this file to suite my needs
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 3:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: configuring freebsd dhcp server/router to listen on device
Hello,
Im trying to move away from my linksys wireless router and move onto
an
old Pentium 200 Mhz I have. It will be the gateway between my modem
and
my network. I
Hello, FreeBSD gurus!
I have a FreeBSD 5.2.1 box that I'm using as a
router and I would like to watch how its interfaces
are being used.
I would like to use MRTG in another FreeBSD box
to graph the use of the interfaces, but I do not
how to make my router an SNMP agent.
How do I do that?
Any
I believe that there's an SNMP daemon shipping with FreeBSD. At least, I have
one on my FreeBSD 5.2.1 Box and I never installed anything regarding SNMP.
/usr/local/sbin/snmpd
Cheers,
Jorn
On Friday 26 March 2004 15:00, Eduardo Viruena Silva wrote:
Hello, FreeBSD gurus!
I have a FreeBSD
El 26/26/2004 09:50AM, Jorn Argelo escribio:
I believe that there's an SNMP daemon shipping with FreeBSD. At least, I have
one on my FreeBSD 5.2.1 Box and I never installed anything regarding SNMP.
/usr/local/sbin/snmpd
FreeBSD doesnt ship an SNMP daemon with the base system, if it did
On Friday 26 March 2004 16:09, Breno Colom wrote:
El 26/26/2004 09:50AM, Jorn Argelo escribio:
I believe that there's an SNMP daemon shipping with FreeBSD. At least, I
have one on my FreeBSD 5.2.1 Box and I never installed anything regarding
SNMP.
/usr/local/sbin/snmpd
FreeBSD doesnt
El 26/26/2004 09:50AM, Jorn Argelo escribio:
I believe that there's an SNMP daemon shipping with FreeBSD. At least, I have
one on my FreeBSD 5.2.1 Box and I never installed anything regarding SNMP.
/usr/local/sbin/snmpd
FreeBSD doesnt ship an SNMP daemon with the base system, if it did
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eduardo Viruena
Silva
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 8:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SNMP FreeBSD as a router.
Hello, FreeBSD gurus!
I have a FreeBSD 5.2.1 box that I'm using as a
router and I
On Fri, 26 Mar 2004, Andras Kende wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eduardo Viruena
Silva
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 8:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: SNMP FreeBSD as a router.
Hello, FreeBSD gurus!
I have
On Fri, 26 Mar 2004, Breno Colom wrote:
El 26/26/2004 09:50AM, Jorn Argelo escribio:
I believe that there's an SNMP daemon shipping with FreeBSD. At least, I have
one on my FreeBSD 5.2.1 Box and I never installed anything regarding SNMP.
/usr/local/sbin/snmpd
FreeBSD doesnt ship an
Breno Colom [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FreeBSD doesnt ship an SNMP daemon with the base system, if it did it would've
It looks to me like it does, but names it basic or Berkeley (?) SNMP deamon:
/usr/sbin/bsnmpd
I know little of SNMP, and haven't install such a SNMP-related port,
but I did
03/26/2004 01:04PM, Gary W. Swearingen wrote:
FreeBSD doesnt ship an SNMP daemon with the base system, if it did it would've
It looks to me like it does, but names it basic or Berkeley (?) SNMP deamon:
/usr/sbin/bsnmpd
Ah, yes, crosschecked in a 5.2.1 box, digging a little it seems
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Aloha Guy wrote:
Already tried that and it did improve things a little. I tried
setting the HZ to 1000 and it didn't make much of a difference. Is
there a larger number that actually works well?
You can try higher HZ numbers, but you might run into other problems.
Chris Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Aloha Guy wrote:
Already tried that and it did improve things a little. I tried
setting the HZ to 1000 and it didn't make much of a difference. Is
there a larger number that actually works well?
You can try higher HZ numbers, but you
On Feb 26, 2004, at 4:53 PM, Aloha Guy wrote:
Here is the HZ setting:
kern.clockrate: { hz = 100, tick = 1, profhz = 1024, stathz = 128 }
There's your issue right there: if you care about the millisecond level
granularity of network traffic going by this router, you ought to set
HZ to 1000 as
Charles Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Feb 26, 2004, at 4:53 PM, Aloha Guy wrote:
Here is the HZ setting:
kern.clockrate: { hz = 100, tick = 1, profhz = 1024, stathz = 128 }
There's your issue right there: if you care about the millisecond level
granularity of network traffic going by
On Feb 26, 2004, at 5:59 PM, Aloha Guy wrote:
Charles Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's your issue right there: if you care about the millisecond
level
granularity of network traffic going by this router, you ought to set
HZ to 1000 as documented in man dummynet.
[ ... ]
Knew I forgot to
Charles Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Feb 26, 2004, at 5:59 PM, Aloha Guy wrote:
Charles Swiger wrote:
There's your issue right there: if you care about the millisecond
level
granularity of network traffic going by this router, you ought to set
HZ to 1000 as documented in man dummynet.
Chris Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, Aloha Guy wrote:
You're right that additional delay while adding a hop is to be
expected, which is less than 0.1ms to the FreeBSD box but everything
past the FreeBSD machine is adding atleast 5ms up to 300ms in the
traceroutes when
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Aloha Guy wrote:
What do you have HZ set to (see sysctl kern.clockrate)? I think I
remember your original message showing you using pipes and queues
and the HZ setting can affect those. Also see if your latency
improves if you remove all pipe and queue rules (other
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, Aloha Guy wrote:
You're right that additional delay while adding a hop is to be
expected, which is less than 0.1ms to the FreeBSD box but everything
past the FreeBSD machine is adding atleast 5ms up to 300ms in the
traceroutes when the normal is no more than 20ms for the
Chris Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Aloha Guy wrote:
What do you have HZ set to (see sysctl kern.clockrate)? I think I
remember your original message showing you using pipes and queues
and the HZ setting can affect those. Also see if your latency
improves if you
Greetings everyone:
I'm using a FreeBSD based notebook (P4-M2.6Ghz, 2GB RAM) on the built in 3COM 920c
(905c compatible) using the xl0 driver with the firewall enabled and set to open and
rc.conf basically has:
xl0 configured as 208.204.x.224 netmask 255.255.255.0 with the alias 192.168.0.1
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, Aloha Guy wrote:
Any ideas what is causing this? Is it the xl0 driver because I've
used FreeBSD machines as ethernet routers before with a similar
setup except there was no NAT involved and used the fxp drivers and
it never had this problem. Thanks for your help in
Chris Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004, Aloha Guy wrote:
Any ideas what is causing this? Is it the xl0 driver because I've
used FreeBSD machines as ethernet routers before with a similar
setup except there was no NAT involved and used the fxp drivers and
it never had this
50 matches
Mail list logo
