On 10/28/2012 03:00 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
PKGNG is a replacement for the pkg_* tools that record package data in
/var/db/pkg.
It also allows for binary package upgrades.
If you are wanting to use pkgng for binary packages, there's no need to
use portupgrade anymore. Just 'pkg install name',
On 10/28/2012 2:16 AM, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
On 10/28/2012 03:00 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote:
PKGNG is a replacement for the pkg_* tools that record package data in
/var/db/pkg.
It also allows for binary package upgrades.
If you are wanting to use pkgng for binary packages, there's no need
Le Sat, 27 Oct 2012 21:22:32 +0300,
Alexander Kapshuk alexander.kaps...@gmail.com a écrit :
Having done all of the above, I ran portupgrade to update all the
pkgs that needed upgrading on my system, and got the message below:
root@box0:/root/tmp # portupgrade -varRP --batch -L '%s_%s'
USING
Got it.
Thanks.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On 10/28/2012 04:27 PM, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
pkg is able to make packages upgrade by itself. I think the good way
to update with packages is pkg updgrade then portupgrade to build the
ports without packages avalaible.
Anyway I had many problems with portupgrade and pkg (basically It was
Quick question about portupgrade's support for pkgng.
The /usr/ports/UPDATING says:
20121015:
AFFECTS: users of ports-mgmt/portupgrade
AUTHOR: bdrew...@freebsd.org
Portupgrade now supports pkgng. To use pkgng, enable it in your
make.conf,
and convert your databases.
This is
?
STDERR.puts Packages are not yet suported. Use pkg(8) directly.
return 0
end
Original Message
Subject:re: Portupgrade now supports pkgng [/usr/ports/UPDATING]
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 21:22:32 +0300
From: Alexander Kapshuk alexander.kaps
On 10/27/2012 1:22 PM, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
Quick question about portupgrade's support for pkgng.
The /usr/ports/UPDATING says:
20121015:
AFFECTS: users of ports-mgmt/portupgrade
AUTHOR: bdrew...@freebsd.org
Portupgrade now supports pkgng. To use pkgng, enable it in your
On 6/25/12 9:53 AM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Hey there,
I'm presently in the process of trying to do a portupgrade from rt-3.8.8
to 3.8.13. By all estimations, this is a minor bump.
Already, I've encountered several annoyances due to ABI changes, such as
the libtool2.4 fun.
On 25/06/2012 08:53, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
I'm presently in the process of trying to do a portupgrade from rt-3.8.8
to 3.8.13. By all estimations, this is a minor bump.
Already, I've encountered several annoyances due to ABI changes, such as
the libtool2.4 fun. With normal
On 06/25/12 10:40, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
On 06/25/12 09:53, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Hey there,
I'm presently in the process of trying to do a portupgrade from rt-3.8.8
to 3.8.13. By all estimations, this is a minor bump.
Already, I've encountered several annoyances due to ABI
On 06/25/12 09:53, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Hey there,
I'm presently in the process of trying to do a portupgrade from rt-3.8.8
to 3.8.13. By all estimations, this is a minor bump.
Already, I've encountered several annoyances due to ABI changes, such as
the libtool2.4 fun. With
You would think there's an option to portupgrade that says don't upgrade
every single package I've got, but if somewhere in the dependency chain I
need a newer version of a thing, then do it.
The problem is that the versioning in the ports system doesn't
distinguish between upgrades that
On 2012-06-25 11:47, John Levine wrote:
You would think there's an option to portupgrade that says don't
upgrade
every single package I've got, but if somewhere in the dependency
chain I
need a newer version of a thing, then do it.
The problem is that the versioning in the ports system
On Mon, 25 Jun 2012 00:53:50 -0700 (PDT)
Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
Hey there,
I'm presently in the process of trying to do a portupgrade from
rt-3.8.8 to 3.8.13. By all estimations, this is a minor bump.
Already, I've encountered several annoyances due to ABI changes, such
as the
On 25 May 2012 12:10, Gary Aitken free...@dreamchaser.org wrote:
Has to be something stupid:
347 /usr/ports#pkg_version -v | grep updating
p5-XML-Twig-3.39 needs updating (port has 3.40)
348 /usr/ports#portupgrade -Rv P5-XML-Twig
--- Session started at: Fri, 25 May
On Sunday 29 April 2012, dgmm wrote:
When running portupgrade -cfa, is there any way to find out where it's up
to and/ot what is still in the queue to be re-built?
Oops. It was obvious really.
ls /var/db/pkg -htU
...is good enough for my needs.
--
Dave
On Wed, 2011-08-24 at 11:20 +, o...@aloha.com wrote:
I too am stuck in ruby-portupgrade swamp :-)
After a fresh install of FreeBSD 8.2 I built potupgrade, then did a
portsnap and a portupgrade -a, in preparation to install Gnome2. When it
stopped I followed the instructions in
On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 00:35:28 -0400
b. f. articulated:
This is the tag that you would use on src collections to update your
base system sources (usually in /usr/src) to 8-STABLE. You would use
RELENG_8_2 for the 8.2-STABLE security branch, RELENG_8_2_RELEASE for
8.2-RELEASE, and so on.
On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 00:35:28 -0400
b. f. articulated:
This is the tag that you would use on src collections to update your
base system sources (usually in /usr/src) to 8-STABLE. You would use
RELENG_8_2 for the 8.2-STABLE security branch, RELENG_8_2_RELEASE for
8.2-RELEASE, and so on.
On 10/07/2011 14:02, Jerry wrote:
On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 00:35:28 -0400
b. f. articulated:
This is the tag that you would use on src collections to update your
base system sources (usually in /usr/src) to 8-STABLE. You would use
RELENG_8_2 for the 8.2-STABLE security branch, RELENG_8_2_RELEASE
On 7/9/2011 1:14 PM, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
As root, I attempted to use
portupgrade -PPRv m4
which attempted to access
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8.2-release/All/m4-1.4.16,1.tbz
but failed - File unavailable (e.g. file not found, no access)
I changed
On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 14:15 -0400, Chris Brennan wrote:
On 7/9/2011 1:14 PM, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
As root, I attempted to use
portupgrade -PPRv m4
which attempted to access
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8.2-release/All/m4-1.4.16,1.tbz
but failed - File
On Sat, 09 Jul 2011 11:33:00 -0700, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
/usr/bin/fetch -v
'ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8-STABLE/All/m4-1.4.16,1.tbz'
looking up ftp.FreeBSD.org
connecting to ftp.FreeBSD.org:21
fetch:
On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 20:47 +0200, Polytropon wrote:
On Sat, 09 Jul 2011 11:33:00 -0700, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
/usr/bin/fetch -v
'ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8-STABLE/All/m4-1.4.16,1.tbz'
looking up ftp.FreeBSD.org
connecting to ftp.FreeBSD.org:21
fetch:
On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 12:05 -0700, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
Sorry to answer my own post.
The packages that are out-of-date on the system I was updating are in
relationship to 8.2-release.
A couple days ago, I cvsup'd the port tree with
*default release-cvs tag=.
ports-all
Today,
portsnap fetch
On Sat, 09 Jul 2011 12:32:12 -0700, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 12:05 -0700, Thomas D. Dean wrote:
Sorry to answer my own post.
The packages that are out-of-date on the system I was updating are in
relationship to 8.2-release.
A couple days ago, I cvsup'd the port tree
On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 21:45 +0200, Polytropon wrote:
If I understood everything correctly, CVS (csup) and portsnap
do both follow the one tree which gets frequently updated,
and by the tag specified above you'll always get the current
version of the tree. Getting older versions (e. g. the
Thomas D. Dean wrote:
...
For the most recent try, I have
...
# OS_PATCHLEVEL:-p8
# OS_PLATFORM:i386 amd64
# OS_PKGBRANCH: 7-current 6.1-release
OS_RELEASE=8-STABLE
OS_BRANCH=STABLE
OS_PKGBRANCH=8-stable
The comments above were not
On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 19:54 -0400, b. f. wrote:
occasionally trip over problems that will require intervention. (Note
that in the section of the csup file that you reproduced in an earlier
message, 'release-cvs' should be 'release=cvs'.)
The '-' was a typo on my part. The machine I used for
On 7/9/11, Thomas D. Dean tomd...@speakeasy.org wrote:
On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 19:54 -0400, b. f. wrote:
occasionally trip over problems that will require intervention. (Note
that in the section of the csup file that you reproduced in an earlier
message, 'release-cvs' should be 'release=cvs'.)
On 7/10/11, b. f. bf1...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 7/9/11, Thomas D. Dean tomd...@speakeasy.org wrote:
On Sat, 2011-07-09 at 19:54 -0400, b. f. wrote:
You could cheat, and neither upgrade your base system nor make the
changes I mentioned in my last message, but instead fool portupgrade
into
2011/2/11 ill...@gmail.com ill...@gmail.com:
On 10 February 2011 08:33, c0re nr1c...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all!
I've got set of servers that uses NFS mounted /usr/ports. When I use
portupgrade samba on 1st server it says
[/usr/ports/INDEX-7.db: unexpected file type or format -- Invalid
On 10 February 2011 08:33, c0re nr1c...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all!
I've got set of servers that uses NFS mounted /usr/ports. When I use
portupgrade samba on 1st server it says
[/usr/ports/INDEX-7.db: unexpected file type or format -- Invalid
argument] [Updating the portsdb format:bdb_btree
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 04:33:17PM +0300, c0re wrote:
Hello all!
I've got set of servers that uses NFS mounted /usr/ports. When I use
portupgrade samba on 1st server it says
[/usr/ports/INDEX-7.db: unexpected file type or format -- Invalid
argument] [Updating the portsdb format:bdb_btree in
Try to move these files out of the way (all INDEX files and pkgdb.db)
/usr/ports/INDEX-*
/var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db
and run (it will take a while)
portsdb -Uu
as another option you can remove the files above and reinstall ruby
and ruby-bdb on those servers.
Are you running on version 7 or 8 ? are
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Michael mlmichae...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Is it possible to force portupgrade to use only http protocol where
possible and skip the ftp servers?
It's because currently I'm using very restrictive public access point where
they block everything other than
On 14/01/2011 21:32, Adam Vande More wrote:
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Michael mlmichae...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Is it possible to force portupgrade to use only http protocol where
possible and skip the ftp servers?
It's because currently I'm using very restrictive public access
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 21:45:22 +
Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk wrote:
MASTER_SORT = http
I used to use
MASTER_SORT_REGEX = ^http
for this when a former ISP traffic shaped ftp
If you set MASTER_SORT = http, then you get
://[^/]*http/ in MASTER_SORT_REGEX, so it looks
On Tue, 04 Jan 2011 11:04:03 -0500, Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com
wrote:
On Tue, 4 Jan 2011, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 04/01/2011 00:51, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
No, the -R flag in portmaster tells it to not rebuild
ports taht have already been built on this run (I
believe from reading man
On 04/01/2011 00:51, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
No, the -R flag in portmaster tells it to not rebuild
ports taht have already been built on this run (I
believe from reading man portmaster). The -R
flag in portupgrade rebuilds the ports on which
the named port depends
-R
--upward-recursive
On Tue, 4 Jan 2011, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 04/01/2011 00:51, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
No, the -R flag in portmaster tells it to not rebuild
ports taht have already been built on this run (I
believe from reading man portmaster). The -R
flag in portupgrade rebuilds the ports on which
the named
so can i just ask, is portmaster or another port upgrading tool recommended
over portupgrade now because i'm going to be upgrading all my ports soon and
in the 18 months i've been using FreeBSD i've always used portupgrade but
sounds like it's best to change now.
jamie
On 3 January 2011 17:54, Jamie Paul Griffin ja...@gnix.co.uk wrote:
so can i just ask, is portmaster or another port upgrading tool recommended
over portupgrade now because i'm going to be upgrading all my ports soon and
in the 18 months i've been using FreeBSD i've always used portupgrade
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 6:37 PM, ill...@gmail.com ill...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 January 2011 17:54, Jamie Paul Griffin ja...@gnix.co.uk wrote:
so can i just ask, is portmaster or another port upgrading tool
recommended over portupgrade now because i'm going to be upgrading all my
ports soon
On 3 January 2011 18:39, Chris Brennan xa...@xaerolimit.net wrote:
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 6:37 PM, ill...@gmail.com ill...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 January 2011 17:54, Jamie Paul Griffin ja...@gnix.co.uk wrote:
so can i just ask, is portmaster or another port upgrading tool
recommended over
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 07:51:48PM -0500, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
No, the -R flag in portmaster tells it to not rebuild
ports taht have already been built on this run (I
believe from reading man portmaster). The -R
flag in portupgrade rebuilds the ports on which
the named port depends
On 27/12/2010 01:32, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Rob == Rob Farmer rfar...@predatorlabs.net writes:
Rob Then, the removal of MD5 distinfo broke it and it stayed broken for
Rob over a week with no indication given that a fix was in the works. On
Rob the other hand, Doug Barton has been very
On Mon, 27 Dec 2010, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 27/12/2010 01:32, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Rob == Rob Farmer rfar...@predatorlabs.net writes:
Rob Then, the removal of MD5 distinfo broke it and it stayed broken for
Rob over a week with no indication given that a fix was in the works. On
Rob
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 13:42, Bob Hall rjh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 11:39:58AM -0800, Ron (Lists) wrote:
But, due to portupgrade no longer being maintained and failing to work
anymore,
I'm a bit confused about this. I did a quick google search and saw that
someone had
Rob == Rob Farmer rfar...@predatorlabs.net writes:
Rob Then, the removal of MD5 distinfo broke it and it stayed broken for
Rob over a week with no indication given that a fix was in the works. On
Rob the other hand, Doug Barton has been very responsive to issues with
Rob portmaster and fixed
Quoth Randal L. Schwartz on Sunday, 26 December 2010:
Rob == Rob Farmer rfar...@predatorlabs.net writes:
Rob Then, the removal of MD5 distinfo broke it and it stayed broken for
Rob over a week with no indication given that a fix was in the works. On
Rob the other hand, Doug Barton has been
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 10:31:01 +0800
xinyou yan yxy@gmail.com wrote:
if i use portupgrade -af --patch (it take much times)
what's --patch?
And i don't finish it
Then the second time . i do it again Does it continue or reupgrade
anythins
It starts again. See pkg_glob(1) for how
On 12/05/2010 10:45 AM, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Yuri y...@rawbw.com writes:
Beginning at some time less than 1 month ago I started getting such
message. Increasing maxproc doesn't help. Current values are like
this:
kern.maxproc: 6164
kern.maxprocperuid: 5547
What may be causing such
Yuri y...@rawbw.com writes:
Beginning at some time less than 1 month ago I started getting such
message. Increasing maxproc doesn't help. Current values are like
this:
kern.maxproc: 6164
kern.maxprocperuid: 5547
What may be causing such condition?
limits(1), perhaps?
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Ron (Lists) rg.li...@rzweb.com wrote:
I'm trying to upgrade my ports and I can't get portupgrade to do anything.
I type 'sudo portupgrade apache' (or any package) and all I get back is a
command prompt. No error or any other message. portversion seems to
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010 12:57:03 -0500, Chris Brennan xa...@xaerolimit.net
wrote:
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Ron (Lists) wrote:
I'm trying to upgrade my ports and I can't get portupgrade to do
anything. I type 'sudo portupgrade apache' (or any package) and all
I get back is a command
On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 09:21:22 -0800, Ron (Lists) rg.li...@rzweb.com wrote:
I'm trying to upgrade my ports and I can't get portupgrade to do
anything. I type 'sudo portupgrade apache' (or any package) and all I
get back is a command prompt. No error or any other message.
portversion seems
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010 19:08:23 +0100, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 09:21:22 -0800, Ron (Lists) rg.li...@rzweb.com wrote:
I'm trying to upgrade my ports and I can't get portupgrade to do
anything. I type 'sudo portupgrade apache' (or any package) and all I
get back is a
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 10:15, Ron (Lists) rg.li...@rzweb.com wrote:
None of these suggestions help. I have never had to put www/ in front
of the port name before. The tab expansion is handled by
bash-completion as used to be smart enough to know the command I was
typing and could
On Sun, Nov 07, 2010 at 09:21:22AM -0800, Ron (Lists) wrote:
I'm trying to upgrade my ports and I can't get portupgrade to do
anything. I type 'sudo portupgrade apache' (or any package) and all I
get back is a command prompt. No error or any other message.
portversion seems to work
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010 10:32:05 -0800
Rob Farmer rfar...@predatorlabs.net articulated:
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 10:15, Ron (Lists) rg.li...@rzweb.com wrote:
None of these suggestions help. I have never had to put www/ in
front of the port name before. The tab expansion is handled by
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 12:12, Jerry freebsd.u...@seibercom.net wrote:
Really! When did r...@freebsd.org drop the port? If he is not
actively maintaining the port then perhaps he should inform the proper
authority.
He is a mailing list.
ports/ports-mgmt/portupgrade/Makefile
Revision 1.256
Tue
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, Ron (Lists) wrote:
I'm trying to upgrade my ports and I can't get portupgrade to do anything. I
type 'sudo portupgrade apache' (or any package) and all I get back is a
command prompt. No error or any other message. portversion seems to work
correctly, showing my out of
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 07 Nov 2010 09:21:22 -0800, Ron (Lists) rg.li...@rzweb.com wrote:
I'm trying to upgrade my ports and I can't get portupgrade to do
anything. I type 'sudo portupgrade apache' (or any package) and all I
get back is a command prompt. No error or any
On Sun, 7 Nov 2010, Ron (Lists) wrote:
None of these suggestions help. I have never had to put www/ in front
of the port name before.
It's not needed.
The tab expansion is handled by bash-completion as used to be smart
enough to know the command I was typing and could auto-complete port
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:24:26 +0100
David Southwell da...@vizion2000.net wrote:
Tried that but no good - it still seems to goof up. I recall it used
to work many versions ago but it may not have been picked up on a
regression test.
It works for me. Which port is it failing
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:24:26 +0100
David Southwell da...@vizion2000.net wrote:
Tried that but no good - it still seems to goof up. I recall it used
to work many versions ago but it may not have been picked up on a
regression test.
It works for me. Which port is it failing on
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 10:14:30 +0100
David Southwell da...@vizion2000.net articulated:
man portupgrade advises:
-f
--forceForce the upgrade of a package even if it
is to be a downgrade or just a reinstall of the same ver-
sion, or the
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 10:14:30 +0100
David Southwell da...@vizion2000.net wrote:
Hi
man portupgrade advises:
-f
--forceForce the upgrade of a package even if it
is to be a downgrade or just a reinstall of the same ver-
sion, or the
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 10:14:30 +0100
David Southwell da...@vizion2000.net wrote:
Hi
man portupgrade advises:
-f
--forceForce the upgrade of a package even if it
is to be a downgrade or just a reinstall of the same ver-
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 13:24:26 +0100
David Southwell da...@vizion2000.net wrote:
Tried that but no good - it still seems to goof up. I recall it used
to work many versions ago but it may not have been picked up on a
regression test.
It works for me. Which port is it failing on?
On 23 June 2010 08:29, n dhert ndhert...@gmail.com wrote:
in the process of upgrading 7.2 - 8.0, the last step is to recompile all
ports
(section 24.2.3 of freebsd manual)
# portupgrade -f ruby
# rm /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db
# portugprade -f ruby18-bdb
# rm /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 23/06/2010 08:29:41, n dhert wrote:
Why does it stop? Can it be avoided? Or can I make portupgrade -af start
from where it got so far in the first run ?
portupgrade is written in ruby -- having its command interpreter ripped
out from underneath
2010/2/8 Dánielisz László laszlo_daniel...@yahoo.com:
hi,
do you have any idea why it is not upgrading:
root# portversion -v|grep php
php5-5.2.12 succeeds port (port has 5.2.10)
php5-pcre-5.2.12 succeeds port (port has 5.2.10)
php5-session-5.2.12
Szia László!
2010/2/8 Dánielisz László laszlo_daniel...@yahoo.com
hi,
do you have any idea why it is not upgrading:
root# portversion -v|grep php
php5-5.2.12 succeeds port (port has 5.2.10)
php5-pcre-5.2.12 succeeds port (port has 5.2.10)
, February 8, 2010 10:34:53 AM
Subject: Re: portupgrade
Szia László!
2010/2/8 Dánielisz László laszlo_daniel...@yahoo.com
hi,
do you have any idea why it is not upgrading:
root# portversion -v|grep php
php5-5.2.12 succeeds port (port has 5.2.10)
php5-pcre-5.2.12
László wrote:
Thank you everybody!
Actually I use cvsup, and it is up to date, but now I give a try with portsnap.
It sounds like your index file or your portsdb are older than the rest
of your ports tree. Try running 'portsdb -Fu'.
b.
___
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, D?nielisz L?szl? wrote:
do you have any idea why it is not upgrading:
root# portversion -v|grep php
php5-5.2.12 succeeds port (port has 5.2.10)
php5-pcre-5.2.12 succeeds port (port has 5.2.10)
php5-session-5.2.12 succeeds port
.
use the
the --batch switch or put BATCH=yes in make.conf IIRC.
That particular make.conf is in /etc
But IMHO, remembering to always give portupgrade the -C
switch is the
way to go.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
This can happen if the ports tree or index file is outdated.
csup/portsnap, run pkgdb -Fu, and try it again.
I think you meant 'portsdb -Fu'. The pkgtools often run 'pkgdb -u'
and 'pkgdb -aF' automatically, and a full-blown 'pkgdb -F' or 'pkgdb
-L' usually isn't required unless there is an
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, b. f. wrote:
This can happen if the ports tree or index file is outdated.
csup/portsnap, run pkgdb -Fu, and try it again.
I think you meant 'portsdb -Fu'. The pkgtools often run 'pkgdb -u'
and 'pkgdb -aF' automatically, and a full-blown 'pkgdb -F' or 'pkgdb
-L' usually
laszlo_daniel...@yahoo.com
Sent: Mon, February 8, 2010 9:03:39 PM
Subject: Re: portupgrade
On Mon, 8 Feb 2010, b. f. wrote:
This can happen if the ports tree or index file is outdated.
csup/portsnap, run pkgdb -Fu, and try it again.
I think you meant 'portsdb -Fu'. The pkgtools often run 'pkgdb -u
I think you can try this:
-y
--yes
Answer yes to all the questions. This option implies -v and negates -n .
László
On 2010.02.07., at 12:59, n dhert ndh...@gmail.com wrote:
When using portupgrade, from time to time, there is a package that displays
an options menu and waits for a
On 07/02/2010 2:14 μ.μ., Dánielisz László wrote:
I think you can try this:
-y
--yes
Answer yes to all the questions. This option implies -v and negates -n .
László
On 2010.02.07., at 12:59, n dhert ndh...@gmail.com wrote:
When using portupgrade, from time to time, there is a
On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 12:59:53PM +0100, n dhert wrote:
When using portupgrade, from time to time, there is a package that displays
an options menu and waits for a interactive response (like hitting OK to
accept the defaults and continue). Is there way to specify that portupgrade
should
Frank == Frank Shute fr...@shute.org.uk writes:
Frank But IMHO, remembering to always give portupgrade the -C switch is the
Frank way to go.
Sadly, I've run across Perl ports that still ask questions, even when
being run from portupgrade, and -C doesn't help those.
I'm guessing from this
On Sun, Feb 07, 2010 at 12:26:49PM -0800, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
Frank == Frank Shute fr...@shute.org.uk writes:
Frank But IMHO, remembering to always give portupgrade the -C switch is the
Frank way to go.
Sadly, I've run across Perl ports that still ask questions, even when
being
Frank == Frank Shute fr...@shute.org.uk writes:
Frank All the Perl ports I've installed (e.g p5-*) have just installed for
Frank me without any curses options menu.
Lucky. :)
Frank Although I'd describe you as a Perl power user and undoubtedly have
Frank more Perl ports installed than I have.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/02/2010 21:38, Randal L. Schwartz wrote:
I wish I could remember. Just that something comes up every once in a while
and I curse that the upgrade has stopped. :)
net/p5-Net
is one I always keep coming across that asks annoying questions.
On Thursday 21 January 2010 10:34:59 pm n dhert wrote:
Today there were about 7 portupgrades to qt4 packages.
Upgrading 'qt4-rcc-4.5.3' to 'qt4-rcc-4.6.1' (devel/qt4-rcc) failed:
...
c++ -c -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -O2 -fPIC -Wall -W
-DQT_BOOTSTRAPPED -DQT_
LITE_UNICODE
Jamie Griffin wrote:
been trying to portupgrade firefox3 for about a day but keep getting a
checksum mismatch error and the build stops. What do I need to do to get
it to upgrade?
Try deleting the firefox sources you downloaded previously and start again.
It seems your download somehow got
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:24 PM, Mark Linimon lini...@lonesome.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:13:36PM -0500, Robert Huff wrote:
The maintainer, ruby@, is aware of this; a check of the PR
database shows multiple open PRs, none critical but many serious
going back six months and more.
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Kevin wrote:
[...]
The only other symptoms I can identify right now are related to the
following entries in my crontab:
0 2 * * 6 /usr/local/sbin/portsclean -DD
0 2 * * 5 /usr/local/sbin/portsclean -C
The e-mailed results simply say env: ruby: No such file or
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:19 PM, Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote:
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Kevin wrote:
[...]
The only other symptoms I can identify right now are related to the
following entries in my crontab:
0 2 * * 6 /usr/local/sbin/portsclean -DD
0 2 * * 5
Glen Barber wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:19 PM, Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote:
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Kevin wrote:
[...]
The only other symptoms I can identify right now are related to the
following entries in my crontab:
0 2 * * 6 /usr/local/sbin/portsclean -DD
0
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Warren Block wrote:
On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Kevin wrote:
[...]
The only other symptoms I can identify right now are related to the
following entries in my crontab:
0 2 * * 6 /usr/local/sbin/portsclean -DD
0 2 * * 5 /usr/local/sbin/portsclean -C
The e-mailed
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 11:40:58PM -0600, Richard Kolkovich wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 08:42:30AM +0100, n dhert wrote:
In my nightly portupgrade I got, while upgrading print/cups-client :
...
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/crt1.o: relocation R_X86_64_32 can not be used when
making
a
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 07:49:54PM +0100, Roland Smith wrote:
Try this;
# cd /usr/ports/print/cups-client
# make patch
# cd work/cups-1.4.2
Open Makedefs.in in an editor and remove @PIEFLAGS@ from line 143.
# cd ../..
# make
It should then build OK. Tested on 8.0-RELEASE amd64.
The
At 12:50 AM + 11/29/09, Frank Shute wrote:
You don't mention what command you are using to upgrade your
ports/packages.
Sorry: portupgrade -aPPR
You do realise that you don't have to upgrade your ports if you go
from 7.1 to 7.2. You can do but don't have to.
No, I didn't realize that. The
1 - 100 of 945 matches
Mail list logo
