mal content [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 28/07/06, Fabian Keil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personally I prefer to use NAT to connect qemu
(and jails) with the world outside. This way you can
use pfctl -ss -r to see which connections come
from the host system and which don't.
How does
On 29/07/06, Fabian Keil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mal content [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 28/07/06, Fabian Keil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Personally I prefer to use NAT to connect qemu
(and jails) with the world outside. This way you can
use pfctl -ss -r to see which connections come
mal content [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Followed instructions from various places and ended up with
the following procedure:
# kldload bridge.ko
# sysctl net.link.ether.bridge_cfg=fxp0,tap0
# sysctl net.link.ether.bridge.enable=1
I don't think it's part of your problem,
but on FreeBSD 6.1 it
On 28/07/06, Fabian Keil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mal content [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Followed instructions from various places and ended up with
the following procedure:
# kldload bridge.ko
# sysctl net.link.ether.bridge_cfg=fxp0,tap0
# sysctl net.link.ether.bridge.enable=1
I don't
Hi.
I've been having serious trouble with this.
I posted a message in the qemu forum, but with only 30-something
threads in the BSD section, I don't think it's really a good place to
get a decent answer about BSD.
A copy of the post follows:
Followed instructions from various places and ended
and
complete transmission of the information contained in this message nor for
any delay in its receipt.
Stephan Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
08/02/2005 07:26 PM
To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
cc
Subject
Networking with FreeBSD
Hello Everyone.
We are going
From: Nikolas Britton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Nikolas Britton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Stephan Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED], freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Networking with FreeBSD
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 18:26:15 -0500
On 8/2/05, Stephan Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED
On 8/3/05, Stephan Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Nikolas Britton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet
|
| |WANs 1-4, 192.168.2/24, 192.168.3/24, 192.168.4/24,
192.168.5/24
Firewall -- DMZ 192.168.1/24 - Pixel, httpd, samba
|
|
HQ LAN 192.168.0/24
Hello Everyone.
We are going to be connecting our Stores to our Main Head Office Via Fiber.
We want to separate our Internal Lan from the store computers.
So we have decided to separate them by networks [ip addressing] because of
security.
Head Office
I have 3 Servers in my LAN. And 4
Stephan Weaver wrote:
Hello Everyone.
We are going to be connecting our Stores to our Main Head Office Via
Fiber.
We want to separate our Internal Lan from the store computers.
So we have decided to separate them by networks [ip addressing]
because of security.
Head Office
I have 3
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Stephan Weaver wrote:
Hello Everyone.
We are going to be connecting our Stores to our Main Head Office Via Fiber.
We want to separate our Internal Lan from the store computers.
So we have decided to separate them by networks [ip addressing] because of
security.
Head
From: Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Stephan Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Networking with FreeBSD
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2005 10:10:44 -0700 (PDT)
On Tue, 2 Aug 2005, Stephan Weaver wrote:
Hello Everyone.
We are going to be connecting our Stores
Stephan Weaver wrote:
[ ... ]
But AFAIK, By Placing all these network cards in the Same Machine,
FreeBSD Will Bridge All Those Networks.
FreeBSD is well-behaved in terms of security. It will not act as a layer-2
bridge or as a layer-3 IP router/firewall, unless and until you tell it to do
From: Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Stephan Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Networking with FreeBSD
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 13:38:27 -0400
Stephan Weaver wrote:
[ ... ]
But AFAIK, By Placing all these network cards in the Same Machine, FreeBSD
Stephan Weaver wrote:
[ ... ]
Thank You So Very Much for your quick response.
You're welcome.
I am familar with firewalling, but i never done something like this.
Mabee you can give me an actual Example from my reference.
Using my networks ect.
Sure, if I had lots of free time and nothing
On 8/2/05, Kevin Kinsey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stephan Weaver wrote:
Hello Everyone.
We are going to be connecting our Stores to our Main Head Office Via
Fiber.
We want to separate our Internal Lan from the store computers.
So we have decided to separate them by networks [ip
From: Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Stephan Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Networking with FreeBSD
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 14:26:07 -0400
Stephan Weaver wrote:
[ ... ]
Thank You So Very Much for your quick response.
You're welcome.
I am
On 8/2/05, Stephan Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Stephan Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Networking with FreeBSD
Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 14:26:07 -0400
Stephan Weaver wrote:
[ ... ]
Thank You So Very
Hello,
ps:
root542 0.0 0.7 1320 812 ?? Ss Tue09AM 2:22.10
/sbin/natd -dynamic -d -log_ipfw_denied -log_denied -dynamic -n
dc0
ifconfig:
pccard_ifconfig=NO
ifconfig_xl0=inet 192.168.0.15 netmask 255.255.255.0
ifconfig_dc0=DHCP
So FreeBSD 5.3 isn't production? I had read
Joe wrote:
Hello,
ps:
root542 0.0 0.7 1320 812 ?? Ss Tue09AM 2:22.10
/sbin/natd -dynamic -d -log_ipfw_denied -log_denied -dynamic -n
dc0
Is this just after a reboot? If so, it does show that natd is running,
so I'm not sure why you're getting the message you were getting.
Okay, I've been looking and looking for duplicate natd's.
I have the /etc/rc.conf which has natd stuff below, and the only
other place I see it is in ipfw.
I was able to change my rc and use /etc/rc.d/natd start and that
works. Which is better as it does not require me to reload my
firewall
Joe wrote:
Okay, back on topic.
I've changed my rules in ipfw, and no longer get the hostname ..
messages.
Now natd does not start and it complains 'unable to bind divert
socket, and then cant assign requested address'. I'm using:
natd_enable=YES
natd_interface=dc0
natd_flags=-dynamic -d
Okay, back on topic.
I've changed my rules in ipfw, and no longer get the hostname ..
messages.
Now natd does not start and it complains 'unable to bind divert
socket, and then cant assign requested address'. I'm using:
natd_enable=YES
natd_interface=dc0
natd_flags=-dynamic -d
Joe wrote:
I'm not sure why I get the hostname ``or'' unknown message
though.
If you still get it once you take away your ifconfig stuff then you'll
know that it was responsible. You haven't posted the actual lines you
use, so no-one is going to be able to figure out what might be
Thanks Alex,
Below are my rules. I have removed the IP addresses and
replaced with x.x.x.x in most cases. Also some ports have been
turned to y's instead of the actual port.
Some of these rules are probably not needed, but it works, or
at least it seems to be working.
In looking at
Joe wrote:
Thanks Alex,
Below are my rules. I have removed the IP addresses and
replaced with x.x.x.x in most cases. Also some ports have been
turned to y's instead of the actual port.
I don't want to go into the details of your firewall; all I can offer is
general advice for you to
I'm still learning the firewall thing.
I didn't understand the 'me' clause until recently. I'm using
it on my UP box.
My router actually runs off a cdrom. Its hard to make changes
to it :-). Its an SMP box. It wouldn't help telling you my ip
addresses anyway, because my system is internet
Joe wrote:
Hey thanks,
it seems that ipfw complains during boot with a message:
hostname ``or'' unknown
which I have no idea where that is coming from yet, but will
look.
Then natd doesn't get started.
If I run /etc/rc.d/ipfw start then the router is up and natd
gets started.
Actually it is not my divert rule that I am using the ip
address. In fact my rc.conf has the 'right stuff' for natd, as
the same ipfw rules worked in 5.2 and 5.1. Same rc.conf stuff
for natd too.
The ifconfig stuff is for other rules like:
ipfw add allow tcp from $EXT_IPADDR to any out xmit dc0
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 09:15:01AM -0700, Joe wrote:
Hello,
Not sure if this is the place to ask this. But this is a
freebsd question.
I've been running FreeBSD since about 4.6. I have 2
machines running FreeBSD. One is used as a router, its an SMP
machine, and the other is
Hello,
Not sure if this is the place to ask this. But this is a
freebsd question.
I've been running FreeBSD since about 4.6. I have 2
machines running FreeBSD. One is used as a router, its an SMP
machine, and the other is used to build the source code.
I'm having a problem
On 6/14/05, Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Not sure if this is the place to ask this. But this is a
freebsd question.
I've been running FreeBSD since about 4.6. I have 2
machines running FreeBSD. One is used as a router, its an SMP
machine, and the other is used to build
I haven't tried 5.4 yet. To build a 5.4 could take a couple of
days on these old machines.
Joe
--- Dmitry Mityugov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/14/05, Joe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Not sure if this is the place to ask this. But this is
a
freebsd question.
I've
Okay, I've figure it out.
natd is not starting via rc.conf, or if it is, it dies. I can
start it manually, and it works okay.
Also it seems that for some reason some of my ipfw rules don't
get set, so I have to rerun ipfw also to make things work.
I'll just hack the rc scripts to get this
Joe wrote:
Okay, I've figure it out.
natd is not starting via rc.conf, or if it is, it dies. I can
start it manually, and it works okay.
Also it seems that for some reason some of my ipfw rules don't
get set, so I have to rerun ipfw also to make things work.
I'll just hack the rc
Hey thanks,
it seems that ipfw complains during boot with a message:
hostname ``or'' unknown
which I have no idea where that is coming from yet, but will
look.
Then natd doesn't get started.
If I run /etc/rc.d/ipfw start then the router is up and natd
gets started.
Hey all,
I'm trying to get wifi working in freebsd 5.2.1. This card WAS working
in 4.9 and 4.10, but I get an error similar to:
Error: busy bit won't clean on wi0
Or something to that effect. If I boot the system without the card, I
can see it and make lights blink, but it never associates to
On Jun 14, 2004, at 05:08, Jon Adams wrote:
My network connectivity is ridiculously slow... I had OpenSSH
timeout set to
the default, 120 secs, and the messages file said the connections (on
the same
100MBPs hub mind you) were timing out before authentication
(password). I went
in and
Thanks for the response,
turns out Speakeasy (ISP) had... ahem.. reprovisioned my IP Address when I
made some changes to my service.. figured this out by putting rl0 on another IP
with the same settings.. its all fixed now.. and the IPFW issue is resolved
(thanks to the person who posted the
Hi all,
First a qualifier: I am FreeBSD noob, I have had exposure to it for about
two years, but I just built my first FreeBSD box last nite... fresh install
over an old (and extremely tweaked) Red Hat Linux box After much
procrastination, I have finally made the change (been stuck on
off the topic, if anybody could point me at how to build ipfw I would
appreciate it, i have seen the basic tutorials via google, but have no idea
where to get the kernel sources to do the install.
You don't need any additional stuff, it all comes with FreeBSD. Either you
load the
--- Jon Adams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snipped stuff
The (main) problem -
My network connectivity is ridiculously slow... I
had OpenSSH timeout set to
the default, 120 secs, and the messages file said
the connections (on the same
100MBPs hub mind you) were timing out before
Hi everyone..
I have two computers systems in my network. The first system is a headless
FreeBSD 5.2.1 system. This system stores my mp3's, datafiles and runs mysql and
apache. I recently, got rid of windows off my laptop and installed FreeBSD
5.2.1. When I had windows on the laptop, I was able
On Jun 1, 2004, at 2:07 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question is this: How would I set something up to perform the same
functionality, as when I had windows? I'm just not sure what needs to
be
installed on either system? Any ideas or comments would be great!
FreeBSD supports mounting
On Tue, 1 Jun 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have two computers systems in my network. The first system is a headless
FreeBSD 5.2.1 system. This system stores my mp3's, datafiles and runs mysql and
apache. I recently, got rid of windows off my laptop and installed FreeBSD
5.2.1. When I had
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have two computers systems in my network. The first system is a headless
FreeBSD 5.2.1 system. This system stores my mp3's, datafiles and runs mysql and
apache. I recently, got rid of windows off my laptop and installed FreeBSD
5.2.1. When I had windows on the
http.
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 01, 2004 2:14 PM
Subject: Re: Networking w/ FreeBSD
On Tue, 1 Jun 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have two computers systems in my network. The first system
that use that driver
I've just moved into an apartment in which drilling and running wires is
taboo. Has anyone delved successfully into the realms of wireless
networking their FreeBSD groups? My main server is running 4.8-STABLE, and
I have a client machine running 5.1-RELEASE (which has
I've just moved into an apartment in which drilling and running wires is taboo. Has
anyone delved successfully into the realms of wireless networking their FreeBSD
groups? My main server is running 4.8-STABLE, and I have a client machine running
5.1-RELEASE (which has been suspect to a lack
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 10:14:19AM -0800, John DeStefano wrote:
I've just moved into an apartment in which drilling and running wires is taboo. Has
anyone delved successfully into the realms of wireless networking their FreeBSD
groups? My main server is running 4.8-STABLE, and I have
Toni Schmidbauer wrote:
On Mon, Nov 03, 2003 at 10:14:19AM -0800, John DeStefano wrote:
I've just moved into an apartment in which drilling and
running wires is taboo. Has anyone delved successfully into
the realms of wireless networking their FreeBSD groups? My
main server is running 4.8
51 matches
Mail list logo
