Martin Hepworth wrote:
> On a side note, I found Outlook 2003 really shoddy/poor at working with IMAP
> based systems, esp when you have lots of rules to run and lots of emails to
> download first thing in the morning.
>
> eg would easily 10 minutes to synchonise, whereas thunderbird takes about 1
Martin Hudec wrote:
> You can give dovecot a try now :), I use it on all mailservers in
> production environments. It handles my ~54k mails in my mail account
> pretty well (only slowdown is detected if I use gprs connection ~56kbits).
>
> One good thing that counts in for dovecot is that postfi
On a side note, I found Outlook 2003 really shoddy/poor at working with IMAP
based systems, esp when you have lots of rules to run and lots of emails to
download first thing in the morning.
eg would easily 10 minutes to synchonise, whereas thunderbird takes about 10
seconds!
So from now I say Ou
Bill Moran wrote:
>
> I don't know enought about Dovecot in particular to say whether or not
> the speed is _purely_ the result of caching (and being written in C).
>
> But I can state a couple of reasons why the server-side cache helps.
> Keep in mind that IMAP is specifically designed as a clie
Mikhail Goriachev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> jan gestre wrote:
> > On 7/22/06, Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> I would recommend dovecot. It's capable of both imap as well as pop if
> >> you later want to add that and can do encrypted versions of those
> >> protocols
> >> as we
jan gestre wrote:
> On 7/22/06, Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I would recommend dovecot. It's capable of both imap as well as pop if
>> you later want to add that and can do encrypted versions of those
>> protocols
>> as well. Dovecot is also in my opinion much easier to configure a
ensive than other imap servers.
If i can be of any assistance let me know.
Thanks.
Dave.
i second it, dovecot works great, try it.
- Original Message -
From: "Gerard Seibert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2006 5:50 AM
Subject: Mail system Sugge
For a small system, Courier-IMAP is easy to set up and the users' mail is
stored in their home directories under Maildir.
--On July 22, 2006 5:50:10 AM -0400 Gerard Seibert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I am setting up a simple mail system that will accumulate 20 people. I
already have Postfix
f any assistance let me know.
Thanks.
Dave.
- Original Message -
From: "Gerard Seibert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2006 5:50 AM
Subject: Mail system Suggestions
I am setting up a simple mail system that will accumulate 20 people. I
already have Pos
Gerard Seibert wrote:
> I am setting up a simple mail system that will accumulate 20 people. I
> already have Postfix installed. I was wondering what users would
> suggest to complete the system. I was thinking of Cyrus-Imap or perhaps
> Dovecot or maybe something else. I definitely want an imap sy
I am setting up a simple mail system that will accumulate 20 people. I
already have Postfix installed. I was wondering what users would
suggest to complete the system. I was thinking of Cyrus-Imap or perhaps
Dovecot or maybe something else. I definitely want an imap system.
--
Gerard Seibert
[EM
11 matches
Mail list logo
