On 24/02/2011 07:05, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 23/02/2011 22:14, Lowell Gilbert wrote:
David Demelierdemelier.da...@gmail.com writes:
I also noticed that even with the -F flag, mergemaster still asks for
files that only differs by CVS id, see :
-# $FreeBSD: src/etc/sendmail/freebsd.mc,v
On 02/24/11 06:05, Matthew Seaman wrote:
[Snip mergemaster options discussion.]
Doing this certainly works for me -- frequently the only file I get
asked about is /etc/motd
And if you don't care about updating /etc/motd (the first line is
automagically updated every boot anyway) add
Hi,
Could you plz share the information on the maximum number of routes that can
be added (by default) in FREEBSD 8.0/7.2 kernel?
In Linux the sysctl rt_max_size is used. Is there a similar tunable
parameter in freeBSD?
Your earliest reply in this regard is much appreciated.
Thanks for any
On 2/24/11 3:00 PM, nikitha wrote:
Hi,
Could you plz share the information on the maximum number of routes that can
be added (by default) in FREEBSD 8.0/7.2 kernel?
In Linux the sysctl rt_max_size is used. Is there a similar tunable
parameter in freeBSD?
Your earliest reply in this regard
Excerpt from freedesktop.org mailing list:
quote
Also, is going away is a bit of an understatement, it's really quite
dead. GNOME switched over a year ago, KDE and XFCE finished the
transition a couple of months back (see [1]). The major distros don't
even install it by default any more, or at
Sysctl -a lists all options. This MAY be what you want:
net.inet.ip.rtmaxcache
- Upper limit on dynamically learned routes
http://people.freebsd.org/~hmp/utilities/satbl/sysctl-net.html
HTH
Gary
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Jerry wrote:
Is FreeBSD now HAL free or is it still a requirement? I still have it
activated via /etc/rc.conf If it is not needed, I would be happy to
remove the entry.
It's not a requirement. You can build xorg-server without it, and there
are other mechanisms
I recently moved my server to a new box and in the process of doing
that, I upgraded from FreeBSD 7.3 to 8.1.
When I say I moved, I mean I backed up all my personal data (databases,
config values, etc.), made a list of all packages, and installed an
identical box with the same pacakges.
Recently
On 2/24/2011 4:51 PM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 2/24/11 3:00 PM, nikitha wrote:
Hi,
Could you plz share the information on the maximum number of routes that can
be added (by default) in FREEBSD 8.0/7.2 kernel?
In Linux the sysctl rt_max_size is used. Is there a similar tunable
parameter in
On 24 February 2011 11:09, Aleksandr Miroslav alexmiros...@gmail.com wrote:
I recently moved my server to a new box and in the process of doing
that, I upgraded from FreeBSD 7.3 to 8.1.
When I say I moved, I mean I backed up all my personal data (databases,
config values, etc.), made a list
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 5:20 PM, Bill Tillman btillma...@yahoo.com wrote:
Yes, but in the good ol' USA it's all about the money. They will not let me do
anything like this unless I pay more to upgrade my service. The wierd thing is
that once in a blue moon my IP address will change. Then I can
Thank you all, for your timely reply..
To answer Niko's question: Just i'm doing some performance/stress testing of
a freebsd router.. :-)
-Sumi
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:11 PM, Nikos Vassiliadis nv...@gmx.com wrote:
On 2/24/2011 4:51 PM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 2/24/11 3:00 PM, nikitha
2011/2/24 Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com:
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Jerry wrote:
Is FreeBSD now HAL free or is it still a requirement? I still have it
activated via /etc/rc.conf If it is not needed, I would be happy to
remove the entry.
It's not a requirement. You can build xorg-server without
Through the years I have become accustomed to having to have a hardware
modem. 7.2 sio correctly identifies my modem as a 3-COM PCI FAX/MODEM
and correct identifies the chip as 16550A.
In 8.1 uart calls the same device an unstandard ns8250 uart. Nonetheless,
tun0 can fireup at boot. But it is
Hi folks,
I have squid installed and working fine using its default settings; if
I set my browser proxy to the server address:3128 , everything works
fine.
I've edited the Privoxy config file and commented out:
debug 1 # Log the destination for each request Privoxy let through.
debug
Andres Perera andres.p at zoho.com writes:
Nowadays all shells supports $() so I advise you to use it :).
no, not all shells support $()
They do, it’s mandated by POSIX. There’s no reason to support the
accidentally non-combining accent gravis (so-called “backtick”¹)
any more, unless you
Gary Kline kline at thought.org writes:
For instance, say that my xterm/console/Konsole is 80x53 lines.
My text file is around 200 lines long and I want to use more or less
or some GUI pager to display only 15 lines at one time. Tapping the
space bar would display another 15 lines and so on
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Thorsten Glaser t...@mirbsd.org wrote:
Andres Perera andres.p at zoho.com writes:
Nowadays all shells supports $() so I advise you to use it :).
no, not all shells support $()
They do, it’s mandated by POSIX. There’s no reason to support the
accidentally
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Edwin L. Culp W. edwinlc...@gmail.com wrote:
Sounded like a good idea to me but ;)
pkg_deinstall hal-0.5.14_12
--- Deinstalling 'hal-0.5.14_12'
pkg_delete: package 'hal-0.5.14_12' is required by these other packages
That list is recursive - kdelibs4 depends
Andres Perera andres.p at zoho.com writes:
mandated by posix and reality usually aren't in sync, as i'm sure you know
by
In this case, closely enough.
now since you pointed out solaris
It’s just /bin/sh on long outdated versions (newer ones, both
from Horracle and not, have ATT ksh93 there
Thanks Berk,
Nope...no dice, that won't work either.
More suggestions???
:-)
Ed
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
On 02/24/2011 10:09 PM, Ed Flecko wrote:
Hi folks,
I have squid installed and working fine using its default settings; if
I set my browser proxy to the server address:3128 , everything works
fine.
I've edited the Privoxy config file and commented out:
debug 1 # Log the destination for
On 02/24/2011 10:09 PM, Ed Flecko wrote:
Hi folks,
I have squid installed and working fine using its default settings; if
I set my browser proxy to the server address:3128 , everything works
fine.
I've edited the Privoxy config file and commented out:
debug 1 # Log the destination for
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 12:09:04 -0800
Ed Flecko edfle...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
I have squid installed and working fine using its default settings; if
I set my browser proxy to the server address:3128 , everything works
fine.
...
and I've added:
listen-address 127.0.0.1:8118
and
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Thorsten Glaser t...@mirbsd.org wrote:
Andres Perera andres.p at zoho.com writes:
mandated by posix and reality usually aren't in sync, as i'm sure you know
by
In this case, closely enough.
now since you pointed out solaris
It’s just /bin/sh on long
Rob Farmer rfarmer at predatorlabs.net writes:
Have you used the default FreeBSD shell (tcsh) recently?
tcsh is not a shell. Well, it’s an interactive command line
interpreter, not a bad one compared to what else is offered
at that, but…
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/unix-faq/shell/csh-whynot/
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 13:02:22 -0800
Rob Farmer rfar...@predatorlabs.net articulated:
Have you used the default FreeBSD shell (tcsh) recently?
[rfarmer@sapphire] ~ echo $(date )
Illegal variable name.
Since I use Bash as my default shell, I never suffer from that problem.
I was wondering if
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Jerry freebsd.u...@seibercom.net wrote:
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 13:02:22 -0800
Rob Farmer rfar...@predatorlabs.net articulated:
Have you used the default FreeBSD shell (tcsh) recently?
[rfarmer@sapphire] ~ echo $(date )
Illegal variable name.
Since I use Bash
can sticky keys (SHIFT. ALT and CTRL hold until the next key is pressed) be
enabled in x11-input.fdi? I wish to enable this accessibility option without
resorting to KDE or GNOME.
==
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Thorsten Glaser t...@mirbsd.org wrote:
Rob Farmer rfarmer at predatorlabs.net writes:
Have you used the default FreeBSD shell (tcsh) recently?
tcsh is not a shell. Well, it’s an interactive command line
interpreter, not a bad one compared to what else is
Rob Farmer dixit:
(New) people will still copy and paste commands into an interactive
tcsh
That’s a FreeBSD® specific issue though. Other operating systems
did the sensible thing ages ago ☺
Even then, I tend to disagree here. There’s the common use of
‘% ’ and ‘$ ’ (and ‘# ’ but we use sudo(8)
Gentlemen,
I think I have it!
https://www.antagonism.org/web/squid-proxy.shtml
The key is to add:
cache_peer localhost parent 8118 0 default no-query no-digest no-netdb-exchange
never_direct allow all
to the squid.conf file (/usr/local/etc/squid/squid.conf) and have
squid re-read its .conf
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 09:36:37PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Rob Farmer dixit:
(New) people will still copy and paste commands into an interactive
tcsh
That’s a FreeBSD® specific issue though. Other operating systems
did the sensible thing ages ago ☺
What exactly is the sensible
On 24 February 2011 16:05, Thorsten Glaser t...@mirbsd.org wrote:
Rob Farmer rfarmer at predatorlabs.net writes:
Have you used the default FreeBSD shell (tcsh) recently?
tcsh is not a shell. Well, it’s an interactive command line
interpreter, not a bad one compared to what else is offered
Chad Perrin perrin at apotheon.com writes:
That’s a FreeBSD® specific issue though. Other operating systems
did the sensible thing ages ago ☺
What exactly is the sensible thing?
http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/usr.sbin/user/
user.c.diff?r1=1.116r2=1.117only_with_tag=MAIN
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 09:59:40PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Chad Perrin perrin at apotheon.com writes:
That’s a FreeBSD® specific issue though. Other operating systems
did the sensible thing ages ago ☺
What exactly is the sensible thing?
Chad Perrin perrin at apotheon.com writes:
1. You think some measure of popularity of a decision makes it correct.
No.
2. You don't like (t)csh.
No. I just point out it’s not a suitable scripting shell.
3. You think your opinions are so self-evident that everybody will just
immediately
Quoth Chad Perrin on Thursday, 24 February 2011:
snip
What we have not yet determined is:
1. Is it a good idea to replace (t)csh?
--
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
Though I dislike the OP's dismissal of backticks, I must admit that I
would
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 13:24:37 -0800, Rob Farmer rfar...@predatorlabs.net wrote:
(New) people will still copy and paste commands into an interactive
tcsh, so it is a good idea to be compatible when posting stuff to the
mailing lists, etc. if possible. There was something on the ports@
list a
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:34:25PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
Chad Perrin perrin at apotheon.com writes:
1. You think some measure of popularity of a decision makes it correct.
No.
Why do you substitute others' email messages for an actual, direct
response to my question, then?
On 24/02/2011 22:39, Chip Camden wrote:
I suppose I could change root to /bin/sh, but that doesn't even
have command recall.
set -o emacs
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard
Quoth Matthew Seaman on Thursday, 24 February 2011:
On 24/02/2011 22:39, Chip Camden wrote:
I suppose I could change root to /bin/sh, but that doesn't even
have command recall.
set -o emacs
Cheers,
Matthew
--
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 02:39:24PM -0800, Chip Camden wrote:
Quoth Chad Perrin on Thursday, 24 February 2011:
What we have not yet determined is:
1. Is it a good idea to replace (t)csh?
Though I dislike the OP's dismissal of backticks, I must admit that I
would prefer that the
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 14:58:34 -0800, Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com
wrote:
Thanks for that -- though I'll go with:
set -o vi
TYVM. I didn't know /bin/sh supported those modes.
It's hardly known as /bin/sh is _not_ used for interactive
comunication regularly, as it's basically
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:40:44PM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 13:24:37 -0800, Rob Farmer rfar...@predatorlabs.net
wrote:
I've read it before. Who hasn't?
I haven't. :-)
While reading it, just keep this in mind:
It's about programming in csh. It's not about using csh
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
1. Is it a good idea to replace (t)csh?
mksh is better than tcsh for everything
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:54:25 -0700, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:40:44PM +0100, Polytropon wrote:
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 13:24:37 -0800, Rob Farmer rfar...@predatorlabs.net
wrote:
I've read it before. Who hasn't?
I haven't. :-)
While reading
Hello Andres Perera,
Am 2011-02-20 22:19:49, hacktest Du folgendes herunter:
that's not true
:-D
echo `echo 1\`echo 2\\\`echo 3\\\`echo 4\\\`\\\`\``
Backslash Orgies!
Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
Michelle Konzack
--
# Debian GNU/Linux Consultant
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Polytropon
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 5:13 PM
To: Chad Perrin
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Backtick versus $()
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 15:54:25
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 06:42:18PM -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 5:40 PM, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
1. Is it a good idea to replace (t)csh?
mksh is better than tcsh for everything
Thank you for your opinion, but it's just an opinion with no explanation,
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 05:18:03PM -0600, Gary Gatten wrote:
Everyone is wrong! pfmsh is the best at everything, period. It does
everything you can possibly think of today and tomorrow. It doesn't
require any upgrades, ever. It's 100% secure. It doesn't use any
memory or other resources,
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Gary Gatten ggat...@waddell.com wrote:
Everyone is wrong! pfmsh is the best at everything, period. It does
everything you can possibly think of today and tomorrow. It doesn't
require any upgrades, ever. It's 100% secure. It doesn't use any
memory or other
Quoth Gary Gatten on Thursday, 24 February 2011:
Everyone is wrong! pfmsh is the best at everything, period. It does
everything you can possibly think of today and tomorrow. It doesn't require
any upgrades, ever. It's 100% secure. It doesn't use any memory or other
resources, $hit, it
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 07:00:11PM -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Gary Gatten ggat...@waddell.com wrote:
Everyone is wrong! pfmsh is the best at everything, period. It does
everything you can possibly think of today and tomorrow. It doesn't
require any
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 03:32:04PM -0800, Chip Camden wrote:
Quoth Gary Gatten on Thursday, 24 February 2011:
Everyone is wrong! pfmsh is the best at everything, period. It
does everything you can possibly think of today and tomorrow. It
doesn't require any upgrades, ever. It's 100%
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 17:18:03 -0600, Gary Gatten ggat...@waddell.com wrote:
Everyone is wrong! pfmsh is the best at everything, period.
It does everything you can possibly think of today and tomorrow.
It doesn't require any upgrades, ever. It's 100% secure.
It doesn't use any memory or
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 07:00:11PM -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Gary Gatten ggat...@waddell.com wrote:
Everyone is wrong! pfmsh is the best at everything, period. It does
everything you
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
[mailto:owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Chad Perrin
Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2011 5:26 PM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Backtick versus $()
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 03:32:04PM -0800, Chip
Quoth Chad Perrin on Thursday, 24 February 2011:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 03:32:04PM -0800, Chip Camden wrote:
Quoth Gary Gatten on Thursday, 24 February 2011:
Everyone is wrong! pfmsh is the best at everything, period. It
does everything you can possibly think of today and tomorrow.
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 17:18:03 -0600, Gary Gatten ggat...@waddell.com wrote:
Everyone is wrong! pfmsh is the best at everything, period.
It does everything you can possibly think of today and tomorrow.
It doesn't require any
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 19:15:22 -0430, Andres Perera andre...@zoho.com wrote:
funny how you point out trivialities and go on to mention one yourself
For an interactive command line shell, it's the trivialities
that count - for _me_, which indicates that other persons may
have very different
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 07:12:55PM -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
So far, your complaints translate to Well, sure, for every concrete
(t)csh problem I've identified, mksh has similar problems, but it's
better because I
I'll try to help make it easy for you, since you seem to be having a lot
of trouble grasping the concept of actually trying to make a point via
logical argument and presentation of evidence:
Start with the Wikipedia page comparing command shells [0]. Look through
the various tables there -- feel
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 07:12:55PM -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
So far, your complaints translate to Well, sure, for every concrete
(t)csh problem
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
I'll try to help make it easy for you, since you seem to be having a lot
of trouble grasping the concept of actually trying to make a point via
logical argument and presentation of evidence:
Start with the Wikipedia page
Quoth Andres Perera on Thursday, 24 February 2011:
[snip]
no, let's start by looking at the SOURCE CODE REPOSITORY instead of WIKIPEDIA
you DROOLING BUFFOON
[snip]
if you disagree then you are retarded and the exchange concludes
[snip]
Resorting to personal insults doesn't help make
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Chip Camden
sterl...@camdensoftware.com wrote:
Quoth Andres Perera on Thursday, 24 February 2011:
[snip]
no, let's start by looking at the SOURCE CODE REPOSITORY instead of WIKIPEDIA
you DROOLING BUFFOON
[snip]
if you disagree then you are retarded and
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 08:09:21PM -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 07:12:55PM -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
the author of vi, who is also the author of csh regards it as poor code
Good for him.
On 24 February 2011 17:39, Chip Camden sterl...@camdensoftware.com wrote:
. . .
Though I dislike the OP's dismissal of backticks, I must admit that I
would prefer that the standard shell be at least Bourne-compatible. I
use csh for root for all the reasons that you shouldn't change your root
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 08:14:55PM -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Chad Perrin wrote:
I'll try to help make it easy for you, since you seem to be having a
lot of trouble grasping the concept of actually trying to make a
point via logical argument and
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 08:36:53PM -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Chip Camden
sterl...@camdensoftware.com wrote:
Quoth Andres Perera on Thursday, 24 February 2011:
[snip]
no, let's start by looking at the SOURCE CODE REPOSITORY instead of
WIKIPEDIA you
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 08:09:21PM -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 07:12:55PM -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
the author of vi,
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 08:36:53PM -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Chip Camden
sterl...@camdensoftware.com wrote:
Quoth Andres Perera on Thursday, 24 February 2011:
[snip]
no, let's
Quoth Andres Perera on Thursday, 24 February 2011:
That wasn't me. I could make some insulting references to failings of
yours that resulted in this mistake on your part, but I really do not
think that's necessary. It is much more fun to just watch you
self-destruct.
it doesn't
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 09:15:30PM -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
it doesn't matter if it wasn't you
if you're all retarded then you are all effectively the same person
I see. Suggesting that slinging insults makes him retarded.
You are naught but a troll. Killfiled.
--
Chad Perrin [
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
You are naught but a troll. Killfiled.
actually im the only person that bothered explaining the 2 noobs at
the start of the thread how shell works
then a buncha jokers started talking about tcsh
you are the trolls that
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 05:57:08PM -0800, Chip Camden wrote:
Quoth Andres Perera on Thursday, 24 February 2011:
That wasn't me. I could make some insulting references to failings
of yours that resulted in this mistake on your part, but I really
do not think that's necessary. It is
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 07:12:23PM -0700, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 09:15:30PM -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
it doesn't matter if it wasn't you
if you're all retarded then you are all effectively the same person
I see. Suggesting that slinging insults makes him
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 9:54 PM, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 07:12:23PM -0700, Chad Perrin wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 09:15:30PM -0430, Andres Perera wrote:
it doesn't matter if it wasn't you
if you're all retarded then you are all effectively the
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Andres Perera andre...@zoho.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Chip Camden
sterl...@camdensoftware.com wrote:
--
Sterling (Chip) Camden | sterl...@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F
http://chipsquips.com | http://camdensoftware.com |
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Rob Farmer rfar...@predatorlabs.net wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 5:06 PM, Andres Perera andre...@zoho.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Chip Camden
sterl...@camdensoftware.com wrote:
--
Sterling (Chip) Camden | sterl...@camdensoftware.com |
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Edwin L. Culp W. wrote:
2011/2/24 Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com:
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Jerry wrote:
Is FreeBSD now HAL free or is it still a requirement? I still have it
activated via /etc/rc.conf If it is not needed, I would be happy to
remove the entry.
It's not a
On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, Aleksandr Miroslav wrote:
Recently I noticed that somehow I am on apr-0.9.19.0.9.19. On my old
box, I was on apr-ipv6-devrandom-gdbm-db47-1.4.2.1.3.10.
See the 20100518 entry in /usr/ports/UPDATING. Well, the apr one,
anyway.
I am trying to connect my FreeBSD 8.1 system to a FreeNAS server
hosting an iSCSI drive. I can successfully connect if I disable header
and data digests, but can't seem to get a connection using header and
data digests to succeed. I know the FreeNAS side is correct because I
was able to
Hello all!
I'm testing setting lower MTU on loopback interfaces to avoid some MTU
problems with IPSEC in a path of traffic.
ifconfig lo1 create
ifconfig lo1 mtu 1300
ifconfig lo1 5.5.5.5/32
# ifconfig lo1
lo1: flags=8049UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1300
inet 5.5.5.5
85 matches
Mail list logo
