Hi,
I have FreeBSD 9.0 (p4) with custom kernel.
uname -i says it:
HOMEWIFI90
However, when I run freebsd-update fetch command it would like to
update my kernel as well:
freebsd-update fetch
Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 3 mirrors found.
Fetching metadata signature for 9.0-RELEASE
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Denis piloy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have FreeBSD 9.0 (p4) with custom kernel.
uname -i says it:
HOMEWIFI90
However, when I run freebsd-update fetch command it would like to
update my kernel as well:
freebsd-update fetch
Looking up
Hi Alexandre,
Have you rebuilt your custom kernel after ?
This is described in the Handbook in the section 25.2.2
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/updating-upgrading-freebsdupdate.html
Yes, I rebuilt my custom kernel after. But this doesn't help - every
time I run
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 19:43:14 -0400
Michael Powell articulated:
{snip}
Keep in mind whenever you install a new kernel your present kernel
(and its matching modules) get moved to kernel.old. What this means
is that the GENERIC you have with a base install will be moved to
kernel.old and can be
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 06:38:33 +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
I always keep saying the ideal
situation would be that you could customise and compile just your own
really mission critical software and freely mix that with installing
pre-compiled packages of anything else from the public
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 14:37:40 +0400, Denis wrote:
Hi Alexandre,
Have you rebuilt your custom kernel after ?
This is described in the Handbook in the section 25.2.2
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/updating-upgrading-freebsdupdate.html
Yes, I rebuilt my custom
Then why not follow my suggestion of _letting_ freebsd-update
update the kernel, but _use_ a different one instead which it
won't touch? In /boot/loader.conf:
kernel=mykernel
bootfile=/boot/mykernel/kernel
Now freebsd-update can happily alter the default kernel without
How do I add an CA Certificate for Mercurial on FreeBSD please?
:; uname -a
FreeBSD box2 9.0-RELEASE-p4 FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE-p4 #0: Fri Aug 17 21:53:39
EEST 2012 root@box2:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386
:; pkg_info -xc mercurial | sed 1q
Information for mercurial-2.3:
Thanks.
== Michael Powell wrote on Sun 19.Aug'12 at 19:43:14 -0400 ==
Keep in mind whenever you install a new kernel your present kernel (and its
matching modules) get moved to kernel.old. What this means is that the
GENERIC you have with a base install will be moved to kernel.old and can be
used
== Jerry wrote on Mon 20.Aug'12 at 8:11:17 -0400 ==
I inquired several years ago about the possibility of changing the
renaming format into something like: kernel_##_YY-MM-DD.old. The ##
would be incremented with each successive build on a given day. I
thought it would alleviate just the
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 14:13:44 +0100, Jamie Paul Griffin wrote:
== Michael Powell wrote on Sun 19.Aug'12 at 19:43:14 -0400 ==
Keep in mind whenever you install a new kernel your present kernel (and its
matching modules) get moved to kernel.old. What this means is that the
GENERIC you have
Polytropon writes:
Very good point! I'd clear the /usr/src/obj directory as pointed out,
then build a generic kenel, install it and boot from it. Then you
know you've got a working kernel to fall back on.
You could then make a copy of that kernel, e. g. from its initial
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 09:46:30 -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
Polytropon writes:
Very good point! I'd clear the /usr/src/obj directory as pointed out,
then build a generic kenel, install it and boot from it. Then you
know you've got a working kernel to fall back on.
You could then
Hi,
here is an interesting comment (basically echoing other people's view) on
Linux developments:
http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20120820
Reader Comments
1 o Arch and systemd (by Microlinux on 2012-08-20 10:11:39 GMT from France)
Much has been said on the subject of Systemd. Let me quote
== Polytropon wrote on Mon 20.Aug'12 at 14:22:45 +0200 ==
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 06:38:33 +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
I always keep saying the ideal
situation would be that you could customise and compile just your own
really mission critical software and freely mix that with installing
== Denis wrote on Mon 20.Aug'12 at 16:41:56 +0400 ==
Then why not follow my suggestion of _letting_ freebsd-update
update the kernel, but _use_ a different one instead which it
won't touch? In /boot/loader.conf:
kernel=mykernel
bootfile=/boot/mykernel/kernel
Now
Those in on the core teams here are very well aware. Did you notice we've
survived this long without ALSA? :-) However, this is very good reading
for anyone who hasn't looked at Linux lately, and it's worth mentioning
that this is snowballing quickly. I used to really like some Linux
If you're building your own customised kernel, why don't you just build the
entire system from source? I've not used freebsd-update yet and probably
won't. Is it just a matter of time, i.e. waiting for the compilation to
finish?
Actually I built this system from source. And now use
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 14:09:12 + (UTC)
jb articulated:
here is an interesting comment (basically echoing other people's
view) on Linux developments:
http://distrowatch.com/weekly.php?issue=20120820
Reader Comments
1 o Arch and systemd (by Microlinux on 2012-08-20 10:11:39 GMT from
France
Colleagues,
Please advise if there are any 3D shooters in the ports collection
which work out of the box on 9.0-STABLE (amd64)? None of those I have
tried work for a number of irritating reasons, like e.g.
games/uhexen: http://pastebin.com/ZaJ74eaa
games/doom: http://pastebin.com/XdrCwzvn
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 21:24:32 +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote:
Colleagues,
Please advise if there are any 3D shooters in the ports collection
which work out of the box on 9.0-STABLE (amd64)? None of those I have
tried work for a number of irritating reasons, like e.g.
games/uhexen:
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 21:24:32 +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote:
Colleagues,
Please advise if there are any 3D shooters in the ports collection which
work out of the box on 9.0-STABLE (amd64)? None of those I have tried
work for a number of irritating reasons, like e.g.
games/uhexen:
I have a fully patche amd64 freebsd 8.3 server with apache 2.2 and PHP 5.4.5.
In the past day, php scripts have started failing with a variety of random
errors,
they hang, errors claiming that builtins like require_once() are not found, and
other stuff. I don't see any pattern. I also can't
Polytropon wrote:
Please advise if there are any 3D shooters in the ports collection
which work out of the box on 9.0-STABLE (amd64)? None of those I have
tried work for a number of irritating reasons, like e.g.
games/uhexen: http://pastebin.com/ZaJ74eaa
MIDI load
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 21:24:32 +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote:
Colleagues,
Please advise if there are any 3D shooters in the ports collection
which work out of the box on 9.0-STABLE (amd64)? None of those I have
tried work for a number of irritating reasons, like e.g.
games/uhexen:
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 00:05:17 +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote:
Polytropon wrote:
Please advise if there are any 3D shooters in the ports collection
which work out of the box on 9.0-STABLE (amd64)? None of those I have
tried work for a number of irritating reasons, like e.g.
Walter Hurry wrote:
prboom works flawlessly on my FreeBSD9 laptop.
Wow! This one really works and looks like the good old Doom, music and
sound and all. Thank you Walter!
--
Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN
sip:suda...@sibptus.tomsk.ru
___
Jerry jerry at seibercom.net writes:
However, the influence of their employer
is so big that these products are forced upon the wider UNIX
community and at some point it will be assimilate or die.
...
Personally, I embrace progress. Even if there are ten failures in a
row, that one
Mark Felder wrote:
Those in on the core teams here are very well aware. Did you notice we've
survived this long without ALSA? :-) However, this is very good reading
for anyone who hasn't looked at Linux lately, and it's worth mentioning
that this is snowballing quickly. I used to really like
Yuri Pankov wrote:
Please advise if there are any 3D shooters in the ports collection
which work out of the box on 9.0-STABLE (amd64)? None of those I have
tried work for a number of irritating reasons, like e.g.
games/uhexen: http://pastebin.com/ZaJ74eaa
games/doom:
Polytropon wrote:
[dd]
Which port is it? make search key=lsdldoom finds nothing.
Oh, it's doomlegacy.
Thanks, will look at it.
I could also play Quake, Quake 2 from ports,
and Jedi Knight II via wine.
Oh, is there really nothing native?
No, that game is far too
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 00:46:40 +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote:
Polytropon wrote:
I could also play Quake, Quake 2 from ports,
and Jedi Knight II via wine.
Oh, is there really nothing native?
No, that game is far too old, but Quake and Quake 2 have ports
(to native FreeBSD) which
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012, Victor Sudakov wrote:
Colleagues,
Please advise if there are any 3D shooters in the ports collection
which work out of the box on 9.0-STABLE (amd64)?
games/ioquake3
games/ioquake3-devel
games/openarena
___
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 20:09:15 +0200
Polytropon wrote:
I'm not sure if wine can run those native DOS games, but
the big virtualisation software (VirtualBox, VMWare)
should be able to emulate a PC, t
You don't need to go that far, dosbox will run most dos games.
Polytropon wrote:
I could also play Quake, Quake 2 from ports,
and Jedi Knight II via wine.
Oh, is there really nothing native?
No, that game is far too old, but Quake and Quake 2 have ports
(to native FreeBSD) which work very nicely with the original
files from
games/quake2max is a good one...At least it was years ago when I tried
it. I see nothing in the Makefile that will prevent it from building on
amd64.
Cheers,
Josh
On 8/20/12 12:16 PM, Polytropon wrote:
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 00:05:17 +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote:
Polytropon wrote:
Please
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 7:46 PM, John Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote:
I have a fully patche amd64 freebsd 8.3 server with apache 2.2 and PHP
5.4.5.
In the past day, php scripts have started failing with a variety of random
errors,
they hang, errors claiming that builtins like require_once()
I've done all the usual voodoo repair: I have rebuilt apache, php, and
all the php modules from source, and rebooted, and it didn't help.
Did you also rebuilt lang/php5-extensions for the modules you need?
Uh, yes, I said that I did.
Regards,
John Levine, jo...@iecc.com, Primary Perpetrator
== jb wrote on Mon 20.Aug'12 at 17:40:40 + ==
The end effect is, they consciously want to screw up Linux and non-Linux
(UNIX,
*BSD, etc) ecosystems that opt not to follow them (read some additional
comments that appeared in the meantime in the comments section of
Distrowatch).
This is
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:18 PM, John R. Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote:
I've done all the usual voodoo repair: I have rebuilt apache, php, and
all the php modules from source, and rebooted, and it didn't help.
Did you also rebuilt lang/php5-extensions for the modules you need?
Uh, yes, I
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 17:40:40 + (UTC)
jb articulated:
This is a bad thing for all UNIX or UNIX-like ecosystems, performed
under the noble flag of progress to neutralize and fight opposition.
Do you have any idea how idiotic that statement sounds? What are you
planning on doing? Are you
nice ad hominem screed
On 08/20/2012 12:57, Jerry wrote:
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 17:40:40 + (UTC)
jb articulated:
This is a bad thing for all UNIX or UNIX-like ecosystems, performed
under the noble flag of progress to neutralize and fight opposition.
Do you have any idea how idiotic that
Then perhaps you should downgrade to lang/php53 and lang/php53-extensions
and compare the results!
Good thought, I just did that. Results:
php5.3: works fine as far as I can tell
php5.4: fails in random ways
This suggests there is a bug in 5.4 which only is apparent on FreeBSD 8.x.
I note
On 20 Aug 2012 16:46:13 -
John Levine articulated:
I have a fully patche amd64 freebsd 8.3 server with apache 2.2 and
PHP 5.4.5.
In the past day, php scripts have started failing with a variety of
random errors, they hang, errors claiming that builtins like
require_once() are not
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 11:02 PM, John R. Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote:
Then perhaps you should downgrade to lang/php53 and lang/php53-extensions
and compare the results!
Good thought, I just did that. Results:
php5.3: works fine as far as I can tell
php5.4: fails in random ways
This
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 14:57:14 -0500, je...@seibercom.net wrote:
Support for FLASH basically sucks.
Please stop trolling. I've been using flash with zero issues for 3 years.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 06:28:57PM +, we recorded a bogon-computron
collision of the free...@edvax.de flavor, containing:
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 00:05:17 +0700, Victor Sudakov wrote:
Please advise if there are any 3D shooters in the ports collection
which work out of the box on
Are you running pecl-APC? If so, what version? There's a major issue with
the latest.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
Good thought, I just did that. Results:
php5.3: works fine as far as I can tell
php5.4: fails in random ways
This suggests there is a bug in 5.4 which only is apparent on FreeBSD 8.x.
I note that the packages for 8.x have gone away on the distribution server,
so I expect they're not
John R. Levine wrote:
Then perhaps you should downgrade to lang/php53 and lang/php53-extensions
and compare the results!
Good thought, I just did that. Results:
php5.3: works fine as far as I can tell
php5.4: fails in random ways
This suggests there is a bug in 5.4 which only is
Are you running pecl-APC? If so, what version? There's a major issue with the
latest.
Hmmn, that might have been it.
I backed down to 5.3, but when I have a chance I'll try 5.4 again without
APC.
R's,
John
mail(1) man page says:
~R string
Use string as the Reply-To field.
However, this doesn't seem to work for me.
Hitting ~R doesn't have any effect at all.
The man page also has:
REPLYTO If set, will be used to initialize the Reply-To field for outgo-
ing
I was looking to build a desktop to learn FreeBSD and was wondering if there
is a list of parts to build one or to just look at the hardware
comparability list? I just don't want to order wrong parts.
--
View this message in context:
On 6:56:26PM, Locksmith ty...@tristatesafeandlock.com wrote:
I was looking to build a desktop to learn FreeBSD and was wondering if there
is a list of parts to build one or to just look at the hardware
comparability list? I just don't want to order wrong parts.
The handbook is always a good
Are you running pecl-APC? If so, what version? There's a major issue with
the
latest.
Hmmn, that might have been it.
I backed down to 5.3, but when I have a chance I'll try 5.4 again without
APC.
Tried it without APC, didn't help. We're back to the theory that there's
something in PHP
Is there a list of parts for building a personal computer or do you just read
through the hardware list?
Tyler
Tri-State Safe and Lock
570-832-0277___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 9:43 PM, Tyler Campbell
ty...@tristatesafeandlock.com wrote:
Is there a list of parts for building a personal computer or do you just
read through the hardware list?
Usually everything works on standard consumer hardware...defer to big name
where possible eg intel.
I was looking to build a desktop to learn FreeBSD and was wondering if there
is a list of parts to build one or to just look at the hardware
comparability list? I just don't want to order wrong parts.
If don't want to make the full commitment to building a desktop, a
Hi,
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 22:43:35 -0400
Tyler Campbell ty...@tristatesafeandlock.com wrote:
Is there a list of parts for building a personal computer or do you
just read through the hardware list?
if you use big names like Asus, nothing should go wrong.
I would avoid Intel's integrated
59 matches
Mail list logo
