> On Wed, 5 Aug 2009 14:14:49 +0100
>
> David Southwell wrote:
> > Hi every one
> >
> > My understanding is that one uses the amd64 for building a kernel for
> > systems with Intel Quad Core processors.
> >
> > It is helpful when naming conventions follow a logical strand. I mean
> > why does free
Hi,
On 06 August 2009 pm 19:07:12 Erik Trulsson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 05:18:09PM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > On 06 August 2009 pm 16:40:41 Mark Stapper wrote:
> > > Erich Dollansky wrote:
> > > > IA 64? Wans't this once - or still is - the term used for
> > > > the Itanium?
> > >
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009 14:14:49 +0100
David Southwell wrote:
> Hi every one
>
> My understanding is that one uses the amd64 for building a kernel for
> systems with Intel Quad Core processors.
>
> It is helpful when naming conventions follow a logical strand. I mean
> why does freebsd use a single
On Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 05:18:09PM +0800, Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 06 August 2009 pm 16:40:41 Mark Stapper wrote:
> > Erich Dollansky wrote:
> >
> > > IA 64? Wans't this once - or still is - the term used for the
> > > Itanium?
> >
> > The one that didn't stick... indeed.
>
> do they r
Hi,
On 06 August 2009 pm 16:40:41 Mark Stapper wrote:
> Erich Dollansky wrote:
>
> > IA 64? Wans't this once - or still is - the term used for the
> > Itanium?
>
> The one that didn't stick... indeed.
do they really sell machines with this CPU in numbers?
I have not seen one in the wild.
>
> > Y
Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Because people using them, new what they were doing.
>
And probably didn't care...
> IA 64? Wans't this once - or still is - the term used for the
> Itanium?
>
The one that didn't stick... indeed.
> Yes, also Intel can fail. Intel also failed with their first 32
> b
Hi,
On 06 August 2009 pm 14:35:40 Mark Stapper wrote:
> Mel Flynn wrote:
> > On Wednesday 05 August 2009 05:27:55 Erik Trulsson wrote:
> >> The amd64 architecture is called that because it was AMD who
> >> invented and created it and was for a while the only one
>
> Now I come to think of it, isn'
per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
> Mark Stapper wrote:
>
>> ... PowerPC is dead ...
>>
Well yes
(lousy excuse coming up!) I meant in the PC/Mac world... ;-)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Mark Stapper wrote:
> ... PowerPC is dead ...
I suspect both IBM and Freescale would beg to differ :)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-qu
Mel Flynn wrote:
> On Wednesday 05 August 2009 05:27:55 Erik Trulsson wrote:
>
>
>> The amd64 architecture is called that because it was AMD who invented and
>> created it and was for a while the only one using it and since AMD named
>> the architecture AMD64 that was the name FreeBSD used too.
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 05:27:55 Erik Trulsson wrote:
> The amd64 architecture is called that because it was AMD who invented and
> created it and was for a while the only one using it and since AMD named
> the architecture AMD64 that was the name FreeBSD used too. Later Intel
> also started
David Southwell wrote:
>> David Southwell wrote:
>>
>>> Hi every one
>>>
>>> My understanding is that one uses the amd64 for building a kernel for
>>> systems with Intel Quad Core processors.
>>>
>>> It is helpful when naming conventions follow a logical strand. I mean why
>>> does freebsd use
> On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 02:14:49PM +0100, David Southwell wrote:
> > Hi every one
> >
> > My understanding is that one uses the amd64 for building a kernel for
> > systems with Intel Quad Core processors.
>
> That depends on if you installed the amd64 version of FreeBSD or the i386
> version. Th
David Southwell wrote:
> Hi every one
>
> My understanding is that one uses the amd64 for building a kernel for systems
> with Intel Quad Core processors.
>
> It is helpful when naming conventions follow a logical strand. I mean why
> does
> freebsd use a single manufacturer's name to represent
On Wednesday 05 August 2009 15:14:49 David Southwell wrote:
> Hi every one
>
> My understanding is that one uses the amd64 for building a kernel for
> systems with Intel Quad Core processors.
>
> It is helpful when naming conventions follow a logical strand. I mean why
> does freebsd use a single m
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 02:14:49PM +0100, David Southwell wrote:
> Hi every one
>
> My understanding is that one uses the amd64 for building a kernel for systems
> with Intel Quad Core processors.
That depends on if you installed the amd64 version of FreeBSD or the i386
version. The kernel shou
Hi every one
My understanding is that one uses the amd64 for building a kernel for systems
with Intel Quad Core processors.
It is helpful when naming conventions follow a logical strand. I mean why does
freebsd use a single manufacturer's name to represent a genre?
David
___
17 matches
Mail list logo
