Anyone installed urchin5? Shared object "libc.so.4" not found error

2005-03-24 Thread Ken Hawkins
i sent something out earlier: ===> Installing for urchin-5.702 ===> Generating temporary packing list ===> Checking if www/urchin5 already installed /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libc.so.4" not found, required by "gunzip" tar: Error opening archive: Em

Re: ghostview missing libc.so.4?

2003-12-29 Thread chip
Matthew Emmerton wrote: You sound like you're running 5.x. You will need to install the compat4x distribution to get FreeBSD-4.x compatibility libraries. You sound lik you should be running 4.x anyway -- 5.x is still a strange mix of "bleeding edge" and "stable" -- but it *is* called -CURRENT for

Re: ghostview missing libc.so.4?

2003-12-29 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 10:04:17PM -0800, Chip Wiegand wrote: > Thanks for the tip - I installed compat4 and lilypond runs fine now. > If I remember correctly the compats were installed by default in earlier > versions weren't they? Only in the sense that today's compat lib was yesterday's latest

Re: ghostview missing libc.so.4?

2003-12-29 Thread Matthew Emmerton
not > easy to do when the apps I need don't even work properly. > -- > Chip > > paul beard wrote: > > > > > On Dec 27, 2003, at 8:17 PM, chip wrote: > > > >> I just installed ghostview and when I try to open a .ps file I get > >> the er

Re: ghostview missing libc.so.4?

2003-12-29 Thread Chip Wiegand
Thanks for the tip - I installed compat4 and lilypond runs fine now. If I remember correctly the compats were installed by default in earlier versions weren't they? Anyway, thanks, Chip Matthew Seaman wrote: On Sat, Dec 27, 2003 at 10:33:34PM -0800, paul beard wrote: On Dec 27, 2003, at 10:27

Re: ghostview missing libc.so.4?

2003-12-28 Thread David Fleck
On Sun, 28 Dec 2003, Chip Wiegand wrote: > Still one problem with doing that - after pkg_delete ghostview and > pkg_add -r ghostview I get these errors - > cannot find ghostscipt in your path - install your favorite version of > ghostscript, otherwise the program is useless > warning: package 'ghos

Re: ghostview missing libc.so.4?

2003-12-28 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sun, Dec 28, 2003 at 12:09:13AM -0800, Chip Wiegand wrote: > Still one problem with doing that - after pkg_delete ghostview and > pkg_add -r ghostview I get these errors - Those are warnings, not errors. Kris pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: ghostview missing libc.so.4?

2003-12-28 Thread Matthew Seaman
On Sat, Dec 27, 2003 at 10:33:34PM -0800, paul beard wrote: > > On Dec 27, 2003, at 10:27 PM, Chip Wiegand wrote: > > >Mine has libc.so.5. No wonder the app is failing, it specifically > >wants .4 and is too dumb to work with anything newer. I'm getting real > >frustrated with this again, I'd l

Re: ghostview missing libc.so.4?

2003-12-28 Thread Chip Wiegand
Paul beard wrote: On Dec 27, 2003, at 10:27 PM, Chip Wiegand wrote: Mine has libc.so.5. No wonder the app is failing, it specifically wants .4 and is too dumb to work with anything newer. I'm getting real frustrated with this again, I'd like to move away from MS but it's not easy to do when th

Re: ghostview missing libc.so.4?

2003-12-28 Thread Chip Wiegand
Dan Nelson wrote: In the last episode (Dec 27), Chip Wiegand said: Mine has libc.so.5. No wonder the app is failing, it specifically wants .4 and is too dumb to work with anything newer. I'm getting real frustrated with this again, I'd like to move away from MS but it's not easy to do when the

Re: ghostview missing libc.so.4?

2003-12-28 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Dec 27), Chip Wiegand said: > Mine has libc.so.5. No wonder the app is failing, it specifically > wants .4 and is too dumb to work with anything newer. I'm getting > real frustrated with this again, I'd like to move away from MS but > it's not easy to do when the apps I need do

Re: ghostview missing libc.so.4?

2003-12-27 Thread paul beard
On Dec 27, 2003, at 10:27 PM, Chip Wiegand wrote: Mine has libc.so.5. No wonder the app is failing, it specifically wants .4 and is too dumb to work with anything newer. I'm getting real frustrated with this again, I'd like to move away from MS but it's not easy to do when the apps I need don't

Re: ghostview missing libc.so.4?

2003-12-27 Thread Chip Wiegand
ip paul beard wrote: On Dec 27, 2003, at 8:17 PM, chip wrote: I just installed ghostview and when I try to open a .ps file I get the error that libc.so.4 is missing. If this is a dependency then why wasn't it installed with ghostscript or ghostview? What do I need to do to fix this? There is

Re: ghostview missing libc.so.4?

2003-12-27 Thread paul beard
On Dec 27, 2003, at 8:17 PM, chip wrote: I just installed ghostview and when I try to open a .ps file I get the error that libc.so.4 is missing. If this is a dependency then why wasn't it installed with ghostscript or ghostview? What do I need to do to fix this? There is no one por

ghostview missing libc.so.4?

2003-12-27 Thread chip
I just installed ghostview and when I try to open a .ps file I get the error that libc.so.4 is missing. If this is a dependency then why wasn't it installed with ghostscript or ghostview? What do I need to do to fix this? There is no one port for libc.so.4. Thanks,

Re: libc.so.4

2003-07-08 Thread Vincent Poy
the error I always receive from my box > > > FreeBSD 5.0-p7 when i run any executable program such as gmake, httpd, etc.: > > > > > > gowee# gmake release > > > /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libc.so.4" not found > > > gowee#

Re: 4.6-stable : libc.so.4 upgrade to libc.so.6 question

2003-07-07 Thread Joshua Oreman
t; > I have a 4.6-stable box, which seems to be running fine. I installed a > PHP extension recently, which requires libc.so.6. My box currently uses > libc.so.4. Two questions.. > > 1) When I upgrade from libc.so.4 to libc.so.6, do I need to recompile > anything like ma

4.6-stable : libc.so.4 upgrade to libc.so.6 question

2003-07-07 Thread Kris Yates
requires libc.so.6. My box currently uses libc.so.4. Two questions.. 1) When I upgrade from libc.so.4 to libc.so.6, do I need to recompile anything like mail or web servers? I am running php 4.3.2, Apache 1.3, the latest stable postfix port and some other basic stuff. 2) I assume I

Re: libc.so.4

2003-07-07 Thread Kris Kennaway
ecutable program such as gmake, httpd, etc.: > > > > gowee# gmake release > > /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libc.so.4" not found > > gowee# > > > > that's the error i always receive, i don't know if how can i fix it :( ... i try &

Re: libc.so.4

2003-07-07 Thread Vincent Poy
/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libc.so.4" not found > gowee# > > that's the error i always receive, i don't know if how can i fix it :( ... i try to > find if what particular library is the libc.so.4 but i got no. > > Thanks and More power. > > Jun You c

libc.so.4

2003-07-07 Thread Jun
Hello there. Greetings!!! I would like to ask if how can I fix the error I always receive from my box FreeBSD 5.0-p7 when i run any executable program such as gmake, httpd, etc.: gowee# gmake release /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libc.so.4" not found gowee# that

Re[2]: cant find libc.so.4

2002-09-27 Thread SweeTLeaF
Hello Giorgos, Friday, September 27, 2002, 4:28:06 AM, you wrote: GK> On 2002-09-27 01:51, SweeTLeaF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I have been looking on all the ftp/s and have noticed that 5.0-current >> has the .tbz format so i guess there is difference in the 5.0 DP1 and >> 5.0-current. I was

Re: cant find libc.so.4

2002-09-27 Thread Giorgos Keramidas
On 2002-09-27 01:51, SweeTLeaF <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have been looking on all the ftp/s and have noticed that 5.0-current > has the .tbz format so i guess there is difference in the 5.0 DP1 and > 5.0-current. I was wanting to load current, as current as possible. > I have not found any 5

Re[2]: cant find libc.so.4

2002-09-26 Thread SweeTLeaF
Hello Jacob, Friday, September 27, 2002, 12:52:58 AM, you wrote: JR> On Fri, 27 Sep 2002 15:34, SweeTLeaF wrote: >> /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libc.so.4" not found >> >> where can i get this lib and do i just add it to the ldd path? JR> I may

Re: cant find libc.so.4

2002-09-26 Thread Jacob Rhoden
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002 15:34, SweeTLeaF wrote: > /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libc.so.4" not found > > where can i get this lib and do i just add it to the ldd path? I may be corrected, but I think librarys work like this: libc.so.4 <-- freebsd 4.x libc.so.3

cant find libc.so.4

2002-09-26 Thread SweeTLeaF
installed them for you. ok the problem with afterstep is when i try to start it i am getting the following error: /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libc.so.4" not found where can i get this lib and do i just add it to the ldd path? If i wanted to run current how would i find the l