Re: send-pr(1) requires local mail daemon, breach of contract forComcast users

2003-03-11 Thread Mike Meyer
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bill Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed: > Just configure sendmail for local submission only (see the docs on rc.conf > and the new configuratin options for sendmail) That is NOT in breach of > your contract since sendmail is NOT running as a daemon at that point. Actually, i

Re: send-pr(1) requires local mail daemon, breach of contract forComcast users

2003-03-11 Thread Bill Moran
Christopher Nehren wrote: I'm running FreeBSD as the only operating system on my home machine, using Comcast non-professional as my ISP. My problem is that send-pr is written to use a local mail daemon to send mail to the GNATS submission site. Running a mail daemon, however, is strictly and expres

Re: send-pr(1) requires local mail daemon, breach of contract forComcast users

2003-03-11 Thread Kirk Strauser
At 2003-03-11T18:40:02Z, Christopher Nehren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've sent them an email asking about the smarthost setup -- the ball's in > their court now. > Thanks for the help, it's most appreciated. I will go out on a limb and assert as fact that running an outgoing mail queue is a

Re: send-pr(1) requires local mail daemon, breach of contract forComcast users

2003-03-11 Thread Miguel Mendez
On Tue, 11 Mar 2003 12:54:02 -0500 Christopher Nehren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Howdy, > I'm running FreeBSD as the only operating system on my home machine, > using Comcast non-professional as my ISP. My problem is that send-pr > is written to use a local mail daemon to send mail to the GNATS