What is the best option out there for a mini-pc to run FreeBSD as a home
router/firewall? (needs to have 2 nic's)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 4:10 PM, firm...@gmail.com firm...@gmail.com wrote:
What is the best option out there for a mini-pc to run FreeBSD as a home
router/firewall? (needs to have 2 nic's)
I had some pretty good experiences with older Soekris models (net-4801)
acting as fanless routers
Op 8 mei 2013 om 16:24 heeft C. P. Ghost cpgh...@cordula.ws het volgende
geschreven:
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 4:10 PM, firm...@gmail.com firm...@gmail.com wrote:
What is the best option out there for a mini-pc to run FreeBSD as a home
router/firewall? (needs to have 2 nic's)
I had some
On 05/08/13 15:10, firm...@gmail.com wrote:
What is the best option out there for a mini-pc to run FreeBSD as a home
router/firewall? (needs to have 2 nic's)
I use an alix2d3 running embedded pfSense as a 3 NIC (WAN, LAN, DMZ)
router. If you only need 2 NICs go for the alix2d2. You can also
On 05/08/13 15:48, Arthur Chance wrote:
On 05/08/13 15:10, firm...@gmail.com wrote:
What is the best option out there for a mini-pc to run FreeBSD as a home
router/firewall? (needs to have 2 nic's)
I use an alix2d3 running embedded pfSense as a 3 NIC (WAN, LAN, DMZ)
router. If you only need
with load but if do not plan such high speeds it work like
charm..Kind of expensive though...
Peter
On 08/05/2013 17:10, firm...@gmail.com wrote:
What is the best option out there for a mini-pc to run FreeBSD as a home
router/firewall? (needs to have 2 nic's
On 05/08/2013 9:10 am, firm...@gmail.com wrote:
What is the best option out there for a mini-pc to run FreeBSD as a
home
router/firewall? (needs to have 2 nic's)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
Alejandro Imass wrote:
[snip]
Most consider the answer to use WPA2, which I do use too. Many think
it is 'virtually' unbreakable, but this really is not true; it just
takes longer. I've done WPA2 keys in as little as 2-3 hours before.
Are you saying that any WPA2 key can be cracked or or you
Arthur Chance wrote:
[snip]
What I was pondering is some form of L2TP tunnel, or some other form of
IPSEC tunnel to form some kind of VPN like communication between the
client and the wifi. Just never have begun to find the time to get
anywhere with the idea. But basically it would resemble a
Michael Powell wrote:
[snip]
Are you saying that any WPA2 key can be cracked or or you simply
referring to weak keys?
I would also like to specifically if it's for weak keys or are all
WPA2 personal keys crackable by brute force. Also is WPA2 Enterprise
as weak also. Could anyone expand
PSKs, of course with enough computing
power virtually anything is crackable by brute force. What I don't get
is that I thought that mac address filtering at the wireless level
meant that the router would not negotiate with a mac no listed in it's
table. I haven't used Kismet but you are saying
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 16:16:32 -0400
Michael Powell wrote:
Alejandro Imass wrote:
[snip]
Most consider the answer to use WPA2, which I do use too. Many
think it is 'virtually' unbreakable, but this really is not true;
it just takes longer. I've done WPA2 keys in as little as 2-3
hours
Hi--
On Apr 24, 2013, at 1:53 PM, Michael Powell nightre...@hotmail.com wrote:
This is along the lines of what I was thinking. I am my own CA and can
generate certs that no one else has the private keys to.
So can someone who does not run their own CA...?
The problem with buying certs from
is already getting a trifle long, so suffice to say if you
really need the best security on a home ISP router the best you can do is
turn off the radio and use Ethernet and UTP. This returns to the original
focus of your question in that the firewall would be the point of
contention and not the cracking
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 8:04 PM, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 14:25:30 -0400
Michael Powell wrote:
Most consider the answer to use WPA2, which I do use too. Many think
it is 'virtually' unbreakable, but this really is not true; it just
takes longer. I've done
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Michael Powell nightre...@hotmail.com wrote:
Alejandro Imass wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking to replace the piece of crap 2wire WiFi router that gets
crakced every other day for something with pfSense or m0n0wall
Not sure what you mean by 'cracked' here. If you
Alejandro Imass wrote:
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Michael Powell nightre...@hotmail.com
wrote:
Alejandro Imass wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking to replace the piece of crap 2wire WiFi router that gets
crakced every other day for something with pfSense or m0n0wall
Not sure what you mean
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Michael Powell nightre...@hotmail.com wrote:
Alejandro Imass wrote:
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Michael Powell nightre...@hotmail.com
wrote:
Alejandro Imass wrote:
Hi,
[...]
Really these WEP/WPA2 protocols are not providing the level of protection
up with something more
resembling something like we have at work. It probably wouldn't be as
involved, but I do think (FreeBSD as a very _capable_ and flexible OS)
something could be designed that would inherently be somewhat more secure
than what I see in the basic ISP home router. I have
need the best security on a home ISP router the best you can do is turn off
the radio and use Ethernet and UTP. This returns to the original focus of
your question in that the firewall would be the point of contention and not
the cracking of WEP/WPA2 auth keys. What I was wanting to point out
suffice to say if you
really need the best security on a home ISP router the best you can do is
turn off the radio and use Ethernet and UTP. This returns to the original
focus of your question in that the firewall would be the point of
contention and not the cracking of WEP/WPA2 auth keys. What I
On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 14:25:30 -0400
Michael Powell wrote:
Most consider the answer to use WPA2, which I do use too. Many think
it is 'virtually' unbreakable, but this really is not true; it just
takes longer. I've done WPA2 keys in as little as 2-3 hours before.
Are you saying that any WPA2
Hi,
I'm looking to replace the piece of crap 2wire WiFi router that gets
crakced every other day for something with pfSense or m0n0wall
I would like something that is plug and play and easy to use in the
$300 rage tops that has the WiFi router integrated. It seems only
Hacom offers
Alejandro Imass wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking to replace the piece of crap 2wire WiFi router that gets
crakced every other day for something with pfSense or m0n0wall
Not sure what you mean by 'cracked' here. If you are meaning that someone is
using aircrack-ng to break your Wifi authentication
Hi,
I'm looking to replace the piece of crap 2wire WiFi router that gets
crakced every other day for something with pfSense or m0n0wall
I would like something that is plug and play and easy to use in the
$300 rage tops that has the WiFi router integrated. It seems only
Hacom offers this. Can
Hi Alejandro. I can't speak about Hacom, but I've had excellent
results with Soekris hardware. It'll run all sorts of FreeBSD-based
systems. They have kit suitable for both wired and wireless networks.
--
James.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
Hi!
I have a printer connected through router which works. But the last two days I
found three printed papers:
two are empty and on the one is:
GET http://www.rackspace.com/ HTTP/1.1
Host: www.rackspace.com
User-Agent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible, MSIE 6.0: Windows NT 5.1)
Axxept: */*
Accept
On 07/06/2012 23:36, Bruce Cran wrote:
I'm trying to set up a IPv6 router (running -current) on my home
network. My ISP gives me a /128 via PPP and I have a /48 allocation,
which I use to give em0 and tun0 public addresses in different subnets
(tun0 is assigned the address via ppp.linkup
Make sure you are only advertising a /64 addr prefixlen in rtadvd.conf,
and not the entire /48.
On 6/7/2012 4:36 PM, Bruce Cran wrote:
I'm trying to set up a IPv6 router (running -current) on my home
network. My ISP gives me a /128 via PPP and I have a /48 allocation,
which I use to give em0
On 07/06/2012 23:56, Robert Bonomi wrote:
Please provide the output from these two commands:
ifconfig -a
netstat -nr
on both the router and on an 'inside' machine. (identifying which is which:)
There is also a question of 'where' the /48 comes from -- and how
traffic to those addresses
On 08/06/2012 06:59, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Probably. The good news is that once you've got it running the IPv6
support in FreeBSD is rock solid and works like a charm.
It turns out that PF was being too helpful and trying to NAT for both
IPv4 and IPv6 - adding 'inet' to the nat on
I'm trying to set up a IPv6 router (running -current) on my home
network. My ISP gives me a /128 via PPP and I have a /48 allocation,
which I use to give em0 and tun0 public addresses in different subnets
(tun0 is assigned the address via ppp.linkup).
I've added all the IPv6 settings to rc.conf
From: Bruce Cran br...@cran.org.uk
I'm trying to set up a IPv6 router (running -current) on my home
network. My ISP gives me a /128 via PPP and I have a /48 allocation,
which I use to give em0 and tun0 public addresses in different subnets
(tun0 is assigned the address via ppp.linkup
I have a twire modem/router that has 5 static IPs assigned to it. It
configures the firewall settings by discovering the hosts (by means
unknown to me) and allowing you to go into the firmware menu and
setting each host individually. Once the hosts are recognized it
sends arp requests every few
router D-604 (dlink), cable Internet and my
computer
with FreeBSD and the other one with Windows are connected to the router.
I got HP bussiness inkjet 5000 which was connected to the network (my
work).
And the last one: I never had printer on my computer with FreeBSD and
looks
like is not so
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011, Franci Nabalanci wrote:
I am so sorry it was my mistake: the printer is HP Business inkjet 3000.
That printer supports PCL and maybe even PostScript. Make sure it has
DNS. Entries in /etc/hosts should be adequate. Set it with a fixed IP
address or through DHCP.
The
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:55:02 -0600 (MDT), Warren Block wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011, Franci Nabalanci wrote:
I am so sorry it was my mistake: the printer is HP Business inkjet 3000.
That printer supports PCL and maybe even PostScript. Make sure it has
DNS. Entries in /etc/hosts should be
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011, Polytropon wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 11:55:02 -0600 (MDT), Warren Block wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011, Franci Nabalanci wrote:
I am so sorry it was my mistake: the printer is HP Business inkjet 3000.
That printer supports PCL and maybe even PostScript. Make sure it has
Hi!
My system: FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p1 #0m I use KDE 4.6.5
CUPS and HPLIP are installed.
I have an old broadband router D-604 (dlink), cable Internet and my computer
with FreeBSD and the other one with Windows are connected to the router.
I got HP bussiness inkjet 5000 which was connected
On Tue, 19 Jul 2011, ajtiM wrote:
My system: FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p1 #0m I use KDE 4.6.5
CUPS and HPLIP are installed.
I have an old broadband router D-604 (dlink), cable Internet and my computer
with FreeBSD and the other one with Windows are connected to the router.
I got HP bussiness inkjet
.
Taking Alix(or any x86 compatible board) and having i386 buildhost
environment
you may install packages from ports to your prepared image.
For router you may use ARM or MIPS boards too but they need to be crossbuilt
and may need more work to setup them and of course their prices may
be better. Many will also sell them pre-loaded with m0n0wall or
pfsense, both of which are FreeBSD-based router/firewall distros with web
interfaces to do most things you would want. (Although I know pfsense at
least doesn't support IPv6 configuration through the web interface yet
Hi Chris,
On Friday 01 of July 2011 00:34:52 Chris Brennan wrote:
Greetings!
While trying to learn IPv6 as best as I can and messing with my Linksys
WRT54Gv3 router running DD-WRT, I realized that it cannot properly do
IPv6 yet. This leaves me rather limited. More then once some people
--As of June 30, 2011 6:34:52 PM -0400, Chris Brennan is alleged to have
said:
While trying to learn IPv6 as best as I can and messing with my Linksys
WRT54Gv3 router running DD-WRT, I realized that it cannot properly do
IPv6 yet. This leaves me rather limited. More then once some people
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Chris Hill
Sent: 27 May 2011 02:16
To: Gary Gatten; Chuck Swiger
Cc: 'questi...@freebsd.org'
Subject: Re: RAM needed for DHCP + router?
On Thu, 26 May 2011, Gary
--As of May 26, 2011 7:46:10 PM -0400, Chris Hill is alleged to have said:
I'm looking to build a NAT / DHCP box for a lab network for my company.
My question is, how do I estimate the amount of RAM the machine will need?
This box will be running isc-dhcpd, doing NAT either via natd or pf, and
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Chris Hill ch...@monochrome.org wrote:
I'm looking to build a NAT / DHCP box for a lab network for my company. My
question is, how do I estimate the amount of RAM the machine will need?
FWIW, I can tell you some experiences that I've had.
Example #1:
At one
On Fri, 27 May 2011, Jaime Kikpole wrote:
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Chris Hill ch...@monochrome.org wrote:
I'm looking to build a NAT / DHCP box for a lab network for my company. My
question is, how do I estimate the amount of RAM the machine will need?
FWIW, I can tell you some
Hello list,
I'm looking to build a NAT / DHCP box for a lab network for my company. My
question is, how do I estimate the amount of RAM the machine will need?
This box will be running isc-dhcpd, doing NAT either via natd or pf, and
not much else. I expect the amount of traffic (throughput)
On May 26, 2011, at 4:46 PM, Chris Hill wrote:
I'm looking to build a NAT / DHCP box for a lab network for my company. My
question is, how do I estimate the amount of RAM the machine will need?
How many DHCP leases and NAT clients?
ISC's DHCPd typically runs a few tens of MB unless you have
? Tweaked/minimal
kernel, etc.
- Original Message -
From: Chris Hill [mailto:ch...@monochrome.org]
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 06:46 PM
To: FreeBSD Questions List questi...@freebsd.org
Subject: RAM needed for DHCP + router?
Hello list,
I'm looking to build a NAT / DHCP box for a lab
Message -
From: Chris Hill [mailto:ch...@monochrome.org]
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 06:46 PM
To: FreeBSD Questions List questi...@freebsd.org
Subject: RAM needed for DHCP + router?
Hello list,
I'm looking to build a NAT / DHCP box for a lab network for my company. My
question is, how do I
Tillman btillma...@yahoo.com
To: Leonardo M. Ramé martinr...@yahoo.com; questi...@freebsd.org
Sent: Fri, May 6, 2011 6:53:56 AM
Subject: Re: Home firewall with DLink router FreeBSD
From: Leonardo M. Ramé martinr...@yahoo.com
To: questi...@freebsd.org
Sent: Thu
From: Leonardo M. Ramé martinr...@yahoo.com
To: questi...@freebsd.org
Sent: Thu, May 5, 2011 3:44:36 PM
Subject: Home firewall with DLink router FreeBSD
The short answer is a definite yes, but you will need two NIC's in the FreeBSD
server. I have a FreeBSD
On Fri, 6 May 2011 04:10:58 -0700 (PDT)
Bill Tillman btillma...@yahoo.com articulated:
Please excuse me. I typed my reply below all the existing text but
somehow it ended up being formatted into the middle of this one. Can
someone give me the tip for insuring I don't top post and that my
Hi, at home I have a DLink Dir 300 router to provide internet access for my
home network. The network is composed by two Windows PCs, one Linux laptop and
one FreeBSD server we use mainly for storage and as web/database server.
I must add, the server only have one network card.
I would like
Hi, at home I have a DLink Dir 300 router to provide internet access for my
home network. The network is composed by two Windows PCs, one Linux laptop and
one FreeBSD server we use mainly for storage and as web/database server.
I must add, the server only have one network card.
I would like
On 5/5/11 8:37 PM, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
Hi, at home I have a DLink Dir 300 router to provide internet access for my
home network. The network is composed by two Windows PCs, one Linux laptop and
one FreeBSD server we use mainly for storage and as web/database server.
I must add
--As of May 5, 2011 5:37:52 PM -0700, Leonardo M. Ramé is alleged to have
said:
Hi, at home I have a DLink Dir 300 router to provide internet access for
my home network. The network is composed by two Windows PCs, one Linux
laptop and one FreeBSD server we use mainly for storage and as
web
--- On Thu, 5/5/11, Jon Radel j...@radel.com wrote:
From: Jon Radel j...@radel.com
Subject: Re: Home firewall with DLink router and FreeBSD
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Date: Thursday, May 5, 2011, 9:50 PM
On 5/5/11 8:37 PM, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
Hi, at home I have a DLink Dir
--As of April 8, 2011 3:50:52 PM -0600, Chad Perrin is alleged to have said:
You seem to fail to realize that it's possible to CC someone who isn't on
the list, but not CC someone who *is* on the list. That would be why
people who aren't members of the list say thinks like please CC me,
while
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 07:56:00 +0300
Odhiambo Washington odhia...@gmail.com articulated:
It may void the warranty yes, but dd-wrt has more features than stock
firmware.
That is like saying A is better than B without divulging any
specific information. It is just a hollow statement. Either point
The finer details are only visible once you look at what you can do with
factory firmware, then flash your router with dd-wrt and compare. FYI, you
can always revert to factory firmware if dd-wrt does not please you.
--
Best regards,
Odhiambo WASHINGTON,
Nairobi,KE
+254733744121/+254722743223
On 04/07/11 15:32, Carmel wrote:
Odhiambo, please don't CC me. I don't need multiple copies of the same
post.
CCing the original poster is standard etiquette on FreeBSD mailing
lists. Most lists are open to anybody to mail to without being signed
up, so when replying there's no way of
needed a spoon to feed someone, but anyway, the main
details are at http://dd-wrt.com/site/content/about
The finer details are only visible once you look at what you can do
with factory firmware, then flash your router with dd-wrt and
compare. FYI, you can always revert to factory firmware if dd
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 12:51:41 +0100
Arthur Chance free...@qeng-ho.org articulated:
On 04/07/11 15:32, Carmel wrote:
Odhiambo, please don't CC me. I don't need multiple copies of the
same post.
CCing the original poster is standard etiquette on FreeBSD mailing
lists. Most lists are open
in
detail or explain them to me yourself.
I did not know I needed a spoon to feed someone, but anyway, the main
details are at http://dd-wrt.com/site/content/about
The finer details are only visible once you look at what you can do
with factory firmware, then flash your router with dd-wrt
On 4/8/11 11:21 AM, Carmel wrote:
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 12:51:41 +0100
Arthur Chancefree...@qeng-ho.org articulated:
On 04/07/11 15:32, Carmel wrote:
Odhiambo, please don't CC me. I don't need multiple copies of the
same post.
CCing the original poster is standard etiquette on FreeBSD
router with dd-wrt and
compare. FYI, you can always revert to factory firmware if dd-wrt
does not please you.
That seems like a lot of work for a potential zero gain. I really don't
see any purpose is taking the time and a perfectly good router out of
commission to just experiment. Based
@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Linksys-E4200 Wireless N-router
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 07:56:00 +0300
Odhiambo Washington odhia...@gmail.com articulated:
It may void the warranty yes, but dd-wrt has more features than stock
firmware.
That is like saying A is better than B without divulging any
specific
On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 10:41 AM, Jon Radel j...@radel.com wrote:
That's the nice thing about standards, there are so many of them to choose
from.
2) I placed a very clear notice at the bottom of my post(s). Many
people would consider that a clue as to my desire to receive multiple
copies
On 04/08/11 16:21, Carmel wrote:
On Fri, 08 Apr 2011 12:51:41 +0100
Arthur Chancefree...@qeng-ho.org articulated:
On 04/07/11 15:32, Carmel wrote:
Odhiambo, please don't CC me. I don't need multiple copies of the
same post.
CCing the original poster is standard etiquette on FreeBSD mailing
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Chuck Swiger cswi...@mac.com wrote:
On Apr 7, 2011, at 3:19 PM, Bryan H. wrote:
If you're just looking for a new router, I would highly recommend the
Linksys WRT160NL. I got mine refurbished from Cisco's store[1], and
flashed it with dd-wrt[2] (which
fills your needs, then there's no reason you
would *have* to flash with a third-party firmware. Although, flashing
that particular model was, in my experience, about as obtrusive as it
would have been flashing the router with an updated firmware from the
manufacturer. Very easy to do.
Agreed. I
On Apr 8, 2011, at 11:37 AM, Chuck Swiger wrote:
Yes, although a new E2100L is much than $20 more than the refurb'ed 160NL.
Hmm, substitute: isn't much than $20 more...
-C
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 06:42:16PM +0100, Arthur Chance wrote:
section 8.6 starts:
start quote
Unless there is a good reason to do otherwise, reply to the sender and
to FreeBSD-questions.
end quote
I, for one, am glad this does not happen more often. I really do
On 8 Apr 2011 20:25, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 06:42:16PM +0100, Arthur Chance wrote:
section 8.6 starts:
start quote
Unless there is a good reason to do otherwise, reply to the sender and
to FreeBSD-questions.
end quote
I,
Quoth Chad Perrin on Friday, 08 April 2011:
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 06:42:16PM +0100, Arthur Chance wrote:
section 8.6 starts:
start quote
Unless there is a good reason to do otherwise, reply to the sender and
to FreeBSD-questions.
end quote
I, for one, am
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 08:30:25PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
On 8 Apr 2011 20:25, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
I, for one, am glad this does not happen more often. I really do
*not* need a bunch of duplicates cluttering up my inbox. I have yet
to see anyone complain of not
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 12:34:24PM -0700, Chip Camden wrote:
+1 (I replied, cluttering up inboxes all over freebsdland)
You didn't CC me directly, though, for which I'm grateful.
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
pgpnTlZSkroSX.pgp
Description: PGP
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 13:11:52 -0600
Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com articulated:
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 06:42:16PM +0100, Arthur Chance wrote:
section 8.6 starts:
start quote
Unless there is a good reason to do otherwise, reply to the sender
and to FreeBSD-questions.
On 8 April 2011 20:28, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 08:30:25PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote:
On 8 Apr 2011 20:25, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
I, for one, am glad this does not happen more often. I really do
*not* need a bunch of duplicates
On 8 April 2011 16:10, Carmel carmel...@hotmail.com wrote:
By the way, did you notice I directed a polite, one sentence directive
towards Odhiambo. Suddenly, every buttinsky crawls out of the woodwork,
sans any factual input on my original post and hijacks this thread
Maybe you would be better
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 01:11:52PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 06:42:16PM +0100, Arthur Chance wrote:
section 8.6 starts:
start quote
Unless there is a good reason to do otherwise, reply to the sender and
to FreeBSD-questions.
end quote
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 11:15:11PM +0200, Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 01:11:52PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 06:42:16PM +0100, Arthur Chance wrote:
section 8.6 starts:
start quote
Unless there is a good reason to do otherwise,
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 23:15:11 +0200
Erik Trulsson ertr1...@student.uu.se wrote:
You seem to miss one crucial fact: Not all the people who write to
this list are subscribed to it. They will not see any replies
directed only to the list. It is for their benefit that that rule
exists.
I don't
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 15:50:52 -0600
Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com articulated:
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 11:15:11PM +0200, Erik Trulsson wrote:
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 01:11:52PM -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Fri, Apr 08, 2011 at 06:42:16PM +0100, Arthur Chance wrote:
section 8.6
Can we just drop this matter? It's bad enough that iPhone mail makes this whole
ordeal a pain in the butt to read, but in the grand scheme of things, it _just
doesn't matter_. I'm subscribed to the list, I expect lots of email from the
list that I probably won't read anyway, but at least it's
Hi,
On Saturday 09 April 2011 05:46:43 Carmel wrote:
On Fri, 8 Apr 2011 15:50:52 -0600
Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com articulated:
The solution to this problem is so obvious that I am amazed that no one
this is a solution which creates just new problems.
has proposed it. Simply require
I was wondering if anyone here has had any experience with a
Linksys-E4200 Wireless N-router
http://homestore.cisco.com/en-us/Routers/Linksys-E4200-MaximumPerformance-Wirelessn-router_stcVVproductId122703236VVcatId551966VVviewprod.htm?icid=meet-series-e4200-image-btnsrc2=meet-eseries-e4200-image
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 15:54, Carmel carmel...@hotmail.com wrote:
I was wondering if anyone here has had any experience with a
Linksys-E4200 Wireless N-router
http://homestore.cisco.com/en-us/Routers/Linksys-E4200-MaximumPerformance-Wirelessn
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011, Carmel wrote:
I was wondering if anyone here has had any experience with a
Linksys-E4200 Wireless N-router
I know that FreeBSD probably does not support its wireless functions as
it employs 802.11n wireless technology; however, other than that
does anyone have any first
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 17:00:43 +0300
Odhiambo Washington odhia...@gmail.com articulated:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 15:54, Carmel carmel...@hotmail.com wrote:
I was wondering if anyone here has had any experience with a
Linksys-E4200 Wireless N-router
http://homestore.cisco.com/en-us/Routers
with a
Linksys-E4200 Wireless N-router
http://homestore.cisco.com/en-us/Routers/Linksys-E4200-MaximumPerformance-Wirelessn-router_stcVVproductId122703236VVcatId551966VVviewprod.htm?icid=meet-series-e4200-image-btnsrc2=meet-eseries-e4200-image-btn
?
I know that FreeBSD probably does not support
wrote:
I was wondering if anyone here has had any experience with a
Linksys-E4200 Wireless N-router
http://homestore.cisco.com/en-us/Routers/Linksys-E4200-MaximumPerformance-Wirelessn-router_stcVVproductId122703236VVcatId551966VVviewprod.htm?icid=meet-series-e4200-image-btnsrc2=meet
On Apr 7, 2011, at 3:19 PM, Bryan H. wrote:
If you're just looking for a new router, I would highly recommend the
Linksys WRT160NL. I got mine refurbished from Cisco's store[1], and
flashed it with dd-wrt[2] (which was incredibly easy, just search for
the router in dd-wrt's router database
...@gmail.com articulated:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 15:54, Carmel carmel...@hotmail.com
wrote:
I was wondering if anyone here has had any experience with a
Linksys-E4200 Wireless N-router
http://homestore.cisco.com/en-us/Routers/Linksys-E4200-MaximumPerformance-Wirelessn
:
On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 17:00:43 +0300
Odhiambo Washington odhia...@gmail.com articulated:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 15:54, Carmel carmel...@hotmail.com
wrote:
I was wondering if anyone here has had any experience with a
Linksys-E4200 Wireless N-router
http
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Carmel carmel...@hotmail.com wrote:
What do you gain by flashing it? I did not see anything specific
mentioned. This would also undoubtedly void any guarantee on the unit
I presume.
Technically yes. However, I have had a failed dd-wrt replaced under
warranty.
1 - 100 of 804 matches
Mail list logo
