i solve it:) the stp should be running on all interfaces
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:43 AM, saeedeh motlagh wrote:
> yes, with any two interfaces the bridge works well. tcpdump show these
> messages when i configure bridge with more than 2 interfaces:
> 14:52:57.771505 ARP, Request who-has 192.16
yes, with any two interfaces the bridge works well. tcpdump show these
messages when i configure bridge with more than 2 interfaces:
14:52:57.771505 ARP, Request who-has 192.168.4.157 tell 192.168.4.155,
length 46
14:52:57.771519 ARP, Reply 192.168.4.157 is-at 00:0b:ab:4f:d4:2a (oui
Unknown), lengt
On 12/12/11 15:49, saeedeh motlagh wrote:
my freebsd is 8.2 and i have four interfaces which two of them are gbeth
and two others are igb. i think the interfaces are ok beacuse when i bridge
two interfaces, it works fine.
i use the below command to create my bridge:
ifconfig bridge0 create
ifconf
my freebsd is 8.2 and i have four interfaces which two of them are gbeth
and two others are igb. i think the interfaces are ok beacuse when i bridge
two interfaces, it works fine.
i use the below command to create my bridge:
ifconfig bridge0 create
ifconfig bridge0 addm gbeth0 addm igb0 addm igb1 a
On 12/11/11 23:31, saeedeh motlagh wrote:
hello everybody
i have a problem in bridging my interfaces. i want to bridge my 4
interfaces and make switching in freebsd box but in doesn't work. with two
interfaces the bridge works well and pass the traffic but for four
interfaces in doesn't what is e
Faizan ul haq Muhammad wrote:
> >
> > i noted that, following information is missing
> > member: sk0 flags=143
> > ifmaxaddr 0 port 1 priority 128 path cost 200
> > member: sk1 flags=143
> > ifmaxaddr 0 port 2 priority 128 path cost 20
> >
> > Now i need to know how to add the interfaces
> Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:28:01 -0600
> From: amvandem...@gmail.com
> CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Bridging-(How to test and verify that bridging is enabled)
>
> Faizan ul haq Muhammad wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > &
Faizan ul haq Muhammad wrote:
> Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:05:09 -0600
> From: amvandem...@gmail.com
> CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Bridging-(How to test and verify that bridging is enabled)
>
> Faizan ul haq Muhammad wrote:
> >
> >
> >
&
> Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:05:09 -0600
> From: amvandem...@gmail.com
> CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Bridging-(How to test and verify that bridging is enabled)
>
> Faizan ul haq Muhammad wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > Date:
Faizan ul haq Muhammad wrote:
> Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 07:48:40 -0600
> From: amvandem...@gmail.com
> CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Bridging-(How to test and verify that bridging is enabled)
>
> Faizan ul haq Muhammad wrote:
> >
> >
> &g
> Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 07:48:40 -0600
> From: amvandem...@gmail.com
> CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: Bridging-(How to test and verify that bridging is enabled)
>
> Faizan ul haq Muhammad wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
Faizan ul haq Muhammad wrote:
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 16:35:33 +0700
From: o...@cs.ait.ac.th
To: faiz...@hotmail.com
CC: fbsd.questi...@rachie.is-a-geek.net; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org;
fb...@a1poweruser.com
Subject: Re: Bridging-(How to test and verify that bridging is enabled)
Hi
> Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 16:35:33 +0700
> From: o...@cs.ait.ac.th
> To: faiz...@hotmail.com
> CC: fbsd.questi...@rachie.is-a-geek.net; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org;
> fb...@a1poweruser.com
> Subject: Re: Bridging-(How to test and verify that bridging is enabled)
>
&
Hi,
> > Are you using properly crossed cables?
> Isnt it enough check for the that two linux can ping each other..
Yes and no. You must used crossed Ethernet cable between your FreeBSD
bridge and each of your Linux boxes.
As someone suggested, what is ifconfig saying on the FreeBSD box? You
sh
> Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 15:28:10 +0700
> From: o...@cs.ait.ac.th
> To: faiz...@hotmail.com
> CC: fbsd.questi...@rachie.is-a-geek.net; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org;
> fb...@a1poweruser.com
> Subject: Re: Bridging-(How to test and verify that bridging is enabled)
>
>
Hi,
> I connected two linux PCs with these two interfaces (sk0 and sk1)
> and tried to ping between them but didnt get any
> success.configuration seems to be ok, but still no traffice is being
> passed. Can any one give any sugestion ?
Stupid question, but if you connect the 2 Linux boxes direct
Faizan ul haq Muhammad wrote:
Hi,
I am not sure but as per some internet guide, I have configured the bridge on
Freebsd(7) Machine with two LAN cards on it
I have compiled my KERNEL with (device if_bridge)
and then added code to rc.conf
cloned_interfaces="bridge0"
ifconfig_bridge
Thanks for your help Chris, I ended up rebooting the router since I wasn't
sure what manner of nonsense I'd put in and everything is working.
On 9/29/07, Christopher Cowart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 09:49:36PM -0600, Simon Timms wrote:
> > That makes a lot of sense, bu
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 09:49:36PM -0600, Simon Timms wrote:
> That makes a lot of sense, but I suppose I still don't understand why this
> isn't working. The handbook section on routing is pretty basic and it seems
> to come down to setting net.inet.ip.forwarding to 1 if you want to route
> packe
That makes a lot of sense, but I suppose I still don't understand why this
isn't working. The handbook section on routing is pretty basic and it seems
to come down to setting net.inet.ip.forwarding to 1 if you want to route
packets between interfaces on a dual-homed host. I'm able to reach hosts
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 07:06:55PM -0600, Simon Timms wrote:
> Hello,
> I seem to be having some trouble bridging interfaces in FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE.
> What I have are two interfaces
>
> rl0 - 192.168.2.2
> sis0 - 192.168.1.2
>
> and a bridge I've set up following the pages in the handbook. Howeve
On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 12:29:30PM -0400, Brian McCann wrote:
> I've poked around on the web, but come up empty. And I find it hard
> to believe there's not a simple way to do this, if it hasn't been done
> before.
>
> I've got a server with two nics configured for bridging and running
> bunches
On Sep 13, 2007, at 9:29 AM, Brian McCann wrote:
I've got a server with two nics configured for bridging and running
bunches of ipfw rules. I'd like to add a 3rd NIC and have it mirror
the 2nd NIC (so all traffic into and out of nic2 goes to nic3), so I
can run an IDS on another server. Yes, I
t;Pete Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "FreeBSD-questions"
Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 12:56 AM
Subject: Re: Bridging with tap
"Pete Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Does anyone know anything about ethernet bridging to a tap interface
in Freebsd 6.2. I h
"Pete Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Does anyone know anything about ethernet bridging to a tap interface
> in Freebsd 6.2. I have compiled the bridge option and the tap device
> into the kernel, but the tap device has not appeared. I have tried
> this on a virtual machine and a separate box
On Jan 17, 2007, at 11:00 AM, Kailas Ramasamy wrote:
Hi Mike,
Thanks a lot. This is what I was looking for.
-Kailas
On 1/17/07, Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Kailas
Ramasamy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
> Hi Mike,
> I read through fork() and exec() man pages
Hi, thanks for the replies.
As per Chuck's request, I've lamped together the output of the suggested
commands and got the current kernel configuration and put them online for
you to take a look at and see what you think.
http://www.sisko.net/bridge/dmesg.txt
http://www.sisko.net/bridge/kernconf
> I've also had problems with the bridge running out of dynamic rules. I've
> raised them to silly figures however I'm always wary that if a machine had a
> Trojan or some other form of malware that attempted a DoS attack, the bridge
> would probably fall over after exhausting its dynamic rule coun
Ian Kaney wrote:
> Hi there. I wonder if somebody could help me with an issue I'm experiencing.
You've asked an interesting question, but there's a lack of data ("vmstat -i",
dmesg, "sysctl net"). You might obtain better results by putting together some
details, maybe as files in a directory bein
---
From: Peter Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 January 2006 08:29 PM
To: Dave Raven
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Bridging a Cisco Trunk
Dave,
> I have two cisco switches, configured to put ports 2-6 on each of
> them into vlan 100. Then I have port 1 on both set t
--- Peter Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dave,
>
> >I have two cisco switches, configured to
> put ports 2-6 on each of
> > them into vlan 100. Then I have port 1 on
> both set to trunk between
> the two
> > switches. If I have a device on port 2 on
> switch1 it can ping a device on
Dave,
>I have two cisco switches, configured to put ports 2-6 on each of
> them into vlan 100. Then I have port 1 on both set to trunk between
the two
> switches. If I have a device on port 2 on switch1 it can ping a device on
> port 2 on switch2.
I do this quite often, and it works very w
Lowell Gilbert wrote:
Don't top-post, please.
On 20 Jul 2005 09:38:22 -0400, Lowell Gilbert <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sushubh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I am going to install FreeBSD on a machine we plan to make a server.
Now, we have 2 lines of internet coming to our place through 2
Don't top-post, please.
> On 20 Jul 2005 09:38:22 -0400, Lowell Gilbert <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Sushubh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > I am going to install FreeBSD on a machine we plan to make a server.
> > >
> > > Now, we have 2 lines of internet coming to our place throug
their is a bridge software in linux which can do that...
http://bridge.sourceforge.com
On 20 Jul 2005 09:38:22 -0400, Lowell Gilbert <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sushubh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I am going to install FreeBSD on a machine we plan to make a server.
> >
> > Now, we have
Sushubh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am going to install FreeBSD on a machine we plan to make a server.
>
> Now, we have 2 lines of internet coming to our place through 2
> separate lan modems. I want the server to take these 2 lines and
> combine the speeds to form a single line which can b
Tried that one myself, but I tried it again. No impact whatsoever!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colin House
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 3:27 PM
To: George Breahna
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Bridging and IPFW
On
On 6/1/05, George Breahna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
..
According to what I have read, using ipfw2 I should now be able to
properly filter by MAC address..so I wrote up some rules!
$IPFW 10 add allow ip from any to any MAC any 00:0E:A6:02:4D:A4 $IPFW
10 add allow ip from any to any MAC 00
1, 2005 11:43 AM
To: George Breahna
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Bridging and IPFW
On 6/1/05, George Breahna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> According to what I have read, using ipfw2 I should now be able to
> properly filter by MAC address..so I wrote up some rules!
&
On 6/1/05, George Breahna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> According to what I have read, using ipfw2 I should now be able to properly
> filter by MAC address..so I wrote up some rules!
>
> $IPFW 10 add allow ip from any to any MAC any 00:0E:A6:02:4D:A4
> $IPFW 10 add allow ip from any to any MAC
> I find no reference to MAC rules showing up in 5.2.1. Any help or advice
> would be appreciated.
That's because bridge(4) doesn't do Layer 2 filtering. Neither does ipfw (as
well it shouldn't). I don't know if there are any plans to add this
capability to FreeBSD's bridge, but I know that OpenBS
John Oxley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi, my scenario is:
>
> onan (WinXP) with realtek NIC MAC address: 00:0a:cd:02:be:8d
>
> reknaw (FreeBSD 5.1-RELEASE-p10) with 2 realtek NIC's, rl0 (mac:
> 00:50:22:8d:f4:3f) and rl1 (mac: 00:40:f4:18:b1:0c).
>
> reknaw:rl0 has a real world ip address (
ext Manuel Rabade (MiG) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> That's fine, but you must check the netmask of the interfaces and your computers
> in the network, it should be 255.255.0.0.
Aha, that could be the problem then. I'm using 255.255.255.0 currently.
> How are you bridging the interfaces ?? i
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 11:12:04PM +0300, Mike Jackson wrote:
> ext Manuel Rabade (MiG) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 02:12:49AM +0300, Mike Jackson wrote:
> > > ext Manuel Rabade (MiG) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > > You want to use the NAT of your ASDL router or that p
ext Manuel Rabade (MiG) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 02:12:49AM +0300, Mike Jackson wrote:
> > ext Manuel Rabade (MiG) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > > You want to use the NAT of your ASDL router or that pc1 do the nat for xl0
> > > and wi0 ?
> >
> > I'm using the NAT on th
On Sun, Oct 05, 2003 at 02:12:49AM +0300, Mike Jackson wrote:
> ext Manuel Rabade (MiG) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > You want to use the NAT of your ASDL router or that pc1 do the nat for xl0
> > and wi0 ?
>
> I'm using the NAT on the ADSL router, because that's the only public IP
> that I have.
ext Manuel Rabade (MiG) ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> You want to use the NAT of your ASDL router or that pc1 do the nat for xl0
> and wi0 ?
I'm using the NAT on the ADSL router, because that's the only public IP
that I have.
--
mike
___
[EMAIL PROTECTE
You want to use the NAT of your ASDL router or that pc1 do the nat for xl0
and wi0 ?
If you want that pc1 do the NAT, you don't have to bridge xl0 and xl1, you only
have to bridge wi0 and xl1 and do nat betwen them and xl1.
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 07:06:31PM +0300, Mike Jackson wrote:
> Hi,
> I
> I have a -stable box that I would like to bridge ethernet across 2 of 3
> interfaces. If I read the man page correctly, all I have to do is set
> net.link.ether.bridge to 1 and set net.link.ether.bridge_cfg to a comma-
> seperated list of interfaces. Eg
> sysctl net.link.ether.bridge_cfg=
"Jonas Sonntag" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> so...is it possible this way, or would it be far smarter to plug a third nic
> into the fbsd box only for bridging ?
>
> thanks for any advice
I don't know if it's possible that way; I'm no expert. But I've read
that it's foolish to put a public ser
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 10:09:16AM +0100, Jonas Sonntag wrote:
> hi list
>
> i'm looking for a little advice here.
> i've got a fbsd server conected to the internet via rl0. there are about 30
> workstation in 192.168, fbsd does nat for, those are connected via rl1.
> now, on rl1, behind nat there
51 matches
Mail list logo
