Re: Anyone using Linux-PAM on 5.x?

2003-10-08 Thread Tony Pagliocco
Joe Lewis wrote: Hello, all; I would like to take a moment of your time. I was having some heavy frustrations on preparing a FreeBSD 5.1 server for handling centrally located accounts using OpenPAM, particularly due to my inability to locate good documentation on it. I found that the problem

Re: Anyone using Linux-PAM on 5.x?

2003-10-08 Thread Joe Lewis
Hello, all; I would like to take a moment of your time. I was having some heavy frustrations on preparing a FreeBSD 5.1 server for handling centrally located accounts using OpenPAM, particularly due to my inability to locate good documentation on it. I found that the problems : Oct 5 13:04:

Re: Anyone using Linux-PAM on 5.x?

2003-10-05 Thread Mikko Työläjärvi
On Sun, 5 Oct 2003, Joe Lewis wrote: > I know of the specification. However, I have a customized version of the > pam-mysql module that I have tried to install. In a previous post to this > list about a week or two ago, I wrote about getting only the following > entrys in the log file (an exampl

Re: Anyone using Linux-PAM on 5.x?

2003-10-05 Thread Joe Lewis
> Having had some experience writing pam modules on a number of > platforms, I whipped out my suite of pam test modules to have a look > at this incredbible breakage you speak of. I mean, there is a > specification for pam after all. I know of the specification. However, I have a customized vers

Re: Anyone using Linux-PAM on 5.x?

2003-10-05 Thread Mikko Työläjärvi
On Sat, 4 Oct 2003, Bill Campbell wrote: > On Sat, Oct 04, 2003, Mikko Työläjärvi wrote: > ... > >Having had some experience writing pam modules on a number of > >platforms, I whipped out my suite of pam test modules to have a look > >at this incredbible breakage you speak of. I mean, there is a

Re: Anyone using Linux-PAM on 5.x?

2003-10-05 Thread Nick Rogness
On Sat, 4 Oct 2003, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 02:12:53PM -0600, Joe Lewis wrote: > > Question for you guru's; > > > I've been trying to install a PAM module on my FreeBSD 5.1 system. > Unfortunately, someone thought they were bright and included OpenPAM, > which would be fine

Re: Anyone using Linux-PAM on 5.x?

2003-10-04 Thread Bill Campbell
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003, Mikko Työläjärvi wrote: ... >Having had some experience writing pam modules on a number of >platforms, I whipped out my suite of pam test modules to have a look >at this incredbible breakage you speak of. I mean, there is a >specification for pam after all. Could you suggest

Re: Anyone using Linux-PAM on 5.x?

2003-10-04 Thread Mikko Työläjärvi
On Sat, 4 Oct 2003, Joe Lewis wrote: > Question for you guru's; > > I've been trying to install a PAM module on my FreeBSD 5.1 system. > Unfortunately, someone thought they were bright and included OpenPAM, > which would be fine and dandy except for it is installed by default as > static. This me

Re: Anyone using Linux-PAM on 5.x?

2003-10-04 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Oct 04), Joe Lewis said: > I've been trying to install a PAM module on my FreeBSD 5.1 system. > Unfortunately, someone thought they were bright and included OpenPAM, > which would be fine and dandy except for it is installed by default > as static. This means I PAM is now AM,

Re: Anyone using Linux-PAM on 5.x?

2003-10-04 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 02:12:53PM -0600, Joe Lewis wrote: > Question for you guru's; > > I've been trying to install a PAM module on my FreeBSD 5.1 system. > Unfortunately, someone thought they were bright and included OpenPAM, > which would be fine and dandy except for it is installed by defau