RE: Network messaging

2004-01-26 Thread Marty Landman
At 04:21 PM 11/19/2003, Feltis, Ralph C. wrote: Ahh yes, I see how preparing an elegant solution would provide greater flexibility. However, Cordula's solution (ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] strings somefile) is about a 15 second fix, whereas setting up a server is, well, not so much a 15 second fix. Cant

Re: Network messaging

2003-11-19 Thread paul beard
On Nov 19, 2003, at 1:21 PM, Feltis, Ralph C. wrote: Ahh yes, I see how preparing an elegant solution would provide greater flexibility. However, Cordula's solution (ssh [EMAIL PROTECTED] strings somefile) is about a 15 second fix, whereas setting up a server is, well, not so much a 15 second fi

RE: Network messaging

2003-11-19 Thread Feltis, Ralph C.
ll achieve pretty much the same results. -Original Message- From: Marty Landman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 1:30 PM To: Feltis, Ralph C.; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Network messaging At 04:21 PM 11/19/2003, Felti

RE: Network messaging

2003-11-19 Thread Feltis, Ralph C.
ginal Message- From: Marty Landman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 1:15 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Network messaging At 03:58 PM 11/19/2003, Cordula's Web wrote: >Is ping not enough? An ICMP ECHO REPLY is a s

Re: Network messaging

2003-11-19 Thread Marty Landman
At 03:58 PM 11/19/2003, Cordula's Web wrote: Is ping not enough? An ICMP ECHO REPLY is a specific reply, directed only to the hosts that sent the ICMP ECHO REQUEST in the first place. It's not a prespecified _text_ reply, but it is a reply nonetheless. Of course, if you need more information, you

Re: Network messaging

2003-11-19 Thread Cordula's Web
> The clients have to log into FreeBSD, and ideally, would receive a MOTD that > tells them which image is on which port. Now, I know it's possible to > simply edit the MOTD and create a new CD, but as often as the images change, > it wouldn't be very practical. That's where my idea of sending so

Re: Network messaging

2003-11-19 Thread Cordula's Web
> > Is it possible to set some type of simple messaging system between > > networked > > FreeBSD machines? For example, client A pings client B, and then > > client B > > sends some prespecified text reply to client A. > > > to what end? I don't know how you respond to a literal ping, but you >

RE: Network messaging

2003-11-19 Thread Feltis, Ralph C.
th the clients. Any ideas? Ralph -Original Message- From: Marty Landman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 12:24 PM To: Feltis, Ralph C.; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: Network messaging At 02:51 PM 11/19/2003, Feltis, Ralph C. wrote: >Is it po

Re: Network messaging

2003-11-19 Thread Marty Landman
At 02:51 PM 11/19/2003, Feltis, Ralph C. wrote: Is it possible to set some type of simple messaging system between networked FreeBSD machines? For example, client A pings client B, and then client B sends some prespecified text reply to client A. Ralph, it's certainly possible to setup something a

Re: Network messaging

2003-11-19 Thread paul beard
On Nov 19, 2003, at 11:51 AM, Feltis, Ralph C. wrote: Is it possible to set some type of simple messaging system between networked FreeBSD machines? For example, client A pings client B, and then client B sends some prespecified text reply to client A. to what end? I don't know how you respond

Network messaging

2003-11-19 Thread Feltis, Ralph C.
Is it possible to set some type of simple messaging system between networked FreeBSD machines? For example, client A pings client B, and then client B sends some prespecified text reply to client A. Ralph Feltis Information Technology Systems Specialist Western State Hospital __