Hi,
First of all usage of 127.0.0.1 as second address is nothing but wrong, as
this is the loopback address :)
For the second part of the question - I suppose it has nothing to do with
the BSD and the jail subsystem.
I am not sure why you have eth1 tbh, you should only have eth0, maybe
Zyumbilev, Peter wrote:
Hi,
I have successfully run multiple jails on freebsd 9.1
Two of the jails are FreeBSD and I have no problems with them.
However I havesome strange problem with Debian 6.0 Jail.
This is my config
jail_debian_rootdir=/jail/debian
jail_debian_hostname=debian.bivol.net
Are you saying you installed the Debian 6.0 operating system
inside of a Freebsd jail and expect it to function?
on top of all works ;-) Look at mailing list archives earlier ...See
mails from me.
Peter
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Zyumbilev, Peter wrote:
Are you saying you installed the Debian 6.0 operating system
inside of a Freebsd jail and expect it to function?
on top of all works ;-) Look at mailing list archives earlier ...See
mails from me.
Peter
Ok I read the archive thread subject jails.
You read a
On 26/01/2013 23:06, Fbsd8 wrote:
Zyumbilev, Peter wrote:
Are you saying you installed the Debian 6.0 operating system
inside of a Freebsd jail and expect it to function?
on top of all works ;-) Look at mailing list archives earlier ...See
mails from me.
Peter
Ok I read the
Le Thu, 24 Jan 2013 11:51:46 -0500,
Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com a écrit :
Is there any situation where assigning the same IP address to a new
jail that has already been assigned to a previous jail valid?
I think not, but want verification.
What are your thoughts?
I'm sure they are case
- Original Message -
From: Zyumbilev, Peter pe...@aboutsupport.com
To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 3:12 AM
Subject: Re: Jails
On 15/01/2013 02:10, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
Yes, and also defined /etc
From: Zyumbilev, Peter pe...@aboutsupport.com
To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 3:53 AM
Subject: Re: Jails
On 13/01/2013 23:58, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
root@debian:/# ping www.google.com
On 15/01/2013 02:10, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
Yes, and also defined /etc/resolv.conf. Any hint?
Leonardo M. Ramé
http://leonardorame.blogspot.com
This is my jail conf.
jail_debian_rootdir=/jail/debian
jail_debian_hostname=debian.bivol.net
jail_debian_ip=192.168.30.12
On Jan 14, 2013, at 10:12 PM, Zyumbilev, Peter wrote:
On 15/01/2013 02:10, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
Yes, and also defined /etc/resolv.conf. Any hint?
Leonardo M. Ramé
http://leonardorame.blogspot.com
This is my jail conf.
jail_debian_rootdir=/jail/debian
On 12/01/2013 18:41, Devin Teske wrote:
On Jan 11, 2013, at 11:31 PM, Zyumbilev, Peter wrote:
Hi,
I have not tested it, but so far things do not look promising...
I cannot even run netstat -nvatp properly, however sopcast seemed to
run, but have not tested it, for plex - have not tried
From: Zyumbilev, Peter pe...@aboutsupport.com
To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
Cc: Mark Felder f...@feld.me; Devin Teske dte...@freebsd.org; Devin Teske
devin.te...@fisglobal.com
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2013 7:09 AM
Subject: Re: Jails
On 12/01/2013 18:41
, January 13, 2013 7:09 AM
Subject: Re: Jails
On 12/01/2013 18:41, Devin Teske wrote:
On Jan 11, 2013, at 11:31 PM, Zyumbilev, Peter wrote:
Hi,
I have not tested it, but so far things do not look promising...
I cannot even run netstat -nvatp properly, however sopcast seemed to
run
- Original Message -
From: Devin Teske devin.te...@fisglobal.com
To: Leonardo M. Ramé martinr...@yahoo.com
Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org
Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2013 2:23 PM
Subject: Re: Jails
On Jan 13, 2013, at 7:45 AM, Leonardo M. Ramé
On 13/01/2013 23:58, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
root@debian:/# ping www.google.com
WARNING: setsockopt(ICMP_FILTER): Protocol not available
WARNING: your kernel is veeery old. No problems.
PING www.google.com (173.194.42.16) 56(84) bytes of data.
ping: recvmsg: Invalid argument
ping:
On 13/01/2013 23:58, Leonardo M. Ramé wrote:
root@debian:/# ping www.google.com
WARNING: setsockopt(ICMP_FILTER): Protocol not available
WARNING: your kernel is veeery old. No problems.
PING www.google.com (173.194.42.16) 56(84) bytes of data.
ping: recvmsg: Invalid argument
ping:
On Jan 11, 2013, at 11:31 PM, Zyumbilev, Peter wrote:
Hi,
I have not tested it, but so far things do not look promising...
I cannot even run netstat -nvatp properly, however sopcast seemed to
run, but have not tested it, for plex - have not tried yet.
netstat isn't allowed in
On 11/01/2013 17:31, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote:
Le Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:02:19 +0200,
Zyumbilev, Peter pe...@aboutsupport.com a écrit :
Hi,
I run FreeBSD 9.1 64 bit(Nas4free). I have no problem setting up
FreeBSD jails inside. However, I wonder, is there any tutorial on how
to make Debian
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 18:28:41 +0200
Zyumbilev, Peter pe...@aboutsupport.com wrote:
1. Use
http://download.openvz.org/template/precreated/debian-6.0-x86.tar.gz
instead the file listed in the howto.
2. Run sysctl compat.linux.osrelease=2.6.32 in Freebsd shell before
starting the jail,
Hi,
I have not tested it, but so far things do not look promising...
I cannot even run netstat -nvatp properly, however sopcast seemed to
run, but have not tested it, for plex - have not tried yet.
Peter
On 11/01/2013 21:19, Mark Felder wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 18:28:41 +0200
Zyumbilev,
On 22 July 2012 21:55, Herbert J. Skuhra h.sku...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 21 Jul 2012 16:10:56 +0200
Herbert J. Skuhra h.sku...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Herbert J. Skuhra h.sku...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
ok, this is obviously a pf problem and the reason why the
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote:
If this is a fxp bug, can you please file a PR explaining the issue
and how to reproduce it?
kern/170081
--
Herbert
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Sat, 21 Jul 2012 16:10:56 +0200
Herbert J. Skuhra h.sku...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Herbert J. Skuhra h.sku...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
ok, this is obviously a pf problem and the reason why the network in
the jail doesn't work.
ifconfig lo1 create
Hi,
ok, this is obviously a pf problem and the reason why the network in
the jail doesn't work.
ifconfig lo1 create
ifconfig lo1 10.0.0.10 netmask 0xff00
nc -s 10.0.0.10 xx.xx.xx.xx 25
With pf: connections fails; server receives SYN-ACK, but nc continues
sending SYNs until nc gives up
With
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 11:24 AM, Herbert J. Skuhra h.sku...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
ok, this is obviously a pf problem and the reason why the network in
the jail doesn't work.
ifconfig lo1 create
ifconfig lo1 10.0.0.10 netmask 0xff00
nc -s 10.0.0.10 xx.xx.xx.xx 25
With pf: connections
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Herbert J. Skuhra h.sku...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:56 AM, joris dedieu joris.ded...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/7/12 Herbert J. Skuhra h.sku...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:59 PM, Herbert J. Skuhra h.sku...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Kalle Møller
freebsd-questi...@k-moeller.dk wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Herbert J. Skuhra h.sku...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 11:56 AM, joris dedieu joris.ded...@gmail.com
wrote:
2012/7/12 Herbert J. Skuhra h.sku...@gmail.com:
On
On 02/03/12 17:02, Devin Teske wrote:
Please give this a try:
http://druidbsd.sf.net/vimage.shtml
http://druidbsd.sf.net/download.shtml
Hi,
Interesting.
Is it safe to run in production (VIMAGE/vnets) ?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing
On Feb 4, 2012, at 10:45 AM, Hugo Silva wrote:
On 02/03/12 17:02, Devin Teske wrote:
Please give this a try:
http://druidbsd.sf.net/vimage.shtml
http://druidbsd.sf.net/download.shtml
Hi,
Interesting.
Is it safe to run in production (VIMAGE/vnets) ?
I can't speak to every
-Original Message-
From: owner-freebsd-questi...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
questi...@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Hugo Silva
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 8:17 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Jails V2, VIMAGE, and integration in the base system
Hello,
I
Hugo Silva wrote:
Hello,
I didn't find much about jails v2 + epair + vimage on google; The
FreeBSD wiki pages concerning this subject seem fairly outdated (that or
not much has happened in 3 years), and the manpages don't mention much
about vimage/vnet.
According to
I've actually done that but the result was jails coming up incredibly
slowly and once up basically not wired.
I'm gonna check my configuration again and I'll update the mailing list
soon.
Thanks for you time to you all.
On Sat, 2011-12-03 at 21:54 +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 03/12/2011
Just an update.
It seems to be working well.
The jail startup slowness I believe is due to the fact that the DNS is
still down.
Thanks for your time.
### host rc.conf related section
ifconfig_lagg0=laggproto failover laggport bge0 laggport bge1
xxx.xxx.26.224/24
ifconfig_lagg0_alias_0=inet
2011/12/3 Snoop sn...@email.it:
Hi there, I've a doubt!
I have 3 jails within the host xxx.xxx.26.224 configured in this way
(below) and everything works well.
What if I want to enable another jail but I don't want to assign to that
my next available public ip address xxx.xxx.26.228/24 but I
On 03/12/2011 17:54, Snoop wrote:
I have 3 jails within the host xxx.xxx.26.224 configured in this way
(below) and everything works well.
What if I want to enable another jail but I don't want to assign to that
my next available public ip address xxx.xxx.26.228/24 but I want this
jail to have
Use ugidfw to limit/deny access to ifconfig - man ugidfw
Cheers,
On 04/23/11 08:21, xor wrote:
Hullo
First off, thanks for a lovely operating system 3
I decided to go for FreeBSD perhaps 3 days ago. Before, ive been an
Debian/OpenBSD guy, and ive only used my obsd box for redundant
Am 22.04.2011, 22:21 Uhr, schrieb xor xor...@gmail.com:
Hullo
First off, thanks for a lovely operating system 3
I decided to go for FreeBSD perhaps 3 days ago. Before, ive been an
Debian/OpenBSD guy, and ive only used my obsd box for redundant
firewalls and networking. Ive not been running any
But then the root in the jail can just go and compile a new version of
ifconfig from the ports collection. (Generally its a flawed idea to
just remove the binaries. Someone can just download new ones. And if
downloading new binaries is not allowed, they can always just push
stdin through b64.. etc
Hi,
Sure there can be a better solution (I think :)):
Use an rfc1918 private address range for your Jail, and use nat, to forward
your external interface IP to the private address of the jail.
This can be done in ipnat, PF, or the other natting, packet filtering tools.
Hope I understood your
I get one dynamic ip address from my ISP. This is what I specify on the
jail for public network access. When the ip address changes on me I have to
manually change the ip address associated with the jail.
Is there some method I can code so jail will all ways have public network
access?
Hi,
I think you may write your only rule set for that jail in
/etc/devfs.rules and specify it by using the line:
jail_(jailname)_devfs_ruleset=(rule_name)
in /etc/rc.conf
Or corresponding line in /usr/local/etc/ezjail/(jailname) if you are
using ezjail.
Regards,
C.C.
On 1/31/2010 6:27 AM, Jay
On 01/09/10 21:21, Tim Judd wrote:
I bought a new SiliconDust HDHomeRun device which brings two Digital
coaxial tuners to an ethernet network. From what I read and
understand about the HDHomeRun (HDHR), is that it does have an IP
address assigned to the system, but all packets of video are
On 12/27/09, Guy Marcenac g...@posteurs.com wrote:
I would like to use a freebsd system with binary packages only. I want
to heavily use the jail concept. All the documentation about jails
implies the use of buildworld into the jails.
In order to avoid any compilation time, I installed a
APseudoUtopia apseudouto...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm setting up jails on my system. I started with a httpd jail for
nginx and php to run in. I used ezjail to create it. I went through
all the steps, and got a jail setup and working. I've logged in and
out several times and installed a couple
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 5:51 AM, Oliver Fromme o...@lurza.secnetix.de wrote:
APseudoUtopia apseudouto...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm setting up jails on my system. I started with a httpd jail for
nginx and php to run in. I used ezjail to create it. I went through
all the steps, and got a jail
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 9:19 AM, APseudoUtopia apseudouto...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 5:51 AM, Oliver Fromme o...@lurza.secnetix.de wrote:
APseudoUtopia apseudouto...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm setting up jails on my system. I started with a httpd jail for
nginx and php to run in.
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 1:24 PM, APseudoUtopia apseudouto...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
Sorry to reply again, but I have some further information.
I used chpass to change the shell of the jailuser account. I tried
/bin/sh, /bin/csh, /bin/tcsh, and /sbin/nologin. All of those gave the
same
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 1:24 PM, APseudoUtopia apseudouto...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
Sorry to reply again, but I have some further information.
I used chpass to change the shell of the jailuser account. I tried
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 1:30 PM, APseudoUtopia apseudouto...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 9:28 AM, Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 1:24 PM, APseudoUtopia apseudouto...@gmail.com
wrote:
[snip]
Sorry to reply again, but I have some further
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 1:33 PM, Glen Barber glen.j.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
jailuser:*:1001:1001:User :/home/jailuser:/bin/false
# su jailuser
su: /bin/false: Permission denied
Also, check the permissions on /home/jailuser
--
Glen Barber
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 4:08 AM, APseudoUtopia apseudouto...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey list,
I'm setting up jails on my system. I started with a httpd jail for
nginx and php to run in. I used ezjail to create it. I went through
all the steps, and got a jail setup and working. I've logged in and
APseudoUtopia wrote:
Thanks for the tips. I'm new to jails, and I didn't think it was
possible to build a jail without tcsh. What shell do you use then?
Just /bin/sh?
I never log into a jail. There's no reason to do that.
However, usually /bin/sh is required to run scripts,
cron jobs
APseudoUtopia apseudouto...@gmail.com wrote:
The permissions on the HOST for /usr/jails/httpd and
/usr/jails/basejail were set incorrectly. When I installed the jail, I
used umask 0077.
You should _never_ have umask 077 as root. It will cause
all kinds of weird problems. It's best to keep
On Thursday 20 November 2008 23:33:30 Marcus I. Ryan wrote:
However, I started hitting issues with libtool and friends. The
children would not find them, and would go ahead and start installing
their own local copies of those ports. Turns out quite a few tools
are defined in /usr/ports/Mk/*
On Tue, 5 Aug 2008, Redd Vinylene wrote:
Hello!
I have a jail with multiple IPs. It runs identd, however it only works
from the jail's main IP:
auth stream tcp nowait root internal auth -r -f -n -o UNKNOWN -t 30
How do I make it work from absolutely all IPs?
Perhaps: auth stream tcp
Yeah but I'm using Bjoern Zeeb's multiple IP patch...
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 4:43 PM, doug [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 5 Aug 2008, Redd Vinylene wrote:
Hello!
I have a jail with multiple IPs. It runs identd, however it only works
from the jail's main IP:
auth stream tcp nowait root
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 6:02 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ah - above my pay grade.
On Tue, 5 Aug 2008, Redd Vinylene wrote:
Yeah but I'm using Bjoern Zeeb's multiple IP patch...
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 4:43 PM, doug [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 5 Aug 2008, Redd Vinylene wrote:
Jason Morgan wrote:
On 2008.07.07 12:16:44, David Allen wrote:
# grep fxp0 /etc/rc.conf
ifconfig_fxp0=inet 10.0.1.2 netmask 0xff00
ifconfig_fxp0_alias0=10.0.1.3 netmask 0x
ifconfig_fxp0_alias1=10.0.1.4 netmask 0x
ifconfig_fxp0_alias2=10.0.1.5 netmask 0x
My
Tanusheff
Deputy Head of IT Department
ProCredit Bank (Bulgaria) AD
Jason Morgan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
07.07.2008 21:01
To
FreeBSD Questions freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
cc
Subject
Re: Jails and IP Aliasing
Hello,
On 2008.07.07 09:51:33, David Allen wrote
On Monday 07 July 2008 18:51:33 David Allen wrote:
Granted, everything is really happening over the loopback address, but a
connection originating from the jailhost to a jail should appear to be
using the jailhost's IP address, or so I'd like to think. If it doesn't,
then the scenario is
On Tuesday 08 July 2008 11:13:04 Ivailo Tanusheff wrote:
Hi,
I guess the problem is with your netmask and respectivly the broadcast
adrresses for the jails.
It should be:
inet 10.0.1.2 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 10.0.1.255
inet 10.0.1.3 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 10.0.1.255
inet
To
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
cc
Subject
Re: Jails and IP Aliasing
On Tuesday 08 July 2008 11:13:04 Ivailo Tanusheff wrote:
Hi,
I guess the problem is with your netmask and respectivly the broadcast
adrresses for the jails.
It should be:
inet 10.0.1.2 netmask 0xff00 broadcast
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 2:01 PM, George Hartzell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you take the necessary steps to restrict the IP addresses on which
sendmail on the host and the jail listen? The jail man page only
says:
I don't think anyone would get too far with jails in general if the
jail host
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 2:24 AM, Mel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 07 July 2008 18:51:33 David Allen wrote:
Granted, everything is really happening over the loopback address, but a
connection originating from the jailhost to a jail should appear to be
using the jailhost's IP address, or
David Allen wrote:
There was a post recently (Matthew Seaman's name comes to mind) that
suggested binding jails to addresses in the loopback range and then
using firewall rules to redirect the traffic accordingly. There's a
possibility that may help in this case, but that layer of added
Hello,
* Something like a loopback address inside the jail. It may be
127.0.0.2 instead of 127.0.0.1 but most software can be persuaded
to use it for loopback style things.
* The ability to map several IPs onto the jailed system by use of
NAT and redirect within
Daniel Gerzo wrote:
Hello,
* Something like a loopback address inside the jail. It may be
127.0.0.2 instead of 127.0.0.1 but most software can be persuaded
to use it for loopback style things.
* The ability to map several IPs onto the jailed system by use of
NAT and
On Tuesday 08 July 2008 11:24:33 Mel wrote:
On Monday 07 July 2008 18:51:33 David Allen wrote:
Granted, everything is really happening over the loopback address, but a
connection originating from the jailhost to a jail should appear to be
using the jailhost's IP address, or so I'd like to
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 9:35 AM, Matthew Seaman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Allen wrote:
There was a post recently (Matthew Seaman's name comes to mind) that
suggested binding jails to addresses in the loopback range and then
using firewall rules to redirect the traffic accordingly.
Hello,
On 2008.07.07 09:51:33, David Allen wrote:
Unless I'm losing my mind, I'm encountering what seems to yet another
gotcha with jails. The following has been dumbed down for clarity and
brevity.
-
# hostname
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Jason Morgan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2008.07.07 09:51:33, David Allen wrote:
Unless I'm losing my mind, I'm encountering what seems to yet another
gotcha with jails. The following has been dumbed down for clarity and
brevity.
On 2008.07.07 12:16:44, David Allen wrote:
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Jason Morgan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2008.07.07 09:51:33, David Allen wrote:
Unless I'm losing my mind, I'm encountering what seems to yet another
gotcha with jails. The following has been dumbed down for
Did you take the necessary steps to restrict the IP addresses on which
sendmail on the host and the jail listen? The jail man page only
says:
To configure sendmail(8), it is necessary to modify
/etc/mail/sendmail.cf.
but you'll probably end up adjusting the DAEMON_OPTIONS lines of
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 19:20:06 +0100
Erik Cederstrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You'll have to answer that yourself. How valuable is your data? What are
you trying to protect? If you're worrying about getting cracked and used
as a spam bot, jails are no more secure than a non-jail system.
On Nov 16, 2007 6:57 AM, Norberto Meijome [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 14 Nov 2007 19:20:06 +0100
Erik Cederstrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You'll have to answer that yourself. How valuable is your data? What are
you trying to protect? If you're worrying about getting cracked and used
On Wednesday 14 November 2007 20:24:14 Erik Cederstrand wrote:
Jonathan Horne wrote:
I was reading a while back that the jails tcp system was getting an
overhaul, possibly in the 7.0 release. I don't remember all the
particulars, but things along the lines to make jails function even
Matt Fioravante wrote:
I've heard that things like freebsd jails or solaris zones can still
be insecure on multicore boxes because a race condition can occur. I
don't know more details about it other than that. Is this true now on
freebsd?
There's always the possibility that a bug exists which
Jonathan Horne wrote:
I was reading a while back that the jails tcp system was getting an
overhaul, possibly in the 7.0 release. I don't remember all the
particulars, but things along the lines to make jails function even
more like a real (independant) system. I believe one of the
improvments
Jonathan Horne wrote:
I was reading a while back that the jails tcp system was getting an overhaul,
possibly in the 7.0 release. I don't remember all the particulars, but things
along the lines to make jails function even more like a real (independant)
system. I believe one of the
Boris Samorodov wrote:
Seems that you are looking for sysutils/ezjail.
WBR
Thank you for the reference. That is a very nice port.
I will definitely make use of it when I need multiple
jails (3). I only need 2 at the moment.
I did a little more digging and it seems that I can
install a
On Sun, 07 Oct 2007 18:13:34 -0400 Vinny wrote:
I'm setting up a server for mail and web. I want to
put each in their own jail on a host system. I have installed
6.2-Release on the host and successfully used freebsd-update
to grab up to -p8. So far so good.
Now, I was going to install
I have three jails on one machine that won't resolve DNS because it looks as
though the jails themselves aren't being assigned IP addresses.
In the end, I tried just rebooting the host, which fixed the problem. Thanks to
Tom for emailing me :-)
Best regards,
Matt
On 5/9/06, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 9, 2006, at 5:53 AM, Michael Grant wrote:
When it comes time to upgrade, how does one upgrade 100 different
jails? This will be a nightmare!
Actually, not. You only need 1 master jail and a bunch of nullfs
read only
On May 10, 2006, at 2:33 AM, Iantcho Vassilev wrote:
On 5/9/06, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 9, 2006, at 5:53 AM, Michael Grant wrote:
When it comes time to upgrade, how does one upgrade 100 different
jails? This will be a nightmare!
Actually, not. You
On 5/9/06, Michael Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I host a bunch of websites on my box. Recently I had some problems
with file access problems with php which caused me to look into
putting each of my clients into their own jail or chroot. I have
roughly 100 different domains I'd need to split.
I'll try to be more explicit on my requirements. I'm not worried
about mail. I'm mostly worried about web. Each client has a web site
with one or more domains. I currently offer them
apache+php+mysql+mod_perl+mod_ssl. One of them needs java server
pages, tomcat I think. Everyone gets access
On 5/9/06, Michael Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I host a bunch of websites on my box. Recently I had some problems
with file access problems with php which caused me to look into
putting each of my clients into their own jail or chroot. I have
roughly 100 different domains I'd need to
-questions@freebsd.org
Objet : Re: jails or chroot?
On 5/9/06, Michael Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I host a bunch of websites on my box. Recently I had some problems
with file access problems with php which caused me to look into
putting each of my clients into their own jail or chroot. I
On Tuesday 09 May 2006 08:24, Michael Grant wrote:
I'll try to be more explicit on my requirements. I'm not worried
about mail. I'm mostly worried about web. Each client has a web
site with one or more domains. I currently offer them
apache+php+mysql+mod_perl+mod_ssl. One of them needs
With the inclusion of mergemaster -u subsequent base system upgrades
are much less painful. Using null mounts for the common areas should
lessen the version sync issues. Once unionfs is stable again, you
could just use one jail as a base image and allow the others to be
cloned off of that.
On May 9, 2006, at 5:53 AM, Michael Grant wrote:
When it comes time to upgrade, how does one upgrade 100 different
jails? This will be a nightmare!
Actually, not. You only need 1 master jail and a bunch of nullfs
read only mounts plus some exclusive space for each jail.I run 44
Philippe Lang wrote:
Hi,
Hi there,
Since there is no way (at least I know of) to limit RAM or CPU in a jail, is
there a way to monitor and do some accounting on jails CPU / RAM used?
You might want to take a look at login.conf.
(perhaps cputime, memoryuse, memorylocked and perhaps
I'm not sure if this is the right forum for this subject, but here it goes.
I've been using ezjail tool to deploy some jails on a server but I've
noticed that the /usr/local/etc/rc.d/* scripts aren't executed at each
jail startup, despite all jails are started normally. On the other hand,
the
Are you sure it's not just the fortune game that's started from your shells
rc file?
I got this in my .bash_profile which displays a freebsd tip every time I
source .bash_profile (eg, every time I log in):
[ -x /usr/games/fortune ] /usr/games/fortune freebsd-tips
If you have the same line
Michael wrote:
Hello,
I recently tried creating some jails on my FreeBSD 5.4
Release installation.
When I try and log into the jail via ssh I get to the
login prompt, type my info and once I press enter I
get some weird error nice tcsh promt: set promt =
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]:%~%#'.
I
When I try and log into the jail via ssh I get to the
login prompt, type my info and once I press enter I
get some weird error nice tcsh promt: set promt =
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]:%~%#'.
I realize tcsh is a shell, but why the error... Does
anyone know what this is, and how I can fix it?
I think
Rob wrote:
I'm trying to figure out the best layout for multiple jails.
I'd like to share binaries across jails - patches and packages only need
to be installed once, and it saves a lot of space. So these directories
would be shared and read-only: [...]
You can also use mount_unionfs with
On Sun, 27 Mar 2005 11:23:05 -0500
Grant Peel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems to me, that for all the work of scponly shell to be setup,
why not just create a simple jail and allow ssh teminal access for
users?
That having been said, is it possible to set up jails for existing
users
On Jul 25, 2004, at 6:29 AM, Hugo Silva wrote:
It is unthinkable to be umount'ing EVERY jail if I want to add one.
I need separate filesystems for jails if I want (I *need* to) user
quotas
on jails
If I have separate filesystems, I can't create a new jail while the
disk
is being used (ie other
Hugo Silva [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Ok, so I decided to use jails instead of vmware and try to live with the
limitations (only 1 ip address, etc..)..
Well, another jail limitation is the impossibility of setting user quotas
inside a jail UNLESS the jail has a filesystem on its own
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
