On 3/31/06, Micah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wee-Sern Soo wrote:
> > http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/releases/1.5.0.1.html#issues
> >
> > It's a known issue. Need to run as privileged user on all platforms,
> > the first time.
> >
> >
> > Yuan Jue wrote the following on 31/03/2006 4:46 PM:
> >> O
Wee-Sern Soo wrote:
http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/releases/1.5.0.1.html#issues
It's a known issue. Need to run as privileged user on all platforms,
the first time.
Yuan Jue wrote the following on 31/03/2006 4:46 PM:
On Friday 31 March 2006 09:18, Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
This happened
Hi Yuan:
I did not pose a question. My suggestion to do a rehash was in response
to someone else having trouble after upgrading Firefox.
It may or may not have been a great suggestion but that is all it was.
If you have a good understanding of that command and why it may or may
not be appropria
On Friday 31 March 2006 14:20, Graham North wrote:
> As said, I am pretty new to unix but is the rehash command not used for
> reorganized the userland directory iindexes after program upgrades?
if what you mean is why firefox cannot start after upgrade, then this is
maybe a mozilla known problem
As said, I am pretty new to unix but is the rehash command not used for
reorganized the userland directory iindexes after program upgrades?
G/
Yuan Jue wrote:
On Friday 31 March 2006 14:02, Graham North wrote:
Okay - I'm pretty close to newbie status, but could this be a needed
rehash?
On Friday 31 March 2006 14:02, Graham North wrote:
> Okay - I'm pretty close to newbie status, but could this be a needed
> rehash?
sorry, but what is your point?
--
Best Regards
Yuan Jue @ www.yuanjue.net
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing lis
On Friday 31 March 2006 13:52, you wrote:
> http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/releases/1.5.0.1.html#issues
>
> It's a known issue. Need to run as privileged user on all platforms,
> the first time.
>
got it. thanks again :)
> Yuan Jue wrote the following on 31/03/2006 4:46 PM:
> > On Friday 31 March
Okay - I'm pretty close to newbie status, but could this be a needed
rehash?
G/
--
Kindness can be infectious - try it.
Graham North
Vancouver, BC
www.soleado.ca
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.385 / Virus Database: 268.3.3/298 - Release Dat
http://www.mozilla.com/firefox/releases/1.5.0.1.html#issues
It's a known issue. Need to run as privileged user on all platforms,
the first time.
Yuan Jue wrote the following on 31/03/2006 4:46 PM:
On Friday 31 March 2006 09:18, Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
This happened to me also, until I
On Friday 31 March 2006 09:18, Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
> This happened to me also, until I remembered this has happened before
> and what to try.
>
> Login as root, start the GUI (mine is KDE), open a terminal program and
> start firefox from there. After that, I had no problems. It's working
> fi
Pete Slagle wrote:
Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
On Thursday 30 March 2006 17:53, Albert Shih wrote:
Le 30/03/2006 à 14:42:10-0800, Micah a écrit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1.5.0.1_2 was commited last night, so it's probably a recent
breakage. I just found a bug report on it at
http://www.freebsd.o
Pete Slagle writes:
> > This happened to me also, until I remembered this has happened before
> > and what to try.
> >
> > Login as root, start the GUI (mine is KDE), open a terminal program and
> > start firefox from there. After that, I had no problems. It's working
> > fine.
>
> S
Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
On Thursday 30 March 2006 17:53, Albert Shih wrote:
Le 30/03/2006 à 14:42:10-0800, Micah a écrit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1.5.0.1_2 was commited last night, so it's probably a recent
breakage. I just found a bug report on it at
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?
On Thursday 30 March 2006 17:53, Albert Shih wrote:
> Le 30/03/2006 à 14:42:10-0800, Micah a écrit
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > 1.5.0.1_2 was commited last night, so it's probably a recent
> > breakage. I just found a bug report on it at
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=951
Le 30/03/2006 à 14:42:10-0800, Micah a écrit
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> 1.5.0.1_2 was commited last night, so it's probably a recent breakage.
> I just found a bug report on it at
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=95100
> So we have four confirmed cases of firefox not working.
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/30/06, Micah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Lars Cleary wrote:
Micah wrote:
I just updated my ports collection this morning and upgraded all out
of date ports, including thunderbird and firefox. Now typing
thunderbird or firefox on the command line does absolutely no
On 3/30/06, Micah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Lars Cleary wrote:
> > Micah wrote:
> >>
> >> I just updated my ports collection this morning and upgraded all out
> >> of date ports, including thunderbird and firefox. Now typing
> >> thunderbird or firefox on the command line does absolutely nothin
Micah writes:
I confirm the problem. (The thunderbird compile finished ~10
minutes ago.)
> Checking... All files in ~/.mozilla and its subs are owned by my
> user and my user's group and have rw (x for dirs) as a minimum
> for user (some have r and rw for group). Likewise for
> ~/.
Lars Cleary wrote:
Micah wrote:
I just updated my ports collection this morning and upgraded all out
of date ports, including thunderbird and firefox. Now typing
thunderbird or firefox on the command line does absolutely nothing.
firefox or thunderbird do not show up in ps (checked using p
Micah wrote:
I just updated my ports collection this morning and upgraded all out of
date ports, including thunderbird and firefox. Now typing thunderbird
or firefox on the command line does absolutely nothing. firefox or
thunderbird do not show up in ps (checked using ps -auwx | grep
fire
20 matches
Mail list logo