we had a power out here this morning and besides it costing most of
my day, it blew out my Brother laser printer. i just got it working
FINALLY with our cups stuff. don't asked me how; other than i was
using our olden lpr/lpd and had /etc/printcap.
is there a laser other than the brother
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:28:08 -0700, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
is there a laser other than the brother {tm}? i mean, that the
members of this org would go for?
Yes: Office printers, even used ones are fine. Pay attention
that they have:
- ethernet port
- postscript
On 16.06.2011 08:28, Gary Kline wrote:
we had a power out here this morning and besides it costing most of
my day, it blew out my Brother laser printer. i just got it working
FINALLY with our cups stuff. don't asked me how; other than i was
using our olden lpr/lpd and had /etc/printcap.
_
From: Chuck Swiger cswi...@mac.com
To: Gary Kline kl...@thought.org
Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Sent: Wed, June 15, 2011 4:04:23 PM
Subject: Re: how do i fsck my server?
You can set fsck_y_enable=YES in /etc/rc.conf, but it shouldn't
Le 15/06/2011 à 22:34:23+0200, Thomas Hansen a écrit
one of my mates teacher says that unix is free and your system running
like UnixWare / SCO UNIX and and that unix is free
Do your BSD kernel run the same unix kernel as unixware
Take a look :
http://www.levenez.com/unix/
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Gary Kline kl...@thought.org wrote:
we had a power out here this morning and besides it costing most of
my day, it blew out my Brother laser printer. i just got it working
FINALLY with our cups stuff. don't asked me how; other than i was
using our olden
Facts:
8.2-RELEASE man fsck
-B ...
background fsck is limited to checking for only the most commonly
occurring file system abnormalities. Under certain circumstances,
some errors can escape background fsck. It is recommended that you
perform foreground fsck
For some time now, people have been referring to what build
they're using by the 'r' number, which I believe to be part of svn.
How would one go about determining this value for the installed
kernel?
Robert Huff
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 08:16:45 -0400
Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com wrote:
For some time now, people have been referring to what build
they're using by the 'r' number, which I believe to be part of svn.
How would one go about determining this value for the
installed kernel?
I'm not
I have very few uses for sqlite3 but I still have them. And PDO?
Never seen anything run it.
Some pretty big projects including Drupal CMS are moving to PDO. I
reckon that having other options without reinventing the wheel, than
one certain Oracle controlled DB-backend is starting to gain
You can't take no for an answer, freebsd-questions!
2011/06/15 17:08:31 -0400 Chris Brennan xa...@xaerolimit.net = To Thomas
Hansen :
CB FreeBSD is a UNIX-like clone, which is indeed free, whereas UNIX is
CB still the proprietary property of ATT/Bell Labs.
unix is a trademark of novell.com.
On 06/16/2011 02:28 PM, Bruce Cran wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 08:16:45 -0400
Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com wrote:
For some time now, people have been referring to what build
they're using by the 'r' number, which I believe to be part of svn.
How would one go about determining this
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 7:16 AM, Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com wrote:
For some time now, people have been referring to what build
they're using by the 'r' number, which I believe to be part of svn.
How would one go about determining this value for the installed
kernel?
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Gary Kline wrote:
we had a power out here this morning and besides it costing most of
my day, it blew out my Brother laser printer. i just got it working
FINALLY with our cups stuff. don't asked me how; other than i was
using our olden lpr/lpd and had /etc/printcap.
is
On 06/16/2011 02:32 PM, Brandon Gooch wrote:
That would be uname(1):
$ uname -v
FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0 r223017: Sun Jun 12 13:55:34 CDT 2011
root@m6500.local:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
where r223017 is the current svn revision number from which my
system is compiled (kernel and
On 16/06/2011 13:52, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
You can't take no for an answer, freebsd-questions!
2011/06/15 17:08:31 -0400 Chris Brennan xa...@xaerolimit.net = To Thomas
Hansen :
CB FreeBSD is a UNIX-like clone, which is indeed free, whereas UNIX is
CB still the proprietary property of
Does `cp -x` works correctly on ZFS?
-- Eir Nym
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Is there any program that can read and or dump the info written in a BIOS chip?
TIA,
JP
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
On 6/16/11 3:17 PM, Bas Smeelen wrote:
On 06/16/2011 02:32 PM, Brandon Gooch wrote:
That would be uname(1):
$ uname -v
FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0 r223017: Sun Jun 12 13:55:34 CDT 2011
root@m6500.local:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC
where r223017 is the current svn revision number from which
On Jun 16, 2011, at 6:23 AM, Jean-Paul Natola jnat...@familycareintl.org
wrote:
Is there any program that can read and or dump the info written in a BIOS
chip?
pkg_add -r dmidecode
--
Devin
_
The information contained in this message is proprietary and/or confidential.
If
At 03:41 PM 6/16/2011 +0300, Reko Turja wrote:
I have very few uses for sqlite3 but I still have them. And PDO?
Never seen anything run it.
Some pretty big projects including Drupal CMS are moving to PDO. I
reckon that having other options without reinventing the wheel, than
one certain
On Thursday, June 16, 2011 09:22:43 AM Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 16/06/2011 13:52, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
You can't take no for an answer, freebsd-questions!
2011/06/15 17:08:31 -0400 Chris Brennan xa...@xaerolimit.net = To
Thomas Hansen : CB FreeBSD is a UNIX-like clone, which is indeed
Now, I wrestling with the apache2 and apr0 issue. The apache port
Makefile
wants apr0, but it now has vulnablilities. Ports UPDATING says to do
this
with apr:
- remove apache2 and then: portupgrade -f -o devel/apr1 devel/apr
...and then reinstall apache2. That didn't work because the Makefile
Jack L. Stone wrote:
[snip]
Now, I wrestling with the apache2 and apr0 issue. The apache port Makefile
wants apr0, but it now has vulnablilities. Ports UPDATING says to do this
with apr:
- remove apache2 and then: portupgrade -f -o devel/apr1 devel/apr
...and then reinstall apache2. That
From: Michael Powell nightre...@hotmail.com
pulls in a few more dependencies than I'd really like, especially
the apr1
(now named apr-ipv6-devrandom-gdbm-db42-1.4.5.1.3.12) port
installing
The name depends completely on the knobs you have used with
portbuild - my apr is:
You can't take no for an answer, freebsd-questions!
2011/06/16 14:22:43 +0100 Matthew Seaman m.sea...@infracaninophile.co.uk =
To freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
MS CB FreeBSD is a UNIX-like clone, which is indeed free, whereas UNIX is
MS CB still the proprietary property of ATT/Bell Labs.
MS
You can't take no for an answer, freebsd-questions!
2011/06/16 10:06:42 -0400 Robert Simmons rsimmo...@gmail.com = To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
RS I think the confusion that you all are having is between the idea of
RS copyright and trademark. They are different. Copyright applies to the
Hi, I'm running 8.2 REL. Are there any specific things to be aware of when
compiling kernel and making world in 64bit? Required kernel modules etc?
I've only done this in 32bit.
Thanks!
Andreas
---
Mvh/Rgds,
Andreas Wideroe andr...@wideroe.net
___
On Thursday, June 16, 2011 11:29:42 AM Peter Vereshagin wrote:
There should be a difference recognized between own a Unix trademark by
http://www.unix.org/trademark.html and ownership of the Unix copyrights
by http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20100330152829622 where I'm
pass.
There
At 06:18 PM 6/16/2011 +0300, Reko Turja wrote:
From: Michael Powell nightre...@hotmail.com
pulls in a few more dependencies than I'd really like, especially
the apr1
(now named apr-ipv6-devrandom-gdbm-db42-1.4.5.1.3.12) port
installing
The name depends completely on the knobs you have used
On 6/16/2011 11:49 AM, Andy Wodfer wrote:
Hi, I'm running 8.2 REL. Are there any specific things to be aware of when
compiling kernel and making world in 64bit? Required kernel modules etc?
I sometimes forget that the kernel config is in
cd /usr/src/sys/amd64/conf/
and not
cd
On Thursday, June 16, 2011 11:47:32 AM Peter Vereshagin wrote:
This will require some efforts from Open Group. Does FreeBSD Foundation pay
for that?
Not necessary. FreeBSD does not use (want to use/need to use) the UNIX
trademark and according to the USL vs. BSDi court case, FreeBSD does not
You can't take no for an answer, freebsd-questions!
2011/06/16 11:54:05 -0400 Robert Simmons rsimmo...@gmail.com = To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
RS http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright
RS http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trademark
I'll surely will when I'll have some to trade ;-)
RS
--
From: Robert Simmons rsimmo...@gmail.com
thrown out of court. Additionally, the source code is GPL, so even
if in the
fictional world of Linus taking the trademark elsewhere, you can
fork the code
and call it
On Thursday, June 16, 2011 12:31:19 PM Reko Turja wrote:
In that fictional world MySQL needed a fork and some GPL'd programs
have been retroactively made completely closed source, forking denied
after taking the issue into court...
I thought that Sun reversed that decision in 2008. Can you
From: Jack L. Stone ja...@sage-american.com
Also, I see the sqlite3 is tacked on the apr you have. I only have:
apr-ipv6-devrandom-gdbm-db46-mysql50-1.4.5.1.3.12
Yeah when I ran make config for apr I selected sqlite as I had it
already installed for stuff where I might need SQL capabilities,
Jack L. Stone wrote:
[snip]
Thanks to both you and Mike for the advice. I've already installed
apache22 on a test server and trying to allocate time to it as and when.
Looks like this apr thing is going to raise the priority.
You shouldn't have any of these apr problems with 22.
Also, I
On 16 June 2011 17:47, Robert Simmons rsimmo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, June 16, 2011 12:31:19 PM Reko Turja wrote:
In that fictional world MySQL needed a fork and some GPL'd programs
have been retroactively made completely closed source, forking denied
after taking the issue into
At 12:56 PM 6/16/2011 -0400, Michael Powell wrote:
Jack L. Stone wrote:
-Mike
Mike, very useful info. I had surmised about the extra .configs to reduce
the size of the main config file. I had already started doing that with
apache2.
Have been studying the files and comparing to my present
On Thu, June 16, 2011 12:20 pm, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
You can't take no for an answer, freebsd-questions!
2011/06/16 11:54:05 -0400 Robert Simmons rsimmo...@gmail.com = To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
RS http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright
RS http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trademark
I've installed and tested postgresql just fine on FreeBSD 8.2.
I've been trying to get postgresql (the server) to start on bootup using
/etc/rc.conf system.
I'm using the script from the tarball (found in the
contrib/start-scripts/freebsd of postreges tarball)
I can't seem to get it to work
You can't take no for an answer, freebsd-questions!
2011/06/16 13:36:32 -0400 Daniel Staal dst...@usa.net = To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
DS RS Copyright pertains to the source code. Trademark pertains to the use
DS of
DS RS signs, symbols, names, logos, etc.
DS
DS Source code itself
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 02:22:43PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 16/06/2011 13:52, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
unix is a trademark of novell.com.
Unix (note capitalization) is actually a trademark of the Open Group:
http://www.unix.org/
In case it was lost in the informative explanations
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 10:20:11PM +0400, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
But both are just words/phrases, right?
Here's an example of the difference:
UNIX, the name, is a trademark. We can use it all we like here, speaking
about the UNIX trademark, its applicability, who owns the trademark, and
so
On Jun 16, 2011, at 10:26 AM, Jeff Hamann wrote:
I've installed and tested postgresql just fine on FreeBSD 8.2.
I gather this means running the database manually via postgres -D
/usr/local/pgsql/data works normally?
As instructed in the script, I've moved the file to
You can't take no for an answer, freebsd-questions!
2011/06/16 12:46:20 -0600 Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com = To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
CP But both are just words/phrases, right?
CP
CP Here's an example of the difference:
Good example, it's on-topic ;-)
CP UNIX, the name, is a
You can't take no for an answer, freebsd-questions!
2011/06/16 12:30:07 -0600 Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com = To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
CP * The UNIX source code's copyright is held by . . . damn. It keeps
I always told this name is a kind of Black Label. Companies to hold it use to
At 12:56 PM 6/16/2011 -0400, Michael Powell wrote:
Jack L. Stone wrote:
The no-accf.conf under includes is for if you do not desire to use either of
the AcceptFilter choices, one for httpd the other for SSL traffic. These
can be loaded as kernel modules in /boot/loader.conf as such:
Jeff Hamann wrote:
I've installed and tested postgresql just fine on FreeBSD 8.2.
I've been trying to get postgresql (the server) to start on bootup using
/etc/rc.conf system.
Sometime quite a while back FreeBSD imported the rc.subr startup subsystem
from NetBSD.
I'm using the script
The no-accf.conf under includes is for if you do not desire to use
either of
the AcceptFilter choices, one for httpd the other for SSL traffic.
These
can be loaded as kernel modules in /boot/loader.conf as such:
accf_http_load=YES
accf_data_load=YES
You can also build the modules into kernel
Jack L. Stone wrote:
At 12:56 PM 6/16/2011 -0400, Michael Powell wrote:
Jack L. Stone wrote:
The no-accf.conf under includes is for if you do not desire to use either
of
the AcceptFilter choices, one for httpd the other for SSL traffic. These
can be loaded as kernel modules in
At 10:57 PM 6/16/2011 +0300, Reko Turja wrote:
The no-accf.conf under includes is for if you do not desire to use
either of
the AcceptFilter choices, one for httpd the other for SSL traffic.
These
can be loaded as kernel modules in /boot/loader.conf as such:
accf_http_load=YES
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 07:00:30 -0600 (MDT), Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com
wrote:
Also, see lpd Printing With FreeBSD
http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/lpdprinting.html
It's worth mentioning that real office printers (those that
come with Ethernet) traditionally contain their own lpd
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 19:29:42 +0400, Peter Vereshagin pe...@vereshagin.org
wrote:
Lawyers are so lawyers ;-)
Two lawyers, three opinions. :-)
--
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
___
Greetings
I have a strange problem with memory on one of my computers. I have
recently converted this computer to a NAS server. It is an Asus
A8N-VM MB running freenas amd64. I have 4 one Gig memory sticks
installed and as well as I can remember, it had always seen the 4 Gig
of RAM. Most
On Jun 16, 2011, at 2:10 PM, Robert wrote:
I have tested with all of the sticks installed and with one at a time.
When all of the sticks are installed, BIOS show a total of 2752 MB of
RAM. If any of the sticks are installed alone in any of the four slots,
BIOS then shows 960 MB instead of the
It's quite simple really, it's another hidden tax - Redistribution of RAM.
You see, even with all the entitlement programs poor people can't afford more
than 512MB of RAM. As you are certainly aware that's not enough to watch
YouTube and Hulu on their government funded (tax payer funded)
--As of June 16, 2011 11:21:34 PM +0400, Peter Vereshagin is alleged to
have said:
CP UNIX, the name, is a trademark. We can use it all we like here,
speaking
Do we need a license to use it? ;-)
According to what I recall of my 'business law for managers' classes: As
long as we don't
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 18:20:43 -0400, Daniel Staal dst...@usa.net wrote:
According to what I recall of my 'business law for managers' classes: As
long as we don't claim we own it, and only *referring* to the company who
does or it's products, no. It's an identifying mark: You can use it to
I am out of the office until June 20th. I will only have intermittent access to
email. I will read and reply to your message when I get back to the office.
If you need assistance with a Berkeley DB or Product Management issue while I
am away, please contact ashok.jo...@oracle.com.
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 17:09:30 -0500
Gary Gatten ggat...@waddell.com wrote:
It's quite simple really, it's another hidden tax - Redistribution
of RAM. You see, even with all the entitlement programs poor
people can't afford more than 512MB of RAM. As you are certainly
aware that's not enough
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 15:11:22 -0700
Chuck Swiger cswi...@mac.com wrote:
On Jun 16, 2011, at 2:10 PM, Robert wrote:
I have tested with all of the sticks installed and with one at a
time. When all of the sticks are installed, BIOS show a total of
2752 MB of RAM. If any of the sticks are
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Chuck Swiger cswi...@mac.com wrote:
As for not being able to access all 4GB, this is a FAQ.
If you run a 32-bit system, the top gigabyte or so of address space is
reserved for memory mapped I/O reservations like AGP, PCIe, etc.
If your hardware is capable of
From owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org Thu Jun 16 16:56:48 2011
Return-Path: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org
Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (ns2.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.129])
by mail2.r-bonomi.com (8.14.4/rdb2) with ESMTP id p5GLumlV010091
for
--As of June 17, 2011 12:47:45 AM +0200, Polytropon is alleged to have said:
(And note that a pure list of facts can't be copyrighted: The phone book
is often an example. It's just a list of names and numbers.)
Interesting, never tought of that, but sounds obvious.
--As for the rest, it
You can't take no for an answer, freebsd-questions!
2011/06/16 18:20:43 -0400 Daniel Staal dst...@usa.net = To Peter Vereshagin :
DS CP UNIX, the name, is a trademark. We can use it all we like here,
DS speaking
DS
DS Do we need a license to use it? ;-)
DS
DS According to what I recall of my
On Jun 16, 2011, at 5:07 PM, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
And does FreeBSD Foundation own its FreeBSD UNIX then? If it does, did it pay
for it? Does it certify its FreeBSD as a UNIX and how much does it pay?
The FreeBSD Foundation is a non-profit organization which supports and
represents the
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 04:07:08 +0400, Peter Vereshagin pe...@vereshagin.org
wrote:
And does FreeBSD Foundation own its FreeBSD UNIX then? If it does, did it pay
for it? Does it certify its FreeBSD as a UNIX and how much does it pay?
Basically, the main page says based on, this states a
fact and
This email newsletter was sent to you in graphical HTML format.
If you're seeing this version, your email program prefers plain text emails.
You can read the original version online:
http://ymlp167.net/zXG3dw
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 07:43:59PM -0400, Daniel Staal wrote:
(The other common case in the USA is road maps. A simple 'lines following
their geographic contours, labeled' is a set of facts. One result of this
is that most road maps in the US either are missing some minor roads, or
have
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 02:50:40AM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 04:07:08 +0400, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
It's just a matter of a freedom to speech to me. And to everyone else
I believe.
Copyright and ownership of creation just makes sure that someone can't
express OTHER's
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:03:16 -0600, Chad Perrin per...@apotheon.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 02:50:40AM +0200, Polytropon wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 04:07:08 +0400, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
It's just a matter of a freedom to speech to me. And to everyone else
I believe.
I've noticed that your mail user agent is including quoted parties' email
addresses in the quote notification. In the text immediately following
this brief paragraph, for instance, my email address was included after
my name. I would appreciate it if you would configure your mail user
agent to
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 21:35:54 -0600, Chad Perrin wrote:
I've noticed that your mail user agent is including quoted parties' email
addresses in the quote notification. In the text immediately following
this brief paragraph, for instance, my email address was included after
my name. I would
2011-06-16 19:36, Daniel Staal skrev:
On Thu, June 16, 2011 12:20 pm, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
You can't take no for an answer, freebsd-questions!
2011/06/16 11:54:05 -0400 Robert Simmonsrsimmo...@gmail.com = To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org :
RS http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copyright
RS
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Bernt Hansson be...@bah.homeip.netwrote:
Unless you work the trademark in you have to pay to register the name.
I'm not sure by what mean by work the trademark in but every business is
entitled to use tm or sm identification without registration. However by
2011-06-17 00:20, Daniel Staal skrev:
--As of June 16, 2011 11:21:34 PM +0400, Peter Vereshagin is alleged to
have said:
(And note that a pure list of facts can't be copyrighted: The phone book
is often an example. It's just a list of names and numbers.)
Which is copyrighted, all databases
2011-06-17 06:53, Adam Vande More skrev:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Bernt Hanssonbe...@bah.homeip.netwrote:
Unless you work the trademark in you have to pay to register the name.
I'm not sure by what mean by work the trademark in but every business is
entitled to use tm or sm
2011-06-16 20:30, Chad Perrin skrev:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 02:22:43PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 16/06/2011 13:52, Peter Vereshagin wrote:
unix is a trademark of novell.com.
Unix (note capitalization) is actually a trademark of the Open Group:
http://www.unix.org/
In EU there are
79 matches
Mail list logo
