?= writes:
Is there any way to reduce partition size on live system?
RH No.
RH Basic steps:
RH 0) go to single-user; unmount partition
RH 1) backup affected partition; test backup
RH 2) delete old partition
RH 3) create new/smaller
Здравствуйте, Robert.
Вы писали 31 декабря 2011 г., 5:16:33:
RH =?windows-1251?B?yu7t/Oru4iDF4uPl7ejp?= writes:
Is there any way to reduce partition size on live system?
RH No.
RH Basic steps:
RH 0) go to single-user; unmount partition
RH 1) backup affected
--- Original message ---
From: Коньков Евгений kes-...@yandex.ru
To: Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com
Date: 31 December 2011, 11:23:56
Subject: Re: reduce partition size. HELP
Здравствуйте, Robert.
Вы писали 31 декабря 2011 г., 5:16:33:
RH =?windows-1251?B?yu7t
On 31/12/2011 09:23, Коньков Евгений wrote:
is there a way to goto singe-user through ssh?
Not in a useful way -- you can bring the system down to single user, but
you will be logged out and not able to log in again.
If you need to do this level of admin work on a remote machine, you
will need
On Sat, 31 Dec 2011, ??? ??? wrote:
, Robert.
?? ?? 31 ??? 2011 ?., 5:16:33:
RH =?windows-1251?B?yu7t/Oru4iDF4uPl7ejp?= writes:
Is there any way to reduce partition size on live system?
RH No.
RH Basic steps:
RH 0) go to single-user
On Sat, 31 Dec 2011 08:45:32 -0700 (MST), Warren Block wrote:
On Sat, 31 Dec 2011, ??? ??? wrote:
, Robert.
?? ?? 31 ??? 2011 ?., 5:16:33:
RH =?windows-1251?B?yu7t/Oru4iDF4uPl7ejp?= writes:
Is there any way to reduce partition size on live system
Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
# cd /var
# dump -0 -L -a -u -f - /dev/ad0s1a | restore -r -f -
Make sure /var does _not_ contain directory
names identical to those found on the / partition!
As I said, maybe use /scratch. :-)
Unless using a freshly newfs-ed partition, it
Hi, Freebsd-questions.
Is there any way to reduce partition size on live system?
server is reachable only by ssh. I need to reduce /usr to 300G
/dev/ad0s1f1.8T188G1.4T11%/usr
--
С уважением,
Коньков mailto:kes-...@yandex.ru
=?windows-1251?B?yu7t/Oru4iDF4uPl7ejp?= writes:
Is there any way to reduce partition size on live system?
No.
Basic steps:
0) go to single-user; unmount partition
1) backup affected partition; test backup
2) delete old partition
3) create new
On 11 May 2011 03:37, Andrea Venturoli m...@netfence.it wrote:
Hello.
Sorry for the stupid questions, but Google only turns out very old answers
which might be outdated (at least I hope so).
What is the maximum partition size I can use on 7.3?
I've used a 3TB gstripe on amd64, but now I'd
On 11 May 2011 08:37, Andrea Venturoli m...@netfence.it wrote:
Hello.
Sorry for the stupid questions, but Google only turns out very old answers
which might be outdated (at least I hope so).
What is the maximum partition size I can use on 7.3?
I've used a 3TB gstripe on amd64, but now I'd
Hello.
Sorry for the stupid questions, but Google only turns out very old
answers which might be outdated (at least I hope so).
What is the maximum partition size I can use on 7.3?
I've used a 3TB gstripe on amd64, but now I'd like to gstripe two 2TB
HDs on a i386.
Will that work?
bye
On Tuesday 08 September 2009 04:14:55 jaymax wrote:
restore -tf /disk03/dump/root2.dump rootrestore-0.lst
To my surprise rootrestore-0.lst contains a whole listings of ./usr/ files
ex.
2926 ./usr/include/bsnmp/snmpmod.h
2927 ./usr/include/bsnmp/snmp_atm.h
Now
, the capacity from df-k is back
down to 10% thanks again
with your permission I'd like to post your advise on the FreeBSD Forum, of
course with credits =)
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Inconsistency-in-root-partition-size-tp25314145p25356456.html
Sent from the freebsd
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Inconsistency-in-root-partition-size-tp25314145p25325443.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http
On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 23:12:07 -0700 (PDT), jaymax jayma...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there somewhere I can find a listing of files and directories that are
supposed to be at the / level? if there is perchance some bizarre file, that
du is not accounting for.
You can of course read man hier to obtain
On Monday 07 September 2009 04:24:07 jaymax wrote:
Filesystem 1K-blocks UsedAvail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a507630503694 -36674 108%/
Don't know if the above can show anything
It is of course entirely possible at this point, that the disk *is* full.
Could you
don't quite know what next to do
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Inconsistency-in-root-partition-size-tp25314145p25334820.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-questions
On Monday 07 September 2009 20:54:51 jaymax wrote:
mach_1# df -k
Filesystem 1K-blocks UsedAvail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a5076304073845963687%/
devfs 1 10 100%/dev
/dev/ad0s1e505646 14212 450984 3%
Mel Flynn-2 wrote:
On Monday 07 September 2009 20:54:51 jaymax wrote:
Thanks, will do a new dump, one question - how can one determine that the
dumpfile produced is good?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Inconsistency-in-root-partition-size-tp25314145p25337689.html
--- On Mon, 9/7/09, jaymax jayma...@gmail.com wrote:
From: jaymax jayma...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Inconsistency in root partition size
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Monday, September 7, 2009, 7:06 PM
Mel Flynn-2 wrote:
On Monday 07 September 2009 20:54:51 jaymax wrote:
Thanks
:
http://www.nabble.com/Inconsistency-in-root-partition-size-tp25314145p25338956.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
On Sunday 06 September 2009 04:34:20 jaymax wrote:
I apparently have open file handles in my / partitions.
It was partitioned at 512 Mb size, used about 150Mb
df shows
Filesystem SizeUsed Avail Capacity Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a496M492M-36M 108%/
adjkerntz 147
/Inconsistency-in-root-partition-size-tp25314145p25316313.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe
On Sunday 06 September 2009 12:17:59 jaymax wrote:
ran fsck on / mounted partition, is that reasonable or possible, since it
is / or do I have to use a livefs disk like Fixit or Frenzy for this
No, single user mode. Root partition in single user mode can be fsck'd and
repaired if mounted ro
Mounted on
/dev/ad0s1a507630503694 -36674 108%/
Don't know if the above can show anything
Could this be a kernel issue, tuning etc?
Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Inconsistency-in-root-partition-size-tp25314145p25324178.html
Sent from the freebsd
Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 9:24 PM, jaymax jayma...@gmail.com wrote:
Mel Flynn-2 wrote:
No, single user mode. Root partition in single user mode can be fsck'd
and
repaired if mounted ro in single user. The system does fsck -p by
default,
which skips partitions marked clean. Since you
in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Inconsistency-in-root-partition-size-tp25314145p25314145.html
Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
to recognize the extra space.
I know that in order to use growfs, I first have to use disklabel to
increase the partition size. However, disklabel doesn't like this big
RAID volume:
# disklabel /dev/da0
disklabel: disks with more than 2^32-1 sectors are not supported
and the existing partition
Hi,
long story short, I have a partition on a RAID5 array which after an accident
where I had to rebuild the array became smaller than it originally was. Here's
the original size:
amrd1: 1430505MB (2929674240 sectors) RAID 5 (degraded)
and the new size after the rebuild:
amrd1: 1430400MB
On 6/30/06, Morten A. Middelthon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
long story short, I have a partition on a RAID5 array which after an accident
where I had to rebuild the array became smaller than it originally was. Here's
the original size:
amrd1: 1430505MB (2929674240 sectors) RAID 5 (degraded)
Hi all
does anyone know any maximum limit to the slice size in freebsd?
We would like to create a filesystem of 2.2T.
Is there any limit in fdisk and bsdlabel?
Thanks a lot
Valerio Daelli
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005, Valerio daelli wrote:
Hi all
does anyone know any maximum limit to the slice size in freebsd?
We would like to create a filesystem of 2.2T.
Is there any limit in fdisk and bsdlabel?
Thanks a lot
fdisk does not support 2TB partitions -- at least, I've been unable to
get
Jerry McAllister wrote:
This 'rest of the disk' should be divided up into chunks that can
be dump(8)ed to one backup media if possible. Otherwise you will
get sloppy and not do backups because it is harder. Since there is a
What kind of nonsense is this? I've never heard about
I'm sure that many will disagree, but if you don't want to worry about
the partition
sizes, don't. Just have two partitions, / and swap.
I may have started a flame war, but for my small installs, it works just fine.
John.
-
John F Hoover
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm sure that many will disagree, but if you don't want to worry about
the partition
sizes, don't. Just have two partitions, / and swap.
Sure, that works. It is an especially viable way of doing it for
small systems that won't be handling lots of file growth.
But, there are reasons,
Danny [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 21:03:17 -0500, Peterhin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am going by what G. Lehey is suggesting in his book The Complete
FreeBSD on pg. 70 he does not recommend a /usr, or a /var file system.
[...]
What does he recommend then?
Now that I
over
to the small partition, make the links and then rename the mount points
and finally clean up).
So, just an example of what works nicely on a machine with a small MySQl
database, full source and ports and 1 GB memory on a 40GB nominal drive:
partition size mounted as % full
256
I would like to say to all that responded to my question a big thanks.
For many of you this is old hat, for an old guy like myself who wants to
learn FreeBSD, the learning curve is steep to say the least. (Like
trying to drink from a fire hose).
I do appreciate the many different approaches to
Jerry McAllister wrote:
This 'rest of the disk' should be divided up into chunks that can
be dump(8)ed to one backup media if possible. Otherwise you will
get sloppy and not do backups because it is harder. Since there is a
What kind of nonsense is this? I've never heard about such an advise,
I asked the question the other day, whether to do a standard install or
a custom install. This was brought about because I read several
sources, including G. Lehey's The Complete FreeBSD
I will be doing a Custom install. My question however, is looking at
page 70, in The Complete FreeBSD and
i dont see the /usr in your calculations...
asside of that...
it really depends on what youre going to do with the system, or which data
its going to be holding...
this is absolutely subjective, cant tell you as long as i dont get any
further data on the probably size of your data, and where
I am going by what G. Lehey is suggesting in his book The Complete
FreeBSD on pg. 70 he does not recommend a /usr, or a /var file system.
i dont see the /usr in your calculations...
asside of that...
it really depends on what youre going to do with the system, or which
data its going to be
On Tuesday 25 January 2005 03:03, Peterhin wrote:
I am going by what G. Lehey is suggesting in his book The Complete
FreeBSD on pg. 70 he does not recommend a /usr, or a /var file system.
i dont see the /usr in your calculations...
asside of that...
it really depends on what youre
On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 21:03:17 -0500, Peterhin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am going by what G. Lehey is suggesting in his book The Complete
FreeBSD on pg. 70 he does not recommend a /usr, or a /var file system.
[...]
What does he recommend then?
...D
That would leave me with a /home of approx. 72GB. I would appreciate
any thoughts as to how I should do this. The computer will be used as
a stand alone workstation, with internet and email access for now. I do
have a large number of JPEG files in my existing /home directory.
(Linux)
On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 01:43:35AM +0100, Oliver Leitner wrote:
i dont see the /usr in your calculations...
That is actually consistent with his source. Greg Lehey's recommendation
is to not separate root and /usr.
aside of that...
it really depends on what youre going to do with the
in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], wrote
Peterhin thusly...
looking at page 70, in The Complete FreeBSD and I quote Use the
rest of the space on disk for a /home file system. as long as it's
possible to back it up on a single tape. Otherwise make multiple
file systems.
My question is do I make
48 matches
Mail list logo
