On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 03:57:50PM -0700, Tom Everett wrote:
I'm running the stock FreeBSD 7.1 kernel on an IBM x330 machine. The
machine has two physical processors but it seems that FreeBSD 7.1 on
sees one. I downloaded the kernel source and it seems that the GENERIC
kernel has SMP
How does the kernel I would build from that link differ from the stock
7.1 kernel?
Ewald Jenisch wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 03:57:50PM -0700, Tom Everett wrote:
I'm running the stock FreeBSD 7.1 kernel on an IBM x330 machine. The
machine has two physical processors but it seems
Am I correct in my understanding that the stock kernel is GENERIC?
Ewald Jenisch wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 03:57:50PM -0700, Tom Everett wrote:
I'm running the stock FreeBSD 7.1 kernel on an IBM x330 machine. The
machine has two physical processors but it seems that FreeBSD 7.1 on
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 06:57:32 Tom Everett wrote:
How does the kernel I would build from that link differ from the stock
7.1 kernel?
It doesn't. It's the generic upgrading fixes all advice.
I don't see anything since 7.1-RELEASE in 7.1-STABLE even, that would have the
potential to fix
Thanks!
Mel wrote:
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 06:57:32 Tom Everett wrote:
How does the kernel I would build from that link differ from the stock
7.1 kernel?
It doesn't. It's the generic upgrading fixes all advice.
I don't see anything since 7.1-RELEASE in 7.1-STABLE even, that would
I'm running the stock FreeBSD 7.1 kernel on an IBM x330 machine. The
machine has two physical processors but it seems that FreeBSD 7.1 on
sees one. I downloaded the kernel source and it seems that the GENERIC
kernel has SMP installed. Is there something else I can try? Thanks in
advance
Hi Everyone,
I am using a FreeBSD version 4.11 for running my BIND. I am in a need of
setting up an audit for the CPU Utilization on my resolvers and have a query
about finding the CPU IDLE percentage on a DUAL processor hosts. As the BIND
binary uses only the first processor, the second CPU
Devanand SP wrote:
Hi Everyone,
I am using a FreeBSD version 4.11 for running my BIND. I am in a need of
setting up an audit for the CPU Utilization on my resolvers and have a query
about finding the CPU IDLE percentage on a DUAL processor hosts. As the BIND
binary uses only the first
Is there a way to see if the system is utilizing both processors on a
two processor system? I seem to remember the top command in Linux
showed the load balance between the two processors (I could be wrong it
has been a while since I used it). Is there some ap that can display
these kinds of
On Saturday 19 January 2008 10:30:49 am Chris Maness wrote:
Is there a way to see if the system is utilizing both processors on a
two processor system? I seem to remember the top command in Linux
showed the load balance between the two processors (I could be wrong it
has been a while since I
Jonathan Horne wrote:
On Saturday 19 January 2008 10:30:49 am Chris Maness wrote:
Is there a way to see if the system is utilizing both processors on a
two processor system? I seem to remember the top command in Linux
showed the load balance between the two processors (I could be wrong it
measuring the load on the cpus, I twould think it should balance that load
nicely, just be sure to compile your apps for threading where it's
supported (perl comes to mind).
Tony
On Thu, 19 May 2005, Brian O'Shea wrote:
Hello all,
I have a dual-processor system that I have been using with only
Hello all,
I have a dual-processor system that I have been using with only a
single CPU for some time. Recently I got ahold of another CPU from
an old retired system. I thought that both processors were identical
(they came from what appears to be the same model PC, an HP Kayak XU).
However
I have a dual processor server Will freebsd use them both is so When I install
it how do I get it to use it ?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail
. If you build the sample LINT kernel config,
it will show you in there.
Good luck,
--Brian
On 4/19/05, William Biggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a dual processor server Will freebsd use them both is so When I
install it how do I get it to use
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Bruce Campbell wrote:
I've manually set:
atacontrol mode 0 UDMA33 UDMA33
and the problem has not recurred.
That sort of hints that there's some issue with the cabling, as UDMA33 is
the highest you can go on a 40wire IDE cable. Going beyond requires an
80wire cable (
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-05-10 20:16:50 +0200]:
Hello, I am in trouble with FreeBSD 4.9p, I have got dual processor server
(2 x Pentium II 400MHz) and I would like that FreeBSD could be able to use
the both of them. I have readen that you need to compile the kernel once
again, but I would
Hello, I am in trouble with FreeBSD 4.9p, I have got dual processor server (2 x
Pentium II 400MHz) and I would like that FreeBSD could be able to use the both of
them. I have readen that you need to compile the kernel once again, but I would like
to know which modifies I should apply to resolve
At 8:16 PM +0200 5/10/04, Vivailsud Staff Member wrote:
Hello, I am in trouble with FreeBSD 4.9p, I have got dual
processor server (2 x Pentium II 400MHz) and I would like that
FreeBSD could be able to use the both of them. I have read that
you need to compile the kernel once again, but I would
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 03:02:46PM +0100, Francesco Casadei wrote:
[snip]
Yesterday I checked the drive ad6 with the Drive Fitness Test program from IBM.
Both quick and advanced test returned that the drive is ok. I then ran the test
against ad0 (the backup drive): the quick test showed that
This article from The Register may be of interest:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/3/18267.html
It talks about a bug in the VIA 686B Southbridge chipset that can cause
data corruption when processing large amounts of data.
Guy
--
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 01:42:03PM -0500, Bruce Campbell wrote:
[snip]
I don't have it enabled:
hw.ata.tags: 0
I've manually set:
atacontrol mode 0 UDMA33 UDMA33
and the problem has not recurred.
--
Bruce Campbell
Engineering Computing
CPH-2374B
University of Waterloo
Quoting Bruce Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Quoting Matthew Emmerton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[ cc'ing Soren since he's the ATA guru ]
Dec 30 23:27:00 ecserv13 /kernel: ad0: trying fallback to PIO mode
Dec 30 23:27:00 ecserv13 /kernel: ata0: resetting devices .. done
The test
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 10:01 PM
Subject: Re: ata fallback to PIO mode on dual processor AMD systems
Quoting Bruce Campbell [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Quoting Matthew Emmerton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[ cc'ing Soren since he's the ATA guru ]
Dec
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 03:57:16PM -0500, Bruce Campbell wrote:
I am seeing a problem with ata disks on 4 new systems, which
I believe is either a bug in the ata driver, or a problem with
the onboard IDE controller, or something else. Systems are as follows:
Motherboard: ASUS A7M266-D
By the way, I've determined our removable IDE disk trays are manufactured
by SNT (http://www.snt.com.tw/metal.htm) and are part number
SNT-129. It looks like these are the same ones startech sells.
I've placed my hardware configuration here:
Bruce Campbell said:
- try UDMA100 with the drives directly attached (ie. no removable tray) -
maybe try a non onboard IDE controller
yes I would reccomend a PCI ide controller, such as the Promise ATA/100, or
Promise ATA/66. Also be sure your IDE cables are 18 and not 24 or 32 some
people
Quoting Francesco Casadei [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 03:57:16PM -0500, Bruce Campbell wrote:
I am seeing a problem with ata disks on 4 new systems, which
I believe is either a bug in the ata driver, or a problem with
the onboard IDE controller, or something else. Systems
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Bruce Campbell wrote:
At present, I don't suspect bad media because the error message is
WRITE command timeout tag=0 serv=0 which doesn't suggest a specific
sector/track etc, and running with UDMA33 instead of UDMA100 makes the problem
appear to vanish.
The fallback is
Quoting Bruce Evans [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Bruce Campbell wrote:
At present, I don't suspect bad media because the error message is
WRITE command timeout tag=0 serv=0 which doesn't suggest a specific
sector/track etc, and running with UDMA33 instead of UDMA100 makes the
On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 01:42:03PM -0500, Bruce Campbell wrote:
[snip]
I don't have it enabled:
hw.ata.tags: 0
I've manually set:
atacontrol mode 0 UDMA33 UDMA33
and the problem has not recurred.
--
Bruce Campbell
Engineering Computing
CPH-2374B
University of Waterloo
On Fri, Jan 03, 2003 at 06:36:29AM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
The fallback is clearly wrong because it turns isolated media errors
into pessimized i/o for the whole disk at best, system hangs during
resets next best, and system crashes at worst. I keep a disk with bad
media on line for
I am seeing a problem with ata disks on 4 new systems, which
I believe is either a bug in the ata driver, or a problem with
the onboard IDE controller, or something else. Systems are as follows:
Motherboard: ASUS A7M266-D
CPUs : 2 x 2000+ AMD MP
Memory : 2 x 512MB Crucial part:
[ cc'ing Soren since he's the ATA guru ]
I am seeing a problem with ata disks on 4 new systems, which
I believe is either a bug in the ata driver, or a problem with
the onboard IDE controller, or something else. Systems are as follows:
Motherboard: ASUS A7M266-D
CPUs : 2 x 2000+ AMD
Quoting Matthew Emmerton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[ cc'ing Soren since he's the ATA guru ]
Dec 30 23:27:00 ecserv13 /kernel: ad0: trying fallback to PIO mode
Dec 30 23:27:00 ecserv13 /kernel: ata0: resetting devices .. done
The test continues to run with the ata controller in PIO mode, with
On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 10:45:55AM +0530, Abhay Kumar Srivastava wrote:
Hi,
I want to run freeBSD 3.2 on a dual processor intell xenon
machine. I tried using the SMP option in the config file. Is there a
utility by which i can accertain if freeBSD has detected both the
processors
Hi,
I want to run freeBSD 3.2 on a dual processor intell xenon
machine. I tried using the SMP option in the config file. Is there a
utility by which i can accertain if freeBSD has detected both the
processors and can use them.
Regards,
Abhay
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
On Wed, 2002-12-04 at 15:15, Abhay Kumar Srivastava wrote:
Hi,
I want to run freeBSD 3.2 on a dual processor intell xenon
machine. I tried using the SMP option in the config file. Is there a
utility by which i can accertain if freeBSD has detected both the
processors and can use them
38 matches
Mail list logo
